Conor and Andy Want Some Pudding
Posted on | January 21, 2010 | 22 Comments
“It is particularly amusing to see folks call the outcome stunning in one breath and aver in the next that they can explain why it happened mere hours after the fact, without any new data save the result. This is especially grating when it’s so obvious that the election turned on all the issues that were most important to me, that the outcome so clearly vindicates my world view, and that the wisest course in light of the results is for both parties to do exactly what I’ve been advocating for all along.”
– Conor Friedersdorf, linked by Andrew Sullivan, and extensively quoted by Dan Riehl in case you don’t want to click those other links and give traffic to the Conor & Andy Show
Having risked financial annihilation to spend six days reporting on this election while crashing on Da Tech Guy‘s sofa, I find this eruption of Friedersdorfism particularly annoying. Da Tech Guy has been relentless in interviewing voters in Massachusetts — in the past week, he’s probably talked to more voters here than Rassmussen — so don’t tell me we don’t have “any new data.” Don’t tell me we can’t interpret the election because we don’t have “solid exit polls.”
Conor claiming strategic credit for Scott Brown’s victory is an insult to the actual conservatives who made this happen.
“Amusing,” indeed.

Pingback: Red House Correspondents
Pingback: Who is Conor Friedersdorf?