The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Gay Baby Merchant Boasts: ‘My Vast Wealth and Contacts Will Crush Anyone’

Posted on | May 2, 2014 | 114 Comments

British couple Barrie and Tony Drewitt-Barlow with two of their surrogate babies.

A British millionaire who stars in a Sky TV reality show about his surrogate baby business responded to an e-mail from a critic by boasting about his £18 million London mansion and threatening to use his influence to “crush anyone” who opposed him.

Barrie Drewitt-Barlow is CEO of the British Surrogacy Centre and, along with his gay partner Tony, stars in the series The Parent Makers that began airing last month on the Sky 192 satellite channel. Publicity for the show drew a hostile online reaction from Luke McKee, an Australian exile living in Asia. McKee posted a message full of anti-gay slurs (“queers,” “faggots,” etc.) at a right-wing online forum, suggesting that Drewitt-Barlow’s surrogate business may be violating British and U.S. laws. After a lengthy e-mail exchange with McKee, Barrie Drewitt-Barlow sent a message Friday morning calling McKee a “stalker” and “trailer trash,” and bragged that his wealth would protect him from investigation or adverse publicity. An excerpt of that e-mail:

From: Barrie Drewitt-Barlow <[email protected]>
To: Luke McKee
. . .
Sent: Friday, May 2, 2014 9:26 AM
Subject: RE: i always have the last word

. . . This time, you have met someone who is not only wealthier than you who can fight your pathetic attempt to blacken their name, but someone who is far more intelligent then you and someone who actually, does not give a shit about what anyone else in the world thinks of him! . . .
Do yourself a big favour and move on, you cannot win a fight against me, I’m far too well respected for some little idiot like you to do anything to. And as far as using other people to do the job for you as you say, hahahhahahaha I laugh in your face, and say to you, BRING IT ON, my vast wealth and contacts will crush anyone you bring onto your team! . . .
[T]onight, I will sit in my 16 bedroomed, £18 million pound London mansion, sipping champagne and eating the finest foods available to me, cooked by the house keeper and served by one of our three live in maids, before tucking my stunningly good looking 5 children up in their amazing bedrooms! After which, I will go for a swim in my swimming pool with my husband and talk about how much money we have made over the past 48 hours whilst YOU, sit in the poverty of your own making! Now do something worthy with your miserable life and get a job!

You prick! lolol

Drewitt-Barlow has often been controversial. Last year, he and his partner sued the Church of England demanding religious recognition of same-sex marriage. That lawsuit provoked criticism of Prime Minister David Cameron from conservatives like Colin Hart of the Coalition for Marriage, who told the London Daily Mail: “The ink’s not even dry on the [new marriage law] and churches are already facing litigation. We warned Mr. Cameron this would happen, we told him he was making promises that he couldn’t possibly keep. He didn’t listen. He didn’t care. He’s the one who has created this mess. Mr. Cameron’s chickens are coming home to roost and it will be ordinary people with a religious belief who yet again fall victim to the totalitarian forces of political correctness.”

The commercial surrogacy business is a growing international trade that has been criticized as  a form of “human trafficking,” especially by women’s rights advocates who say the lucrative practice — which is outlawed in many countries — enables wealthy people to exploit poor women as “breeders.” Reuters reported last year:

India opened up to commercial surrogacy in 2002. It is among just a handful of countries – including Georgia, Russia, Thailand and Ukraine – and a few U.S. states where women can be paid to carry another’s genetic child through a process of in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) and embryo transfer.
The low-cost technology, skilled doctors, scant bureaucracy and a plentiful supply of surrogates have made India a preferred destination for fertility tourism, attracting nationals from Britain, the United States, Australia and Japan, to name a few. . . .
A U.N.-backed study in July 2012 estimated the surrogacy business at more than $400 million a year, with over 3,000 fertility clinics across India. . . .
India’s surrogacy industry is vilified by women’s rights groups who say fertility clinics are nothing more than “baby factories” for the rich. In the absence of regulation, they say many poor and uneducated women are lured by agents, hired by clinics, into signing contracts they do not fully understand.
In May [2012], surrogate mother Premila Vaghela, 30, died days after delivering a child for an American couple at a clinic in Gujarat. It was recorded as an “accidental death” by police.

Negative attention was also focused on surrogate parenthood last year by the highly-publicized case of a gay couple whose son — which they said was produced by a Russian surrogate impregnated by one of the men’s sperm — was exploited by an “international syndicate” of pedophiles known as the “Boy Lovers Network”:

Mark Newton, 42, was sentenced to 40 years in federal prison last week by U.S. District Court Judge Sarah Evans Barker. Authorities say Newton and his partner, Peter Truong, 36, paid a Russian woman $8,000 to give birth to a boy they said was conceived using artificial insemination with Newton’s sperm. The men began sexually abusing the boy before he was two weeks old, recording the acts on video they shared online with other pedophiles.
“What can be said? What can be done to erase some of the horror of this?” Judge Barker said Friday in giving the maximum sentence to Newton, an American who had become an Australian citizen. Prosecutors said the case was tried in Judge Barker’s U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana because images of the boy were found on the computer of an Indiana man who was arrested as part of a larger child-pornography investigation.
Records in the case had previously been sealed, the Indianapolis Star reported. Newton and Truong made the boy available for molestation by other men in France, Germany and the United States, according to prosecutors. “For more than one year and across three continents, these men submitted this young child to some of the most heinous acts of exploitation that this office has ever seen,” said U.S. Attorney Joe Hogsett.

Barrie Drewitt Barlow is @Gaydads on Twitter. The Sky TV show has its own Twitter account, @TheParentMakers. Luke McKee is  @gaysabovethelaw on Twitter.

 

Comments

114 Responses to “Gay Baby Merchant Boasts: ‘My Vast Wealth and Contacts Will Crush Anyone’”

  1. richard mcenroe
    May 2nd, 2014 @ 6:59 pm

    So babies can be created, bought and sold on demand. Wow.

    Good thing we taught those damned Confederates a lesson about slavery.

  2. RS
    May 2nd, 2014 @ 7:08 pm

    The contracting “parents” assert ownership over the product of the surrogacy, i.e. the child. If there are no ownership rights, what is the nature of the contract?

  3. DaveO
    May 2nd, 2014 @ 7:09 pm

    Trafficking in humans, whether as chattel slaves, for sex, or as babies, are all found on the same slippery slope. This transaction isn’t an orphan in need of a family, but a commodity desired at the moment. But later? One of the many problems we have with Russia is Americans adopting Russian children, then abandoning them and sending them back to Russia. A child is not a commodity to be trafficked. A child not a boutique adornment on a man or woman’s resume’. That the traffickers are a$$holes, and gay, makes no matter: they are slavers.

  4. RKae
    May 2nd, 2014 @ 7:10 pm

    Yeah, Bob, I smelled that a mile away, too. The ol’ “profit motive is good for everything” notion.

  5. RS
    May 2nd, 2014 @ 7:12 pm

    I don’t deny that the absence of Mothers is not a uniform across surrogate practice or adoption for that matter. I was speaking about this specific case described in RSM’s post.

  6. RKae
    May 2nd, 2014 @ 7:12 pm

    300 thumbs-up for the line “Utilitarianism is the enemy of Morality.”

  7. dwduck
    May 2nd, 2014 @ 7:33 pm

    In some sectors of society, yes. In others — like your friendly local Planned Parenthood office — it’s as vicious as ever.

  8. K-Bob
    May 2nd, 2014 @ 7:33 pm

    Larry Niven needs to dust off his old Organlegging stories.

    We’re nearly there.

  9. dwduck
    May 2nd, 2014 @ 7:35 pm

    One can reasonably assume that Tony’s meal ticket depends on him understanding that he’s just another accessory. I mean, you don’t apologize to the Aston when you take the Ferrari out for a spin, do you?

  10. Wombat_socho
    May 2nd, 2014 @ 7:58 pm

    As the Token Papist on staff here, I can assure you this is not in fact the case.

  11. Anon Y. Mous
    May 2nd, 2014 @ 8:00 pm

    LOL. Ok, Would you care to expand on that, or does just telling me I’m wrong wrap things up?

  12. RS
    May 2nd, 2014 @ 8:11 pm

    As the Token Papist on staff here . . .

    . . . you are the perfect person to be entrusted with the “Ban-hammer of Anathema.”

    : )

  13. Zohydro
    May 2nd, 2014 @ 9:02 pm

    +1 for having the diligence to capitalise that word!

  14. Anon Y. Mous
    May 2nd, 2014 @ 9:03 pm

    Are you referring to me? I said: Just as a general matter, if the couple loves the child, you have a
    happy child, happy couple, and (assuming she is well paid), a happy
    surrogate. In what way is anyone worse off?

    Before you start reading volumes into what I said, you might start with reading what I actually said. You may want to rethink your point if that’s what it depends on.

  15. Anon Y. Mous
    May 2nd, 2014 @ 9:07 pm

    Surrogacy is not the buying and selling of babies. Surrogates get paid for providing a service: allowing a child to grow to term in their bodies.

    Before you can come up with a proper unedrstanding of the morality of the situation, you must first understand what is actually occurring.

  16. Anon Y. Mous
    May 2nd, 2014 @ 9:10 pm

    Hmmm… I’m not sure, do you understand the difference between a Libertarian and a libertarian?

  17. maniakmedic
    May 2nd, 2014 @ 9:16 pm

    I agree. However, I myself won’t be too broken up about it if they never do. I know it’s a flaw, but I’ve never been one to feel sorry for bad people (I am so not a natural peacemaker). I get a kick out of bad things happening to bad people. I’m human, I own it.

  18. Zohydro
    May 2nd, 2014 @ 9:16 pm

    Aren’t the Libertarians anti-Israel and pro-homosexual “marriage”?

  19. RS
    May 2nd, 2014 @ 9:17 pm

    I was responding to this comment above:

    I asked you to identify a single person who was harmed in the hypothetical I laid out (infertile, loving, heterosexual couple using a surrogate).

    You have not made an honest attempt to answer that question.

  20. Anon Y. Mous
    May 2nd, 2014 @ 9:19 pm

    To tell the truth, I don’t really follow the Libertarian Party’s positions, but you are probably correct. It is enough for me to know that they don’t believe in borders. I believe in the privileges and responsibilities of citizenship, which would all be meaningless without national borders.

  21. Anon Y. Mous
    May 2nd, 2014 @ 9:22 pm

    That remark referred to the to one in my original comment. I think it is a bit much to criticize me for not fully quoting myself when I referred to my previous comment in the very same thread.

  22. maniakmedic
    May 2nd, 2014 @ 9:22 pm

    Isn’t that what children are nowadays? I assume so given how little parenting most people seem to actually do – or want to do – with their children. Granted, I myself don’t have children, but when people start complaining about how their kids have no manners, they can barely read, and they aren’t getting the proper sex education at school, I have to wonder what the hell they are teaching their children at home. Call me crazy, but I was always under the impression that that stuff comes from home, taught by parents. Am I wrong, parents? I genuinely want to know.

  23. Jeanette Victoria
    May 2nd, 2014 @ 9:24 pm

    In my journey as a Christian I am sadden by anyone who doesn’t what their life changed by following Jesus and therefore condemning themselves to perdition.

  24. Jeanette Victoria
    May 2nd, 2014 @ 9:29 pm

    Yes that is taught by parents and other adults The problem is most today haven’t a clue how to be parents. Even some of the parents at my church have children, who though, very nice and loving have no self discipline and don’t respect their elders

    I’m extremely old world I find I’ve become the children’s second mother. They drive me nuts so in order to be around them I treat them as I would my own child. They are in fact learning discipline

  25. DaveO
    May 2nd, 2014 @ 9:30 pm

    We are there already. Trafficking in organs, whether the human was paid for giving an organ or it was taken, is big business. Or are you referring to the practice of birthing babies to harvest their organs?

  26. Jeanette Victoria
    May 2nd, 2014 @ 9:31 pm

    Adoption has become a big business

  27. maniakmedic
    May 2nd, 2014 @ 9:35 pm

    My friend has a saying: I’m not corrupt enough for this world. Only he used a different word from corrupt. Can’t for the life of me think of which word it is right now. But corrupt works.

  28. Zohydro
    May 2nd, 2014 @ 9:39 pm

    Snob…

  29. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    May 2nd, 2014 @ 9:44 pm

    I would share with you Zohydro!

    And I have had to compromise on the rot gut too on occasion.

  30. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    May 2nd, 2014 @ 9:45 pm

    They should go to a cabbage patch and wait for a child. Okay, I denounce myself.

  31. maniakmedic
    May 2nd, 2014 @ 9:45 pm

    I find myself feeling sad for the good people who could have so much more if they acknowledged Christ. For the people who probably need Him most due to being bad people: meh. It is a terribly un-Christlike attitude, but as I said, I own it. Makes me sound like a bad person, but those who know me know better. I’m loyal to a fault and would do anything for anybody who hasn’t wronged me or anyone else.

  32. trangbang68
    May 2nd, 2014 @ 9:55 pm

    Hey Barrett, one day God will crush your evil little pissant self into dust, your fantasy of omnipotence notwithstanding.

  33. Luke McKee
    May 3rd, 2014 @ 12:05 am

    All I can say is f@##$ me. I didn’t see this coming.

  34. Luke McKee
    May 3rd, 2014 @ 12:13 am

    Gay Surrogacy is used as a COVER to BUY BABIES from Russia – fake surrogacy!

    And here’s the Australian Federal Police interview where they peddle their lies about using surrogacy!
    http://tinyurl.com/eqlove (MP3 – courtesty of usa.rightwingamerica.com)

    The greatest achivements of the NSW Gay and Lesbian rights lobby is shows America where it’s heading as Australia is a nation of trail-blazing politically correct knobs.

    http://glrl.org.au/index.php/About-Us/About-Us/History-Of-The-Lobby
    1st achievement – special gay apartheid police that must be in charge of investigating heteros.
    2nd LEGAL GAY SEX WITH 16 Year olds
    3nd Gay partner visa sponsorship to bring in American baby rapist Mark Newtown
    4nd Gay adoption (god help us)
    and so on..

    And of course the latest news of me reporting CRIMINAL CONDUCT of the Barry – not threats BUT OPERATING AN ILLEGAL COMMERCIAL SURROGACY BUSINESS IN THE UK!

    It’s on page two of http://tinyurl.com/gaydadschurchsuingbabysellers (warning offensive right wing jocks and swearing)

    Vote up! or down depending on your sexual preference!

  35. Luke McKee
    May 3rd, 2014 @ 2:42 am

    Here’s me doing battle with the usual gay troll crowd after plugging this article!

    Matilda McCorish Are you right in the head?
    25 mins · Like
    Luke McKee So you support this? Pedophilia is a mental disorder! http://tinyurl.com/abcplugspedos
    ABC admits it “accidentally” adored child rapist boy love network member as model father
    ENABLE Annotations or you miss true story! TODAY(12/7/13): Vinny Eastwood show e… See More
    24 mins · Like · Remove Preview
    Matilda McCorish Paedophilia
    and homosexuality are very different things. Plenty of kiddie fiddlers
    are straight men, straight dads. That doesn’t make all straight men
    paedophiles any more than cherry picking stories of gay paedophiles
    does.
    22 mins · Like
    Luke McKee http://billmuehlenberg.com/…/dont-mention-the-h-and-p…/ Not so I say to the child rape apologist.
    Don’t Mention the H and P Words Together billmuehlenberg.com
    Here is a news story which should be on the front page of every single newspaper… See More
    21 mins · Like · Remove Preview
    Matilda McCorish Is
    child rape more acceptable if it’s done by straight men then? If it is
    you’re more of an apologist than me. I think child rape is child rape,
    and that it’s abhorrent. I don’t care if the person who does it is
    male, female, gay or straight.

    If you want to find a common denominator for rapists and child rapists, it’s men. Are you going to ban them too?
    20 mins · Like
    Luke McKee https://www.causes.com/posts/891061
    My 75 year old father who was just interviewed on truthnews.com.au last
    week (as i was before that and Jessie Ventura last week too!) breaks it
    down for you. James Cantor dot com has the MOST CITED (as in other
    medical
    journals) MEDICAL (not quack psychological pseudoscience taken over by
    the gay lobby) STUDY into gays and pedophilia. The report shows a gay
    man is at LEAST 3 times more likely to be a pedophile. It doesn’t cover
    the fact that gay pedophiles are more prolific and have more victims,
    thats a subject of another study. It’s common sense. 20 years ago gays
    couldn’t BUY KIDS to have as their own toys, they would have to steal
    them. Now in Rainbow families some children no doubt, particularly the
    ones bought by the 110,000 boylovers.net members in the ABC video above
    are going to be woken up to be raped every day of their life, something
    that wouldn’t happen if gay adoption wasn’t done. So by doing positive
    discrimination against gay men getting kids it’s NO DOUBT that there
    will be a reduction in the incidence (number of events of child rape).
    If you are for gay men having kids you are put simply for more child
    rape. Gay marriage is a different issue if it’s not being used to
    justify gay getting kids.
    TNRA: ABC Ginger Goreman’s puff piece” using gay dads’ rape victim to promote “rainbow families” http://www.causes.com
    Video posted as a reason to Facebook Must Block Illicit Images and Videos of Children
    11 mins · Like · Remove Preview
    Luke McKee Here’s
    an uncensored photo of a gay dads rape victim that gay bloggers use
    themselves to promote gay marriage. They say to all of us “Who can argue
    with us now Gay Marriage is right look at this happy family [with boy
    rapists mark newtown and peter truong]” http://yawningbread.wordpress.com/…/pastor-ambushes…/
    So after they come out as gay rapists, you can’t say the issue has
    nothing to do with gay marriage – because then you’ll be having your
    fudge pudding and eating it too!
    Pastor ambushes Goh Chok Tong with demand to defend 377A

    Luke McKee And
    here is a thesis from the guy on the right Mark Newtown now in jail for
    40 years saying why the church is bad for not doing big gay weddings http://www.csulb.edu/~d49er/spring99/v6n88-samesex.html
    The Australian federal police say his purpose of promoting this on his
    blog was “for the sole purpose of child sexual exploitation”

    Matilda McCorish Trash. You’re a weirdo.

  36. Luke McKee
    May 3rd, 2014 @ 2:44 am

    https://www.facebook.com/groups/wakeupaustralia/811799992181847/ The gay trolls love me what can I say…

  37. Anamika
    May 3rd, 2014 @ 3:07 am

    Who doesn’t hate big business? (DeMint inlcuded.)

  38. Luke McKee
    May 3rd, 2014 @ 3:35 am

    Why do I fight against “gay dads” getting children?

    My first born child was taken from me due to actions by a mainstream media confirmed gay man, pedo cop, Mr BakersfieldGraffiti.com Youth Graffiti investigator Officer Christopher Kent Bowersox Bakersfield Police. You can look him up on familywatchdog.us (CA) sex offenders registrar!

    http://tinyurl.com/arrestedbychildrapingfagcop

    And if that wasn’t bad enough, I’m a refugee from Australia due to a mainstream media confirmed woman bashing Australian rugby union Waleroo’s 2014 Captian Tui Ormsby who’s also a special NSW Police GLLO Gay police officer.
    Source: “UK Mirror – Boosted by a lesbian tiff”

    http://tinyurl.com/homocopvicitm

    And of course the latest issue!
    http://tinyurl.com/gaydadschurchsuingbabysellers
    – admit criminal commercial surrogacy operation using UK surrogates (criminal conduct) and have been reported to Essex police yesterday for an investigation!

  39. Luke McKee
    May 3rd, 2014 @ 3:44 am

    gay troll banned! yipee!

  40. gaysabovethelaw
    May 3rd, 2014 @ 9:45 am

    See my or @gaydads twitter – yes they are coming to Australia to sell babies to fags and @sunriseon7 promoted them!

  41. Quartermaster
    May 3rd, 2014 @ 10:30 am

    I propose we call him Cardinal Wombat.

  42. Quartermaster
    May 3rd, 2014 @ 10:31 am

    He did. It actually makes it worse.

  43. Quartermaster
    May 3rd, 2014 @ 10:32 am

    You’re grasping at straws.

  44. Quartermaster
    May 3rd, 2014 @ 10:35 am

    With a wire brush and Comet may not be enough. Perhaps combined with an acid dip?

  45. K-Bob
    May 3rd, 2014 @ 3:15 pm

    The “taking” part isn’t yet as big a business as the vast majority of other black market activity, but yeah, both the taking and the “farming” of humans. And you see not a peep from the progs about it.

  46. K-Bob
    May 3rd, 2014 @ 5:00 pm

    You should see him in his (s)miter.

  47. Quartermaster
    May 3rd, 2014 @ 7:51 pm

    Head of the Congregation of The Doctrine of The Faith. Otherwise known as Chief Inquisitor.

  48. Quartermaster
    May 3rd, 2014 @ 7:56 pm

    The writers of scripture were moved to write (2 Peter 1:21). God did not dictate the exact words. You can do some research on Bibliology. There are a number of systematic Theologies on line and the view of the content of scripture is close to being the same no matter what the theological tradition. Orton Wiley’s is easily called up and is one of the better Protestant systematic theologies on line.

  49. gaysabovethelaw
    May 4th, 2014 @ 1:27 am

    See my twitter for updates twitter.com/gaysabovethelaw – UK Daily Mirror admits they have a history of a death threats, scamming hetrosexual parents in fake school in spain, and putting their kids on the instant gaydar sex website! They have just threatened to kill my family with threats CC @rsmccain They have gay police living on their private estate! I am writing my own in depth article on their BS today

  50. Nan
    May 4th, 2014 @ 2:08 am

    Well, the Catholic Church believes otherwise.