<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: More on the Bauer/Shealy Angle in the South Carolina GOP Sex Scandal</title> <atom:link href="http://theothermccain.com/2010/05/28/more-on-the-bauershealy-angle-in-the-south-carolina-gop-sex-scandal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/05/28/more-on-the-bauershealy-angle-in-the-south-carolina-gop-sex-scandal/</link> <description>&#34;One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up.&#34; -- Arthur Koestler</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:41:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Will Folks’ Stunt Backfires; Nikki Haley Still Leads in South Carolina Governor’s Poll &#171; Fort Liberty</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/05/28/more-on-the-bauershealy-angle-in-the-south-carolina-gop-sex-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-17691</link> <dc:creator>Will Folks’ Stunt Backfires; Nikki Haley Still Leads in South Carolina Governor’s Poll &#171; Fort Liberty</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 17:10:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=8290#comment-17691</guid> <description>[...] I know, is the last thing that I would want is a pro like Erick Erickson pissed off at me, a bloodhound like Stacy McCain on my trail, or a pitbull like Dan Riehl out to prove me [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I know, is the last thing that I would want is a pro like Erick Erickson pissed off at me, a bloodhound like Stacy McCain on my trail, or a pitbull like Dan Riehl out to prove me [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Will Folks Stunt Backfires; Nikki Haley Still Leads in South Carolina Governor&#8217;s Poll &#171; Red Dog Report</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/05/28/more-on-the-bauershealy-angle-in-the-south-carolina-gop-sex-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-17192</link> <dc:creator>Will Folks Stunt Backfires; Nikki Haley Still Leads in South Carolina Governor&#8217;s Poll &#171; Red Dog Report</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 20:15:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=8290#comment-17192</guid> <description>[...] I know, is the last thing that I would want is a pro like Erick Erickson pissed off at me, a bloodhound like Stacy McCain on my trail, or a pitbull like Dan Riehl out to prove me [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I know, is the last thing that I would want is a pro like Erick Erickson pissed off at me, a bloodhound like Stacy McCain on my trail, or a pitbull like Dan Riehl out to prove me [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ak4mc</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/05/28/more-on-the-bauershealy-angle-in-the-south-carolina-gop-sex-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-16738</link> <dc:creator>ak4mc</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 12:41:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=8290#comment-16738</guid> <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;Dan Reihl seems pretty angry all the time these days.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;As I recall, Riehl&#039;s blog was originally named &quot;Carnivorous Conservative&quot; -- as in, &quot;red meat.&quot; I don&#039;t think that was necessarily a reference solely to his dietary preferences.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><i>Dan Reihl seems pretty angry all the time these days.</i></p></blockquote><p>As I recall, Riehl&#8217;s blog was originally named &#8220;Carnivorous Conservative&#8221; &#8212; as in, &#8220;red meat.&#8221; I don&#8217;t think that was necessarily a reference solely to his dietary preferences.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ak4mc</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/05/28/more-on-the-bauershealy-angle-in-the-south-carolina-gop-sex-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-47083</link> <dc:creator>ak4mc</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 12:41:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=8290#comment-47083</guid> <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;Dan Reihl seems pretty angry all the time these days.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;As I recall, Riehl&#039;s blog was originally named &quot;Carnivorous Conservative&quot; -- as in, &quot;red meat.&quot; I don&#039;t think that was necessarily a reference solely to his dietary preferences.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><i>Dan Reihl seems pretty angry all the time these days.</i></p></blockquote><p>As I recall, Riehl&#8217;s blog was originally named &#8220;Carnivorous Conservative&#8221; &#8212; as in, &#8220;red meat.&#8221; I don&#8217;t think that was necessarily a reference solely to his dietary preferences.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Knottzi</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/05/28/more-on-the-bauershealy-angle-in-the-south-carolina-gop-sex-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-16737</link> <dc:creator>Knottzi</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 12:27:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=8290#comment-16737</guid> <description>It might also be noted that Jake Knotts has endorsed Larry Richter.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_3wAHw56ehk</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It might also be noted that Jake Knotts has endorsed Larry Richter.<br
/> <a
href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_3wAHw56ehk" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_3wAHw56ehk</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Knottzi</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/05/28/more-on-the-bauershealy-angle-in-the-south-carolina-gop-sex-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-47082</link> <dc:creator>Knottzi</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 12:27:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=8290#comment-47082</guid> <description>It might also be noted that Jake Knotts has endorsed Larry Richter.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_3wAHw56ehk</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It might also be noted that Jake Knotts has endorsed Larry Richter.<br
/> <a
href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_3wAHw56ehk" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_3wAHw56ehk</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Estragon</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/05/28/more-on-the-bauershealy-angle-in-the-south-carolina-gop-sex-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-16731</link> <dc:creator>Estragon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 11:48:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=8290#comment-16731</guid> <description>Wolfe is a &quot;political journalist&quot; like Erich von Däniken was an astrophysicist.  Meaning - NOT.
Will Folks drinking pal, maybe.  Anti-Sanford hack, definitely.  Total tool - well, you be the judge.
If he&#039;s your source, you got diddly.
I strongly suspect Bauer, as I&#039;ve said since early on, but Wolfe isn&#039;t confirmation, or evidence, or even particularly interesting.
If anyone hired a private dick, why would they follow Folks, unless they were interested in second-rate bars and third-rate people?  If a PI was hired, it was connected to Bauer, all right, but they would have been tracking Sanford, not Folks (who had been fired) and certainly not Haley, who was barely a blip on the radar back at the time.
Sorry, the idea that someone would have gone to the trouble of hiring a PI to track a fired wife-beating loser and a little-known legislator doesn&#039;t pass the laugh test.  It&#039;s part of Folks&#039; delusion of grandeur.  After that bursts, he&#039;ll have to deal with his delusion of adequacy.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wolfe is a &#8220;political journalist&#8221; like Erich von Däniken was an astrophysicist.  Meaning &#8211; NOT.</p><p>Will Folks drinking pal, maybe.  Anti-Sanford hack, definitely.  Total tool &#8211; well, you be the judge.</p><p>If he&#8217;s your source, you got diddly.</p><p>I strongly suspect Bauer, as I&#8217;ve said since early on, but Wolfe isn&#8217;t confirmation, or evidence, or even particularly interesting.</p><p>If anyone hired a private dick, why would they follow Folks, unless they were interested in second-rate bars and third-rate people?  If a PI was hired, it was connected to Bauer, all right, but they would have been tracking Sanford, not Folks (who had been fired) and certainly not Haley, who was barely a blip on the radar back at the time.</p><p>Sorry, the idea that someone would have gone to the trouble of hiring a PI to track a fired wife-beating loser and a little-known legislator doesn&#8217;t pass the laugh test.  It&#8217;s part of Folks&#8217; delusion of grandeur.  After that bursts, he&#8217;ll have to deal with his delusion of adequacy.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Estragon</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/05/28/more-on-the-bauershealy-angle-in-the-south-carolina-gop-sex-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-47081</link> <dc:creator>Estragon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 11:48:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=8290#comment-47081</guid> <description>Wolfe is a &quot;political journalist&quot; like Erich von Däniken was an astrophysicist.  Meaning - NOT.
Will Folks drinking pal, maybe.  Anti-Sanford hack, definitely.  Total tool - well, you be the judge.
If he&#039;s your source, you got diddly.
I strongly suspect Bauer, as I&#039;ve said since early on, but Wolfe isn&#039;t confirmation, or evidence, or even particularly interesting.
If anyone hired a private dick, why would they follow Folks, unless they were interested in second-rate bars and third-rate people?  If a PI was hired, it was connected to Bauer, all right, but they would have been tracking Sanford, not Folks (who had been fired) and certainly not Haley, who was barely a blip on the radar back at the time.
Sorry, the idea that someone would have gone to the trouble of hiring a PI to track a fired wife-beating loser and a little-known legislator doesn&#039;t pass the laugh test.  It&#039;s part of Folks&#039; delusion of grandeur.  After that bursts, he&#039;ll have to deal with his delusion of adequacy.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wolfe is a &#8220;political journalist&#8221; like Erich von Däniken was an astrophysicist.  Meaning &#8211; NOT.</p><p>Will Folks drinking pal, maybe.  Anti-Sanford hack, definitely.  Total tool &#8211; well, you be the judge.</p><p>If he&#8217;s your source, you got diddly.</p><p>I strongly suspect Bauer, as I&#8217;ve said since early on, but Wolfe isn&#8217;t confirmation, or evidence, or even particularly interesting.</p><p>If anyone hired a private dick, why would they follow Folks, unless they were interested in second-rate bars and third-rate people?  If a PI was hired, it was connected to Bauer, all right, but they would have been tracking Sanford, not Folks (who had been fired) and certainly not Haley, who was barely a blip on the radar back at the time.</p><p>Sorry, the idea that someone would have gone to the trouble of hiring a PI to track a fired wife-beating loser and a little-known legislator doesn&#8217;t pass the laugh test.  It&#8217;s part of Folks&#8217; delusion of grandeur.  After that bursts, he&#8217;ll have to deal with his delusion of adequacy.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Matt X</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/05/28/more-on-the-bauershealy-angle-in-the-south-carolina-gop-sex-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-16703</link> <dc:creator>Matt X</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 02:48:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=8290#comment-16703</guid> <description>Why does everybody talking about this story have to dump on SC politics like there aren&#039;t bad politicians in other states?  I&#039;m getting tired of this &quot;good ol&#039; boy&quot; meme that people not from SC like to describe our politicians.  There also seems to be this stereotype that men in SC are sexist but that&#039;s not the case at all.
Dan Reihl seems pretty angry all the time these days.  His attack on Allahpundit was bizarre....Allahpundit&#039;s a reliable conservative and I think he&#039;s more conservative than he even he thinks despite his somewhate defensive &quot;RINO!&quot; statements every time he takes a little heat for being liberal on abortion and gay marriage.  I do think Erick Erickson deserved a little mocking...I did not understand why he didn&#039;t tell us last night if he had &quot;the real scoop&quot; on Folks.  I don&#039;t see a need to do a practical joke using Folks as Folks already is a joke, even if he&#039;s telling the truth.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does everybody talking about this story have to dump on SC politics like there aren&#8217;t bad politicians in other states?  I&#8217;m getting tired of this &#8220;good ol&#8217; boy&#8221; meme that people not from SC like to describe our politicians.  There also seems to be this stereotype that men in SC are sexist but that&#8217;s not the case at all.</p><p>Dan Reihl seems pretty angry all the time these days.  His attack on Allahpundit was bizarre&#8230;.Allahpundit&#8217;s a reliable conservative and I think he&#8217;s more conservative than he even he thinks despite his somewhate defensive &#8220;RINO!&#8221; statements every time he takes a little heat for being liberal on abortion and gay marriage.  I do think Erick Erickson deserved a little mocking&#8230;I did not understand why he didn&#8217;t tell us last night if he had &#8220;the real scoop&#8221; on Folks.  I don&#8217;t see a need to do a practical joke using Folks as Folks already is a joke, even if he&#8217;s telling the truth.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Matt X</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/05/28/more-on-the-bauershealy-angle-in-the-south-carolina-gop-sex-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-47080</link> <dc:creator>Matt X</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 02:48:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=8290#comment-47080</guid> <description>Why does everybody talking about this story have to dump on SC politics like there aren&#039;t bad politicians in other states?  I&#039;m getting tired of this &quot;good ol&#039; boy&quot; meme that people not from SC like to describe our politicians.  There also seems to be this stereotype that men in SC are sexist but that&#039;s not the case at all.
Dan Reihl seems pretty angry all the time these days.  His attack on Allahpundit was bizarre....Allahpundit&#039;s a reliable conservative and I think he&#039;s more conservative than he even he thinks despite his somewhate defensive &quot;RINO!&quot; statements every time he takes a little heat for being liberal on abortion and gay marriage.  I do think Erick Erickson deserved a little mocking...I did not understand why he didn&#039;t tell us last night if he had &quot;the real scoop&quot; on Folks.  I don&#039;t see a need to do a practical joke using Folks as Folks already is a joke, even if he&#039;s telling the truth.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does everybody talking about this story have to dump on SC politics like there aren&#8217;t bad politicians in other states?  I&#8217;m getting tired of this &#8220;good ol&#8217; boy&#8221; meme that people not from SC like to describe our politicians.  There also seems to be this stereotype that men in SC are sexist but that&#8217;s not the case at all.</p><p>Dan Reihl seems pretty angry all the time these days.  His attack on Allahpundit was bizarre&#8230;.Allahpundit&#8217;s a reliable conservative and I think he&#8217;s more conservative than he even he thinks despite his somewhate defensive &#8220;RINO!&#8221; statements every time he takes a little heat for being liberal on abortion and gay marriage.  I do think Erick Erickson deserved a little mocking&#8230;I did not understand why he didn&#8217;t tell us last night if he had &#8220;the real scoop&#8221; on Folks.  I don&#8217;t see a need to do a practical joke using Folks as Folks already is a joke, even if he&#8217;s telling the truth.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: theothermccain.com @ 2012-02-12 15:45:53 by W3 Total Cache -->
