The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Some Stereotypes Are True

Posted on | September 27, 2015 | 78 Comments

Somebody on Twitter started the hashtag #NoHymenNoDiamond which was either (a) an extreme argument for premarital abstinence, or (b) another brilliant 4chan satire to troll feminists. It doesn’t matter which it was, because it brought out the feminist crazies, including one who wanted to lecture the world about misogyny and heteronormativity, and another who declared, “Men have no idea how women’s bodies work.”

When I started snarking about this, it attracted the attention of a feminist who accused me of “bullying.” When I get that kind of reaction, it makes me wonder, who is saying these things? So I checked her Twitter profile and saw a link to — what else? — a Tumblr blog where she describes herself as a 19-year-old “aggressive lesbian communist & feminist” who likes “harry potter and astrology.” (She’s “pisces sun / taurus moon / leo rising.”) A quick survey of the content at her blog proved her to be a perfect example of the angry man-hating lunatic stereotype that feminists claim doesn’t represent their movement.

Feminism is about empowering mentally ill teenage Marxist lesbians with facial piercings, who feel an urge to tell sane, normal adults that we are the problem, and that they are the solution.





 

Category: Sex Trouble

Comments

78 Responses to “Some Stereotypes Are True”

  1. Mike G.
    September 27th, 2015 @ 4:02 pm

    Just face it Stacy…you bring out the best in “those people.” 😉

  2. Bob Belvedere
    September 27th, 2015 @ 4:04 pm

    And we love him [in a manly, John Wayne-ish kind of way] for it!

  3. Jeanette Victoria
    September 27th, 2015 @ 4:35 pm

    What a sad and deeply disturbed person she is. And talk about bizarre coincidence Valinor is a name of planet made up by my deceased daughter over 15 years ago and and she was mist definitely NOT a feminist http://valiya.tripod.com/valinor.html

  4. TheOtherAndrewB
    September 27th, 2015 @ 4:36 pm

    You know that feminists are truly sane, focused and correct when they have appointed Bill Nye, a mechanical engineer, as the world’s leading authority on conception. Maybe we can get the opinion of an aerospace technician on the G-spot next, or perhaps a landscape architect can weigh in on intersectionality.

  5. Jeanette Victoria
    September 27th, 2015 @ 4:41 pm

    The Manslater: (Woman Language Translator)

    https://youtu.be/ezVib_giTFo

  6. kilo6
    September 27th, 2015 @ 4:42 pm

    That #NoHymenNoDiamond thingy on Twitter is has some good ones

    twitter.com/EmmarRuseman/status/561308763937075200

  7. kilo6
    September 27th, 2015 @ 4:46 pm

    A newspaper Tumblr blog is a device for making the ignorant more ignorant and the crazy crazier.
    -H.L Mencken
    (if Mencken had lived to see Tumblr I think he would have updated his earlier comment)

  8. kilo6
    September 27th, 2015 @ 5:03 pm

    Should I click that Tumblr link that our host graciously provided??
    https://i.imgur.com/s5eYavf.png

  9. Mike G.
    September 27th, 2015 @ 5:07 pm

    Of course we do! [ In a manly John Wayne-ish kind of way]

  10. Phil_McG
    September 27th, 2015 @ 5:14 pm

    This whole #NoHymenNoDiamond proves that […] Feminism is needed

    Feminism’s like climate change then. Whatever the weather does, climate change is More Urgent Than Ever, You Guys!

    Jackie says she was raped by Haven Monahan and his frat bros… proof that feminism is needed.

    Some people start to doubt Jackie’s lurid tale… proof that feminism is needed!

    Haven Monahan turns out not to exist, and Jackie’s rape never happened… SHUT UP! AND… FEMINISM IS NEEDED!

    It’s like arguing with people in a cult, because that’s what feminism is. A narcissistic cult that promotes irrationality (muh oppression) and mysticism (muh witchcraft and muh feminine intuition) over logic and reason (patriarchal rape-facts. Boo!)

    A cult that elevates people based on their claims of victimhood, so the most pathetic shrieking broken basket cases end up at the top of the feminist totem pole.

    Round them up and sell them to Saudi Arabia.

  11. Julie Pascal
    September 27th, 2015 @ 5:15 pm

    Stacey… harassing the mentally ill has got to stop.

    😉

  12. mole
    September 27th, 2015 @ 5:19 pm

    To a child with a hammer, everything looks like a nail.

  13. mole
    September 27th, 2015 @ 5:25 pm

    I think 4 chan did the no hymen no diamond a while back. The latest appears to be calling ladies “roasties” by comparing their nether regions to an Arbies roast meat sandwich.
    Unfair but funny.

  14. kilo6
    September 27th, 2015 @ 5:26 pm

    Credit due:

    Above pic from Emmar Ruseman (@EmmarRuseman) who apparently is with the USAF 38th Rescue Sqdn SAR unit (PJs) out of Moody AFB

    https://twitter.com/EmmarRuseman

  15. Steve Skubinna
    September 27th, 2015 @ 6:03 pm

    Actually, I think a mechanical engineer is the perfect person to describe conception. At least take all that messy emotion out of it.

    In fact, feminists insist upon treating procreation as a purely mechanical process, divorced from human emotion, let alone needs. They had plenty of help, however – the so-called “sexual revolution” was all about decoupling sex from personality, making it nothing more than a physical act.

    What’s pathetic is that these idiot feminists have no idea that they’re following Hugh Hefner’s prescriptions for human sexuality.

  16. Steve Skubinna
    September 27th, 2015 @ 6:04 pm

    No, no no no… that’s a Thomas Jefferson quote, dummy!

  17. Steve Skubinna
    September 27th, 2015 @ 6:06 pm

    What separates science from religion is that science is falsifiable where religion requires faith.

    And that’s how you can tell the AGW people, feminists, and Marxists are all following a cult. Everything that happens is evidence in support.

  18. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    September 27th, 2015 @ 6:07 pm

    You two need to get a room [in a manly John Wayne-ish kind of way]

    ; )

  19. concern00
    September 27th, 2015 @ 6:10 pm

    Once upon a time men could use the word love in a sentence describing their male friends, without anyone raising an eyebrow. Now it’s seen as suspect. Who can we thank for that?

  20. TheOtherAndrewB
    September 27th, 2015 @ 6:29 pm

    Good point. No male chauvinist could wish upon women anything one bit as awful as what they have voluntarily embraced in the name of equality and “taking control of their sexuality.”

  21. BSR
    September 27th, 2015 @ 6:41 pm

    Eh, as a woman, I don’t find it all that offensive. Feminists just don’t have any sense of humor whatsoever unless the ‘humor’ involves roasting a man.

    I concluded a long time ago that it’s natural for men to obsess over women’s parts. They DO tend to think about sex an awful lot. I’d rather it was because they love and appreciate women than because they hate and despise them.

  22. Finrod Felagund
    September 27th, 2015 @ 6:43 pm

    She’s no daughter of Valinor; I should know, I’ve been there.

  23. Mike G.
    September 27th, 2015 @ 8:22 pm

    I’ll take the LGBTQ for $500 Alex.

  24. mole
    September 27th, 2015 @ 9:34 pm

    Hmm the second pat which ive omitted is the “fact” that “roasties’ are that way because theyve had too much sex.

    Now the funny thing is the feminazis have taken the bait and get trolled mercilessly with it, its the argument equivalent of “mansplaining’ whenever a female holds forth an opinion.

    It doesnt make it right or good, but it does annoy the hell out of the right class of people.

  25. RS
    September 27th, 2015 @ 9:45 pm

    You have a bunch of great looking kids. Take after their mother, do they?

    : )

  26. Wombat_socho
    September 27th, 2015 @ 11:31 pm

    It’s the Daily Double!

  27. Wombat_socho
    September 27th, 2015 @ 11:32 pm

    Only if you’re ready to find out how deep the rabbit hole of insanity really goes.

  28. Wombat_socho
    September 27th, 2015 @ 11:34 pm

    Which is what 4chan is, and has always been, about.

  29. Wombat_socho
    September 27th, 2015 @ 11:35 pm

    The girls do. The boys’ resemblance to Stacy is pretty obvious.

  30. robertstacymccain
    September 27th, 2015 @ 11:35 pm

    Men who speak this way about women’s anatomy have watched too much porn, period. I mean, to critique the vulva in this manner requires a lot of time spent “comparison shopping,” as it were. Does anyone believe these geeks have seen so many vulvas in real life? Don’t be silly. These guys are wankers, and should be avoided as such.

  31. mole
    September 28th, 2015 @ 12:09 am

    Absolutely, but the reactions from the SJW crowd makes them fine…from a distance.

    Its not so much that what they say is just medically incorrect, but the fact most blokes dont over-analyse the contents of the lady they are with’s pants.

  32. Fail Burton
    September 28th, 2015 @ 12:54 am

    When “heteronormative” is an interchangeable term for women-hatred you just know you’ve run up against a mental case. Fortunately they always inform us they have mental health issues and that’s just a coincidence that has nothing to do with their sociopathy towards men.

    Lesbian or not, what Miss Cutesy Stupsey will learn is the same lesson all morons of her type learn: when you live on your looks and don’t prepare for the future then when your looks go, so does your future. I’ve seen too many women wave their looks around like a club, never exercise a day in their lives or create a profession and by 35 are minimum wage fruit-buyers for some supermarket distribution warehouse driving a car that never seems to quite work. The men don’t call anymore and all the parties and clubs are in the past. Have fun Miss Nineteen.

  33. Fail Burton
    September 28th, 2015 @ 12:55 am

    Well, if they want to push male fragility hashtags they can take the pushback too.

  34. Fail Burton
    September 28th, 2015 @ 12:58 am

    You don’t need to be an expert on intersectionality to know it’s an anti-white ideology.

  35. Daniel Freeman
    September 28th, 2015 @ 1:32 am

    Now that is the part that needs to be hammered home. Also the part where if they wait until 35, they can’t actually have as many babies as at 25.

  36. Andrea Latham
    September 28th, 2015 @ 4:00 am

    A Way To Get Paid $97/hour And More…….After earning an average of 19952 Dollars monthly,I’m finally getting 97 Dollars an hour,just working 4-5 hours daily online.….. Weekly paycheck… Bonus opportunities…earn upto $16k to $19k /a month……….Only a few hour required to understand and start working…….look over here …
    .poz…
    ??? http://GoogleTopCareersGetDynamicFinancialJobs/get/morethan$97/h…
    ????????????????????????????????????????????????

  37. Quartermaster
    September 28th, 2015 @ 5:26 am

    That exploration will take at least as long as the efforts to explore and map Mammoth Cave.

  38. Mike G.
    September 28th, 2015 @ 5:32 am

    You forget-to most of “these women”, a baby is a burden…and we sure as hell don’t want ” these women” perpetuating their ideology onto another generation of kids, amirite?

  39. Mike G.
    September 28th, 2015 @ 5:33 am

    If its anything like trying to map Carlsbad Caverns, it is an ongoing process.

  40. Dana
    September 28th, 2015 @ 7:14 am

    I note that you sired four men but only two women. Clearly, you are a white cisheteronormative patriarchist, and I denounce you!

  41. Dana
    September 28th, 2015 @ 7:17 am

    The only women who were never raped are Kathleen Willey, Juanita Broaddrick and Paula Jones.

  42. Dana
    September 28th, 2015 @ 7:21 am

    If she’s living on her looks, she’s bound to be on food stamps, or else she’d starve to death.

  43. robertstacymccain
    September 28th, 2015 @ 8:10 am

    Youth is a resource wasted on the young. Part of feminist resentment of “inequality” is ultimately rooted in a recognition that biological differences put women at a disadvantage if — and I emphasize “if” here — it is their desire to compete against males or to emulate masculine behavior.

    Young men who “play the field” or “sow their wild oats” seem to pay no penalty for their sexual irresponsibility. Indeed, the carefree young bachelor is envied by his peers and admired by women. By contrast, promiscuous women are treated contemptuously by men and derogated as “sluts” by women. (Feminists denounce “slut-shaming” as sexist, despite the fact that this is practiced chiefly by women, who recognize how the availability of promiscuous rivals undermines their own ability to interest men in relationships.) However, it is the difference between male and female biology in reproduction — rather than “patriarchal oppression” — that accounts for the difference in social attitudes.

    Males are most valued as providers of resources — the “breadwinner” husband who can pay the bills for his wife and children — and this is a role that the typical young man is ill-suited to perform. It is not until he reaches his mid-20s, in most cases, that a young man has gotten far enough ahead financially as to be able to pay the bills while his wife stays home to tend to a newborn. It is because of the young man’s unsuitability for the husband/father role that so many avoid the responsibility and social limitations inherent in a monogamous long-term relationship. He “plays the field” because he simply can’t afford the alternative of marriage and fatherhood.

    Young women, however, are most valued as wives according to their future potential as mothers (even though this valuation is usually not conscious or apparent to young people). From a strictly Darwinian perspective, it behooves the young man to choose a wife who (a) is near her reproductive prime and (b) has behavioral traits associated with monogamous fidelity.

    The modest, pious, hard-working, chaste, quiet, serious girl — whose companionship may be little valued when guys are looking to “play the field” with party girls — simply has to endure her youthful disadvantage, and resist the temptation to envy the party girls. Her potential as mother and wife is a resource that will become more valued when, in young adulthood, she is an appropriate candidate for marriage — but this is not apparent to her at the time. The serious-minded girl feels that she is peculiarly and unfairly disadvantaged and, rather than blaming this on a culture that celebrates unrestricted casual sex, she is often attracted to feminism, which blames “male supremacy” for her problems.

    EFFECTIVE PARENTING IS THE SOLUTION! Young people must be disciplined and supervised and warned away from the reckless hedonism that engenders the harms to which feminism presents itself (falsely) as the answer. It may be true that “boys will be boys,” but parents can limit the damage by (a) discouraging sons from engaging in irresponsible and disrespectful sexual behavior, and (b) surrounding their daughters with protective supervision.

    The “old-fashioned” approach to parenting may not yield perfect results, but it is infinitely superior to the permissiveness of “modern” parenting.

  44. robertstacymccain
    September 28th, 2015 @ 8:27 am

    Genetic superiority requires that children inherit high-quality DNA from both parents. Superior intelligence is exhibited by an ability to select a superior mate; if I was in any way deficient in some desirable characteristic, those traits were high on my list sought in a wife. Among other things, my wife has beautiful teeth and high cheekbones, and is also relatively tall (5-foot-6). She has many excellent qualities, of course, but these were definitely factors that weighed in her favor. While I do not think love is strictly rational, there is no reason why superior intellectual faculties should not be applied to the process of mate selection.

  45. Ilion
    September 28th, 2015 @ 8:33 am

    I recently re-read ‘The Lord of the Rings’ (which I’d read back in the late 1970’s) — and I was shocked, shocked! at the way Frodo and Sam were constantly expressing love for one another.
    .
    If someone were to write LOTR today, all the wise, knowing heads would read the very same words as blatant homoeroticism.

  46. Quartermaster
    September 28th, 2015 @ 9:41 am

    Carlsbad is a small storm sewer in comparison to Mammoth Cave. So far mapped passages total over 300 miles and the lead list keeps growing. Carlsbad is no where near as active.

  47. Quartermaster
    September 28th, 2015 @ 9:56 am

    You is mostly sertannly rite.

  48. Quartermaster
    September 28th, 2015 @ 9:59 am

    If 4chan didn’t exist, we’d have to invent it just to annoy SJWs and CHORFs.

  49. kilo6
    September 28th, 2015 @ 10:05 am

    A failing of the modern English language that we don’t have a translation for the Greek words philía, agáp? and storg?. “Love” when used in modern English frequently tends to mean ér?s when in fact it shouldn’t

  50. Dana
    September 28th, 2015 @ 10:12 am

    And some homosexual activists tried to claim just that, but, after returning home, Sam married Rosie Cotton.