The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Planned Perversion

Posted on | July 15, 2014 | 63 Comments

“Planned Parenthood’s Sex Ed Pushes BDSM, ‘Asphyxiation’ On Teens” is the headline at Breitbart.com, highlighting a new video from Live Action that demonstrates how America’s leading abortion provider is teaching kids about kinky sex.

Planned Parenthood’s advocacy of perversion and promiscuity — under the aegis of “Comprehensive Sexuality Education” — isn’t really anything new. They’ve been promoting this deviancy for decades, and it makes sense if you understand the economics of the abortion industry: Encouraging young girls to screw around recklessly guarantees that a certain percentage of of those girls are going to get knocked up and then pay for an abortion. So the people on the “supply” end of this supply-and-demand equation will do everything possible to increase demand for their services. Q.E.D.

Of course, the push for “Comprehensive Sexuality Education” is based on a myth that kids’ problems with sex are the result of a shortage of sexual knowledge. In fact, kids have never in history had as much access to information about sex as they do now. Whatever it is, if you can spell it, you can Google it — C-H-L-A-M-Y-D-I-A — and if schools would just teach kids basic reading and writing, they could figure out this sex stuff for themselves. Believe it or not, some of us managed to figure it out even before there was an Internet. Or cable TV, for that matter.

Kids are overloaded with sexual information. What seems to be in short supply, however, is sexual virtue. We could fix this problem pretty easily, if America’s schools weren’t run by liberals.

Suppose that a Republican wins the White House in 2016 and is crazy enough to put me in charge of the nation’s sex education agenda. Within a matter of weeks, our nation’s school counselors would receive bundles of helpful pamphlets and posters.

KEEP YOUR BRITCHES ON, MISSY!
DON’T YOU KNOW BOYS HAVE COOTIES?

Just basic common-sense stuff like that. There would also be a pamphlet called, YOU’RE PROBABLY NOT A HOMO, in which young fellows would be reminded that the odds are at least 20-to-1 against them being gay, so if they’re worried about it, they should probably stop worrying. Unless they’re getting boners thinking about Justin Bieber or something, in which case, yeah.

KATE UPTON NUDE

If you feel an overwhelming urge to click that link, you’re not a homo, unless you’re a chick, but even chicks might be curious to see Kate Upton nude without being totally lezbo, so we’ll need to ask some additional questions for the chicks:

This is the kind of basic common-sense curriculum kids really need. Simple messages like, “Stop Wanking to Porn, You Horny Freaks” and “There Were More Than 1.4 Million Cases of Chlamydia Last Year. Don’t Be the Next Case. Keep Your Britches On, Missy.” We must implement the Four Basic Principles of Sex Education:

  1. Fear.
  2. Guilt.
  3. Shame.
  4. And more Fear.

For example, there was a 20% increase in unprotected anal sex among gay men. So we need pamphlets and posters: “Your Mother Would Be So Disappointed If You Got Chlamydia in Your Butt” and “Eewww! That’s Gross! Stop Doing That, You Weirdo!”

Most sex problems could be solved by this basic common-sense approach. The World Health Organization, however, is run by liberals, not people with common sense, so they want to spend $13,000 a year for every gay man in the world to provide them with HIV prevention drugs. This is crazy. All you need is some pamphlets and posters: “Why Do You Keep Doing It In Your Butt? Stop That Right This Minute, Young Man, or I’m Going to Tell Your Mother!”

Meanwhile, for those of you kids who aren’t homos or lezzies, you’re probably wondering, “How can I get somebody to have sex with me without catching a nasty case of chlamydia?”

Simple answer: Do you have a wedding ring on your finger? OK.

Just don’t do it in the butt. That’s gross.

 

Bookmark and Share

Comments

  • Pinker

    No, actually for it to be murder there needs to be malicious intent. That’s why legally abortion is not murder. Second the courts give the rights to women, and the fetus as something unborn has no legal rights in that situation. Third, I think the immorality is not terminating the fetus. or embryo which has no life in the human sense of the word, but in forcing a woman to give birth against her will. for her there can be no act more demoralizing, and that’s not even counting if she was rasped which makes it worse.

  • pinker

    The councilors are not there to hand out moral judgement about someone’s sexual interests. The “investigator” obviously lead the councilor, too. and what was Rose expecting her to answers to be? To call her a slut and tell her to pray for forgiveness? pretty worthless all around. It’s actually kind of laughable.

  • http://boogieforward.us/ K-Bob

    Sure, but having it “up” all the time back then was far more of a problem than needing to have it hoisted.

    Besides, women past a certain age are all nymphos. That’s when you really need to work on your diet (carnivorous, with lots of protein) and exercise (to improve circulation).

  • Quartermaster

    Any killing done for personal advantage involves malicious intent, and that is exactly what abortion is. One can rationalize all they like, but that simple fact is inescapable.

  • Pinker

    That it’s done for “personal
    advantage” is hyperbole on your part, and a rhetorical twist inferring that the woman having the abortion is bad, or lazy. and second what if it’s done for the developing fetus in the case that it will be born disfigured, disabled , etc. and is done on an MD’s recommendation? I’m not rationalizing anything. The law says murder is about intent and there is no intent involved in an abortion. I suggest you refer law here as opposed to religion.

  • Puma

    yeah, because you know God! lol! as a physicist you should be well aware of the Copenhagan interpretation, and the observer effect. in other words it’s just a map in your mind, and nothing more. objective reality is completely alien to us, and there is no way of knowing it. God, therefore is just a concept of the human mind, especially in the form you interpret it.

  • James G

    Intent – you keep using that word; I don’t think it means what you think it does. Intent is actively willing an action or outcome. Walking into a PP clinic INTENDING to have an abortion and then having one is as clear-cut an example as one could imagine of establishing intent. You can try and argue the legality of the act but denying intent to it is to deny the concept of causality.
    James G

  • Quartermaster

    James G. said it.

  • Quartermaster

    God has revealed Himself and so is knowable. He cared enough to make Himself known, and sent His Son so that provison could be made or sin and salvation made available to all humankind. He will allow you to live as you will, but He cares not a whit if you like what He has to say. Based on the idiocy floating around, God is the supreme homophobe. That doesn’t matter, however, because He sets the standard and if you ignore or reject Him, you will pay a very heavy price.

    You’ll have a long time to think about it, and you’ll not get another chance either.

  • Pingback: Da Tech Guy On DaRadio Blog » Blog Archive » Stacy McCain on why the Catholic Church is not a Democracy

  • Pinker

    Malicious intent. Abortion does not qualify in that regard, hence it’s legality as decided by the courts. And in the subject if intent: is manslaughter the same as murder? No, and for the same reason: intent.

  • Pinker

    excuse the typos. it’s auto fill.

  • Pingback: #TheBearIsLoose and it’s Bear Week | Batshit Crazy News