The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Why Does Obama Hate Your Babies?

Posted on | August 1, 2015 | 104 Comments

 

Obama Will Veto Bill to De-Fund
Planned Parenthood Despite
Selling Aborted Baby Parts

Steven Ertelt, LifeNews

Obama Appointee And Bundler
Blocks More Video Releases By Group
Behind Planned Parenthood Sting

Mollie Hemingway, The Federalist

White House threatens to veto bill
blocking Planned Parenthood’s funding

Jordan Fabian, The Hill

Does a Future Planned Parenthood Video
Contain ‘Prima Facie Evidence
of Born-Alive Infants?’

David French, National Review

It is important to keep in mind during this controversy that, despite everything the abortion industry will try to tell you, the question is not Planned Parenthood’s existence, but whether federal taxpayer dollars should be used to fund it.

Apologists for the Culture of Death are experts at rhetorical prestidigitation, deflecting criticism and distracting the public’s attention with emotional appeals about “rights” and “women’s health.” They will use character assassination against their critics, trying to “kill the messenger” by demonizing their opponents with accusations of bad faith (mala fides) that are irrelevant to the issue. However, we do not need to engage in metaphysical or existential debates about “rights” in order to say that American taxpayers should not be required to fund an organization that profits from what everyone with a conscience recognizes as a ghastly and abominable business:

We have passed the point where Nazi comparisons are inappropriate. In the latest video about Planned Parenthood, if you want to watch it, you will see an admission that some of the children are born alive before being killed and carved up — their bodies being sold essentially for scrap.
These are children. They entered into the world alive and were killed, chopped up, and sold bit by bit.
“It’s a boy,” one person commented in the latest film. They talk about the commoditization of children’s eyeballs (the ones in the video were not developed enough), hearts that turn to mush they are so small, and reference the legs, feet, and hands of the children.
They are children being killed, butchered, and sold in pieces.

You can read the rest at Red State.

Democrats are the Party of Death, forever stained by their embrace of this hideous evil. No honest person believes their lies.




 

Comments

104 Responses to “Why Does Obama Hate Your Babies?”

  1. RS
    August 1st, 2015 @ 10:06 am

    With the release of the first video, I posted comments at several sites recalling that PP has always been opposed to laws requiring babies born alive after “botched” abortions be afforded all treatment necessary to save their lives. I further commented that it would not surprise me to find that PP deliberately keeps babies alive in order to harvest viable organs. These babies are “off the books.” That is, there is neither a birth or death certificate issued. They do not exist, and therefore, they are the perfect subjects for these abominable practices.

    What we see is not just abortion; it is the sale of children into medical slavery for their short lives.

  2. robertstacymccain
    August 1st, 2015 @ 10:12 am

    The lies Democrats tell about “choice” and “women’s health” are convincing only to those who believe that Dr. Mengele was a humanitarian philanthropist.

  3. RS
    August 1st, 2015 @ 10:22 am

    It is the inevitable end-game of the Leftist project, which is predicated upon denying the transcendent significance and dignity of the individual human. Of course, subordinating the individual to the collective never actually aids the collective. Rather it provides wealth and status to those who have arrogated to themselves power over the collective.

  4. The Other McCain asking why the President hates babies. | The End of Abortion
    August 1st, 2015 @ 10:27 am

    […] From Robert Stacy McCain: […]

  5. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    August 1st, 2015 @ 10:38 am
  6. Steve White
    August 1st, 2015 @ 10:41 am

    I thought the judge had blocked only the release of the parts of the videos that referenced the company buying the parts — Stem Cell Technologies. That was because (as I understand it) the company claimed that the videographers had signed, and were now violating, nondisclosure statements.

    I don’t think all the videos are banned.

  7. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    August 1st, 2015 @ 10:44 am
  8. Unless they are anchor babies… What difference does it make ? | Head Space
    August 1st, 2015 @ 10:57 am

    […] Why Does Obama Hate Your Babies? […]

  9. Matt_SE
    August 1st, 2015 @ 11:24 am

    #WarOnBabies

  10. Matt_SE
    August 1st, 2015 @ 11:28 am

    There are two temporary restraining orders now:

    The first was against CMP’s release of anything having to do with StemExpress.
    The second was against the release of anything having to do with the National Abortion Federation’s annual meeting.
    The second one is odd, since CMP hasn’t yet even mentioned NAF. I assume the abortionists got together and tracked down CMP’s movements over the last 3 years, and can guess that they attended the NAF convention, and furthermore that VERY DAMAGING things were said (and recorded) there.

  11. Matt_SE
    August 1st, 2015 @ 11:31 am

    The exact same thing goes on in Communist China, for the exact same reasons.

  12. Matt_SE
    August 1st, 2015 @ 11:35 am

    When Obama was filmed singling out PP for praise by saying “God bless Planned Parenthood,” I knew this was trolling. It was designed to shove the evil in our faces with the message “there’s nothing you can do about it” along with mocking our religion.
    IMO, that clip of Obama should be run next to the PP videos 24/7. Make that despicable piece of shit own his evil. That is even more true now that Obama has decided to double down on his support.

  13. darleenclick
    August 1st, 2015 @ 11:39 am

    I have asked, in all seriousness in any discussion I’ve had with pro-aborts – if PlannedParenthood wishes to continue to received taxpayer money, then they should agree to divest themselves of the abortion services.

    I NEVER get a straight answer.

  14. Matt_SE
    August 1st, 2015 @ 11:40 am

    They say that only 3% of PP’s business is abortions. I say that the other 97% is just a cover.

  15. darleenclick
    August 1st, 2015 @ 12:32 pm

    Time for someone in Congress to subpoena ALL the tapes as a workaround these politically-driven injunctions.

  16. marcus tullius cicero
    August 1st, 2015 @ 12:51 pm

    …What if they ignore the judge’s order? They can do an Obama run around the laws gig……

  17. McGehee
    August 1st, 2015 @ 1:12 pm

    And the leaders of CMP will get the Nakoula Basseley Nakoula treatment.

    Our job is to ensure the Streisand Effect, videos or no videos.

  18. Daniel O'Brien
    August 1st, 2015 @ 1:38 pm

    The 3% is based on a count of the number of “clients” using abortion “services”, but they over-count the clients use of other “services”. Abortion is a big part of their revenue stream.

  19. Kory Oransky
    August 1st, 2015 @ 2:33 pm

    Anyone who has ever had anything to do with running a business knows the maxim “10% brings in 90% of your profits”. In other words….you can have 15 other things available, but the majority of your clientele will pick your “famous BBQ ribs” or “those cute earrings.”

    Abortion is their money maker. They will never get rid of it because they can’t AFFORD to. They are squeezing out every dime from it, as anyone with a pulse can see after watching the videos.

    If they truly were just going for the cost of production, they wouldn’t be charging what they do for each liver, heart and kidney. They certainly aren’t giving the woman a discount based on how valuable the recoverable parts are.

    The rest of all their “services”? They just serve as camouflage. They couldn’t keep the doors open if they depended on that revenue, whatever it might be.

  20. Kory Oransky
    August 1st, 2015 @ 2:37 pm

    I’m hoping they’ve stashed some files in Upper Absurdistan or somewhere else beyond the reaches of American courts.

    It’s not like you can’t put things on YouTube or other platforms and still get the message out…. 😉

  21. Dianna Deeley
    August 1st, 2015 @ 2:51 pm

    Those need to come out, and I’m not sure what grounds the restraining order was issued. It just doesn’t seem warranted.

  22. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    August 1st, 2015 @ 3:02 pm
  23. TheLittlePeopleFlyCommercial
    August 1st, 2015 @ 3:12 pm

    51%

  24. TheLittlePeopleFlyCommercial
    August 1st, 2015 @ 3:13 pm

    Or for a concerned citizen who made the unfortunate at some point in the past to sue PP for misusing parts of her aborted baby. Surely PP ONLY sold those parts for which it had permission and did not, you know, sell everything. Since you know, that would be wrong.

  25. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    August 1st, 2015 @ 3:41 pm

    That is like asking ExxonMobile to divest from petroleum. Planned Parenthood is all about abortion and everything else is 2nd to that mission.

  26. Matt_SE
    August 1st, 2015 @ 3:42 pm

    The issuing judge was an Obama true believer, and has no respect for the law. That’s how.

  27. concern00
    August 1st, 2015 @ 3:54 pm

    With or without a restraining order surely there are plenty of options for this information to be “accidentally” disseminated by parties other than CMP.

  28. Daniel Freeman
    August 1st, 2015 @ 4:24 pm

    “Well gosh, it sure is a shame that our file server got hacked, but if it happened to the Fed OPM then it could happen to anyone.”

  29. RKae
    August 1st, 2015 @ 4:24 pm

    You never get a straight answer because none of them want to say, “Damn it! We’re trying to fulfill Margaret Sanger’s vision here!”

  30. RKae
    August 1st, 2015 @ 4:25 pm

    How are these videos any different from the run-of-the-mill consumer advocate stuff that every local TV channel does when looking into shady small businesses?

    How does a judge get off saying that the practice of using a hidden camera is suddenly wrong just because it’s managed to catch a huge national disgrace instead of a slightly crooked tire salesman in Wichita?

  31. DeadMessenger
    August 1st, 2015 @ 4:39 pm

    I know that what you’re saying here is true, and it makes me want to puke.

  32. DeadMessenger
    August 1st, 2015 @ 4:40 pm

    You totally nailed it with this one, EBL.

  33. concern00
    August 1st, 2015 @ 4:41 pm

    Could be the same people responsible for the alleged PP site hacking!

  34. DeadMessenger
    August 1st, 2015 @ 4:42 pm

    That’s a really sad – yet true – point of view.

  35. DeadMessenger
    August 1st, 2015 @ 4:47 pm

    Satan’s vision, more like. Seriously…parting out babies??? Even Sanger couldn’t come up with that.

    I’m starting to think that even the Lake of Fire is going to be too good for some people.

  36. DeadMessenger
    August 1st, 2015 @ 4:51 pm

    Hell yeah. Gowdy is subpoenaing everything else and being ignored. I betcha these guys would have no problem complying with a Congressional subpoena.

    Although I want to see any remaining tapes. Well, not personally…I want some man to watch them and give me the salient info, leaving out the more grotesque details. Because emotionally, I can’t handle it. It’s babies…I’m a mommy…I can’t handle the depth of evil.

  37. DeadMessenger
    August 1st, 2015 @ 4:57 pm

    And it’s not like you can’t put them on a conveniently unsecure Hillary Clinton Brand Secretary of State Server®, and if someone hacks in and takes them…well, oopsie…how’d that happen?

  38. DeadMessenger
    August 1st, 2015 @ 5:00 pm

    Hahahaha! I just said something like that two minutes ago, before I got to your earlier remark here. Sneaky minds think alike, I guess. =)

  39. DeadMessenger
    August 1st, 2015 @ 5:00 pm

    Because racist, that’s why.

  40. Finrod Felagund
    August 1st, 2015 @ 5:05 pm

    “Because shut up, that’s why”.

  41. RS
    August 1st, 2015 @ 5:07 pm

    There is a doctrine of law known as “the right of sepulcher.” It basically holds ownership of a deceased person’s remains–deceased humans are no longer “persons” under the law–belong to the “next of kin,” which is a legal term of art. This is why only certain individuals can consent to post mortem organ donations of relatives.

    Here is the problem, however. As I mention above, these babies are “off the books.” There is no official record of their existence. Therefore proving what happened to a specific baby post abortion would be practically impossible as I’m sure PP keeps no records beyond those required pertaining to the mother’s “medical” treatment.

    Nonetheless, it would be worth a try. Perhaps a class action on behalf of all woman who’ve used PP’s abortion services.

  42. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    August 1st, 2015 @ 5:25 pm

    I should have said does a hunter hate his prey? So I will say it now.

  43. MaMcGriz
    August 1st, 2015 @ 5:46 pm

    Liberals.

    They kill their base, sell the body parts, then replace these lost American lives with filthy criminals and illiterates who break the law by being here and bring with them nothing but trouble.

    Liberals.

  44. Jeanette Victoria
    August 1st, 2015 @ 6:41 pm

    Because Christian conservative = HITLER

  45. IWantALamborghini
    August 1st, 2015 @ 6:43 pm

    Certainly we can subpoena the records to verify if there is some unique tracking from the mother -> baby -> organs ->stem express -> stem express customer. In fact for liability and quality reasons, it seems quite likely that this would be the case.

  46. Jeanette Victoria
    August 1st, 2015 @ 6:50 pm

    Have y’all seen the meme on twitter? “Progressives” are denying that PP are selling baby parts because we all know it is just a clump of cells. Yes really

    On at the We the People Part of the Constitution means were are really socialist form of government. Yes really that is a meme on Twitter

    Folks we have generations of people who haven’t a shred of common sense and who don’t know how to reason anymore

  47. Daniel Freeman
    August 1st, 2015 @ 7:02 pm

    I think that Hell is basically having such a corrupt soul that God’s presence is pain, and then Him allowing them to be apart — wandering the outer wastes, as it were. Purgatory would then be remaining just close enough to endure the pain until the dross has been burnt out.

    Anyone who could do that, their souls must be dead. Nothing but dross. No conscience left to even recognize that they did something wrong, let alone desire forgiveness.

  48. Jeanette Victoria
    August 1st, 2015 @ 7:08 pm

    “Whenever there is animal worship there is human sacrifice.” G.K.Chesterton

  49. Jeanette Victoria
    August 1st, 2015 @ 7:11 pm

    Grounds they don’t need any grounds the US has become thugocracy and has been so for a while

  50. Daniel Freeman
    August 1st, 2015 @ 7:12 pm

    So it isn’t just a coincidence that the distraction is Cecil the lion.