<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Rule 6: Don&#8217;t Be a Complete Douchebag</title> <atom:link href="http://theothermccain.com/2010/05/26/rule-6-dont-be-a-complete-douchebag/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/05/26/rule-6-dont-be-a-complete-douchebag/</link> <description>&#34;One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up.&#34; -- Arthur Koestler</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: I Too, Had An Inappropriate Physical Relationship With South Carolina Gubernatorial Candidate Nikki Haley &#124; Parcbench</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/05/26/rule-6-dont-be-a-complete-douchebag/comment-page-1/#comment-17266</link> <dc:creator>I Too, Had An Inappropriate Physical Relationship With South Carolina Gubernatorial Candidate Nikki Haley &#124; Parcbench</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 11:23:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=8173#comment-17266</guid> <description>[...] Robert Stacy McCain   [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Robert Stacy McCain   [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: VIDEO: Is Wes Donehue Evil? Or Is Will Folks Total Scum? : The Other McCain</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/05/26/rule-6-dont-be-a-complete-douchebag/comment-page-1/#comment-16881</link> <dc:creator>VIDEO: Is Wes Donehue Evil? Or Is Will Folks Total Scum? : The Other McCain</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 18:07:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=8173#comment-16881</guid> <description>[...] is nothing tentative, hypothetical or equivocal in Wolfe&#8217;s assessment of Will Folks. See Rule 6. var addthis_append_data=&#039;false&#039;;var addthis_language=&#039;en&#039;;var addthis_options=&#039;twitter, digg, [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is nothing tentative, hypothetical or equivocal in Wolfe&#8217;s assessment of Will Folks. See Rule 6. var addthis_append_data=&#39;false&#39;;var addthis_language=&#39;en&#39;;var addthis_options=&#39;twitter, digg, [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Robo-Love: Memorial Day Weekend Edition &#124; Mind Numbed Robot</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/05/26/rule-6-dont-be-a-complete-douchebag/comment-page-1/#comment-16647</link> <dc:creator>Robo-Love: Memorial Day Weekend Edition &#124; Mind Numbed Robot</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 15:39:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=8173#comment-16647</guid> <description>[...] The Other McCain has decided that there is a Rule 6! Who knew? And here I am still trying to get a handle on Rule 2 and Rule 5. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Other McCain has decided that there is a Rule 6! Who knew? And here I am still trying to get a handle on Rule 2 and Rule 5. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Los Angeles Republican Party Wins Lawsuit Against Ron Paul Supporters : The Other McCain</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/05/26/rule-6-dont-be-a-complete-douchebag/comment-page-1/#comment-16536</link> <dc:creator>Los Angeles Republican Party Wins Lawsuit Against Ron Paul Supporters : The Other McCain</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 20:15:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=8173#comment-16536</guid> <description>[...] than to alienate everybody and marginalize myself by being a complete douchebag. Remember Rule 6.Once more, thanks to Joe at Valley of the Shadow for the tip. var addthis_append_data=&#039;false&#039;;var [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] than to alienate everybody and marginalize myself by being a complete douchebag. Remember Rule 6.Once more, thanks to Joe at Valley of the Shadow for the tip. var addthis_append_data=&#39;false&#39;;var [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: The Classic Liberal Is a Good Blog : The Other McCain</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/05/26/rule-6-dont-be-a-complete-douchebag/comment-page-1/#comment-16516</link> <dc:creator>The Classic Liberal Is a Good Blog : The Other McCain</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 17:24:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=8173#comment-16516</guid> <description>[...] be more than 97% douchebag. So there is at least some hope for his redemption before he reaches Rule 6 territory.It takes persistent effort to make my Enemies List. Very few people can devote the kind [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] be more than 97% douchebag. So there is at least some hope for his redemption before he reaches Rule 6 territory.It takes persistent effort to make my Enemies List. Very few people can devote the kind [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Fingers Malloy &#187; Blog Archive &#187; I Too, Had An Inappropriate Physical Relationship With South Carolina Gubernatorial Candidate Nikki Haley</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/05/26/rule-6-dont-be-a-complete-douchebag/comment-page-1/#comment-16508</link> <dc:creator>Fingers Malloy &#187; Blog Archive &#187; I Too, Had An Inappropriate Physical Relationship With South Carolina Gubernatorial Candidate Nikki Haley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 16:07:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=8173#comment-16508</guid> <description>[...] Robert Stacy McCain Tags: Fingers Malloy, Rep. Nikki Haley, South Carolina, South Carolina Gubernatorial Election, The [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Robert Stacy McCain Tags: Fingers Malloy, Rep. Nikki Haley, South Carolina, South Carolina Gubernatorial Election, The [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Thomas L. Knapp</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/05/26/rule-6-dont-be-a-complete-douchebag/comment-page-1/#comment-16453</link> <dc:creator>Thomas L. Knapp</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 07:44:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=8173#comment-16453</guid> <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://knappster.blogspot.com/2010/05/this-too-shall-pass.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;This, too, shall pass.&lt;/a&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a
href="http://knappster.blogspot.com/2010/05/this-too-shall-pass.html" rel="nofollow">This, too, shall pass.</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Thomas L. Knapp</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/05/26/rule-6-dont-be-a-complete-douchebag/comment-page-1/#comment-47019</link> <dc:creator>Thomas L. Knapp</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 07:44:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=8173#comment-47019</guid> <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://knappster.blogspot.com/2010/05/this-too-shall-pass.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;This, too, shall pass.&lt;/a&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a
href="http://knappster.blogspot.com/2010/05/this-too-shall-pass.html" rel="nofollow">This, too, shall pass.</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: NYTimesIsntEvenGoodToiletPaper</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/05/26/rule-6-dont-be-a-complete-douchebag/comment-page-1/#comment-16407</link> <dc:creator>NYTimesIsntEvenGoodToiletPaper</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 02:40:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=8173#comment-16407</guid> <description>&quot;....so it’s hard for me to fathom why David Brooks is still employed by The New York Times, or why MSNBC keeps Chris Matthews on the air....&quot;
Are you kidding us?
I&#039;m thinking this scene is repeated fairly often:
Brooks/Matthews brings a page of text to Times/MSNBC management, says &quot;Here is what I&#039;m planning to say, can you take a look at it?&quot;
Times/MSNBC manager/editor/whatever takes a look, reads it over, and replies &quot;Well, it&#039;s got potential, but it isn&#039;t NEARLY Douchebaggish enough - You&#039;re off your game today - we&#039;ve got a reputation to uphold here.  Bring this back to me when it&#039;s got at least 50% more Douchebaggery and then maybe we can run it!&quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;.so it’s hard for me to fathom why David Brooks is still employed by The New York Times, or why MSNBC keeps Chris Matthews on the air&#8230;.&#8221;</p><p>Are you kidding us?</p><p>I&#8217;m thinking this scene is repeated fairly often:</p><p>Brooks/Matthews brings a page of text to Times/MSNBC management, says &#8220;Here is what I&#8217;m planning to say, can you take a look at it?&#8221;</p><p>Times/MSNBC manager/editor/whatever takes a look, reads it over, and replies &#8220;Well, it&#8217;s got potential, but it isn&#8217;t NEARLY Douchebaggish enough &#8211; You&#8217;re off your game today &#8211; we&#8217;ve got a reputation to uphold here.  Bring this back to me when it&#8217;s got at least 50% more Douchebaggery and then maybe we can run it!&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: NYTimesIsntEvenGoodToiletPaper</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/05/26/rule-6-dont-be-a-complete-douchebag/comment-page-1/#comment-47016</link> <dc:creator>NYTimesIsntEvenGoodToiletPaper</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 02:40:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=8173#comment-47016</guid> <description>&quot;....so it’s hard for me to fathom why David Brooks is still employed by The New York Times, or why MSNBC keeps Chris Matthews on the air....&quot;
Are you kidding us?
I&#039;m thinking this scene is repeated fairly often:
Brooks/Matthews brings a page of text to Times/MSNBC management, says &quot;Here is what I&#039;m planning to say, can you take a look at it?&quot;
Times/MSNBC manager/editor/whatever takes a look, reads it over, and replies &quot;Well, it&#039;s got potential, but it isn&#039;t NEARLY Douchebaggish enough - You&#039;re off your game today - we&#039;ve got a reputation to uphold here.  Bring this back to me when it&#039;s got at least 50% more Douchebaggery and then maybe we can run it!&quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;.so it’s hard for me to fathom why David Brooks is still employed by The New York Times, or why MSNBC keeps Chris Matthews on the air&#8230;.&#8221;</p><p>Are you kidding us?</p><p>I&#8217;m thinking this scene is repeated fairly often:</p><p>Brooks/Matthews brings a page of text to Times/MSNBC management, says &#8220;Here is what I&#8217;m planning to say, can you take a look at it?&#8221;</p><p>Times/MSNBC manager/editor/whatever takes a look, reads it over, and replies &#8220;Well, it&#8217;s got potential, but it isn&#8217;t NEARLY Douchebaggish enough &#8211; You&#8217;re off your game today &#8211; we&#8217;ve got a reputation to uphold here.  Bring this back to me when it&#8217;s got at least 50% more Douchebaggery and then maybe we can run it!&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: theothermccain.com @ 2012-02-12 12:27:15 by W3 Total Cache -->
