Wombs for Rent, Babies for Sale: TV Promotes Gay Surrogate Business

Posted on | May 1, 2014 | 66 Comments

Barrie Drewitt-Barlow is CEO of the British Surrogacy Centre, a business that specializes in hiring surrogate mothers for gay men:

Barrie and his partner were the first same sex couple in the UK to use a surrogate mother and to be recognised on the birth certificate of those children, as parent 1 and parent 2. Over the past 14 years Barrie has been involved in many media shows to highlight surrogacy and same sex parenting . . .

Now Britain’s Sky TV is promoting this lucrative trade in human flesh:

Britain’s first gay parents are appearing in their own TV show, recording the path to surrogacy.
The Parent Makers, which is set to air on Sky this month, follows the lives of Barrie and Tony Drewitt-Barlow, who run the British Surrogacy Centre, in Chandlers Quay, Maldon.
The 10-episode series will feature footage of their lives at home, at work, wedding preparations and how they deal with their five children, Saffron, Aspen, Orlando, Jasper and Dallas.
Barrie, 43, said TV bosses are so impressed with the first series that they have already given the go-ahead for a second, which will begin filming in July.

How wonderful — free advertising for your baby-selling business!

And, of course, what could possibly go wrong?

Two Gay Men Used Russian Surrogate
Mother to Create Boy for Sex Abuse Ring

Peter Truong and Mark Newton with their 5-year-old sex toy, 2010

Perhaps you’ve forgotten that story from last July:

Police Vow to Pursue Pedophile
Ring ‘To the Ends of the Earth’
Authorities in Australia say they intend to apprehend and prosecute every member of an international child pornography ring that exploited a boy who was molested from infancy by two men who reportedly created him with a Russian surrogate mother. “With this network, rest assured that we will pursue them to the ends of the Earth to make sure each and every one of them faces justice for what their role has been in crimes against this child,” Queensland Police Officer Jon Rouse told the Australian Broadcasting Company.
Officer Rouse is a member of Task Force Argos, the special unit that investigated the case of two Australian men who sexually molested a boy for six years, providing video of their crimes — and even paid sexual encounters with the boy — to an “international syndicate” of pedophiles called the Boy Lovers Network.
Mark Newton, 42, was sentenced to 40 years in federal prison last week by U.S. District Court Judge Sarah Evans Barker. Authorities say Newton and his partner, Peter Truong, 36, paid a Russian woman $8,000 to give birth to a boy they said was conceived using artificial insemination with Newton’s sperm. The men began sexually abusing the boy before he was two weeks old, recording the acts on video they shared online with other pedophiles.
“What can be said? What can be done to erase some of the horror of this?” Judge Barker said Friday in giving the maximum sentence to Newton, an American who had become an Australian citizen. Prosecutors said the case was tried in Judge Barker’s U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana because images of the boy were found on the computer of an Indiana man who was arrested as part of a larger child-pornography investigation.
Records in the case had previously been sealed, the Indianapolis Star reported. Newton and Truong made the boy available for molestation by other men in France, Germany and the United States, according to prosecutors. “For more than one year and across three continents, these men submitted this young child to some of the most heinous acts of exploitation that this office has ever seen,” said U.S. Attorney Joe Hogsett.
Two U.S. men, John R. Powell, 41, of Florida; and Jason Bettuo, 36, of Illinois, also face federal charges in connection with the case. Police say they believe Newton and Truong created the boy “for the sole purpose of exploitation,” according to the Sydney Morning Herald . . .
Prosecutors said videos showed the boy “performing sex acts on Newton with a disturbing level of sophistication” when the boy was not yet 2 years old. At least eight different men had sex with the boy, investigators believe. ”The purchase of the child for the explicit and sole purpose of exploiting him across a network of men is incredibly depraved and very sad tale for that little boy,” Officer Rouse said.

So, nothing at all to worry about: Just a TV network promoting a business that rents out wombs to supply gay men with babies.

Barrie Drewitt Barlow is @Gaydads on Twitter. The Sky TV show has its own Twitter account, @TheParentMakers.

(Hat-tip: @gaysabovethelaw on Twitter.)

Category: Gays, Great Britain

Comments

66 Responses to “Wombs for Rent, Babies for Sale: TV Promotes Gay Surrogate Business”

Evi L. Bloggerlady
May 1st, 2014 @ 8:52 pm

Most surrogate parents are sincere, but there is something questionable about a male same sex couple wanting surrogate children.
robertstacymccain
May 1st, 2014 @ 9:08 pm

The commercialization of reproduction is, in itself, cause for concern. Given what we know about the Newton-Truong, we are entitled to speculate that some percentage of such baby-for-sale transactions will lead to horror stories. It does not matter, really what that percentage might be, because there is no practical way to tell the “good” baby-buyers from the bad ones.

Whether there is any policy implication here, I’ll let others decide for themselves. But young women should be made aware of who might be hiring their services as a surrogate — and why.
CrustyB
May 1st, 2014 @ 9:15 pm

Some poor kid won’t know what it’s like to have a mother so two sick people can pretend to be normal.
gaysabovethelaw
May 1st, 2014 @ 9:25 pm

Great article my friend! 1 fact inaccurate. They (Mark Newtown Peter Truong) masquraded it was surrogate baby in an Australia Federal Police Censored @ABCFarNorth radio (available outside Australia at tinyurl.com/eqlove). Peter Truong wanted a sentance reduction because he claimed he only paid $4000 for the baby instead of $8000! Also Mark Newtown has something in common with Barrie! He attacked the Church in this CSU Long Beach Student 49’ers student newspaper for not letting them marry and have kids for what our AFP friends said was “for the sole purpose of sexual exploitation”
http://www.csulb.edu/~d49er/spring99/v6n88-samesex.html

I added annotations to the ABC admissions the ABC made when they admitted to praising a boylover dot net “model father” here! This is why if you didn’t know Putin and the Russian democracy made those anti-gay propaganda / adoption laws. India just made the same! California needs to follow now to shut these people down!

For those who wont be offended from some course language and want more details on this saga please see http://tinyurl.com/gaydadschurchsuingbabysellers

Also there you’ll see how my first born US child was ripped from me by the actions of a mainstream media confirmed, gay man, pedophile police officer in Bakersfield California! Please vote this up if you liked @rsmccain’s great work and FOLLOW HIM for the breaking news!
gaysabovethelaw
May 1st, 2014 @ 9:32 pm

Oh and of course I forgot to plug your follow up article on this! @pinknews and @itvnews told All gays in England where surrogacy is illegal.
@HFEA : http://www.hfea.gov.uk/fertility-treatment-options-surrogacy.html
“GAYS DID YOU KNOW YOU CAN GET BABIES [FROM AMERICA or the 3rd world!] Don’t let the politicians say it’s illegal” SHAME SHAME SHAME! They were covertly promoting this business! Give them hell R.S. McCain!

India and Russia have made laws to stop gay dads buying their oprhans / surrogates! California is where all this filth is going on! Get in touch with your lawmakers so American can follow suit – hopefully before the end of these @gaydads clowns second season. Let’s put them out of business!

Vote up so all your good friends can see this shocking video (Thanks to AdamAndEveNotSteve1 youtube channel)
gaysabovethelaw
May 1st, 2014 @ 9:38 pm

Also worth sharing! They have the same gay guy being asked to fill a cup in two different TV shows! Clearly something is contrived. He even says “I don’t think I can fill it” in both different TV shows (one of them being @TheParentMakers shame!)

The First Informercial: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V_fAmDVN3Jk
(my channel)

The Second Infomercial aka @TheParentMakers:

(their channel)

Again vote up so everyone sees how scummy and fake these publicity whores are!
gaysabovethelaw
May 1st, 2014 @ 10:06 pm

Don’t forget @freshchilli at ABC who deleted all her 2010 tweets to protect those in the gay marriage lobby that introduced these men (tinyurl.com/abcplugspedos) were clearly a part of. US court transcript shows Drake was abused by Australian gays! State media protects pedophile ring and destroys evidence. Also gays can’t claim that these men have nothing to do with gay marriage. In the youtube video description is a PRO-Gay Marriage website using an uncensored photo (yawningbread blogspot com) of a gay dads rape victim as a poster boy for gay marriage – where the gays say “who can argue with us now – gay marriage is right look at this happy rainbow family” captioned below a gay rape victim. They can’t have their fudge-pudding and eat it too! This is clearly linked to the gay marriage debate. More information on the ABC cover-up at http://billmuehlenberg.com/2013/12/10/more-tales-from-the-tolerance-thugs/ – the journalist even wanted photo credits for the rape victims uncensored photo from the rival media outlets when the story broke! Also of note the leader of Australia’s “Marriage Equality” lobby Alex Greenwich MP is no friend of mine. He’s trying to make a law to force a gay subculture in Catholic and Islamic schools (http://tinyurl.com/vinnyeastwoodshow pg3) – and before he was a politician he ran gay parties that donated money to little kids in the nippers (Australian Surf-Life Savers). He owns the trademark to “BondiBoys” with IP Australia and here’s his old blog! http://bondiboys.blogspot.com/ Where you can see his pubic hair.
M. Thompson
May 1st, 2014 @ 10:09 pm

I’m just disgusted by some of those people. Raising children to molest them, and the obsession there is about normallizing the habit…

Stop the world, I WANT TO GET OFF!
Bob Belvedere
May 1st, 2014 @ 10:11 pm

Can I join you?
Anon Y. Mous
May 1st, 2014 @ 10:13 pm

I don’t really have a problem with surrogacy, but I don’t approve of homosexual couples being allowed to adopt. It is not in the best interest of the child.

If it is your standard run of the mill infertile MF couple, I don’t see why they shouldn’t arrange for a surrogate, if they can afford it. I also don’t see any reason that she shouldn’t be paid for her contribution.

The problem with the pedophiles who got that little boy is not the process by which the boy was conceived, but rather that a gay couple was allowed to have custody of him.
Evi L. Bloggerlady
May 1st, 2014 @ 10:15 pm

By its very nature it should be treated as adoption (and heavily regulated and monitored). But of course, it is not. Brave. New. World.
Anamika
May 1st, 2014 @ 10:17 pm

Do you realize that there are millions of cases of parental child sex abuse in traditional marriages. Are you just blind to them? And only shudder when you hear about those damn frightening gay couples.
gaysabovethelaw
May 1st, 2014 @ 10:22 pm

Also inaccurate “not less than 2 years old” is a LIE that comes from the ABC. See above. It’s “less than two weeks old” according to NY Daily News.
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/2-convicted-adopted-son-porn-article-1.1385895
The scrag Ginger Goreman also went there too asking for photo credits for a gay dad’s rape victim just like I caught her on twitter doing to Sydney Morning Heralds Nick Ralston. Maybe you could use your connections to get a copy of her email to the NY Daily News.
???
May 1st, 2014 @ 10:39 pm

Hmm… I acknowledge that statistic, but that has no epistemic relevance to this.

Since my feet are on terra firma, I ask you, what ethically “bugs” you about this. There was no invocation of moral repugnance at this same practice, so I assume you have no moral principles. Yes, no moral principles…
You’ve come a long way baby: Barista Rule 5 | Batshit Crazy News
May 1st, 2014 @ 10:40 pm

[…] And TOM notes, if barista work is not your bag, there is always renting your uterus for gay couple surrogate babies… […]
Evi L. Bloggerlady
May 1st, 2014 @ 10:43 pm

Compared to renting your uterus, The post graduate barista jobs don’t seem so bad in comparison, do they?
Anamika
May 1st, 2014 @ 10:45 pm

quote: “the obsession there is about normallizing the habit…”

He is talking about same sex couples raising kids.
M. Thompson
May 1st, 2014 @ 10:45 pm

I’m referring to the Truong-Newton incident. It’s egrerious when people claim not to behave in a certain fashion, and then behave in that fashion.

Otherwise, this is the first time I’ve been Annimika’d. Is that a badge of honor around here?
M. Thompson
May 1st, 2014 @ 10:47 pm

Er, no, it’s about treating one of THE taboo behavoirs in human society as normal.
Anamika
May 1st, 2014 @ 10:53 pm

Who is obsessed about normalizing “Truong-Newton” behavior? It’s all in you head.

By your silly logic proponents of traditional family values must be obsessively normalizing parental child sex abuse too.
Anamika
May 1st, 2014 @ 10:56 pm

You consider homosexuality as a taboo behavior in this day and age. You are against “normalizing” it. You make my point more clear. And that answers “???”.
???
May 1st, 2014 @ 11:13 pm

You seem rather trained in the character-assassination yourself, Anamika. The initiates will deal with it

“By your silly logic ”

Lest not forget that concluding sentence, which dies the death of a thousand deductive arguments.

I submit that anyone who carefully reads the above passages and thinks about it objectively will be able to see that your argument is a blatant non sequitur. You’re making one or the other of the following mistakes. You’re either attempting to banish a substantive question by terminological fiat, or you’re equivocating on ‘family values proponents.’. That is all.
Zohydro
May 1st, 2014 @ 11:19 pm

Save a seat for me!
Anamika
May 1st, 2014 @ 11:27 pm

I might be guilty of equivocation of same-sex parental child abuse with traditional marriage parental sex abuse. Statistics *perhaps* lean more favorably towards the good parenting skills of the former (but that’s a different debate.)

Down the line M. Thompson made his views on the issue more clear. He doesn’t just hate Truong & Newton (who wouldn’t) he also detests societal “normalizing” of same sex behavior so much so that he wants to stop the rotating Sphere and get off it to go some place where ~~there is no child sex abuse~~ gay behavior doesn’t bother him.
gaysabovethelaw
May 1st, 2014 @ 11:48 pm

Did yon u realize a single gay man is at least 3 times more likely to rape a child than a hetro? My father breaks it down here: https://www.causes.com/posts/891061

JamesCantor.com is the world expert on the MEDICAL (not only quack gay dominated psychological fields) links between homosexuality and paedophilia.

That’s the study my father cites. It says 1/10 pedos are gay. Are gays 10% of the Population. No that’s the Kinsey Myth and his love of Alister Crowley the satantic child murderer.

I really break it down on Austin’s 90.1FM radio (call GLAAD dot or and CRY) here:

And of course my filthy language on the home of pissed of patriots usa.rightwingamerica.com is here:
http://tinyurl.com/gaydadschurchsuingbabysellers

@rsmccain you forgot to say @gaydads admit on their website they SELL USA BABIES to SINGLE GAY MEN WITH AIDS!
Anamika
May 2nd, 2014 @ 12:00 am

I’ll just say that you are propagating myths about gays and pedophilia based on selective reading & wishful interpretations of scientific literature. I’m not going to spent time providing supporting evidence to the contrary (already did that several times on this blog) in the hopes that you’ll be convinced, as you clearly won’t from the looks of it, in all probability. And I don’t intend to hijack this thread with a debate on popular gay myths.
???
May 2nd, 2014 @ 12:14 am

Here we observe once again the patented Anamikan ‘bait and switch’ dialectical ploy. Note the scare quotes around ‘perhaps’. She’s chronically been switching from the relevant normative sense of the word to an irrelevant nonnormative sense. She’s been equivocating on ‘right’ and ‘wrong’ as between nonnormative and normative senses of the term.

Avoid that confusion and you will be able to see that a practice cannot be shown to be morally acceptable by saying that the practice is engaged in. Slavery and ethnic cleansing are practices which have proven to be be very effective by nonnormative criteria. World War II in the Pacific was ended by the nuclear slaughter of noncombatants. Questions about moral acceptability and unacceptability cut perpendicular to questions about effectiveness, survival value and the like.
gaysabovethelaw
May 2nd, 2014 @ 12:20 am

BREAKING NEWS! @gaydads (http://twitter.com/gaydads) admits criminal conduct (under UK Law on their own website)
VOTE UP AND RETWEET TO METROPOLITAN POLICE UK!
https://twitter.com/gaysabovethelaw/status/462081248475611137

http://www.bsc-america.com/hetrosexual-surrogacy/
“We are also extremely pleased with our results working with HIV+ surrogacy. We are happy to announce that the BSC has been working with the HIV+ community for several years and has built links with clinics to ensure HIV+ men may now have a biological child of their own, without transferring the HIV virus to either the child or surrogate mother. This service is open to both the gay and heterosexual community.

Please note, currently we do not have a waiting list for surrogate mothers. We have a current list of surrogates who are screened and ready to start the process right away, both in the USA and UK. We do NOT work with Surrogates in India. We have access to over 500 egg donors through partner agencies in the USA and UK.”

Notice they say 2 times – no mistake they use surrogate mothers in the UK!

Here’s what the law of the land where they comes from says.

They now are running an infomerical on TV – the product is babies and their operation is a criminal operation = ORGANIZED BABY SELLING CRIME!

http://www.hfea.gov.uk/fertility-treatment-options-surrogacy.html

“Paying surrogate expenses- You are not allowed to pay for a surrogate in the UK – commercial surrogacy is illegal. However, the intended parents are responsible for the reasonable expenses of the surrogate (for example, clothes, travel expenses and loss of earnings).

….

Remember: commercial surrogacy is illegal in the UK – people thinking about surrogacy should be wary of agencies purporting to offer this service.”

Call London Police at night! Time for a dawn raid on these pricks!
Anonymous
May 2nd, 2014 @ 12:24 am

All of that is totally irrelevant, and a clear attempt to evade this issue with statistical sleights-of-hand. I am not impressed with your feeble understanding of statistical principles.
Anamika
May 2nd, 2014 @ 12:27 am

Your twitter account has a single (anti-gay) agenda and you have what less than 50 followers in 3 years. Now you want to help start a twitter war against a reputed UK gay surrogacy twitter account that has more than 100K followers. I don’t think @rsmccain & his supporters would jump at this opportunity. But good luck!
Zohydro
May 2nd, 2014 @ 12:28 am

Are there any unequivocally reliable statistics at all on the prevalence of child sex abuse where the gender of the perpetrator and victim are known?

I believe that the observed incidence of man-on-boy abuse is curiously high and inexplicable except in the context of an inherent male homosexual predeliction for pubescent boys!
???
May 2nd, 2014 @ 12:37 am

Yeah, for all her posturing, Anamika seems to apprehend very little about statistics.

Chi-squared, I say, chi-squared.
gaysabovethelaw
May 2nd, 2014 @ 12:46 am

That that is because a mainstream media confirmed child raping pedophile took action against me that in effect took away my first born child! Christopher Bowersox (CA) Bakersfield police is on familywatchdog.us as a child sexual predator.

The charge sheet in the own hand of the gay (with boyfriend) child porn producing scum is here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/165031433/Arrest-Bowersox-31may2005a and you can follow the instructions on the youtube video to verify the document. All charges against me were dismissed.

http://tinyurl.com/arrestedbychildrapingfagcop

On top of that I am a UNHCR declared refugee from Australian gay politics on letterhead after being accused of the crime of FOI’ing a cop in my only other arrest who is a mainstream media confirmed woman basher and captian of the Australian Rugby Union Waleroos womans Team this year. Verify in UK Mirrror article “boosted by a lesbain tiff”

details: http://tinyurl.com/homocopvictim

2 contients. 2 arrests. 2 mainstream media confirmed criminal gay police. Gay Apartied policing is wrong. Expect a big update on tinyurl.com/homocopvictim – A FOI came back from a GAY FOI Officer who threatened my father on NSW Police letterhead. He is “Richard Hanson” and he’s on ABC The Drum blog (same outfit as @freshchilli ABC pedophile praiser @rsmccain loves to hate) His personal blog linked to their domrant.blogspot.com previously (i backed i up) talked about going to gay orgies at the KKK gay bathhouse public sex club in Sydney along with the Gay police minister (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4DE9PMndZ1k) who took my complaint before I was accused of Australia’s rarest crime 60C NSW Crimes Act – that gay rights activist and senator @leerhiannon said only corrupt police would use in Hansard (think CSPAN) before only gay police did. It’s Australia’s rarest crime and First domestic terrorist “outlaw motorcycle gang law”. In America DHS says “see something say something. In Australia @nswpolice said on their website “dob in a bikie”. Get the drift?

Also @gaydads probably bought their twitter followers just like they bought their TV show!

http://twitlonger.com/show/n_1s1jpe4

P.S. People if you thought church suing was bad. Check this out!
Anamika
May 2nd, 2014 @ 12:50 am

I’m not in mood to impress today 🙂 Gay & pedophilia issue will come up again and again on this blog. I’m not going to argue numbers & quote scientific papers every time.

I’m going to start a blog* shortly. So next time I’ll just link my relevant blog post(s) in such arguments here, that would be more practical.

*This was a long standing request/demand from many at ToM. I’m thinking of a blog name. Suggestions are welcome. (Someone here already recommended “The Insane Asylum”.)
gaysabovethelaw
May 2nd, 2014 @ 12:56 am

P.S.my twitter account was suspended for 2 years due to gay censorship after @frednile an Australian politician retweeted me. I just reactivated this one. My twitter account after that for a year http://twitter.com/homocopvictim (http://twitpic.com/photos/homocopvictim still works) was also removed due to censor nazis @chrismurphys a lawyer who’s declared a war on @twitterAU who I exposed plead a guy guilty against his will. He is / was Julian Assanges lawyer. More info here: http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=212098.0

@nswpolice GLLO gay sex police officers – first great achievement of the http://www.glrl.org.au -> about us -> history wear their NAZI SS designed pink-triangle.org logos with pride. So I thought what’s the harm in adding another Nazi symbol on top for the sake of parody! And if you don’t think Gay sex police exist – google “hate crime and terrorism” and click on the first link to secure.nsw.gov.au and see Gay police, London Bombing and 9/11 all on the one page. Against Gay Marriage? THEN YOU ARE A TERRORIST!
Anamika
May 2nd, 2014 @ 1:02 am

Lots of back story. You might find a few kindred spirits at ToM, if u stay for a while.
SSChristianity
May 2nd, 2014 @ 1:39 am

Yes, Herr Himmler! All homosexuals are filthy degenerates who if left unchecked will destroy the Fatherland like they did ancient Greece, and Rome! We must drown them all like dogs in a filthy bog!

Seig Heil!
gaysabovethelaw
May 2nd, 2014 @ 1:42 am

Explains why @nswpolice wear their Nazi pink-triangle.org symbols with pride!

Before & After!

http://www.thepinktriangle.com/images/nazi_camp_marks-th.jpg
gaysabovethelaw
May 2nd, 2014 @ 1:51 am

Who wants to go baby shopping like these guys?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xufh8XysHJ4

ABC 4 Corners Australia says “this incident has nothing to do with gay marriage”. If so why were the gay child rapists blogging in support of gay marriage before they got caught?
(Attn: @rsmccain – NEW video!)

C/- Cal State Long Beach Student 49’ers Newspaper – Mark Newtown (on the left)
http://www.csulb.edu/~d49er/spring99/v6n88-samesex.html

Right after the child rapists were caught ABC Catalyst (science show) does a promo saying GAY DADS Make good parents. Don’t shoot the messenger I’m not saying I agree with that last sentence.
http://www.abc.net.au/catalyst/stories/3805051.htm

More info on ABC Scumbaggery:
http://billmuehlenberg.com/2013/12/10/more-tales-from-the-tolerance-thugs/
Kirby McCain
May 2nd, 2014 @ 4:19 am

Every child is the result of heterosexual union. Now, we have those who have decided that they want to opt out of that natural productive union but still wish to be parents. Children of rental wombs raised in homosexual homes and this is going to turn out well for them? Do you not see the narcissism of gays wanting to have children like this? No one has the right to every desire. The expectation that our society should accommodate every whim of the homosexual community is a tyranny. These people don’t want the same rights as the rest of society. They seek special accommodation. People will eventually tire of this burden and there will be a reform. What you so obviously don’t comprehend is that the homosexual community has no respect for anyone else. It’s all about what they want. They don’t give a fuck about what the rest of the society wants. The minute you see a story where they are concerned about the rest of our society you pop that link in here. BTW I’m not a patient man, so where the hell’s that link?
Anamika
May 2nd, 2014 @ 5:02 am

A lot of heterosexuals go for surrogate babies because they are biologically incapable of having a child naturally. Straight single men who want to be fathers turn to surrogacy too, how is that different from gay single/couple going for a surrogate baby?

They don’t give a fuck about what the rest of the society wants.
BTW I’m not a patient man, so where the hell’s that link?

LOL. I just ran to the nearest gay shop and have this offering for you: https://twitter.com/GOPROUD
DeadMessenger
May 2nd, 2014 @ 5:07 am

Wholeheartedly agree with you, Kirby McCain.
gaysabovethelaw
May 2nd, 2014 @ 5:41 am

A Lot of homosexuals go for babies because they want to rape them! only 1% of boylovers caught! watch the video! “110,000 boylovers.net members are awaiting delivery! Don’t tell me your agenda doesn’t lead to a higher increase of child rape – if these freaks can’t own children and have to resort to stealing them! http://tinyurl.com/abcplugspedos (watch fullscreen with annotations) and see the Australian Federal Police censored ABC @AbcFarNorth radio interview http://tinyurl.com/eqlove

And don’t say gays that rape boys are just pedos – remember this guy? http://tinyurl.com/arrestedbychildrapingfagcop – want me to link to his prison penpals letter talking about his boyfriend?
gaysabovethelaw
May 2nd, 2014 @ 5:43 am

If you are going to drop twitter ID’s why don’t you drop your own you gay troll! http://www.twitter.com/AnaMyID
Kirby McCain
May 2nd, 2014 @ 6:00 am

Well, even if they don’t molest them they’re going to put their children into our schools. Then at an all too early age everyone else’s children will have to learn about their child’s special circumstances so that, God forbid, their child isn’t offended by the fact other children have mothers and fathers. Of course, it won’t stop there. The children from normal homes have to be made to feel guilty for having a mother and father because no left wing radical bullshit agenda is complete without making the majority feel guilty for its very existence. This is tyranny in action.
Kirby McCain
May 2nd, 2014 @ 6:02 am

You argue the exception. Most children from traditional marriages are not molested.
Kirby McCain
May 2nd, 2014 @ 6:05 am

Where is the heterosexual equivalent to NAMBLA?
Red
May 2nd, 2014 @ 8:51 am

GROSS.
Anamika
May 2nd, 2014 @ 9:12 am

Same’s the case, in same sex parenting.
Paul H. Lemmen
May 2nd, 2014 @ 10:55 am

And the sheep look up …