“The sycophants at Little Green Footballs are enabling Johnson’s delusions of adequacy.” Spot on, as usual Mr. McCain.

The left is always trying to project their crazies onto the right. It’s ridiculous.

Johnson purports to despise “truthers”, but he sure does seem to spend a lot of time and effort explaining away their actions and deflecting the issue. See Van Jones.

MrPaulRevere, who do you think you are, Dr. Michael Savage? Get off the internets!

As for RSM (which stands for Racist Still McCain), now I am Chuckles? Well that is a new one.

And are you a libertarian if you eat lamb chops? Or is it, are you a libertine if you eat milk fed veal? All I can tell you is Sharmuta is milk fed, corn fed, and basically herring fed, because she is so fat that she could replace the murderous orca at SeaWorld.

I stopped going to LGF some time back in 2008. I’ll probably visit tonight, just because you reminded me of the site and I’ve not been there for so long. It’s better to let a site like this fade away. Still, I wish I had his crew of suck-ups to prop up my traffic. Take LGF public today, it may be your last chance.

David Jacobson
Cleveland, OH
(I don’t want Ed to ferret me out, so I always out myself.)

Hey CJ, what did you get from MoveOn/Plouffe to leap onboard the Hindenburg in such timely fashion?

Will there be some Alinsky medal or something if you succeed in taking down one of these pesky bloggers standing in the way of the revolution?

There is no possible philosophy, reaction, or development on the ground that explains a guy flipping out of the blue and then promptly attacking those deemed irksome to the Obama’s underhanded allies of the online left- except graft, imo.

Or did you bump your head in the shower, boy?

I think it is amusing to note that Charles Johnson groupie and suck up, the Wild Irish Rose, has been banned and blocked from that libel site.

Of course, I was banned years ago from the libel site because I refused to kiss Charle’s butt as regards is smears of Vlams Beggan and Filip DeWinter; however, I think it is more honorable to be expelled from Little Green Footballs for refusing to kiss his derriere instead of being a stupid sycophant such as Irish Rose who constantly kissed Charles Johnson’s derriere, but was expelled anyway because Charles did not enjoy her anilingus technique.

The blogmocracy — http://www.theblogmocracy.com/?_login=dc3e5b2e09/ — gives the dope on this very enjoyable state of affairs.

“Schadenfreude. It is what is for breakfast.”

Michelle Malkin

Always and forever it has been the case…
The worst enemies a person can have are those who have been made to eat s***** on your behalf and then are rejected. In other words,Chucky hen johnson…when irish eyes are smiling watch your step…bwahhhaaaaaaaaa

I finally banned Wild Irish Rose because…well she was bat shit crazy even for me. She was crazy even for the Irish, which is pretty crazy.

Sharmuta has left too. Good riddens. I could not keep her around after she killed her trainer at SeaWorld. It is time to clean house.

Two words to describe Charles Johnson: F(self-deleted)ing Insane.

More example of religious Creationists nut jobs, don’t they realize only I get to decide who gets stoned to death for matters of betrayal of faith! If and when I decide to put Sharmuta down is my decision only! .

“Don’t cry Sharmuta!”

He bans everyone who disagrees with him therefore the only ones left are sycophants. On a thread yesterday he was crying about a picture of Michelle Obama being racistly compared to a primate. When one of his posters posted multiple pictures of George Bush with comparative photos, and racists posts of Condi Rice he banned them and the sick-o-pants piled on after the guy could no longer respond.

Why Do Charles Johnson’s Beliefs Keep Turning Out to Be Delusional?

Because … he is?

McGhee, as a child I liked to put ants in a jar and then selectively burn them with a magnifying glass.

(pre-script: Stacy, could you please add your own byline? Blogs are personal by nature, and it creeps me out a bit to see writing presented the way newspapers do it, NTTAWWT)

I’m working slowly on an understanding of this phenomenon. We all know people who refuse to accept a balanced argument with well-documented facts. Usually it’s on a more personal level, and induces much family strife. We also know people who find no ethical problem with the workings of “spin” to shade an interpretation of events. A common example is found in many sports discussions over plays called by a losing coach.

These “illogisms” are a part of our human heritage, it seems.

But the deeper, more disturbing sorts of overt propagandizing, and the refusal to hear reason regardless of who presents it… these leave us all feeling like we are in the presence of insanity. I doubt the invective directed at Mr. Johnson will do anything but harden the shell with which he has encased his mind. He may or may not be coping with a problem, I’m not qualified to know. But the whole episode feels rotten. I cannot see how his “break with the right” can lead to anything good for the left, nor for him personally.