<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: VIDEO: Scott Brown Reponds to Coakley Attack Ad</title> <atom:link href="http://theothermccain.com/2010/01/12/video-scott-brown-reponds-to-coakley-attack-ad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/01/12/video-scott-brown-reponds-to-coakley-attack-ad/</link> <description>&#34;One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up.&#34; -- Arthur Koestler</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 02:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: For Massachusetts, Journalism Reinforcement Arrives : The Other McCain</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/01/12/video-scott-brown-reponds-to-coakley-attack-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-1032</link> <dc:creator>For Massachusetts, Journalism Reinforcement Arrives : The Other McCain</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 14:34:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=745#comment-1032</guid> <description>[...]  [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Thomas L. Knapp</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/01/12/video-scott-brown-reponds-to-coakley-attack-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-908</link> <dc:creator>Thomas L. Knapp</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 07:29:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=745#comment-908</guid> <description>Scott,
It was a &lt;em&gt;joke&lt;/em&gt;, dammit. I was just poking at Stacy&#039;s tender spot.
Scott Brown is a piss-poor candidate and an especially sickening indicator of just how quickly the &quot;Tea Party leaders&quot; have dragged that movement down into the GOP establishment&#039;s sewer, but I have no particular reason to believe he&#039;s a racist.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,</p><p>It was a <em>joke</em>, dammit. I was just poking at Stacy&#8217;s tender spot.</p><p>Scott Brown is a piss-poor candidate and an especially sickening indicator of just how quickly the &#8220;Tea Party leaders&#8221; have dragged that movement down into the GOP establishment&#8217;s sewer, but I have no particular reason to believe he&#8217;s a racist.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Thomas L. Knapp</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/01/12/video-scott-brown-reponds-to-coakley-attack-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-38870</link> <dc:creator>Thomas L. Knapp</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 07:29:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=745#comment-38870</guid> <description>Scott,
It was a &lt;em&gt;joke&lt;/em&gt;, dammit. I was just poking at Stacy&#039;s tender spot.
Scott Brown is a piss-poor candidate and an especially sickening indicator of just how quickly the &quot;Tea Party leaders&quot; have dragged that movement down into the GOP establishment&#039;s sewer, but I have no particular reason to believe he&#039;s a racist.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,</p><p>It was a <em>joke</em>, dammit. I was just poking at Stacy&#8217;s tender spot.</p><p>Scott Brown is a piss-poor candidate and an especially sickening indicator of just how quickly the &#8220;Tea Party leaders&#8221; have dragged that movement down into the GOP establishment&#8217;s sewer, but I have no particular reason to believe he&#8217;s a racist.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Scott</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/01/12/video-scott-brown-reponds-to-coakley-attack-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-901</link> <dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 04:00:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=745#comment-901</guid> <description>It&#039;s not racism.  The purpose of the ad is to link the uncharismatic Martha Coakley with the unpopular Deval Patrick, who happens to be black.  So while the link is purposeful, the man&#039;s race is incidental.  Indeed, Governor Patrick would probably be even less popular in Massachusetts if he were white, because then liberals white voters wouldn&#039;t feel good about themselves for voting for him.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not racism.  The purpose of the ad is to link the uncharismatic Martha Coakley with the unpopular Deval Patrick, who happens to be black.  So while the link is purposeful, the man&#8217;s race is incidental.  Indeed, Governor Patrick would probably be even less popular in Massachusetts if he were white, because then liberals white voters wouldn&#8217;t feel good about themselves for voting for him.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Scott</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/01/12/video-scott-brown-reponds-to-coakley-attack-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-38869</link> <dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=745#comment-38869</guid> <description>It&#039;s not racism.  The purpose of the ad is to link the uncharismatic Martha Coakley with the unpopular Deval Patrick, who happens to be black.  So while the link is purposeful, the man&#039;s race is incidental.  Indeed, Governor Patrick would probably be even less popular in Massachusetts if he were white, because then liberals white voters wouldn&#039;t feel good about themselves for voting for him.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not racism.  The purpose of the ad is to link the uncharismatic Martha Coakley with the unpopular Deval Patrick, who happens to be black.  So while the link is purposeful, the man&#8217;s race is incidental.  Indeed, Governor Patrick would probably be even less popular in Massachusetts if he were white, because then liberals white voters wouldn&#8217;t feel good about themselves for voting for him.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Can Scott Brown Pull Off the Waterloo of the Dem Party and Defeat Coakley in the MASS Senate Race? Only Down by 2 Points! &#124; Scared Monkeys</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/01/12/video-scott-brown-reponds-to-coakley-attack-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-833</link> <dc:creator>Can Scott Brown Pull Off the Waterloo of the Dem Party and Defeat Coakley in the MASS Senate Race? Only Down by 2 Points! &#124; Scared Monkeys</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 14:13:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=745#comment-833</guid> <description>[...] The Other McCain,  Scott Brown Reponds to Coakley Attack Ad. The comical thing about this is the attack ads that [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Other McCain,  Scott Brown Reponds to Coakley Attack Ad. The comical thing about this is the attack ads that [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: A Reid too far - rightofcourse.com</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/01/12/video-scott-brown-reponds-to-coakley-attack-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-817</link> <dc:creator>A Reid too far - rightofcourse.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 05:10:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=745#comment-817</guid> <description>[...] The Republican looking to take the seat, Scott Brown, is haveing a good deal of success running as the anti-Democrat.  It hasn&#8217;t helped the liberals that their candidate, Martha Coakley, apparently can&#8217;t [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Republican looking to take the seat, Scott Brown, is haveing a good deal of success running as the anti-Democrat.  It hasn&#8217;t helped the liberals that their candidate, Martha Coakley, apparently can&#8217;t [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: BruceC</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/01/12/video-scott-brown-reponds-to-coakley-attack-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-814</link> <dc:creator>BruceC</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 04:59:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=745#comment-814</guid> <description>Sorry about another OT post, but this story has me worried:
http://pajamasmedia.com/instapundit/91677/
This seriously smells like a attempt by the Obama administration to gain control over your 401K and IRA money.  I know they will just dissemble and say that it will be optional.  Kind of like public option(al).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry about another OT post, but this story has me worried:<br
/> <a
href="http://pajamasmedia.com/instapundit/91677/" rel="nofollow">http://pajamasmedia.com/instapundit/91677/</a></p><p>This seriously smells like a attempt by the Obama administration to gain control over your 401K and IRA money.  I know they will just dissemble and say that it will be optional.  Kind of like public option(al).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: BruceC</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/01/12/video-scott-brown-reponds-to-coakley-attack-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-38868</link> <dc:creator>BruceC</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 04:59:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=745#comment-38868</guid> <description>Sorry about another OT post, but this story has me worried:
http://pajamasmedia.com/instapundit/91677/
This seriously smells like a attempt by the Obama administration to gain control over your 401K and IRA money.  I know they will just dissemble and say that it will be optional.  Kind of like public option(al).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry about another OT post, but this story has me worried:<br
/> <a
href="http://pajamasmedia.com/instapundit/91677/" rel="nofollow">http://pajamasmedia.com/instapundit/91677/</a></p><p>This seriously smells like a attempt by the Obama administration to gain control over your 401K and IRA money.  I know they will just dissemble and say that it will be optional.  Kind of like public option(al).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bob Belvedere</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/01/12/video-scott-brown-reponds-to-coakley-attack-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-811</link> <dc:creator>Bob Belvedere</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 04:29:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=745#comment-811</guid> <description>Senator Brown reminds me of Tony Snow.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senator Brown reminds me of Tony Snow.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: theothermccain.com @ 2012-05-24 22:22:49 by W3 Total Cache -->
