<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: When Phyllis Schlafly Speaks the Truth, Democrats Call It &#8216;Extremism&#8217;</title> <atom:link href="http://theothermccain.com/2010/07/30/when-phyllis-schlafly-speaks-the-truth-democrats-call-it-extremism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/07/30/when-phyllis-schlafly-speaks-the-truth-democrats-call-it-extremism/</link> <description>&#34;One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up.&#34; -- Arthur Koestler</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Foppish Munch-head&#8217;s Jacked-up Ruling: Annoying : The Other McCain</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/07/30/when-phyllis-schlafly-speaks-the-truth-democrats-call-it-extremism/comment-page-4/#comment-27274</link> <dc:creator>Foppish Munch-head&#8217;s Jacked-up Ruling: Annoying : The Other McCain</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 10:24:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=11545#comment-27274</guid> <description>[...] Graham Sadly Abdicated His Elected ResponsibilityThe Lonely ConservativeObi&#8217;s SisterPhyllisWhen Phyllis Schlafly Speaks the Truth, Democrats Call It &#8216;Extremism&#8217;VA RightDaTechguyTaylor MarshRed StateThe Camp of the SaintsUS Message BoardWorlds Only Rational [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Graham Sadly Abdicated His Elected ResponsibilityThe Lonely ConservativeObi&#8217;s SisterPhyllisWhen Phyllis Schlafly Speaks the Truth, Democrats Call It &#8216;Extremism&#8217;VA RightDaTechguyTaylor MarshRed StateThe Camp of the SaintsUS Message BoardWorlds Only Rational [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Unexpected Endorsement for Schlafly : The Other McCain</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/07/30/when-phyllis-schlafly-speaks-the-truth-democrats-call-it-extremism/comment-page-4/#comment-26512</link> <dc:creator>Unexpected Endorsement for Schlafly : The Other McCain</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 19:17:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=11545#comment-26512</guid> <description>[...] Arthur KoestlerUnexpected Endorsement for SchlaflyPosted on &#124; August 2, 2010 &#124; No CommentsRemember my defense of Phyllis Schlafly? Well, now comes some blunt truth from Patterico:Here is a generalization for you: when I see [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Arthur KoestlerUnexpected Endorsement for SchlaflyPosted on | August 2, 2010 | No CommentsRemember my defense of Phyllis Schlafly? Well, now comes some blunt truth from Patterico:Here is a generalization for you: when I see [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: cowboydave</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/07/30/when-phyllis-schlafly-speaks-the-truth-democrats-call-it-extremism/comment-page-4/#comment-26379</link> <dc:creator>cowboydave</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 00:10:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=11545#comment-26379</guid> <description>PLEASE CALL THE NRA 800 392 8683 PRESS #3 TELL THE REP. DO NOT ENDORSE harry reid….. PLEASE THIS IS IMPORTANT….. TELL YOUR FRIENDS TO CALL THEM, ALSO NRA MEMBERS PLEASE WRITE THE NRA DIRECTORS TELL THEM TO NOT LET THE NRA ENDORSE harry reid THANK YOU</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PLEASE CALL THE NRA 800 392 8683 PRESS #3 TELL THE REP. DO NOT ENDORSE harry reid….. PLEASE THIS IS IMPORTANT….. TELL YOUR FRIENDS TO CALL THEM, ALSO NRA MEMBERS PLEASE WRITE THE NRA DIRECTORS TELL THEM TO NOT LET THE NRA ENDORSE harry reid THANK YOU</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: cowboydave</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/07/30/when-phyllis-schlafly-speaks-the-truth-democrats-call-it-extremism/comment-page-4/#comment-53428</link> <dc:creator>cowboydave</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 00:10:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=11545#comment-53428</guid> <description>PLEASE CALL THE NRA 800 392 8683 PRESS #3 TELL THE REP. DO NOT ENDORSE harry reid….. PLEASE THIS IS IMPORTANT….. TELL YOUR FRIENDS TO CALL THEM, ALSO NRA MEMBERS PLEASE WRITE THE NRA DIRECTORS TELL THEM TO NOT LET THE NRA ENDORSE harry reid THANK YOU</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PLEASE CALL THE NRA 800 392 8683 PRESS #3 TELL THE REP. DO NOT ENDORSE harry reid….. PLEASE THIS IS IMPORTANT….. TELL YOUR FRIENDS TO CALL THEM, ALSO NRA MEMBERS PLEASE WRITE THE NRA DIRECTORS TELL THEM TO NOT LET THE NRA ENDORSE harry reid THANK YOU</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Joe</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/07/30/when-phyllis-schlafly-speaks-the-truth-democrats-call-it-extremism/comment-page-4/#comment-26356</link> <dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 21:18:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=11545#comment-26356</guid> <description>Tennwriter, there are lots of issues out there, but small &quot;l&quot; libertarians are not the problem.  Big &quot;L&quot; losertarians, unfortunately, occasionally cost Republicans elections as spoilers.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tennwriter, there are lots of issues out there, but small &#8220;l&#8221; libertarians are not the problem.  Big &#8220;L&#8221; losertarians, unfortunately, occasionally cost Republicans elections as spoilers.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Joe</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/07/30/when-phyllis-schlafly-speaks-the-truth-democrats-call-it-extremism/comment-page-4/#comment-53427</link> <dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 21:18:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=11545#comment-53427</guid> <description>Tennwriter, there are lots of issues out there, but small &quot;l&quot; libertarians are not the problem.  Big &quot;L&quot; losertarians, unfortunately, occasionally cost Republicans elections as spoilers.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tennwriter, there are lots of issues out there, but small &#8220;l&#8221; libertarians are not the problem.  Big &#8220;L&#8221; losertarians, unfortunately, occasionally cost Republicans elections as spoilers.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tennwriter</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/07/30/when-phyllis-schlafly-speaks-the-truth-democrats-call-it-extremism/comment-page-4/#comment-26355</link> <dc:creator>Tennwriter</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 21:02:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=11545#comment-26355</guid> <description>Miss Attilla,
Its libertarians who are the Chihuahuas who snap at the ankles of conservatives, thus distracting said Conservatives from forcing RINOs to pretend to be reasonable, and then the conservatives moving on to stomping the crud out of liberalism.
AKA, if libertarians spent less time sniping at conservatives with their understandable social concerns (as Conservatism is based on Freedom and Virtue), then libertarians might see the expansion of Freedom they claim so loudly to support.  However, one sometimes suspects they hate conservatives more than they love Freedom.
Perhaps this is not you, but you might spread the word to the other libertarians eager to start fights that need not be fought now.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Miss Attilla,<br
/> Its libertarians who are the Chihuahuas who snap at the ankles of conservatives, thus distracting said Conservatives from forcing RINOs to pretend to be reasonable, and then the conservatives moving on to stomping the crud out of liberalism.</p><p>AKA, if libertarians spent less time sniping at conservatives with their understandable social concerns (as Conservatism is based on Freedom and Virtue), then libertarians might see the expansion of Freedom they claim so loudly to support.  However, one sometimes suspects they hate conservatives more than they love Freedom.</p><p>Perhaps this is not you, but you might spread the word to the other libertarians eager to start fights that need not be fought now.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tennwriter</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/07/30/when-phyllis-schlafly-speaks-the-truth-democrats-call-it-extremism/comment-page-4/#comment-53426</link> <dc:creator>Tennwriter</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 21:02:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=11545#comment-53426</guid> <description>Miss Attilla,
Its libertarians who are the Chihuahuas who snap at the ankles of conservatives, thus distracting said Conservatives from forcing RINOs to pretend to be reasonable, and then the conservatives moving on to stomping the crud out of liberalism.
AKA, if libertarians spent less time sniping at conservatives with their understandable social concerns (as Conservatism is based on Freedom and Virtue), then libertarians might see the expansion of Freedom they claim so loudly to support.  However, one sometimes suspects they hate conservatives more than they love Freedom.
Perhaps this is not you, but you might spread the word to the other libertarians eager to start fights that need not be fought now.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Miss Attilla,<br
/> Its libertarians who are the Chihuahuas who snap at the ankles of conservatives, thus distracting said Conservatives from forcing RINOs to pretend to be reasonable, and then the conservatives moving on to stomping the crud out of liberalism.</p><p>AKA, if libertarians spent less time sniping at conservatives with their understandable social concerns (as Conservatism is based on Freedom and Virtue), then libertarians might see the expansion of Freedom they claim so loudly to support.  However, one sometimes suspects they hate conservatives more than they love Freedom.</p><p>Perhaps this is not you, but you might spread the word to the other libertarians eager to start fights that need not be fought now.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Joe</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/07/30/when-phyllis-schlafly-speaks-the-truth-democrats-call-it-extremism/comment-page-4/#comment-26350</link> <dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 19:52:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=11545#comment-26350</guid> <description>There are about 1.5 billion [a bit high but okay] moslems [spelling] in this world. The moslem countries that have bizarre [spelling] laws about gay people represent a small minority of them and in those countries, the people themselves are living in functional dictatorships [ahhh, every Muslim majority state other than arguably Turkey is a functional dictatorship, monarchy, or olicharchy]. I’d bet huge odds that a smaller proportion moslems than christians hate gay people – especially among American conservatives [where is this coming from?]. I am 100% certain that the number of moslems that think gay people should be killed is a tiny percentage [I am not aware of any Western state condoning anything like that, I know Iran, the Taliban and al Qaeda promote doing that now]. It is extremism to imply that all moslems do. [Who implied that?  This is a straw man argument].
Those of you that think that parents of a fourteen year old pregnant girl don’t suck or that the child is a rationale player in her economic future, choosing a fabulous life on $500/month are idiots, spewing irrational talking points to further more uncaring cruelty.  [I have no idea what you are saying].
That said, I made no claim that there are no women that figure that welfare will take care of them, merely that it’s extremism to claim that all of them are. [My head is starting to hurt now reading this crap].  I made no claim the you, Roxeanne, are not an independent woman, I said that the characterization of any mother that doesn’t have a man as a parasite is extremism and, worse, a manipulative way of casting aspersions on independent women in general. (And, it’s worth noting, this started with Shafly talking, not about unwed mothers, but all divorced women, in this way.) [Roxanne is twice the man you are].
When you “slut-slammers” talk about young unwed mothers in terms of “just keep your legs shut” you reveal a stupid cruelty that is unbearable but indicative of the fantasy life of conservatives. [Your perjoritives aside, that is not bad advice to start with, we all recognize it is hardly foolproof.] Children do not cooperate. [Duh.] They do dumb, counterproductive things all the time. [Duh.] The idea that society has the ability to force them not to screw is just plain dumb. People have tried everything from literal chastity belts, to shotgun marriages, to putting girls in prison, to immeasurable cruelties of all sorts. [You must be thinking of your Muslim pals noted above].  It never works. I love the idea that preventing sex education, ie, attempting to conceal the reality of sex from children, will make them more responsible. Pure fantasy.  [Sex education on the mechanics of how pregnancy happens, explaining what controception is, and why having sex at an early age is a bad idea is fine, telling kids what fisting is all about or encouraging them that picking up strange adult men at bus stations is okay is not.]
But the most stupid thing I read here is the ongoing assertion about liberal motivation. I have been a politically active, thoughtful liberal for decades. [No kidding?  I never would have guessed that.] I have protested, run campaigns, written articles, read books, engaged in every way. [You go girl].  I have never, ever known a liberal that has an affirmative motivation to replace the father, ruin families, encourage dependency, or any of the other dumb things you people have said. [Well, spend some time in a feminist book store and you might find what you say does not exists.]
Never. To the extent that you base your viewpoints on that notion, you are 100% wrong. [This refers to the paragraph above?]
Of course, you’ll call me a liar but that’s because the conservative mindset operates on a fantasy that, “if it makes sense to me, it must be true.” [Liar, no, you really do believe this shit.] Somehow you think that, given enough cruelty and intolerance, the things you dislike will magically go away. [Dude, did we hurt your feelings?]  Think badly of me and fellow liberals and maybe that will be true, too.  [Come on now, let&#039;s smoke a bong and hug it out.]
Or not.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are about 1.5 billion [a bit high but okay] moslems [spelling] in this world. The moslem countries that have bizarre [spelling] laws about gay people represent a small minority of them and in those countries, the people themselves are living in functional dictatorships [ahhh, every Muslim majority state other than arguably Turkey is a functional dictatorship, monarchy, or olicharchy]. I’d bet huge odds that a smaller proportion moslems than christians hate gay people – especially among American conservatives [where is this coming from?]. I am 100% certain that the number of moslems that think gay people should be killed is a tiny percentage [I am not aware of any Western state condoning anything like that, I know Iran, the Taliban and al Qaeda promote doing that now]. It is extremism to imply that all moslems do. [Who implied that?  This is a straw man argument].</p><p>Those of you that think that parents of a fourteen year old pregnant girl don’t suck or that the child is a rationale player in her economic future, choosing a fabulous life on $500/month are idiots, spewing irrational talking points to further more uncaring cruelty.  [I have no idea what you are saying].</p><p>That said, I made no claim that there are no women that figure that welfare will take care of them, merely that it’s extremism to claim that all of them are. [My head is starting to hurt now reading this crap].  I made no claim the you, Roxeanne, are not an independent woman, I said that the characterization of any mother that doesn’t have a man as a parasite is extremism and, worse, a manipulative way of casting aspersions on independent women in general. (And, it’s worth noting, this started with Shafly talking, not about unwed mothers, but all divorced women, in this way.) [Roxanne is twice the man you are].</p><p>When you “slut-slammers” talk about young unwed mothers in terms of “just keep your legs shut” you reveal a stupid cruelty that is unbearable but indicative of the fantasy life of conservatives. [Your perjoritives aside, that is not bad advice to start with, we all recognize it is hardly foolproof.] Children do not cooperate. [Duh.] They do dumb, counterproductive things all the time. [Duh.] The idea that society has the ability to force them not to screw is just plain dumb. People have tried everything from literal chastity belts, to shotgun marriages, to putting girls in prison, to immeasurable cruelties of all sorts. [You must be thinking of your Muslim pals noted above].  It never works. I love the idea that preventing sex education, ie, attempting to conceal the reality of sex from children, will make them more responsible. Pure fantasy.  [Sex education on the mechanics of how pregnancy happens, explaining what controception is, and why having sex at an early age is a bad idea is fine, telling kids what fisting is all about or encouraging them that picking up strange adult men at bus stations is okay is not.]</p><p>But the most stupid thing I read here is the ongoing assertion about liberal motivation. I have been a politically active, thoughtful liberal for decades. [No kidding?  I never would have guessed that.] I have protested, run campaigns, written articles, read books, engaged in every way. [You go girl].  I have never, ever known a liberal that has an affirmative motivation to replace the father, ruin families, encourage dependency, or any of the other dumb things you people have said. [Well, spend some time in a feminist book store and you might find what you say does not exists.]</p><p>Never. To the extent that you base your viewpoints on that notion, you are 100% wrong. [This refers to the paragraph above?]</p><p>Of course, you’ll call me a liar but that’s because the conservative mindset operates on a fantasy that, “if it makes sense to me, it must be true.” [Liar, no, you really do believe this shit.] Somehow you think that, given enough cruelty and intolerance, the things you dislike will magically go away. [Dude, did we hurt your feelings?]  Think badly of me and fellow liberals and maybe that will be true, too.  [Come on now, let's smoke a bong and hug it out.]</p><p>Or not.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Joe</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/07/30/when-phyllis-schlafly-speaks-the-truth-democrats-call-it-extremism/comment-page-4/#comment-53425</link> <dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 19:52:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theothermccain.com/?p=11545#comment-53425</guid> <description>There are about 1.5 billion [a bit high but okay] moslems [spelling] in this world. The moslem countries that have bizarre [spelling] laws about gay people represent a small minority of them and in those countries, the people themselves are living in functional dictatorships [ahhh, every Muslim majority state other than arguably Turkey is a functional dictatorship, monarchy, or olicharchy]. I’d bet huge odds that a smaller proportion moslems than christians hate gay people – especially among American conservatives [where is this coming from?]. I am 100% certain that the number of moslems that think gay people should be killed is a tiny percentage [I am not aware of any Western state condoning anything like that, I know Iran, the Taliban and al Qaeda promote doing that now]. It is extremism to imply that all moslems do. [Who implied that?  This is a straw man argument].
Those of you that think that parents of a fourteen year old pregnant girl don’t suck or that the child is a rationale player in her economic future, choosing a fabulous life on $500/month are idiots, spewing irrational talking points to further more uncaring cruelty.  [I have no idea what you are saying].
That said, I made no claim that there are no women that figure that welfare will take care of them, merely that it’s extremism to claim that all of them are. [My head is starting to hurt now reading this crap].  I made no claim the you, Roxeanne, are not an independent woman, I said that the characterization of any mother that doesn’t have a man as a parasite is extremism and, worse, a manipulative way of casting aspersions on independent women in general. (And, it’s worth noting, this started with Shafly talking, not about unwed mothers, but all divorced women, in this way.) [Roxanne is twice the man you are].
When you “slut-slammers” talk about young unwed mothers in terms of “just keep your legs shut” you reveal a stupid cruelty that is unbearable but indicative of the fantasy life of conservatives. [Your perjoritives aside, that is not bad advice to start with, we all recognize it is hardly foolproof.] Children do not cooperate. [Duh.] They do dumb, counterproductive things all the time. [Duh.] The idea that society has the ability to force them not to screw is just plain dumb. People have tried everything from literal chastity belts, to shotgun marriages, to putting girls in prison, to immeasurable cruelties of all sorts. [You must be thinking of your Muslim pals noted above].  It never works. I love the idea that preventing sex education, ie, attempting to conceal the reality of sex from children, will make them more responsible. Pure fantasy.  [Sex education on the mechanics of how pregnancy happens, explaining what controception is, and why having sex at an early age is a bad idea is fine, telling kids what fisting is all about or encouraging them that picking up strange adult men at bus stations is okay is not.]
But the most stupid thing I read here is the ongoing assertion about liberal motivation. I have been a politically active, thoughtful liberal for decades. [No kidding?  I never would have guessed that.] I have protested, run campaigns, written articles, read books, engaged in every way. [You go girl].  I have never, ever known a liberal that has an affirmative motivation to replace the father, ruin families, encourage dependency, or any of the other dumb things you people have said. [Well, spend some time in a feminist book store and you might find what you say does not exists.]
Never. To the extent that you base your viewpoints on that notion, you are 100% wrong. [This refers to the paragraph above?]
Of course, you’ll call me a liar but that’s because the conservative mindset operates on a fantasy that, “if it makes sense to me, it must be true.” [Liar, no, you really do believe this shit.] Somehow you think that, given enough cruelty and intolerance, the things you dislike will magically go away. [Dude, did we hurt your feelings?]  Think badly of me and fellow liberals and maybe that will be true, too.  [Come on now, let&#039;s smoke a bong and hug it out.]
Or not.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are about 1.5 billion [a bit high but okay] moslems [spelling] in this world. The moslem countries that have bizarre [spelling] laws about gay people represent a small minority of them and in those countries, the people themselves are living in functional dictatorships [ahhh, every Muslim majority state other than arguably Turkey is a functional dictatorship, monarchy, or olicharchy]. I’d bet huge odds that a smaller proportion moslems than christians hate gay people – especially among American conservatives [where is this coming from?]. I am 100% certain that the number of moslems that think gay people should be killed is a tiny percentage [I am not aware of any Western state condoning anything like that, I know Iran, the Taliban and al Qaeda promote doing that now]. It is extremism to imply that all moslems do. [Who implied that?  This is a straw man argument].</p><p>Those of you that think that parents of a fourteen year old pregnant girl don’t suck or that the child is a rationale player in her economic future, choosing a fabulous life on $500/month are idiots, spewing irrational talking points to further more uncaring cruelty.  [I have no idea what you are saying].</p><p>That said, I made no claim that there are no women that figure that welfare will take care of them, merely that it’s extremism to claim that all of them are. [My head is starting to hurt now reading this crap].  I made no claim the you, Roxeanne, are not an independent woman, I said that the characterization of any mother that doesn’t have a man as a parasite is extremism and, worse, a manipulative way of casting aspersions on independent women in general. (And, it’s worth noting, this started with Shafly talking, not about unwed mothers, but all divorced women, in this way.) [Roxanne is twice the man you are].</p><p>When you “slut-slammers” talk about young unwed mothers in terms of “just keep your legs shut” you reveal a stupid cruelty that is unbearable but indicative of the fantasy life of conservatives. [Your perjoritives aside, that is not bad advice to start with, we all recognize it is hardly foolproof.] Children do not cooperate. [Duh.] They do dumb, counterproductive things all the time. [Duh.] The idea that society has the ability to force them not to screw is just plain dumb. People have tried everything from literal chastity belts, to shotgun marriages, to putting girls in prison, to immeasurable cruelties of all sorts. [You must be thinking of your Muslim pals noted above].  It never works. I love the idea that preventing sex education, ie, attempting to conceal the reality of sex from children, will make them more responsible. Pure fantasy.  [Sex education on the mechanics of how pregnancy happens, explaining what controception is, and why having sex at an early age is a bad idea is fine, telling kids what fisting is all about or encouraging them that picking up strange adult men at bus stations is okay is not.]</p><p>But the most stupid thing I read here is the ongoing assertion about liberal motivation. I have been a politically active, thoughtful liberal for decades. [No kidding?  I never would have guessed that.] I have protested, run campaigns, written articles, read books, engaged in every way. [You go girl].  I have never, ever known a liberal that has an affirmative motivation to replace the father, ruin families, encourage dependency, or any of the other dumb things you people have said. [Well, spend some time in a feminist book store and you might find what you say does not exists.]</p><p>Never. To the extent that you base your viewpoints on that notion, you are 100% wrong. [This refers to the paragraph above?]</p><p>Of course, you’ll call me a liar but that’s because the conservative mindset operates on a fantasy that, “if it makes sense to me, it must be true.” [Liar, no, you really do believe this shit.] Somehow you think that, given enough cruelty and intolerance, the things you dislike will magically go away. [Dude, did we hurt your feelings?]  Think badly of me and fellow liberals and maybe that will be true, too.  [Come on now, let's smoke a bong and hug it out.]</p><p>Or not.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: theothermccain.com @ 2012-02-12 15:33:14 by W3 Total Cache -->
