Sir Dana @Milbank, White Knight
Posted on | April 1, 2014 | 51 Comments
Being a liberal means you have license to speak for the oppressed, as the enlightened and beneficent custodian of their interests. White male Dana Milbank goes “mansplaining” a Women’s History Month Event because ladies don’t understand this stuff:
The conservative minds of the Heritage Foundation have found a way for Republicans to shrink the gender gap: They need to persuade more women to get their MRS degrees.
The advocacy group held a gathering of women of the right Monday afternoon to mark the final day of Women’s History Month — and the consensus was that women ought to go back in history. If Facebook executive Sheryl Sandberg’s mantra is “lean in,” these women were proposing that women lean back: get married, take care of kids and let men earn the wages.
See? Mona Charen, Mollie Hemingway and Karin Agness shouldn’t worry their pretty little heads. They should just outsource their thinking to the gallant Sir Dana Milbank, and let him speak on their behalf. He’s got an Honorary Vagina, you know.
And hey, it’s not like there are any facts involved:
An unmarried woman with children is much more likely to be poor than her married counterpart. According to the National Poverty Center, “Poverty rates are highest for families headed by single women, particularly if they are black or Hispanic. In 2010, 31.6 percent of households headed by single women were poor, while 15.8 percent of households headed by single men and 6.2 percent of married-couple households lived in poverty.” Those aren’t numbers made up to scare women into voting Republican; they’re facts.
According to a 2013 Gallup poll, a whopping 56 percent of 18 to 34 years olds are unmarried men and women who want to get married. In contrast, only 9 percent are unmarried and not interested in getting married. . . . The desire to be married isn’t something conservative scam artists made up; it’s something that most young adults want.
Nor is it only conservatives who are pushing for women with kids to work part-time or not at all. In 2012, a whopping 67 percent of mothers of minor children surveyed by the Pew Research Center wanted to either work part-time or not work. That’s what women say they want, not what conservatives say women want.
That’s from Katrina Trinko, who is merely a woman, and not a feminist like Sir Dana Milbank, Knight of the Honorary Vagina.
@rsmccain @AceofSpadesHQ @jtLOL @iowahawkblog It's a fine line between "white knight" and "mangina."
— Instapundit.com (@instapundit) April 1, 2014
Comments
51 Responses to “Sir Dana @Milbank, White Knight”
April 1st, 2014 @ 11:29 am
[…] TOM: Sir Dana @Milbank… […]
April 1st, 2014 @ 11:31 am
RT @smitty_one_each: TOM Sir Dana @Milbank, White Knight http://t.co/MaZvSdjMiw #TCOT
April 1st, 2014 @ 11:40 am
Shorter Milbank: “We can’t let pesky facts infect . . . The Vagina!
April 1st, 2014 @ 11:51 am
All men ( well I spose most) are genocidal maniacs. Every time one has an involuntary nocturnal (or in the daytime) emission one is committing genocide. Billions of sperm; potential human beings, expire on the bedsheets or wherever.
Well I reckon all women have the potential to put a stop to this genocide.
All they have to do is put themselves in the way.
April 1st, 2014 @ 11:52 am
Please note that the Dana who comments here is not Sir Dana of Milbank.
Our friends on the left have taken the accumulated wisdom of all of human history, wisdom which set up marriage in every society known to us previously, and decided that it’s just old fashioned, uncool and irrelevant.
April 1st, 2014 @ 11:56 am
You do know that Monty Python was just being amusing with the “Every Sperm Is Sacred” song, right?
April 1st, 2014 @ 12:08 pm
??
Jewish law clearly prohibits male masturbation. This law is derived from the story of Onan (Gen. 38:8-10), who practiced coitus interruptus as a means of birth control to avoid fathering a child for his deceased brother. G-d killed Onan for this sin. Although Onan’s act
was not truly masturbation, Jewish law takes a very broad view of the acts
prohibited by this passage, and forbids any act of ha-sh’cha’tat zerah (destruction of the seed), that is, ejaculation outside of the vagina. In fact,
the prohibition is so strict that one passage in the Talmud states, “in the case of a man, the hand that reaches below the navel should be chopped off.” (Niddah 13a)
April 1st, 2014 @ 12:15 pm
I’m sorry, was I supposed to care what sort of idiocy dribbles out of Sir Dana’s pir-hole?
April 1st, 2014 @ 12:34 pm
Be interesting to find out how many poor women REMAIN poor even after taking advantage of the liberating therapies Planned Parenthood offers.
April 1st, 2014 @ 12:34 pm
“Gevalt! You scratch one knee…”
April 1st, 2014 @ 1:39 pm
EXCEPT for the homosexuals where it is a time-honoured tradition of indescribable dignity and poignancy like the drag show at Kadena AFB or the Folsom Street Fair…
April 1st, 2014 @ 1:55 pm
We truly don’t know this guy’s heart, as black as it may seem to us. The Lord does though. Mere contemplation of scripture, however misguided, is an auspicious start. Road to Damacus moments are well-documented. God works that way sometimes, and it’s something we can all discuss with Him in our next prayers.
April 1st, 2014 @ 1:55 pm
You’re not Canadian, are you?
April 1st, 2014 @ 1:59 pm
Nope!
April 1st, 2014 @ 2:38 pm
Quite right!
Every sperm is sacred!
April 1st, 2014 @ 2:43 pm
Wow. Anamika.
Used to part of the feminist spiel that all men were rapists!!
April 1st, 2014 @ 2:46 pm
Genocide for sure! But the one whereby so many men have their hands
removed for too much below-the-navel activity that the society cannot
function: the men can’t do much with one or zero hands, they die and the
society grinds to a halt.
April 1st, 2014 @ 2:50 pm
Anamika, are you targeting Dana Milbank’s Jewish ancestry and his feminism with your misogynistic jewish law & genocide remark?
April 1st, 2014 @ 2:54 pm
Oh!
Yes quite. Well, that too 🙂
There’s got to be something about masturbatus reservatus somewhere…
April 1st, 2014 @ 2:55 pm
Brilliant from Monty Python
Laughed and laughed
Thanks Fin & G
April 1st, 2014 @ 3:00 pm
Didn’t know he is a jew…..
April 1st, 2014 @ 3:52 pm
Riiiiight…
April 1st, 2014 @ 4:14 pm
That’s what they ALL say . . .
April 1st, 2014 @ 4:16 pm
Milbank’s been at WaPo writing this crap for 20+ years now.
So, yeah, we DO know his heart – it belongs to Daddy Barack and all his Socialist cousins.
Dude is a leftist propagandist, nothing more.
April 1st, 2014 @ 4:52 pm
[…] Sir Dana @Milbank, White Knight […]
April 1st, 2014 @ 6:01 pm
[…] although research shows she has that backward: poor people are more likely to be single. And Stacy McCain rebukes Milbank’s “mansplaining,” but Taylor Marsh offered an almost identical analysis. Will telling women marry help the GOP win […]
April 1st, 2014 @ 8:52 pm
Feminism, however, encourages a woman to make choices that end up placing her in a terrible position in life.
http://no-maam.blogspot.ca/2012/06/keynesian-sexual-marketplace.html
The post leads to others that bear thinking about.
April 1st, 2014 @ 9:55 pm
It’s very important to liberals that they belittle women who choose to be married and be mothers. The over the top bullshit from liberals is that accumulating wealth is bad but women should abandon the idea of raising children to engage in materialistic pursuits. A friend who works in a school said, ‘forty years ago we didn’t have kids coming to school and shooting their classmates. What changed?’ Well, more children are growing up in single parent homes and we started giving them mood altering drugs so they’d be manageable. These are just inconvenient facts for the liberal intelligentsia. Inconvenient, like a mother and father noticing something going on with their daughter and finding a rat named Kate Hunt. And look who the left chose to champion.
April 1st, 2014 @ 10:02 pm
Glad I had that vasectomy.
April 1st, 2014 @ 10:27 pm
Dear Dana, there is no honor in using one’s butthole as a vagina.
April 1st, 2014 @ 10:38 pm
Dana went to a Penn State summer camp 20 years ago. Cut him some slack….He understands what it’s like to be a bottom….
April 1st, 2014 @ 10:41 pm
Oh please. The Republican Party dreams of turning this country into Saudi Arabia, where women are chattel and aren’t even allowed to drive. Instead of smearing an excellent writer, you should be talking about Republican criminals that destroy the lives of women, children, minorities, and gays in order to enrich Big Oil, Halliburton, and the Koch Brothers. It is no secret the criminal Koch Brothers are funding the smear campaign against the black President’s signature initiative in order to dissuade women from signing up in order to have access to healthcare. It is astounding that The right wing jumps to aim hate at a writer while ignoring Republican hate for millions of women.
April 1st, 2014 @ 10:50 pm
Oh take it easy on the guy, It’s probably Sir Milbank’s only ticket to bedding one of the women who believe the stuff he writes.
April 1st, 2014 @ 11:51 pm
Sure, Princess. You go on telling yourself whatever Soros-approved fairy-tales you have to so you can sleep at night. Just don’t labor too hard under the delusion that they actually resemble reality.
April 2nd, 2014 @ 12:07 am
Never mind.
April 2nd, 2014 @ 12:09 am
Wrong. He is doucheish.
April 2nd, 2014 @ 12:49 am
Honorary vaginas are never as much fun as the real deal.
April 2nd, 2014 @ 3:02 am
Dana’s a woman’s name anyway. He’s just a little gender dysphoric or whatever the phrase is.
April 2nd, 2014 @ 5:30 am
Bottom line, liberals would always rather be right than happy.
April 2nd, 2014 @ 5:31 am
So I guess the millions of Republican women ALSO hate millions of women?
April 2nd, 2014 @ 7:12 am
They always end up being neither.
April 2nd, 2014 @ 7:15 am
Great sarcasm. This is as realistic Dem BS as you can get.
April 2nd, 2014 @ 8:41 am
I’m a woman, not a feminist (or, as I prefer to call them, “vaginalogues”). And as a woman, I would like to punch Sir Dana of Milbank, Protector of the Vaginal Realm, right in his doughy face, along with every one of his vaginalogue cohorts.
April 2nd, 2014 @ 9:36 am
Apparently crazy Christians (in real life, not Monty Python) make it a mission to tell everyone that masturbation turns people gay.
April 2nd, 2014 @ 9:36 am
The problem with the numbers is that as soon as the left smartens up about this they will use them to justify additional re-distributive programs and taxes in order to “equalize” the single parents and married parents so as to reduce the advantages a couple has over a single parent. More subsidizing of poor lifestyle choices is just a short way down the road.
April 2nd, 2014 @ 10:10 am
I thought Bill Clinton had the trademark on the “lean over” line. Or maybe “bend over.”
April 2nd, 2014 @ 11:44 am
You mean they think — shh! don’t tell anyone — it’s *deviant*? LOL!
April 2nd, 2014 @ 1:43 pm
*snigger* either the best sarcasm ever, or the best example of leftwing stupidity ever.
April 3rd, 2014 @ 11:18 am
Perhaps it is better to say they would rather be perceived as being right, since it is pretty rare that they ever actually are right.
April 3rd, 2014 @ 1:04 pm
Okay let’s say they like to perceive themselves as being right, which they ALWAYS do.