RadFem: ‘No Woman Is Heterosexual’

Posted on | February 12, 2014 | 157 Comments

How many times have I explained that feminism is an ideology of man-hating Marxist lesbian baby-killers? This is what feminists themselves say, if you bother to study feminist theory:

[University of California-Santa Cruz Women’s Studies] Professor Bettina Aptheker is the daughter of a famous American Communist, the late Herbert Aptheker . . .
Professor Bettina Aptheker is by her own proud admission both a Communist and a self-described “lesbian activist.” . . . Aptheker’scourse syllabus describes lesbianism as the “highest state of feminism” . . . In other words, change in sexual orientation is an inevitable final stage in the development of the socially conscious individual.

Allison Jaggar is professor of philosophy and a former chair of the Women’s Studies Department at the University of Colorado, Boulder . . . Integrating Marxism and feminist theory, Jaggar describes herself as a “socialist feminist” and “activist,” who seeks to combat “the male-dominant structure of everyday life.” . . .
“The political economy of socialist feminism,” writes Jaggar, “establishes that, in contemporary society, women suffer a special form of exploitation and expression. . . . The distinctive social experience of women generates insights that are incompatible with men’s interpretations of reality . . . The validity of these insights . . . must be tested in political struggle . . .”

Are we clear about this? Lesbianism is the “highest state of feminism” and feminist insights “are incompatible with men’s interpretations of reality.” This isn’t what I say about feminism. This is what feminists say about themselves. And if you think they don’t take themselves seriously, you’re not paying attention.

OK, so last night — I blame you, Kim Jossfolk — I was compelled to pay attention to the radical feminist (radfem) blogger who says all heterosexual intercourse (penis-in-vagina, PIV) is rape, and that when men read her blog, “they view it with the intent of harming radical feminists and women in general.”

One of my women-harming readers pointed out that the aforesaid radfem blogger has commenters on her blog who are equally crazy, if not more so. And I noticed this comment:

The first paragraph in your second post on heterosexual grooming is one of the best quotes I have ever found.

Oh, really? Let’s quote the first paragraph of “Grooming / pimping into heterosexuality: politics of love pt II“:

No woman is heterosexual. What men call heterosexuality is an institution where men make women captive for PIV, to control our reproductive functions and steal our labour. Heterosexuality, or sexuality with men does not exist, because the only relationship to men that exists is men’s violence, physical and mental invasion — one that men have so well crafted and disguised for so long that we can mistake it for attraction, sexual urges or love. All women’s “attraction” to men is 100% eroticised trauma bonding / stockholm syndrome. There is no other form of attraction to men possible than that. None. Any woman “sexually” or “sentimentally” attached to a man is ONLY trauma-bonded to him. This is a universal rule under patriarchy.

If any of you women think you are attracted to men, this can only be because you have been brainwashed, the radfem explains:

Men know how we react to their violence and deliberately manipulate our responses to increase their control over us, and to decrease the efforts it takes them to do so. It’s in men’s interest to disguise their violence as much as possible. It’s not for nothing that modern western patriarchy has perfected “psycho” and “behavioural” (brainwashing and mind-control) sciences for centuries as a powerful anti-women’s liberation tool, and that men rely so heavily on it to keep us at their knees, or rather, below their dicks. It’s part of the global male infrastructure that ensures men a constant supply of ready-tamed and pre-possessed women to effortlessly stick their dicks in, impregnate and abuse. The more it grows, the easier it is for each individual man to break any woman’s will and trick her into PIV and being owned by him — and maintain submission level with the help of men’s institutions.

Men “deliberately manipulate” women’s responses, to provide a “constant supply” for the “global male infrastructure.”

Read the whole thing — she’s got an entire theoretical infrastructure to explain all her zany assertions. And yes, there is a Part III:

When we define an act of violence and a system of oppression, we look at what the abuser or oppressor class does to the victim that qualifies as violence or oppression in any form. . . . When we define patriarchy we look at the structure, the pattern of what men do to us. All this is always external to us, outside of the victims. It doesn’t have anything to do with women and our individual choices as free beings but with men, patriarchy. Their violence is about them.
The very purpose of violence is to inflict something on you that you don’t want and that’s against your interest: the point is to harm, destroy you or go against your will. . . . The only reason we seem to be drawn to subordination to men is because men’s violence functions in a way that turns our survival impulse against ourselves . . .
Consent is meaningless and irrelevant with regards to defining men’s violence and describing the objective reality of it. The only ones to choose and want are those who do the violence: men. They choose to resort to violence because they want to obtain something from us that they wouldn’t otherwise be able to obtain (using us as their dick receptacles, control our reproduction). Will, calculation, intent and choice of means to achieve their end are all on their side. Saying that we choose and want it is a reversal and lie. The illusion of our choice protects men not us, because deception and reversal is in part how they maintain their rule.

You can read the entirety of that, too. To summarize radfem’s beliefs:

All acts of male-female sex are inherently violent.
All women are naturally lesbians.
Patriarchy manipulates women into thinking they want to have sex with men; women’s feelings of “love” toward men are actually the psychological side-effect of violent trauma.
Women’s “choice” in the context of heterosexual relationships is an illusion; the patriarchal system of oppression means that women are always victims of male violence.

This is what feminism is all about: Defining men as rapists, defining women as helpless victims, and promoting lesbianism.

Roses are red,
Violets are blue.
The heteronormative patriarchy
Is raping you.

Category: Feminism

Comments

157 Responses to “RadFem: ‘No Woman Is Heterosexual’”

Pauline Wolak
February 12th, 2014 @ 5:27 pm

I want to love this blog but clearly I’m just being brainwashed by the authoritative nature of your penis.
Zohydro
February 12th, 2014 @ 5:46 pm

There had to have been a Penisaurus erectus somewhere in that family tree…
RKae
February 12th, 2014 @ 6:06 pm

You need more grooming! Stop fighting it!
concern00
February 12th, 2014 @ 7:16 pm

Damn shame we wasted that rib on this one…
Dana
February 12th, 2014 @ 7:17 pm

I’ve been using that one for a while now. In fact, I’m not really sure when the last time I said something new was.
Dana
February 12th, 2014 @ 7:22 pm

D’you think she’d be more tolerant of the metrosexuals?
JeffS
February 12th, 2014 @ 7:23 pm

And hot pants!
Dana
February 12th, 2014 @ 7:23 pm

You know, I’d actually like to met this young lady, to try to talk to her, just to see if she is, in real life, what she purports to be on the internet.
Dana
February 12th, 2014 @ 7:25 pm

I always was disappointed that Wonder Woman wore full shorts, instead of a thong.
Dana
February 12th, 2014 @ 7:28 pm

Perhaps . . . http://www.worldofsuperheroes.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/wonder-woman-.jpg
JeffS
February 12th, 2014 @ 7:31 pm

I just hope that genetic engineering doesn’t discover viable cloning technology. With this level of weapons grade crazy, it’s bad enough that freezing sperm and in vitro fertilization are well developed techniques.
Evi L. Bloggerlady
February 12th, 2014 @ 7:57 pm

I would say Cabin Boy, but he would eat all the candy first.
Delaney Coffer
February 12th, 2014 @ 8:31 pm

They can have my PIV when they pry it from my cold dead…wait, shit. What were we talking about?
DaveO
February 12th, 2014 @ 8:33 pm

Like I’ve written before: people like these radfem are just bomb-vest wearers waiting their turn.
The Consequences Of Being An Ideologue – Part 69: Feminists | The Camp Of The Saints
February 12th, 2014 @ 8:50 pm

[…] a quote taken from another post by Stacy McCain [well-worth a read, as well, for his […]
darleenclick
February 12th, 2014 @ 8:59 pm

I keep wanting to believe she’s an over-the-top parody and her commenters are in on the joke.

Good flippin lord. She’s not just insane, but dangerous. I wouldn’t want her around ANY child, male or female.
Minicapt
February 12th, 2014 @ 9:02 pm

Roses are red,
Violets are blue,
Lesbians have no idea
What to do.

Cheers
Bob Belvedere
February 12th, 2014 @ 9:27 pm

THIS.
Bob Belvedere
February 12th, 2014 @ 9:33 pm

-Damn well put.

-These Feminists are suffering from First World Psychosis.
Bob Belvedere
February 12th, 2014 @ 9:34 pm

All the forms are, ultimately, seeking species suicide. They’re all Nihilists.
Bob Belvedere
February 12th, 2014 @ 9:35 pm

I’m not surprised…

http://thecampofthesaints.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/stacy-mccain-speedo-1990-264.jpg
DaveO
February 12th, 2014 @ 9:51 pm

Most, if not radfemz have their womens’ studies paid for by money the school makes from football. Did the radfemz not understand that the pigskin refers to the football, not a sister?
Taxpayer1234
February 12th, 2014 @ 10:23 pm

My husband’s heteronormative patriarchy makes me HAWT. ‘Scuse me, folks….
JeffS
February 12th, 2014 @ 10:36 pm

Better than hot pants! But there must be a downside for Wonder Woman when she’s engaged in hand-to-hand combat with the forces of evil. Unless she never gets knocked on her bum……

Of course, that outfit is PERFECT for … … mud wrestling … …

IYKWIMAITTYD.
Jason Lee
February 12th, 2014 @ 11:42 pm

#WarOnScience
Jason Lee
February 12th, 2014 @ 11:46 pm

Their sophistry is so thick you have to cut it with a chainsaw.
Jason Lee
February 13th, 2014 @ 12:15 am

She is suffering from a deep need to be dominated by a strong man. But she’s never been attractive enough to draw that kind of interest… Or maybe her sexual orientaion really is completely broken and she just wants the rest of the world to be more like her so she can fit in better.
Either way, this is an extreme example of the use of pathological defence mechanisms.
Jason Lee
February 13th, 2014 @ 12:26 am

O…M…G…
Nan
February 13th, 2014 @ 12:49 am

Drink heavily and hug a drag queen?
Nan
February 13th, 2014 @ 12:53 am

I think you need a Victoria’s Secret catalog. Isn’t that the antidote to this crap?
Kirby McCain
February 13th, 2014 @ 5:29 am

Hetronormative patriarchy? The next time a liberal says to me labels are bad, can I bitch slap that ass clown?
scarymatt
February 13th, 2014 @ 5:48 am

I’ve wondered if she isn’t really a man and it’s all an elaborate put on. Maybe she’s a trans-woman, which is why she can’t reveal herself to the rest of the rad-fems. Poe’s Law tells us we’ll never know if she’s a troll or just crazy.

Everyone knows there are no women on the Internet.
rmnixondeceased
February 13th, 2014 @ 7:11 am

Naw, I’m good. What they need is several rounds of Electo-Convulsive Therapy!
Dana
February 13th, 2014 @ 7:21 am

Wait! I’ve figure it out! Apparently XX chromosomes constitute a date rape drug!
RS
February 13th, 2014 @ 8:22 am

Um, point of order.
Zohydro
February 13th, 2014 @ 9:25 am

Indeed!
Dana
February 13th, 2014 @ 10:39 am

So, due to her violent tirade, if her boyfriend had agreed to do his boyfriendly duties, would she have been raping him?
Dana
February 13th, 2014 @ 10:39 am

I’ll bet that Witchwind is wishing she had a man around now, to shovel all of this snow!
Dana
February 13th, 2014 @ 10:41 am

Thing is, lezzies like their women cute, too.
Allan L
February 13th, 2014 @ 11:34 am

No. Not genetically. Parents teach children more or less the same values.
Dodd
February 13th, 2014 @ 12:09 pm

Are we certain this PIV=rape thing isn’t just a really successsful 4-chan initiative (like the bikinis and freeblood things)?

I mean, seriously. I grok that there are some seriously nutty people out there, but even Poe’s Law strains to allow for the possibility this is real.
Dana
February 13th, 2014 @ 1:44 pm

You know, since Witchwind specified only penis in vagina intercourse as being rape, does that mean she’s fine with sodomy? 🙂

OK, that’s awful; I denounce myself!
Quartermaster
February 13th, 2014 @ 3:40 pm

Wombat! Please ban Belvedere for posting that pic again.
Quartermaster
February 13th, 2014 @ 3:44 pm

Mine is going for a whirlpool suite at Country Inn and Suites. She doesn’t like strawberries either.
Quartermaster
February 13th, 2014 @ 3:52 pm

Women lie about their weight and age.
cmdr358
February 13th, 2014 @ 5:15 pm

And then she’d still be able to breed without the complications of a responsible (and legal) adult relationship.
cmdr358
February 13th, 2014 @ 5:23 pm

“Penetrate…with truth”

I can hear it now…”Men are raping our psyches with their so-called truth”
cmdr358
February 13th, 2014 @ 5:25 pm

Whatdya expect, coconuts?
:-
cmdr358
February 13th, 2014 @ 5:27 pm

Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.
cmdr358
February 13th, 2014 @ 5:30 pm

Who needs a lasso of truth when you got gams like those!