The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

‘Camp Epic’: Gay California Teacher Molested Boys as Young as 11

Posted on | March 16, 2014 | 129 Comments

“Allegedly”it’s important always to add “allegedly”:

Even as he allegedly abused the middle-school age children left in his care, even as he purportedly lied to parents about field trips throughout the Bay Area, court documents show that Ronald Guinto articulated a strict code to his campers: “What happens at Camp Epic stays at Camp Epic.”
What allegedly happened on the off-campus, overnight camping trips was repeated sexual abuse of 11-and 12-year old boys, the documents say. . . .
Authorities say Guinto recruited his victims while he was teaching at Making Waves Academy, a charter school in Richmond near Hilltop Mall, to join Camp Epic, an organization he founded in 2009 as part of his Master’s degree program in urban education. Nineteen students have been identified as participating in Camp Epic, which has no affiliation with the charter school . . . investigation into Guinto began on Oct. 29, when an administrator at Making Waves called Richmond police to report Guinto had been placed on administrative leave for an inappropriate Facebook conversation with an 11-year-old student, according to a probable cause statement by lead investigator Detective Walton Nelson.
Within weeks, investigators uncovered Guinto had taken students on trips to Mount Diablo State Park, San Jose, Yosemite, and Napa, engaging in sex acts with students inside tents beginning in December 2012 and ending as recently as Oct. 26, three days before police were notified, according to documents. On that outing, the parents of one of the boys said they thought their son and other students were camping overnight at Mare Island, but Guinto instead took them [to] a Motel 6 in Vallejo, Nelson wrote. Guinto allegedly slept in the same bed as two boys.
One 12-year-old boy told an investigator that his alleged abuse began in December 2012, when he was sleeping in a tent with Guinto and another student. Guinto allegedly asked the boy if he could fondle him, the first of about 30 such incidents spread over about 10 campouts, according to documents.
At a camping trip in Napa Skyline in 2013, the boy said, Guinto woke him up in the middle of the night to show him a video titled “Teacher Porn,” and then performed oral sex on him. . . .

Read the whole thing. Nothing to see here. Move along.

 

 

Comments

129 Responses to “‘Camp Epic’: Gay California Teacher Molested Boys as Young as 11”

  1. Dana
    March 16th, 2014 @ 3:16 pm

    Again, you have missed the point. In your claims concerning “prepubescent children,” you are missing the fact that most of these abuse cases are not about pedophilia, the sexual attraction to prepubescents, but hebephilia, the attraction to those entering puberty, generally 11 to 14 year olds, and slightly older teenagers.

    At least be honest with yourself.

  2. concern00
    March 16th, 2014 @ 3:17 pm

    Thanks for the clarification. Hereby it is noted that you are not having fun, but you are advocating for homosexuality and pedophilia.

    Glad we cleared that up.

  3. Anamika
    March 16th, 2014 @ 3:25 pm
  4. ZZZZZZZZ
    March 16th, 2014 @ 3:30 pm

    Yup. You support child molestation. Regardless of gender.

    Are you an acolyte of Harry Hay?

  5. Anamika
    March 16th, 2014 @ 3:31 pm

    Also note that I’m not “advocating for homosexuality and pedophilia.” That’s an imagination of your sick mind. I’m certainly against pedophilia and I’m certainly concerned about homophobia. There’s nothing wrong with homosexuality or heterosexuality. Are we clear now?

  6. ZZZZZZZZ
    March 16th, 2014 @ 3:36 pm

    You are certainly apologizing for homosexuality and pedophilia by attempting to explain it away, like that idiot pro-Putin concern troll who post links to Russian history so that we can “understand” the latest tyrant.

    (Yes, you are a concern troll.)

    And you certainly are not condemning, at the very least, pedophilia. Some people would give you a pass on not condemning homosexuality. But not condemning pedophilia? You condemn yourself as a support of both.

  7. Anamika
    March 16th, 2014 @ 3:37 pm

    Your assumptions and homophobia are not supported by facts or studies. The articles I have linked above is an opportunity to help you get rid of ingrained biases against homosexuality. Take it or leave it.

  8. Jeanette Victoria
    March 16th, 2014 @ 3:37 pm

    And her links are from advocates of degeneracy. How about some REAL FACTS
    Child Molestation & the Homosexual Movement http://goo.gl/9tUk39

    Homosexual activist and leader of the “It Gets Better” Campaign Dan Savage states, “we need to acknowledge the existence of good pedophiles.” http://goo.gl/a0qyK3

    Peter Tatchell, the UK’s most prominent homosexual activist, has done more than advocating the abolition of the age of consent, he has broken the
    age of consent law in Britain:” http://goo.gl/zBKfTa

  9. Anamika
    March 16th, 2014 @ 3:41 pm

    I provided you with broad studies on the subject and you defend yourself with the opinions about a few “scary” homosexual activists to justify your homophobia? Have an open mind; its hard to get rid of strong biases.

  10. Jeanette Victoria
    March 16th, 2014 @ 3:43 pm

    The “facts” you provided have been wrote by pro homosexual advocates.

  11. concern00
    March 16th, 2014 @ 3:46 pm

    And yet what we have here is a homosexual, (and of course there’s nothing wrong with that) taking advantage of boys. Why is it that far too many homosexuals (and of course there’s nothing wrong with that) like them young…too young, in fact?

  12. Anamika
    March 16th, 2014 @ 3:50 pm

    Right, just pick the facts that suit your biases, be in denial of the rest. Nice way to go through life.

    Undeniable fact: Jeanette Victoria is a homophobe and proud of it.

  13. Jeanette Victoria
    March 16th, 2014 @ 3:51 pm

    Ah I see we have a perversion apologist posting here who is trying to pretend that there is no link between pedophiles and homosexuality

    Study shows link between homosexuality and pedophilia
    http://www.theinterim.com/2002/sept/02study.html

    Homosexuals more likely to molest kids, study reports
    http://goo.gl/FmyZnW

    Dr. Judith Reisman’s work, exposing the fraudulent child sex studies of Dr. Kinsey, vindicated and confirmed…http://www.drjudithreisman.com/archives/ALEC%20paper.pdf

    Homosexuals Molest Children At A Far Higher Rate Than Heterosexuals http://goo.gl/f9j4VV

  14. Jeanette Victoria
    March 16th, 2014 @ 3:51 pm

    Pot kettle black

  15. Anamika
    March 16th, 2014 @ 4:00 pm

    My facts vs your facts. Anyone who is unbiased can see the problems with yours and the strength in mine.

    I’m sure, say even a Creationist can provide me links showing “scientific facts” that the earth was created 4000 years ago as written in the Bible. I’ll provide scientific studies to the contrary but I will be accused of being an Satan apologist or some such.

    Nobody can change the likes of you, certainly not me.

  16. Jeanette Victoria
    March 16th, 2014 @ 4:02 pm

    FYI the Bible never mentions how old the earth is…LOL even your pathetic attempt to smear fails

  17. Anamika
    March 16th, 2014 @ 4:09 pm

    I stand corrected, make that “Hebrew Bible.”

  18. Jeanette Victoria
    March 16th, 2014 @ 4:19 pm

    Greg Herek, a homosexual activist psychologist who advocates for pedophilia basis all of his statements from the fraudulent data of Alfred Kinsey. While explaining why homosexuality and pedophilia are completely unrelated, he does exactly that — frames pedophilia as an “orientation” of precisely the same sort

    How Homosexualists Redefine Homosexual Child Molesting http://goo.gl/ZTxaH9

  19. ZZZZZZZZ
    March 16th, 2014 @ 4:22 pm

    BZZZZZT!!! Attempting to change the subject when losing the debate!

    Penalty, 30 minute “time out” in a telephone booth with 3 denizens of ‘Frisco’s Castro District, chosen at random.

  20. Jeanette Victoria
    March 16th, 2014 @ 4:22 pm

    Care to point out the passage in the Tanakh where the exact age of the earth is given?

  21. Jeanette Victoria
    March 16th, 2014 @ 4:24 pm

    LOL it doesn’t really matter no where in the OT nor the NT ever mention the age of the earth

  22. Jeanette Victoria
    March 16th, 2014 @ 4:25 pm

    An “expert” offered by Herek was pro-pedoophile John de Cecco, Ph.D., who has also written affirmatively of man-boy “intergenerational intimacy” in the Journal of Homosexuality, and is an editor of PAIDIKA a Dutch pro-pedo publication.

  23. Jeanette Victoria
    March 16th, 2014 @ 4:27 pm

    Herek cited psychologist John Money, Ph.D. as an expert in sexual identity. In an interview published in the Dutch journal of pedophilia (PAIDIKA), Money once said, “If it [man-boy sexual contact] is consensual, it can be constructive.”

  24. ZZZZZZZZ
    March 16th, 2014 @ 4:27 pm

    No, but that doesn’t keep Anamika from (a) lying through its teeth, and (b) attempting to change the subject.

    One can’t stop Anamika from lying (which she does often), but calling her on her rhetorical slight of hand is a different matter.

  25. ZZZZZZZZ
    March 16th, 2014 @ 4:32 pm

    Anamika loathes real facts (i.e., “truth”). They get in the way of it’s ideology and personal pleasure.

  26. Jeanette Victoria
    March 16th, 2014 @ 4:33 pm

    Not to mention her links don’t even prove her point

  27. Dana
    March 16th, 2014 @ 4:35 pm

    Let me see if I understand this: I present the facts that men who sexually abuse minors abuse boys to afar greater extent than the homosexual percentage of the population, while you just cite (supposedly) learned studies saying that, oh, homosexuality has nothing to do with it, but which cannot explain why males are victims in such large numbers, but I’m the one with biases?

  28. Anamika
    March 16th, 2014 @ 4:36 pm

    Age of Earth is supposedly interpreted as less than 10,000 years and perhaps about 4000 BC according to literal interpretations of the scriptures.

    You can go through this:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Young_Earth_creationism
    That was just an example to illustrate the kind of unscientific crazy views some people hold. According to Gallup 2011 survey, apparently, 3 in 10 Americans still interpret the Bible literally.

  29. ZZZZZZZZ
    March 16th, 2014 @ 4:37 pm

    Using the ad hominem rhetorical trick while losing a debate, as a ploy to invoke emotional response and change the subject, eh?

    Sucks to be you, huh?

  30. Dana
    March 16th, 2014 @ 4:38 pm

    Even the “Hebrew Bible” doesn’t give such a date. The 6,000 (not 4,000) year estimate was done by counting back the given ages for the Patriarchs listed in Genesis.

  31. Jeanette Victoria
    March 16th, 2014 @ 4:39 pm

    Reisman and Barber said that Fred Berlin was at the B4U-Act meeting where all they did was argue that pedophilia wasn’t that harmful to children and that the DSM should be revised to help decrease social stigma on pedophilia. Berlin is responsible for coaching the Catholic church to move the homosexual molesting priests around rather than giving them the boot and sending them to jail.

    http://dailycaller.com/2011/08/15/conference-aims-to-normalize-pedophilia/

  32. ZZZZZZZZ
    March 16th, 2014 @ 4:41 pm

    Jeannette asked you to point the passage in the Tanakh. Wikipedia is an on-line reference with limited quality control. That does not make it any sort of holy scripture, let along the Tanakh, even if you are a godless commie.

  33. Dana
    March 16th, 2014 @ 4:42 pm

    But, but, but, Jeanette, the problem is that the learned professionals see the victims as children, not as boys or as girls. They do so, like our good friend Anamika, so that they can study the subject without causing any aspersions to be placed on homosexuals. They ignore the elephant in the room because they want to ignore the elephant in the room!

    Liberal acceptance of homosexuality requires the ignoring of any evidence, any evidence at all, that homosexuality might have some negative consequences; they don’t look at the facts objectively because they can’t look at the facts objectively.

  34. Jeanette Victoria
    March 16th, 2014 @ 4:50 pm

    She is apparently reading disabled I asked for verse not the results of a survey from Wikipedia EPIC FAIL

  35. mackykam
    March 16th, 2014 @ 4:52 pm

    Are we still talking about Michael Jackson?

  36. Jeanette Victoria
    March 16th, 2014 @ 4:53 pm

    Homosexual pro-pedophile advocates are not my idea of unbiased sources

  37. Anamika
    March 16th, 2014 @ 4:54 pm

    I find it really surprising that you are ignorant about Young Earth Creationism and creationism histroy. There’s no one verse. See Genesis and their literal interpretations that yield the age of Earth as soemwhere between about 6000 and 10,000 years old. Please stop nitpicking and hijacking this thread with alternate debate.

  38. Jeanette Victoria
    March 16th, 2014 @ 4:56 pm

    I’m not nit picking YOU bought it up! As a pathic insult thinking somehow you were referring to me. There is no verse in the scriptures referring to the age of the earth

  39. Anamika
    March 16th, 2014 @ 5:03 pm

    I didn’t call you a creationist. Creationism was just an example to illustrate the craziness that still remains among the religious in America. I was suggesting that your links/”facts”(like the scientific “facts”, not just the ones in scripture, provided by the creationists) doesn’t prove anything except your own biases against homosexuality which you see as a sin as per your strong religious beliefs and nothing will change that.

  40. Jeanette Victoria
    March 16th, 2014 @ 5:17 pm

    Oh like the fact the “sources” you posted had pedophile apologist as their experts. How about this FACT! It was Dr Fred Berlin from John Hopkins (who was at the B4U-Act meeting where all they did was argue that pedophilia wasn’t that harmful to children) is the person responsible for
    coaching the Catholic church to move the homosexual molesting priests around rather than giving them the boot and sending them to jail.

    Oh PLEASE stop lying that you interested in facts you aren’t

  41. Anamika
    March 16th, 2014 @ 5:19 pm

    “but which cannot explain why males are victims in such large numbers, but I’m the one with biases?”

    No, you are not. Where do you get these numbers from if not for your biases? Its true men are bigger offenders but girls are far more abused than boys in the US:

    The Centers for Disease Control and the U.S. Department of Justice have found that 11% of high school girls and 4% of high school boys report having been forced to have sex at some point.
    http://journalistsresource.org/studies/government/criminal-justice/global-prevalence-child-sexual-abuse/

    Researchers estimate that in our country about one out of six boys and one out of four girls are sexually abused.
    http://www.ptsd.va.gov/public/types/violence/child-sexual-abuse.asp

  42. ZZZZZZZZ
    March 16th, 2014 @ 5:24 pm

    You’re still changing the subject. That means you know you are still losing the debate.

  43. Dana
    March 16th, 2014 @ 5:32 pm

    Trouble is, the vast, vast! majority of abusers are male, as even you have said. Despite you having given two widely disparate estimates, which show that more girls, in absolute terms, are abused than boys, since homosexuals make up only 2 to 4% of the population, it still winds up that sexual abuse is disproportionately homosexual in nature because the homosexual population is so small.

  44. Zohydro
    March 16th, 2014 @ 5:47 pm

    No… We’re talking about paedophilia, pederasty, ephebophilia, hebephilia, homosexuality and intergenerational intimacy!

  45. daleyrocks
    March 16th, 2014 @ 5:50 pm

    Dana – You are not supposed to question Anamika’s link from an openly gay psychologist.

  46. Dana
    March 16th, 2014 @ 5:53 pm

    Is the psychologist homosexual? I neither knew nor cared, but if is is, then it would seem that he might have a conflict of interest there.

  47. Anamika
    March 16th, 2014 @ 5:54 pm

    “Despite you having given two widely disparate estimates,”

    That’s “reported cases” vs “estimated cases”, that explains the discrepancy.

    Like I wrote earlier any person that abuses a male child isn’t automatically a homosexual, same with a woman and a girl.

  48. Jeanette Victoria
    March 16th, 2014 @ 5:55 pm

    She is a cheerleader for pederasty

  49. daleyrocks
    March 16th, 2014 @ 5:58 pm

    Kevin Jennings could not be reached for comment.

  50. Dana
    March 16th, 2014 @ 5:58 pm

    And that is where we differ: if a male sexually assaults another male, whether the victim is an adult or a child, the assault is homosexual in nature.

    You wish to try to dismiss that very obvious truth, but that is just plain silly.