<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Three in a Row</title> <atom:link href="http://theothermccain.com/2010/01/31/three-in-a-row/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/01/31/three-in-a-row/</link> <description>&#34;One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up.&#34; -- Arthur Koestler</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:31:11 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: I R A Darth Aggie</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/01/31/three-in-a-row/comment-page-1/#comment-2762</link> <dc:creator>I R A Darth Aggie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:55:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=1685#comment-2762</guid> <description>&lt;I&gt;Kevin’s on track to die single, jaded, &amp; alone.&lt;/I&gt;
We all die alone.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Kevin’s on track to die single, jaded, &amp; alone.</i></p><p>We all die alone.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: I R A Darth Aggie</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/01/31/three-in-a-row/comment-page-1/#comment-38986</link> <dc:creator>I R A Darth Aggie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:55:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=1685#comment-38986</guid> <description>&lt;I&gt;Kevin’s on track to die single, jaded, &amp; alone.&lt;/I&gt;
We all die alone.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Kevin’s on track to die single, jaded, &amp; alone.</i></p><p>We all die alone.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: B-Daddy</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/01/31/three-in-a-row/comment-page-1/#comment-2745</link> <dc:creator>B-Daddy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 07:52:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=1685#comment-2745</guid> <description>Smitty, your point is taken.  I like the story I linked better, but that is because it is part of a larger and greater tale.  I sense that you agree.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smitty, your point is taken.  I like the story I linked better, but that is because it is part of a larger and greater tale.  I sense that you agree.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: B-Daddy</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/01/31/three-in-a-row/comment-page-1/#comment-38985</link> <dc:creator>B-Daddy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 07:52:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=1685#comment-38985</guid> <description>Smitty, your point is taken.  I like the story I linked better, but that is because it is part of a larger and greater tale.  I sense that you agree.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smitty, your point is taken.  I like the story I linked better, but that is because it is part of a larger and greater tale.  I sense that you agree.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: smitty</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/01/31/three-in-a-row/comment-page-1/#comment-2508</link> <dc:creator>smitty</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:42:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=1685#comment-2508</guid> <description>@liamascorcaigh,
I thank you for the feedback, and would be genuinely interested in seeing a link to your positive definition of &quot;short story&quot;.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@liamascorcaigh,<br
/> I thank you for the feedback, and would be genuinely interested in seeing a link to your positive definition of &#8220;short story&#8221;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: smitty</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/01/31/three-in-a-row/comment-page-1/#comment-38984</link> <dc:creator>smitty</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:42:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=1685#comment-38984</guid> <description>@liamascorcaigh,
I thank you for the feedback, and would be genuinely interested in seeing a link to your positive definition of &quot;short story&quot;.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@liamascorcaigh,<br
/> I thank you for the feedback, and would be genuinely interested in seeing a link to your positive definition of &#8220;short story&#8221;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: liamascorcaigh</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/01/31/three-in-a-row/comment-page-1/#comment-2502</link> <dc:creator>liamascorcaigh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:35:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=1685#comment-2502</guid> <description>&quot;If the story made an explicit, final point, then it would be a sermon.&quot;
For a story that&#039;s explicitly not a sermon Steve sure does a lot of sermonizing to Kevin.  He is a sanctimonious prig.  And yes, the three women are sluts and Kevin&#039;s a horn dog.  They deserve each other.  Why Kevin alone should apologize to women who abase themselves willingly, nay eagerly, is quite a mystery.  Should they not equally be obliged to apologize to him for using him sexually to work off their frustrations, anxieties and sense of inadequacy?  Apparently not.
The subtext here is that in any exchange of bodily fluids the male is ipso facto the predator while any and all females are the haplessly beguiled victims of his ruthless phallus.  What utter tosh!
BTW, while this piece is well written, if not very coherently conceived, it is not a short story.  It&#039;s short and it&#039;s a story but this story consists merely of an anecdote containing three other anecdotes topped off with some facile selective social moralizing which, because of its selectivity, renders the whole exercise absurd.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If the story made an explicit, final point, then it would be a sermon.&#8221;</p><p>For a story that&#8217;s explicitly not a sermon Steve sure does a lot of sermonizing to Kevin.  He is a sanctimonious prig.  And yes, the three women are sluts and Kevin&#8217;s a horn dog.  They deserve each other.  Why Kevin alone should apologize to women who abase themselves willingly, nay eagerly, is quite a mystery.  Should they not equally be obliged to apologize to him for using him sexually to work off their frustrations, anxieties and sense of inadequacy?  Apparently not.</p><p>The subtext here is that in any exchange of bodily fluids the male is ipso facto the predator while any and all females are the haplessly beguiled victims of his ruthless phallus.  What utter tosh!</p><p>BTW, while this piece is well written, if not very coherently conceived, it is not a short story.  It&#8217;s short and it&#8217;s a story but this story consists merely of an anecdote containing three other anecdotes topped off with some facile selective social moralizing which, because of its selectivity, renders the whole exercise absurd.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: liamascorcaigh</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/01/31/three-in-a-row/comment-page-1/#comment-38983</link> <dc:creator>liamascorcaigh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:35:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=1685#comment-38983</guid> <description>&quot;If the story made an explicit, final point, then it would be a sermon.&quot;
For a story that&#039;s explicitly not a sermon Steve sure does a lot of sermonizing to Kevin.  He is a sanctimonious prig.  And yes, the three women are sluts and Kevin&#039;s a horn dog.  They deserve each other.  Why Kevin alone should apologize to women who abase themselves willingly, nay eagerly, is quite a mystery.  Should they not equally be obliged to apologize to him for using him sexually to work off their frustrations, anxieties and sense of inadequacy?  Apparently not.
The subtext here is that in any exchange of bodily fluids the male is ipso facto the predator while any and all females are the haplessly beguiled victims of his ruthless phallus.  What utter tosh!
BTW, while this piece is well written, if not very coherently conceived, it is not a short story.  It&#039;s short and it&#039;s a story but this story consists merely of an anecdote containing three other anecdotes topped off with some facile selective social moralizing which, because of its selectivity, renders the whole exercise absurd.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If the story made an explicit, final point, then it would be a sermon.&#8221;</p><p>For a story that&#8217;s explicitly not a sermon Steve sure does a lot of sermonizing to Kevin.  He is a sanctimonious prig.  And yes, the three women are sluts and Kevin&#8217;s a horn dog.  They deserve each other.  Why Kevin alone should apologize to women who abase themselves willingly, nay eagerly, is quite a mystery.  Should they not equally be obliged to apologize to him for using him sexually to work off their frustrations, anxieties and sense of inadequacy?  Apparently not.</p><p>The subtext here is that in any exchange of bodily fluids the male is ipso facto the predator while any and all females are the haplessly beguiled victims of his ruthless phallus.  What utter tosh!</p><p>BTW, while this piece is well written, if not very coherently conceived, it is not a short story.  It&#8217;s short and it&#8217;s a story but this story consists merely of an anecdote containing three other anecdotes topped off with some facile selective social moralizing which, because of its selectivity, renders the whole exercise absurd.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: smitty</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/01/31/three-in-a-row/comment-page-1/#comment-2486</link> <dc:creator>smitty</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 12:06:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=1685#comment-2486</guid> <description>@B-Daddy,
It is what it is.
Part of what I think makes a good short story is that it, while complete, leaves room for the reader to derive their own point.
If the story made an explicit, final point, then it would be a sermon.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@B-Daddy,<br
/> It is what it is.<br
/> Part of what I think makes a good short story is that it, while complete, leaves room for the reader to derive their own point.<br
/> If the story made an explicit, final point, then it would be a sermon.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: smitty</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/01/31/three-in-a-row/comment-page-1/#comment-38982</link> <dc:creator>smitty</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 12:06:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=1685#comment-38982</guid> <description>@B-Daddy,
It is what it is.
Part of what I think makes a good short story is that it, while complete, leaves room for the reader to derive their own point.
If the story made an explicit, final point, then it would be a sermon.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@B-Daddy,<br
/> It is what it is.<br
/> Part of what I think makes a good short story is that it, while complete, leaves room for the reader to derive their own point.<br
/> If the story made an explicit, final point, then it would be a sermon.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: theothermccain.com @ 2012-02-11 10:22:08 by W3 Total Cache -->
