The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Harvard Feminists Lie About Rape

Posted on | October 5, 2015 | 108 Comments

An anti-rape protest at Harvard University.

No honest, decent or moral young person would ever want to go near Harvard University, a corrupt and decadent institution run by depraved perverts. Harvard women are particularly notorious for their shameless promiscuity — one Harvard girl boasted of her “freedom to have as many sexual partners as I want without being looked down on” — which is a major cause of sexually transmitted diseases in the Boston metro area.

“Boston residents ages 15 through 24 are almost four times
more likely to have Chlamydia than residents overall.
Among that age group, 70% of those diagnosed are female.”

Sex with Harvard girls is such a health risk it’s a wonder any man smart enough to get into Harvard would do it. Of course, most men who attend Harvard are gay, which may substantially lower their risk of chlamydia. However, some Harvard women still claim to be victims of rape:

The number of rapes reported by students at Harvard University’s Cambridge campus “nearly doubled” between 2013 & 2014, according to an article in school paper The Harvard Crimson. This alarming info comes via the new campus-security report from Harvard police, compiled as part of federal Clery Act requirements. But like so much related to campus rape numbers, this seemingly drastic increase isn’t nearly as alarming as some will make it out to be.
First, it’s important to consider concrete sexual assault numbers, which were still quite low. In 2014,33 instances of rape were reported to either campus police, university officials, or local law enforcement by students at Harvard’s main campus in Cambridge, and one rape was reported at Harvard’s Longwood campus. . . .. The number of rapes reported at Harvard last year is up from 17 incidents in 2013, and 24 in 2012.
But as Ashe Schow points out in the Washington Examiner, six of the 2014 rape reports — nearly 20 percent — were determined to be “unfounded,” i.e. “false or baseless.” This leaves us with just 28 credible rape reports at Harvard last year. . . .
In any event, with a population of about 21,000 students, Harvard University’s rape rate for 2014 was about 0.13 percent, or one in every 750 Harvard students.
The campus-crime report does not include a gender breakdown for rape victims, but let’s just assume for the sake of further extrapolation that all 28 were women. Roughly half the Harvard University student body is women. If we count both graduate and undergraduate students, that’s a rape rate of about 0.27 percent for female Harvard students, or one in every 375 Harvard women.
There are about 6,400 undergraduate students at Harvard, and about half are women as well. If we assume all the reported rape victims were undergraduate women — a not baseless assumption, considering only one incident of rape reported between 2012-2014 took place outside of a residence hall (though of course these aren’t exclusively undergrad housing) — that leaves us with a rape rate of about 0.88 percent.
In other words, this worst-case-scenario assumption means that about one in 114 female undergraduates reported rapes at Harvard last year.

You can read the whole thing. The fact that there were six false rape accusations — officially determined to be “unfounded . . . baseless” — at Harvard last year does not surprise anyone who knows anything about Harvard girls, whose dishonesty is as notorious as their promiscuity.

Still we must confront the shocking allegation that Harvard is now admitting heterosexual men who are willing to have sex with Harvard women despite the well-known risk of chlamydia infection.

This suggests either a serious mental health crisis in Cambridge, or else these Harvard students are using powerful mind-altering narcotics that deprive them of their capacity for rational thought. Perhaps they are getting high on ether. As a famous journalist once observed, “There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge.”

Whatever the explanation, any man accused of having sex with a Harvard woman should plead insanity, because he would have to be completely unhinged to do something as crazy as that.

P.S.: Tuesday will be my 56th birthday. Hit the freaking tip jar.





 

Comments

108 Responses to “Harvard Feminists Lie About Rape”

  1. kilo6
    October 5th, 2015 @ 6:19 pm

    Save yourselves from this perverse generation (cf Acts 2:40)

  2. Dana
    October 5th, 2015 @ 6:27 pm

    Our esteemed host wrote:

    Harvard women are particularly notorious for their shameless promiscuity — one Harvard girl boasted of her “freedom to have as many sexual partners as I want without being looked down on” — which is a major cause of sexually transmitted diseases in the Great Boston region.

    What, is she claiming that she has the right to determine what I, or anyone else, think?

  3. Dana
    October 5th, 2015 @ 6:31 pm

    Of course, Nian Hu did, in a way, tell us what to think about her. Assuming that she is as promiscuous as she implies — which might or might not be the case — the lovely Miss Hu has already told the normal young men at Hahvahd to spread the word: she’s easy.

  4. robertstacymccain
    October 5th, 2015 @ 6:34 pm

    DTF.

  5. Dana
    October 5th, 2015 @ 6:41 pm

    I admit it: I wasn’t cool enough to know what DTF meant, and had to look it up.

  6. DeadMessenger
    October 5th, 2015 @ 7:45 pm

    I believe that’s the implication, yeah. Or maybe she meant “without being looked down on by other sluts”.

  7. Fail Burton
    October 5th, 2015 @ 7:46 pm

    And of course this “empirical” basis for man-hatred all started with insane lesbian feminist ideology. Now even they are being rejected by the monsters they created. Susan Brownmiller and Julie Bindel are too “second wave” for women who want to shut down free speech. Ironically, the biggest issue separating them is whether transgender should get the new intersectional title of “most oppressed.” In other words, in the new and improved version of lesbian non-white feminism, men are the biggest victims. LOL. The Patriarchy is clever beyond all imagining.

  8. DeadMessenger
    October 5th, 2015 @ 7:48 pm

    I’m a lady, and so officially I’m saying I don’t understand what that phrase means. And I’d be shocked if I did understand. I might get a case of the vapors.

  9. RS
    October 5th, 2015 @ 7:53 pm

    She wishes to pretend there is no moral component to her actions, or, more precisely, there should be no moral component to her actions. The problem with that, however, is that this entire “rape crisis,” in which “rape” is conflated with “regret,” presupposes some morality associated with sexual behavior.

    Girl wakes up and regrets a sexual encounter; she feels guilty about it, so she retreats to the moral arena by claiming “rape” to absolve herself morally of any culpability. Sadly, it doesn’t work for deep down she still knows what she did.

  10. JeffS
    October 5th, 2015 @ 8:21 pm

    “….any man accused of having sex with a Harvard woman should plead insanity….”

    The old rule of thumb is, never stick it to the crazy.

    Or is that, “never stick in the crazy”?

  11. Bob Belvedere
    October 5th, 2015 @ 8:40 pm

    You think Harvard Girls is crazy?

    They ain’t got nuthin’ on them Wellesley Wymins.

  12. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    October 5th, 2015 @ 8:50 pm
  13. Harvard Feminists Lie About Rape | Living in Anglo-America
    October 5th, 2015 @ 8:54 pm
  14. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    October 5th, 2015 @ 8:59 pm

    Radcliffe girls are ratty

  15. Daniel Freeman
    October 5th, 2015 @ 9:03 pm

    Ha! I know a humblebrag when I see one. Yes, we’re all aware that you’re happily married and have no reason to know terms like that. :p

  16. Daniel Freeman
    October 5th, 2015 @ 9:05 pm

    Close. “Never stick it in crazy.”

  17. mole
    October 5th, 2015 @ 9:15 pm

    Stop raping them with facts and maths….

  18. RKae
    October 6th, 2015 @ 12:05 am

    Just in case no one saw this one (and I apologize it it’s a repost, but I can’t resist), it’s a crackup.

    Feminists show their solidarity with rape victims by peeing their pants. Unfortunately… it was started as a hoax. Oops.

    http://legalinsurrection.com/2015/10/feminists-fall-for-pissforequality-hoax/

  19. concern00
    October 6th, 2015 @ 12:43 am

    Stuart Schneiderman always has a great take on things. You should collaborate.

    http://stuartschneiderman.blogspot.com.au/2015/10/does-feminism-undermine-womens-careers.html

  20. Carrie
    October 6th, 2015 @ 12:52 am

    Wow. So much wrong in one little article 🙁

    “Baseless” rape accusations are not necessarily false, and any law enforcement agency will tell you this. Accusations which “do not have enough evidence to prosecute” have been lazily labeled “false” or “baseless” for too long, lending to the very wrong and very high “false rape report’s being as high as 15%, etc”. (Law Enforcement truly puts false rape reports at the 4-8% level, right alongside 4-8% false theft and 4-8% false assault, etc., charges.) Girls who were raped got fined or jailed for reporting “baseless” rape reports, only to be vindicated when enough other victims also report her rapist (Google “Lynwood Washington police fined rape victim $500 for lying, Marc O’Leary Colorado” for one instance).

    Gay males have a statistically MUCH higher chance of contracting STDs over heterosexual women, not a lower chance as implied.

    One reason why nearly twice as many rapes have been reported is likely because historically, fewer than ten percent of rapes ever get reported. But with the campaigns to end rape, men and women have been very strongly compelled to report those rapes, if for no other reason than to be sure no other victims are created by the rapist you didn’t want to report. Police do the absolute most rotten job of investigating rapes, sadly, and universities are not far behind. You always hear how “reporting your rape is like being raped a second time — publically. L.E. needs some serious training to stop blaming and disregarding victims by calling their assaults “unfounded” just because the perpetrator didn’t leave a full confession behind.

    As for calling heterosexual men “crazy” for desiring (or getting) heterosexual sex is more misandrist against men than anything a feminist has ever said or done against men.

  21. mole
    October 6th, 2015 @ 1:18 am

    Oh they are so cute when they are young.

    “..One reason why nearly twice as many rapes have been reported is likely because historically, fewer than ten percent of rapes ever get reported…”

    Thats folklore and unsupportable BY ITS VERY NATURE. Im quite prepare to say the figure is higher, and am more than happy for any lady raped to out her attacker, but a claim like that is clown-shoes stuff. Its a semi-religious belief.

    Newsflash: Cops hate rapists, men hate rapists, there is a reason rapists used to be lynched quite often by town mobs. (Unfortunately the racial connotations with the deep south/segregation make that a tricky search topic)

    Rape was a capital crime right up until the early part of the 20th century in most ‘western nations.

    1932:
    “Child rapist David Bennett spoke for nine minutes on the scaffold in September 1932. The 59-year-old also protested his innocence of having violated the four-year-old girl.

    “The execution was carried immediately he stopped speaking,” newspaper reports at the time stated.

    What you are calling for is either the trivialisation of the charge of rape, with less burden of proof to convict (and therefore lighter penalties) or gross injustice which negates the fundamentals of a fair trial.

    In short you are asking for KKK/deep south negro standard of justice for men.
    Well done feminism is now the inheritor of the robes of the grand dragon, wear them with…pride.

  22. mole
    October 6th, 2015 @ 1:22 am
  23. Daniel Freeman
    October 6th, 2015 @ 3:54 am

    I have zero chance of listening to anything you say, since I was falsely accused by one of your precious little princesses, who believed your false rhetoric and thought that men were just all rapey and should just be accused as early and as often as possible so that their future victims would be more believed. So fuck you and the horse you rode in on, asshole.

  24. Dana
    October 6th, 2015 @ 5:24 am

    Oh, I know a few terms, but I’m 62½ years old; I’m afraid my cool days are well in the past.

  25. M. Thompson
    October 6th, 2015 @ 6:23 am

    The response to this title is, what don’t they lie about?

  26. M. Thompson
    October 6th, 2015 @ 6:31 am

    They are now officially part of Harvard.

  27. Gunga
    October 6th, 2015 @ 7:00 am

    …proving yet again that the younger you are, the less apt you are to appreciate the intersection of flawed dogma with cold hard facts…or hyperbolic mockery…or mockery of the hyperbolic… Also, femsplaining misandry is the bestest! Please do more! I totally respect your “health-be-damned, bang-as-many-diseased-sleazy-chicks-as-you-can” attitude.

  28. Gunga
    October 6th, 2015 @ 7:14 am

    Daniel…my brother…you are older than me…do you still feel the pain…of the scars that won’t heal? Apparently you do…sorry…

  29. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    October 6th, 2015 @ 7:56 am

    Stop raping them with examples of their own voluntary slutty behavior

  30. RS
    October 6th, 2015 @ 8:32 am

    You do realize that through the magic of “Google,” one can access crime statistics for every city in the United States, including university and college towns. Pick one, it doesn’t matter and determine the rate of sexual assaults per 100,000 people. It’s nowhere near the “1 in 5” statistic we hear. In fact, even if we accept your assertion that reported sexual assaults are less than actual sexual assaults by a factor of 10, one still doesn’t get to “1 in 5.”

    The entire “crisis” is predicated upon an assertion which is demonstrably false. Indeed, if it were true, colleges and universities are then deliberately hiding that truth from the parents of young women who wish to attend in order to glom onto those sweet, sweet tuition dollars.

    No, this entire “crisis” is a means of establishing an alternate system in which personal responsibility plays no role and consequences of behaviors can be ignored by adults who insist upon being treated like children who have no ability to control their own lives.

  31. ConstantineX1
    October 6th, 2015 @ 8:42 am

    It is better to let 1,000 rapists go free than falsely convict one innocent man.

  32. Adobe_Walls
    October 6th, 2015 @ 8:43 am

    Quite.

  33. Finrod Felagund
    October 6th, 2015 @ 9:47 am

    I saw it posted on Moe Lane’s blog this morning, so it’s likely not a repost. Amusing that they were able to troll that many people into posting pictures of that. Disgusting, but amusing.

  34. Finrod Felagund
    October 6th, 2015 @ 9:51 am

    Three words for you:

    Duke lacrosse team.

  35. LIbtardian slayer
    October 6th, 2015 @ 10:33 am

    Women need never feel guilty about immoral sexual encounters if they can instead be the morally superior victim and foist all their guilt via the false accusation on the object of her guilt.
    Rather than she feel guilt, she makes him feel the guilt if she so chooses.
    And hey, you better believe her.
    Women wouldnt lie about rape.
    Oh, no.
    Just like women never commit domestic violence so men dont need dv services, only women get protection and blame is reserved for men

  36. LIbtardian slayer
    October 6th, 2015 @ 10:50 am

    The safest places for women in the entire world are really the most unsafe places for women?
    Women attending the most elite colleges in the entire world costing $50,000+ annually are lacking agency such that the poorest women in the slums are safer and more likely to have agency to report rape to the patriarchal cops?
    In truth I could find much wrong with the article, but what you dont understand is its parody, not academe and even as such, it is still infinitely more logical than most extremist feminist psuedo-intellectualism.
    Men are sexist because we wont admit we are sexist?
    But, even if we did admit it, we might still be subconsciously sexist.
    And bt the way miss carrie, if those colleges really had rape rates so high you would protest to shut those institutions down with signs saying “not a school, a rape factory”
    I bet your ignorant of how women won the vote.
    Protest.
    Harvard U is more dangerous than a Somali refugee camp you say for a young woman away from her family for the first time?
    You do not care about women if you encourage women not to report real rape to the police for prosecution.
    Oh sure, kick the rapist out of school so they can go rape others?
    And who cares if men’s lives are ruined because i do not see that you even have the capacitybto empathize with men from your gynocentric lens you wear.

  37. LIbtardian slayer
    October 6th, 2015 @ 10:57 am

    Here ya go.
    Have fun, hon
    Every so often I’ll deign to give expert advice to the subhuman oppressor-pigs who call themselves “men”. According to feminist ideology, somehow these idiots managed to effectively oppress us wymyn seamlessly for thousands and thousands of years because of their motiveless evil. But a few decades ago, quite suddenly, these ultra-competent, ultra-clever oppressors became too stupid and inept to do anything right. Isn’t that an astonishing turn of events? And that’s why those bungling yet masterfully-oppressive men need the sublime gift of female advice… although they clearly don’t deserve it.

    Yes, you men are all a bunch of drooling, low-IQ losers who nonetheless manage to oppress us females using diabolically invisible methods of mind control that only us feminists can discern. But I’m optimistic that not even you are so dim-witted and vile that you can’t comprehend a bit of simple-worded advice from your intellectual betters. (See? I’m not a man-hater. Perish the thought!)

    We womyn are your equals, but we’re also your moral superiors because we believe in equality. And we womyn stopped evolving the instant we hit perfection back in the mid-70s, but you swine still have a long way to go before you can reach our dizzying heights of flawlessness. So the advice I’m going to give today is how you clueless ##### can avoid being the sexual-harassers that you usually are. (Go get a dictionary because I’m going to use words longer than 8 letters. I know you guys have trouble with those. *smirk*)

    To be a vigorous and carefree male today is dirty and wrong!

    You are always enjoying improper thoughts and you might occasionally be doing bad things when our backs are turned. Frankly this pisses us righteous womyn off to no end. That’s why we do everything we can to make sure your happiness and ease of mind in the workplace can never come to fruition. So a team of wonderfully prickly, heterophobic and censorious feminist jurists cooked-up a very convenient entrapment-scheme called “sexual harassment”. There were two assumptions on which sexual harassment is based:

    First, Male heterosexuality is based on domination and violence but female heterosexuality is based on rainbows and happy thoughts. Therefore females are horribly oppressed by your speech but you are not harmed or bothered by the same speech when it comes from a female. This assumption is necessary to guarantee equal treatment for both sexes.

    Second, There are increasing numbers of hard-edged, savvy and self-confident career-womyn entering the workplace and the possibility of you having any heterosexuality at all is absolutely terrifying and beastial to them. It turns out that the hard-edged, savvy and self-confident career-womyn around you are also fragile, easily-hurt orchids who could spontaneously combust from overhearing a risqué pun.

    And because we love to politicize personal conflicts (especially conflicts which are not easily solved by intrusive political means), it is your behavior that needs to be reigned-in. For the sake of equality. The fact that feminist lawyers and feminist harassment counselors profit mightily from the resulting suspicion and dischord is a total coincidence.

    Are You A Sexual Harasser?

    Of course you are, nitwit!

    Have you ever made an off-color remark in mixed company? Have you ever stood close to a female in an elevator? Have you ever gestured with your hands in ways that might be interpreted as obscene by a paranoid onlooker across the room? Have you ever dated a co-worker or unsuccessfully asked a co-worker on a date? Did you ever say something that was offensive to an eavesdropping prude? Well I’ve got news for you, buster: THAT MAKES YOU A FILTHY HARASSER FOR WHOM HANGING IS TOO KIND! You are required to change your speech, habits and behavior immediately.

    (Special note: if you ever expect me to ever “tone down” my potty mouth or change how I dress or act, then it means you’re a misogynist who is forcing me to wear a burkha. Self-control is for YOU, never for me. Expecting me to adjust my behavior is absolutely outrageous.)

    Sexual harassment is not about sex, it’s actually about power. (Special note: SEX is not about sex either, it’s actually about power.) And sexual harassment is not only the making of unwanted sexual advances, but it’s also the failure to make advances when they are wanted by me. Similarly, if you and I were to have a short fling in the workplace (unlikely, but bear with me) and you decide to end the relationship without my consent, then it proves that you were just using me and THAT is a form of sexual harassment. In fact, any behavior I don’t like is harassment. Got it, jerk?

    I have the right to go to work without ever getting uncomfortable in any way and everyone else has got to make accomodations to suit my ever-changing emotional hang-ups. Thems the rules, boys. Deal with it. For the sake of equality.

    And even though us womyn are equally rough and tough as men, we’re also frail and delicate enough to collapse into quivering heaps of fainting Victorian jelly if you make saucy double-entendres or ribald witticisms. We’re equally strong and aggressive as men but we’re also weak and helpless and need protection from men. Yes, perhaps sexual harassment rules create many opportunities for cynical abuse by unscrupulous and vindictive females due to office politics or personal grudges, but unscrupulous and vindictive females simply DO NOT exist!

    Honest, they don’t.

    Trust us.

    In any sexual-harassment situation, it’ll be my word against your word, and my word ought to carry more weight. Because you, as my equal, lack the sense of fair play and human decency that come so naturally to me.

    Always keep these simple rules in mind:

    1. Your behavior may create a HOSTILE ENVIRONMENT for female co-workers. A “hostile environment” is defined however the most hypersensitive, Puritanical and erotophobic ice-queen in the office chooses to define it at that particular instant. The burden is on you to figure-out when that is. The victim might not decide she was harassed until several weeks after the fact.

    2a. Do not make sexual jokes around me. If another man tells a sexual joke, do not laugh and tell him to stop immediately. However, you must be a good sport whenever I choose to crack a sexual joke or a penis-based insult. Especially the jokes and insults that I make at your expense. Those are hilarious.

  38. Ilion
    October 6th, 2015 @ 11:17 am

    But, of course. Because “Rape!” And, if that’s not enough to establish her right to determine your thoughts, because Shut-Up!

  39. Ilion
    October 6th, 2015 @ 11:23 am

    Just as chastity isn’t strictly speaking merely a matter of what one has *not* done with one’s genitals, likewise sluttishness isn’t strictly speaking merely a matter of what one *has* done with the same.
    The point is, even if Miss Hu were physically a virgin (and what are the odds on that?), she is a slut.

  40. texlovera
    October 6th, 2015 @ 11:26 am

    This is fantastic…

  41. Ilion
    October 6th, 2015 @ 11:26 am

    What’s unfortunate about this starting as a hoax?

  42. texlovera
    October 6th, 2015 @ 11:27 am

    FTS.

  43. texlovera
    October 6th, 2015 @ 11:28 am

    and up to trouble…

  44. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    October 6th, 2015 @ 11:32 am
  45. texlovera
    October 6th, 2015 @ 11:33 am

    Damn you’re fast with the p-shop…

  46. Dana
    October 6th, 2015 @ 11:33 am

    That one I could figure out on my own. 🙂

  47. texlovera
    October 6th, 2015 @ 11:34 am

    Heh.

  48. texlovera
    October 6th, 2015 @ 11:34 am

    Oh, and Happy Freakin’ Birthday, McCain.

  49. chrisgale
    October 6th, 2015 @ 2:36 pm

    Congratulations and agree: though I have three kids and three grandkids (even though I’;m a year younger than you).

    In this time, those raised with a father in the house — particularly males — have a huge advantage. You forgt some advice for the boys: go to trade school not the academy (professional schools are trade school with pretensions: I work in one)

    Don’t have a weapon you cannot use.

    Do hit the gym.

    Do have a job . Do have a plan.

    Make neither dependant on your emotions or the emotions of your GR (my boys are not married: yet). It is about bringing home money so you can live.

    If you are woman with small children and husband, keeping the house is more than a full time job. Wait until they are bit older before thinking about earning.

    And it is a job, not a career. There is no such thing as a career. There are but a series of projects and jobs… so have more than one going at any one time.

  50. Daniel Freeman
    October 6th, 2015 @ 5:47 pm

    The commenter “broomhandle” has the right wrong idea:

    I wish they’d chosen “Suck d*ck for feminism” instead. That would’ve closed the loop.