Hateful @SarahKSilverman Mocks Christianity in Pro-Abortion Video

Posted on | January 26, 2014 | 73 Comments

The Daily Caller’s Caroline May caught this on Friday: In a 5-minute video for “Lady Parts Justice” — the pro-abortion group she formed last year with Daily Show producer Lizz Winstead — Sarah Silverman pretends that she was visited by Jesus Christ, who told her to spread a pro-abortion message. Also, Jesus gives Silverman an orgasm:

This kind of pro-abortion fanaticism is always difficult for me to comprehend. It’s hard to imagine anyone could have such a bloodthirsty enthusiasm for killing babies, but it is especially hard to believe women could harbor this kind of monomaniacal death fetish.

Aleister points out that Siliverman’s choice of religions to mock doesn’t include Islam or Scientology:

If Sarah Silverman had any guts she’d take on Hollywood’s only approved faith, the so-called Church of Scientology which is nothing more than a Ponzi scheme disguised as a UFO religion. Do you know why she doesn’t do that? Because like everyone else in Hollywood, Sarah Silverman is always looking for her next job and she doesn’t want to offend anyone who might offer her a part in their next movie, TV show or commercial.
You never know when Tom Cruise or John Travolta might call, right Sarah?

Actually, she has done jokes about Scientology in her stand-up routine, but her career is rapidly going downhill anyway. She was popular for a few years when she was young and dating Jimmy Kimmel, but now she’s in her 40s and resorting to this: Political videos on YouTube, hoping to land an appearance on MSNBC maybe. In a few years, she’ll be like Joan Rivers, doing jokes about facelifts and menopause.

Category: Abortion, Celebrities

Comments

73 Responses to “Hateful @SarahKSilverman Mocks Christianity in Pro-Abortion Video”

LigueDefJuifs
January 26th, 2014 @ 8:50 am

RT @smitty_one_each: TOM Hateful @SarahKSilverman Mocks Christianity in Pro-Abortion Video http://t.co/6R0n9wI7fb #TCOT
tracieeeeee
January 26th, 2014 @ 9:05 am

RT @smitty_one_each: TOM Hateful @SarahKSilverman Mocks Christianity in Pro-Abortion Video http://t.co/6R0n9wI7fb #TCOT
Socialism: Organized Evil
January 26th, 2014 @ 8:15 am

What a fool.
Kirby McCain
January 26th, 2014 @ 8:22 am

Can I have freedom of expression, too? Sarah is obviously all hole and no soul.
RS
January 26th, 2014 @ 9:04 am

I wonder if all these people who use Christian imagery in sacrilegious ads and such pay Andres Serrano royalties. As for the message, one wonders what happened to these types of people to make them so twisted and completely devoid of any moral sense whatsoever.
Dana
January 26th, 2014 @ 9:20 am

Our esteemed host wrote:

This kind of pro-abortion fanaticism is always difficult for me to comprehend. It’s hard to imagine anyone could have such a bloodthirsty enthusiasm for killing babies, but it is especially hard to believe women could harbor this kind of monomaniacal death fetish.

It’s not difficult at all to comprehend that. Despite the Bill Clinton rhetorical formulation that abortion should be safe, legal and rare, some of the pro-choicers realize that if abortion were truly to become rare, it would cease to be affordable for most women, and that to be pro-choice necessarily means being pro-abortion: they must want a significant number of abortions to occur for abortion to continue to remain available.

More, abortion needs to be common so that those who have abortions aren’t somehow stigmatized, since so many women do it.
CrustyB
January 26th, 2014 @ 9:31 am

Does she think she’s actually changing anyone’s position on the issues?

“I was ambivalent about abortion. But then I saw Sarah Silverman dressed up as a vagina with a giant, inflatable dildo and it really made me think.”

She’s just a punk talking shit on a playground
cmdr358
January 26th, 2014 @ 9:39 am

“…but her career is going rapidly downhill anyway.”

Career? What is this tramp famous for other than being famous? She’s like a Kardashian or Honey Boo-Boo.
Just because people know who you are doesn’t make you famous or popular. Just ask Angela Corey or Michael Bloomberg.
richard mcenroe
January 26th, 2014 @ 9:43 am

You never seem to see a happy older progressive. Perhaps that’s the result of realizing they’ve wasted a lifetime on crap that doesn’t work, or perhaps it’s that combined with an innate disposition…
richard mcenroe
January 26th, 2014 @ 9:44 am

She usedta have gams, so Playboy was happy to present her as a hot edgy lezbeen comic. But when Playboy is your peak…
cmdr358
January 26th, 2014 @ 9:59 am

When they are done with their Latte’s and bran muffins later this morning the progtrolls will be along to label us anti-semetic mysoginists furthering the war on women in the name of a fictional character in a two thousand year old fable. We’re all just h8ers don’t you know? :-
cmdr358
January 26th, 2014 @ 10:05 am

“…when Playboy is your peak…” it still doesn’t mean your famous or popular. Just ask Lindsey Logan or Shannen Doherty.
DaTechGuy on DaRadio
January 26th, 2014 @ 10:36 am

She was very funny in Monk & very good in Wreck it Ralph and profaning Christ will never cost her work in Hollywood
RKae
January 26th, 2014 @ 10:51 am

What drives me crazy about chattering on and on with these people and having to put up with junk like this – how liberal atheists are so positive that Jesus would be on their side – is that it’s all talk meant to obfuscate.

Just LOOK at an aborted baby. Stop talking, stop coming up with new euphemisms for it, stop showing me how legal abortion fits in with your worldview, stop showing me charts and stats. JUST LOOK.

But no. Actually showing a picture of what occurs is “a scare tactic meant to take away women’s rights.”

Reality. It’s hell when it gets in the way.
FiftycalTX
January 26th, 2014 @ 11:06 am

I can’t understand why “conservative/small government” types want BIG GOVERNMENT when it comes to enforcing their religious superstition. Other than lining the pockets of anti-abortion groups, what purpose does the “anti-abortion lite” laws like “transvaginal ultrasound”, 24 hour waiting periods, etc. have? There is ONE WAY to “outlaw” abortion. Pass a constitutional amendment and turn the matter over to the states. So where is this amendment? NO WHERE! So why don’t you get Rush or Hannity or some other “big name” to propose a constitutional amendment. If the big government anti-abortion forces are such a majority now, it should be easy. So get on with it.
DaveO
January 26th, 2014 @ 11:10 am

Evil is like meth. One hit and your hooked. If you’re good, you spend the rest of your life fighting the temptations within your self. Other folks jump into the meth life. They may just stay in a role as drug-taker/enabler-of-evil. Others get into selling the drug, and few get into cooking – and that’s where Sarah Silverman is: she is manufacturing evil for its own sake. A year or so ago, she publicized her own abortion, which she said she’d had done just to have done it. Anton LaVey. Hugh Hefner, Mikey Weinstein, and Sarah Silverman: what a krewe. People never stumble into Hell, they dive in.
Killing babies is an age old, time honored tradition of identifying one’s self and one’s culture as evil. No infanticidal culture has ever survived.
Evi L. Bloggerlady
January 26th, 2014 @ 11:17 am

She is also not funny.
The Daley Gator | It must really suck to be Sarah Silverman
January 26th, 2014 @ 11:17 am

[…] Moral retardation? Or Moral destitution? Or maybe just the antics of a truly despicable person who is obsessed with killing babies and mocking Christianity? Stacy McCain has Sarah Silverman at her very worst, […]
cmdr358
January 26th, 2014 @ 11:20 am

Oh, is she a comedienne? I only know of her name because of her political ravings.
A comedienne?
Hm, I guess she’s not funny and so is attempting a career change?
cmdr358
January 26th, 2014 @ 11:23 am

I knew y’all would be along sooner or later. How was the latte and muffin this morning Tex?
cmdr358
January 26th, 2014 @ 11:24 am

+1 THIS !
RS
January 26th, 2014 @ 11:27 am

My only quibble with your comment is that they really don’t believe Jesus is on their side. At best, they see Him as an historical figure with a philosophy which, while good in parts, was way too “judgmental” when taken as a whole. Their invocation of Christ in their work is designed solely to offend Christians. It’s not sophisticated; it’s infantile and demonstrates no depth of philosophical thought or knowledge whatsoever. Bertrand Russell would wince at its imbecility.
Stogie
January 26th, 2014 @ 11:29 am

Opposing the destruction of human life isn’t based on “religious superstition,” but a universal standard that murder is morally wrong. Leftists seem to be devoid of any sense of morality or right and wrong. Indeed, they wallow in evil as if it were an honor rather than something despicable.
RS
January 26th, 2014 @ 11:30 am

Abortion is not merely a religious issue. If you value human life, as our foundational documents obviously do, then abortion is a moral question. And as secularists are found of telling us, morality, i.e. the question of how we should then live, is not tied to religious belief at all.
Stogie Chomper
January 26th, 2014 @ 11:41 am

This kind of pro-abortion fanaticism is always difficult for me to comprehend. It’s hard to imagine anyone could have such a bloodthirsty enthusiasm for killing babies, but it is especially hard to believe women could harbor this kind of monomaniacal death fetish.

I don’t understand it either. I am convinced that liberalism is a form of self-hatred, so intense that they have a strong death wish for themselves and for their fellow citizens, for their own country, traditions and culture. Liberalism truly is a mental illness.
FiftycalTX
January 26th, 2014 @ 11:54 am

And do any of you “moralists” have a reason there is no movement toward a constitutional amendment or do you just want to “prove” how much “holier” you are?
Evi L. Bloggerlady
January 26th, 2014 @ 12:07 pm

It is not easy to tell…but yeah she self describes herself that way.
Evi L. Bloggerlady
January 26th, 2014 @ 12:08 pm

She makes money and has a liberal following. She occasionally gets gigs (Pixar used her as a voice in Wreck Em Ralph).

I would still consider her a failure.
RS
January 26th, 2014 @ 12:21 pm

I shall answer your question with another. Are the laws prohibiting murder an example of “big government?” Your denomination of abortion restrictions as “big government” is absurd on its face.

As for the balance of your comment, the purpose of laws passed within the current framework established by Roe v. Wade provide those seeking an abortion to understand precisely what they are doing. That is destroying human life. Given that under the current state of affairs, absolute prohibition is not possible, the next best alternative is persuasion, which these laws attempt to accomplish.

Finally, many of us are indeed working within the political system to pursue all avenues available to protect human life, including constitutional ones. A movement to have a convention for proposing amendments is gaining steam. Check out Mark Levin’s latest book.
FiftycalTX
January 26th, 2014 @ 12:39 pm

“murder” is defined as killing a “person”. A fetus is a “potential” person depending on the stage of development. So equating “murder” with “abortion” is sophistry.
As to “big government”, how do you propose to enforce your anti-abortion nirvana? With the Soviet style, where a suitable agent of the state is placed in EVERY doctors office to “oversee” that no abortions are conducted? Or do you prefer the Chinese method, where every woman of child bearing ability has to “prove” her status every 30 days to someone the equivalent of a motor vehicle clerk?

And Roe v Wade only demanded UNRESTRICTED access to abortion rights in the first 2 trimesters. THAT is why the chicken shit roadblocks that have gone to SCOTUS have all been overturned.

Now ignore every point I’ve made and go back to patting yourself on the back because your “cause” is so much more “moral”.
richard mcenroe
January 26th, 2014 @ 12:59 pm

Suddenly happy I missed both.
richard mcenroe
January 26th, 2014 @ 1:01 pm

What the hell else is a foetus going to become, Texy? Is a foetus in a women’s womb going to turn out to be a cocker spaniel, or a porpoise, or even just more horse’s asses like your mama managed?
A foetus can become nothing but a mature human being. Therefore a foetus is human to start with.
RS
January 26th, 2014 @ 1:02 pm

Actually, the sophistry is attempting to draw a line between “human” and “not human” with no rational philosophical basis whatsoever, solely to allow its destruction predicated upon what’s personally expedient at the moment. Attempting to draw that line has always been the predicate to taking human life. The examples are legion.

As for enforcement of laws protecting human life, if doctors lost their licenses to practice medicine, abortion, it would eliminate the vast, vast majority of those willing to do it. Would it eliminate it entirely? Probably not. But that’s not an excuse for society refusing to protect human life.
gwvanderleun
January 26th, 2014 @ 1:04 pm

Once a formerly cute formerly amusing “comedienne” stoops to this level her career has already been over for some years. Anybody remember that wombscarred troll Janeane Garofalo?
DaveO
January 26th, 2014 @ 1:08 pm

Return the decision to have abortion to the state level – which conservatives are doing – at the state level. If the people of the state want to have abortion, then they have a say in it.
Roe v. Wade was argued on the basis to a right to privacy, which Obamacare eliminates. SCOTUS Justice Ginsberg has spoken about how Roe was a case of using subterfuge (deception) to gain a specific outcome. A ‘right’ gained by lying is not a right, because rights are self-evident and self-evidently true and need not require a lie. So I’m not ignoring what you wrote, you’re just incorrect in the matter of facts and substance. If you can, go back the arguments made at the time.
That which was guaranteed by Roe v. Wade no longer enjoys legal protection. Obamacare eliminated the right to privacy, including medical privacy. So Roe v. Wade and HIPAA are no longer operative. Because of that, now is the time for states to ask their question of their citizens on whether they want abortion, and to what degree.
Today, given the Gosnell horrors, and the case in Baltimore as well as other vectors, abortion is not safe. Never has been. Even abortions in the case of ectopic pregnancies carry risk.
In terms of science, by 1973, no scientist questioned when life began – it began at conception when the impregnated egg split into 2 cells, then 4, then more. Since 1973, politicians and activists have made the argument that life begins at viability, the earliest state in development in which a child can live. With greater and still greater improvements in medical technology, viability in now as early as 5 months. When you watch videos of abortions, you will witness human, living reactions made by the baby trying to avoid and defend it’s self from the needle and vacuum.
Pro-abortion is built on a lie, and built on a legal lie: that women have a right to privacy. As with every lie, another has to be created in order to justify the original and subsequent lies. Nothing good, safe, or sane comes from lies, and people who espouse the lie know that they lie and become jerks. Just admit it: you want to kill humans, but you lack the testicular fortitude to take on an adult.
FiftycalTX
January 26th, 2014 @ 1:17 pm

I have no reason to “want to kill humans” and can defend against the kind that have 2 legs and are upright and posing a threat to me. I just don’t see where it is anybody else’s BUSINESS what someone else does with their body and BUSYBODIES should stick to worrying about themselves and not whether some FOUR CELLED “human” is flushed out of some other female with the morning after pill.

Oh, and let me guess, all the anti-abortion types on this thread are MALE, right. Well sparkies, here’s a hint. YOU CAN”T GET PREGNANT!
Stogie Chomper
January 26th, 2014 @ 1:18 pm

There is no question that being anti-abortion is moral whereas being pro-abortion is not. And abortion is indeed murder, as a fetus more often than not has a beating heart, measurable brain waves and ten fingers and toes when it is aborted. Your attempt to deny the humanity of these fetuses is what is “pure sophistry.”
Proof
January 26th, 2014 @ 1:20 pm

I hear she copyrighted the phrase “Sarah Silverman is funny” so that when no one else ever says it, she can claim they are just respecting her copyright!
Stogie Chomper
January 26th, 2014 @ 1:24 pm

Garofalo is indeed a great example of a self-hating leftist.
Cube
January 26th, 2014 @ 1:27 pm

Rejection of the Good corrodes the soul. Once you’ve killed your own conscience, the rest comes fairly easily. But from the level of vitriol seen here, it’s pretty obvious she’s desperately and unsuccessfully trying to shout down the small voice still telling her she’s messed up.
Quartermaster
January 26th, 2014 @ 1:38 pm

Even if none of those existed at the time, a human life is still being terminated.
Quartermaster
January 26th, 2014 @ 1:40 pm

The inability to get pregnant is irrelevant to the argument. What counts are the facts about the child that was created at conception.
Quartermaster
January 26th, 2014 @ 1:42 pm

Morality is not determined by majority vote. Your argument is actually just an effort to prove how much “stupider” you are than a person with common sense and a modicum of knowledge of Biology.
Escher's House
January 26th, 2014 @ 1:47 pm

Silverman is much likelier to go the way of Janeane Garofolo. From once appealing and funny comedienne and actress to increasingly shrill, charmless and intellectually shallow political commentator.

I think the radical strident pro-abortion position comes from the heart of a deeply conflicted woman who has undergone at least one abortion and simply cannot admit that she deeply regrets her decision and doubles down again and again on her support for not only the right to make that the decision, but the decision itself.

I strongly suspect that not even Jesus could bring Sara off, unless he brought with him a bottle of tequila, a couple of Quaaludes and a jackhammer.

Now that we’ve made short shrift of Sara’s career, her sexuality and her motivations, let’s talk about her decision to use and abuse Jesus. Anyone up for a discussion of Jewish bigotry against Christianity?
kbiel
January 26th, 2014 @ 1:55 pm

She was celebrated for being bold and different. Now she’s about as edgy as a deflated basketball.
Hateful @SarahKSilverman Mocks Christianity in Pro-Abortion Video : The Other McCain | Dead Citizen's Rights Society
January 26th, 2014 @ 2:38 pm

[…] Hateful @SarahKSilverman Mocks Christianity in Pro-Abortion Video : The Other McCain. […]
cmehusky
January 26th, 2014 @ 3:08 pm

I got half-way through that, Does that count?
Dave
January 26th, 2014 @ 3:36 pm

You’re an idiot, but we already know that. Two haploid cells meet and form a growing diploid cell with unique human DNA. Of course it’s a human being, the science is unequivocal. Morally bankrupt people like yourself argue differently for one reason and one reason only: You want the ability to fuck without the responsibility of the possible consequences. It’s selfish, and it’s evil, but go ahead and REPLY IN CAPS some more, that’s sure to help you obfuscate the reality of what you’re defending.
Wraith
January 26th, 2014 @ 4:10 pm

I think you’re right, Stogie. And we’re in good company:
“They do not want to have your fortune; they want you to lose it. They do not wish to succeed; they want you to fail. The do not want to live; they want you to die.”
Ayn Rand had their number 60 years back. 🙁
Evi L. Bloggerlady
January 26th, 2014 @ 4:53 pm

I am surprised you lasted that long.