Feminist Tumblr: She Loves Your Tears, You ‘Whiny’ #GamerGate ‘Baby Men’

Posted on | July 23, 2015 | 79 Comments

She was asked her opinion of Anita Sarkeesian:

“I like that she is doing what she does and I drink the tears of whiny piss baby men who are upset that a woman has the nerve to analyze videogames from a feminist perspective”

This anonymous radical feminist is 25 years old, but provides no information about her education or background. She is a tabula rasa. We know nothing about her except for her all-encompassing hatred of males, who are always wrong about everything:

Male Opinions Are Not Objective Facts
Men are socialized since birth to think their feelings and thoughts are the objective truth. They are taught they are generally right about something, unless contradicted by another male with equal or more authority. men subconciously believe they are firmly right about things so much they won’t even consider alternative perspectives unless it comes from a place of higher authority.
Men are socialized to believe women are inherently wrong, and that is why women are “crazy”, because it is so difficult for men to even consider the possibility that they don’t know shit. This is why men often offer strong opinions on topics they just heard about, especially if they’re contradicting a woman.
This is because people will respect a man’s opinion and give his words weight even if he has zero background in the subject because men are considered credible by default. Women are considered wrong by default and must argue their way to display their truth, no matter how strong their credentials.
Men probably have to tell themselves they’re logical all the time just to keep up the lie that feeds their ego. Thinking is difficult work for a man who is used to instantly being told he is right, while women are constantly being argued against and therefore exploring the topics more deeply and doing more thinking.

A summary translation: “Men know nothing. Everything any man claims to know is an expression of his own arrogant prejudice. No woman should ever trust any man, because all men are fools.”

She got more than 1,800 notes for that denunciation of males, basically a restatement of what Rebecca Solnit argues in her popular feminist book Men Explain Things to Me. Could I make a counter-argument? Perhaps, but why bother? Feminists never listen to anything a man says. We understand why feminism’s First Rule for Men is, “SHUT UP!”

This is why feminism is not about equality. No feminist wants to be “equal” to that despicable subhuman creature, the male. Feminism means males must be silenced, because no male has any truth to speak. Men are stupid and untrustworthy; feminists have a monopoly on truth and virtue. From the feminist perspective, everything about males is invalid, inferior, irrelevant, bad and wrong. Therefore, every woman must gratefully embrace the knowledge imparted to her by feminists. By invoking this crypto-Marxist totalitarian concept — women as a revolutionary class, led by an intellectual vanguard — feminists thereby anoint themselves as Omniscient Arbiters of Truth.

Any 25-year-old feminist with a Tumblr blog can join the pantheon of Olympian Goddesses who dispense immortal wisdom to the Sacred Sisterhood. Oh, did I mention she wants to “Desexualize the Female Body” because “F–k Your Fascist Beauty Standards”?

You see her feminism involves a sort of sour-grapes rationalization. Men do not value her opinion because (a) men are stupid and inferior, and (b) men “think their feelings and thoughts are the objective truth.” She is disappointed that men “sexualize” women, evaluating her in terms of her desirability as a romantic companion. This involves “beauty standards” that are “fascist,” by which she means that beauty is undemocratic because it is not equally distributed among all women. Some women are more beautiful than others, and this is wrong because . . .?

Well, it’s just wrong. How dare you ask a feminist to explain herself?

Like all radical egalitarian philosophies, feminism appeals to the ambitious malcontent who, feeling herself somehow disadvantaged by the status quo, dreams of a utopia in which women will be treated according to a “fair” standard, which is to say, a standard that will make her Queen Bee of the hive. A woman who declares that she is “oppressed” by “male supremacy” usually means nothing more than this: Men don’t treat her the way she would like to be treated, and so she wants to destroy civilization as we know it, and institute a gynocracy in which women will be empowered to inflict humiliating punishment on men. Whatever else feminism may be, it is always in large measure a sadistic revenge fantasy whose strongest appeal is to women of unlimited cruelty. If any man doesn’t like her “feminist perspective,” his disagreement proves he’s a “whiny piss baby,” and she will celebrate by drinking your tears.

She hates you. She really, really hates you. You’re probably “a fedora wearing doritos munching mountain dew drinking reddit bro.”

<br />

Category: Sex Trouble

Comments

79 Responses to “Feminist Tumblr: She Loves Your Tears, You ‘Whiny’ #GamerGate ‘Baby Men’”

Locjus
July 23rd, 2015 @ 6:58 pm

She KNOWS that “bro drinking mountain dew and eating doritos” is a meme created by gamers to mock unethical game journalism, right?
Zakn
July 23rd, 2015 @ 7:08 pm

Exactly. Good old Doritogate
RS
July 23rd, 2015 @ 7:10 pm

This is because people will respect a man’s opinion and give his words weight even if he has zero background in the subject because men are considered credible by default.

Note the sleight of hand. To what subject might she be referring? Could it possibly “Feminist Reality?” Thus, she attends “Womyn’s Studies 101” and obtains the “background” information that sexuality is not function of biology but rather of socialization. Thus, counterarguments are refuted merely by her existence and assertion and not by argument with reference to evidence and known truth. She assumes the mantle of oracle with wisdom received by epiphany and thus, all of her statements and those of her “sisters” in agreement with her magically become tautologies merely by uttering them.
WT
July 23rd, 2015 @ 7:22 pm

Here’s “Transparent” show runner, and feminist Jill Soloway asking the state of California to investigate Hollywood for “male privilege”, and why there aren’t more female writers, and directors.

http://variety.com/2015/scene/vpage/transparent-jill-soloway-women-in-film-barneys-1201544690/

Now for the average person this might be no big deal, and maybe women aren’t getting a fair shot, but for someone that understands feminists this is another push for state violence against men in the form of civil rights violations, and quota systems, and for that Mr. McCain I say thank you. You provide a valuable service.
Joe Guelph
July 23rd, 2015 @ 7:31 pm

Anyone remember the old TWILIGHT ZONE episode, “Four O’Clock”? It eerily presages SJWism, what with its protagonist, a shut-in fanatic, waging a full-time campaign to destroy the lives of “evil” people by making slanderous calls and writing poison-pen letters to their employers and families. I’m sure that Rod Serling intended the teleplay as a metaphor for McCarthyism, but Fifties anti-communism was the work of government agencies and organized groups, not solitary zealots. The anonymous, cowardly moral-crusader of the episode was a beneficiary of modern communications technology, and a direct conceptual ancestor of today’s character-assassinating keyboard-warriors.
Here’s the episode on HULU:
[hulu id=440863]
Evi L. Bloggerlady
July 23rd, 2015 @ 7:40 pm

It is what it is…
missbosslady
July 23rd, 2015 @ 7:41 pm

Would it be wrong to speculate that the next big clash of civilizations will be between man-hating women and woman-hating muzzies?

After losing the fight I would assume the muzzies will take their POWs as wives.

Just sayin’.
Evi L. Bloggerlady
July 23rd, 2015 @ 8:07 pm

I could not think of a worse defeat for them both than to be joined in that manner.
robertstacymccain
July 23rd, 2015 @ 8:17 pm

Her assertions about how men are “socialized since birth” — notice there are no qualifiers? This is a blanket statement about all men. And on whose authority does she offer this assertion? No source is cited. Meanwhile, let us ask by whom are these men socialized thus? Do their mothers teach them this? In kindergarten and elementary schools, where nearly all teachers are female? Exactly when and how was I — or my sons — “socialized to believe women are inherently wrong”? And notice that this assertion in her argument is linked to her claim that men actually “don’t know shit.” But if you don’t tug the forelock and acknowledge her intellectual superiority, you’re a whiny baby man.
Wombat_socho
July 23rd, 2015 @ 8:44 pm

Women like this are why #GamerGate keeps winning. All we have to do is show their ravings to people to make them look like the insane, twisted wretches they are.
Daniel Freeman
July 23rd, 2015 @ 9:02 pm

Perhaps Wu is an autolachryphile.
TiminAL
July 23rd, 2015 @ 9:20 pm

“gynocracy”. That was brilliant, McCain.
Daniel Freeman
July 23rd, 2015 @ 9:24 pm

Men are socialized since birth to think their feelings and thoughts are the objective truth.

Third Rule: SJWs always project.
Evi L. Bloggerlady
July 23rd, 2015 @ 9:36 pm

They are socialized by their hormones…and the irony how the more testosterone a male has the more women seem to like it.
NeoWayland
July 23rd, 2015 @ 9:39 pm

I beg to differ.

They don’t look past the mirror.

It’s reflection.

And distorted too.
Trespassers W
July 23rd, 2015 @ 10:21 pm

A simple search and replace, et voila:

Female Opinions Are Not Objective Facts

Women are socialized since birth to think their feelings and thoughts are the objective truth. They are taught they are
generally right about something, unless contradicted by another female with equal or more authority. Women subconciously believe they are firmly right about things so much they won’t even consider alternative perspectives unless it comes from a place of higher authority.

Women are socialized to believe men are inherently wrong, and that is why men are “crazy”, because it is so difficult for women to even consider the possibility that they don’t know shit. This is why women often offer strong opinions on topics they just heard about, especially if they’re contradicting a man.

This is because people will respect a woman’s opinion and give her words weight even if she has zero background in the subject because women are considered credible by default. Men are considered wrong by default and must argue their way to display their truth, no matter how strong their credentials.

Women probably have to tell themselves they’re logical all the time just to keep up the lie that feeds their ego. Thinking is difficult work for a woman who is used to instantly being told she is right, while men are constantly being argued against and therefore exploring the topics more deeply and doing more thinking.
Finrod Felagund
July 23rd, 2015 @ 10:44 pm

I drink Mountain Dew Throwback, and I’m damn proud of it.
John Rose
July 23rd, 2015 @ 10:50 pm

Huh. That sounds closer to reality, come to think of it.
DeadMessenger
July 24th, 2015 @ 12:52 am

The fact of the matter is, she’s actually talking about women here. Men don’t like to talk about things, and in fact, won’t offer an opinion unless you drag it out of them.

I am absolutely certain of this, from a literal lifetime spent growing up on a farm with 4 brothers, then working in a male-dominated field during my entire professional career.

I so greatly prefer having male employees, no matter the race or culture. Reason being, men want a strong “commander” who is competent and knows how to give orders, which is me. They just want you to tell them specifically what to do. Good. Fine. I can do that, because I have an actual plan.

With women employees, you have to play this “feelings” and “group agreement” game in order to get “buy-in”. I hate it.

I’m not sure what opinions men have amongst themselves, and I don’t care, but from what I can tell, they only involve sports, cars, breasts and booties.

So I call BS on this dumb girl.
DeadMessenger
July 24th, 2015 @ 1:00 am

As you surmise, the whole thing is the bogus ramblings of a crazy person.

Not only are boys NOT “socialized to believe women are inherently wrong”, it’s exactly the opposite, as you say, as a good part of their youthful exposure is to Mom or Teacher. And at the very least, they have to pretend to believe those sources, same as girls do. Which is why boys are actually conditioned to not share opinions with stupid, mouthy women, but instead to get any sex they can, while giving the answer of “Whatever” to any question put to them by women. (I get around this myself by either simply giving an order, or asking a trick question.)

Every woman knows this inherently. Therefore, I believe this stupid girl has not actually spent much time, if any, with men.
Fail Burton
July 24th, 2015 @ 1:21 am

A reddit bro who can build canals which connect seas and oceans.
mole
July 24th, 2015 @ 1:25 am

Thats an excellent way to stuff around with frightbats heads, point out there has probably never been a time in history when boys have had less “influencing” from men.
Evi L. Bloggerlady
July 24th, 2015 @ 1:28 am

I would have said freak, but your word sounds more fun.
mole
July 24th, 2015 @ 1:34 am

“….men subconciously believe they are firmly right about things so much they won’t even consider alternative perspectives unless it comes from a place of higher authority.”….

I was guilty of this for years, then I started taking financial and lifestyle advice from the crack whore who would blow me under the underpass for a junior whopper.

Boy has my life changed! No longer do I worry about having enough money for retirement or ponder the increases in my stock portfolio. No since investing all my money in crack all i have to worry about now is bugs under my skin, the Po-Po, pubic lice in my eyelashes and Bubba during any of my state mandated vacation times.

Even better worrying about having enough money during retirement isnt a problem any-more either, ever since I acquired AIDS and drug resistant syphilis 10 years is more than enough of a financial horizon to plan for. I even got a free Obamaphone.

There is a reason I dont take advice from drooling mouthbreathers lady. Your idea of level headed would be someone with the drool coming out both sides of their mouth evenly.
LoneSage
July 24th, 2015 @ 1:56 am

“You see her feminism involves a sort of sour-grapes rationalization. Men do not value her opinion because …” She is nuttier than a walnut tree.
“…evaluating her in terms of her desirability as a romantic companion.” The more she talks the uglier she will get.
DeadMessenger
July 24th, 2015 @ 3:09 am

BWAHAHAHA! That would be extra-special great if you could get it on pay-per-view!!!
RonaldmcKnight
July 24th, 2015 @ 3:11 am

It’s All About You h e o t h e r m c c a i < Make It Easy
DeadMessenger
July 24th, 2015 @ 3:12 am

Mmmm…Throwback…
concern00
July 24th, 2015 @ 4:45 am

Are women not socialized since birth?
concern00
July 24th, 2015 @ 4:46 am

I’d say Amazons versus Towel Heads, but I actually respect the Amazon concept more than feminists.
Quartermaster
July 24th, 2015 @ 6:04 am

You left out the most important thing from that list.
Dana
July 24th, 2015 @ 6:44 am

Translation: she isn’t beautiful, under anyone’s standards, and therefore her thoughts and words might as well be as ugly as her physical form.
Dana
July 24th, 2015 @ 6:46 am

How, exactly, are men socialized into Teh Evil Patriarchy™ “since birth,” when the primary caregivers of infants and smaller children are almost always women?
Trespassers W
July 24th, 2015 @ 6:53 am

But imagine the wailing and gnashing of teeth by certain feminazis (Rush was so right when he coined that nelogism) of something like that was espoused by a manly male person of the XY persuasion.
Gunga
July 24th, 2015 @ 7:09 am

True, that! In this corner, people to whom winning is everything. In this corner, people victimized by everything that has ever existed because, “Shut up!”

Imagine growing up, hearing the tale of The Fox and the Grapes, and deciding that the fox is your role model… Also, women who claim that they drink men’s tears probably spend a lot of time alone…crying… …and some of the anonymous ones have Y-chromosomes and drive Miattas…nttawwt…
Gunga
July 24th, 2015 @ 7:17 am

I’m a Prince from Nigeria, trying to hide a substantial amount of what I like to call, “stuff” in a western country. I assure that this is all true and will totally change your life again! It’s just what I do. Let’s get together IRL!
Gunga
July 24th, 2015 @ 7:21 am

As someone who has a serious sinus condition and happens to enjoy the sensation of my own warm spittle on my chin, that last paragraph hurt…it just hurt…
Ilion
July 24th, 2015 @ 7:22 am

How DARE you ask that question!
I insist that you denounce yourself.
Sandtiger
July 24th, 2015 @ 7:52 am

And she CERTAINLY doesn’t want the attention of the unattractive men who are beneath her, because that would be “settling” for less than she, as a goddess, truly deserves. But, but…men are rejecting her, how dare they! Oh, so let’s change the male standards for what is perceived as beauty. Good luck with that…it has the same chance for success as convincing women that a man is “successful” if he earns less than minimum wage. Each sex has it’s unrealistic standards (e.g, Shades of Gray, or any romance novel).
Men are raised not to have this sort of delusion about their sexual market value, or how handsome they are…that’s emotional and magical thinking, purely delusional…it doesn’t last long in nearly all young men. Reality tends to beat it out of them.
Dana
July 24th, 2015 @ 8:24 am

Oh, very well, I denounce myself, I strongly denounce myself.
Zimriel
July 24th, 2015 @ 8:27 am

I think the “vanguard” theory comes from Lenin, more than from Marx.
Dana
July 24th, 2015 @ 8:28 am

Alas! The original Mountain Dew was best, but it was bestest of all when it came in the 10 or 16 oz returnable bottles. It actually tasted different in the thin, disposable glass bottles, and worst of all in the plastic ones. Dew in cans is OK.
Dana
July 24th, 2015 @ 8:29 am

A prince from Nigeria? A Princess would be OK, but a Prince is just feeding into the cisheteronormative patriarchy.
Finrod Felagund
July 24th, 2015 @ 8:43 am

“Beauty is skin-deep, but ugly goes to the bone.”
DFG2
July 24th, 2015 @ 9:04 am

Damn. What did her daddy do to her? How do you get that broken by 25?
Ilion
July 24th, 2015 @ 9:04 am

Alas and alak, I must denounce myself — for, I “insisted” that you denounce yourself, whereas, I should have “demanded” that you denounce yourself. These nuances are important.
Gunga
July 24th, 2015 @ 9:08 am

Actually, I’m the Con Artist formerly known as a Prince from Nigeria…how much “stuff” can I put you down for?
Ramonshelton
July 24th, 2015 @ 9:31 am

It’s All About You t-h-e-o-t-h-e-r-m-c-c-a-i-n < Make It Easy
Alex Furlong
July 24th, 2015 @ 9:33 am

Dad probably wasn’t around much. I suspect a lot of this anger originated thanks to catty high school girls.
A Fun New Drinking Game! | Rotten Chestnuts
July 24th, 2015 @ 9:33 am

[…] Sip every time you find an example of the Three Laws in a typical feminist rant. Stacy McCain has a great one to get you started. But here’s the catch: You have to clearly identify each […]