The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

The #LaquanMcDonald Farce

Posted on | November 27, 2015 | 134 Comments

PCP (phencyclidine) is a dangerous drug. It is a depressant, originally marketed as an animal tranquilizer. Taken orally in moderate dosage, PCP produces a mellow high. However, when used as “angel dust” — sprinkled onto marijuana and smoked — PCP induces a sort of instant psychosis, which can include violent craziness. One evening in the summer of 1975, at an apartment in Mableton . . .

Well, there’s no point telling that story now, eh?

If anyone needs expert testimony on the effects of PCP, however, let me know. The statute of limitations has almost certainly expired by now, although I am prepared to invoke my right to remain silent and have my attorney present during questioning. Meanwhile, in Chicago . . .

Laquan McDonald had PCP in his system on Oct. 20, 2014. We know this from the autopsy performed after McDonald, 17, decided to exercise his constitutional right to vandalize cars and stagger down the middle of Pulaski Road, brandishing a knife at the Chicago police officers who were trying to arrest him. The coroner’s conclusion was that the cause of Laquan’s death was institutional racism.

And also, 16 shots from Officer Jason Van Dyke’s 9-mm pistol:

Laquan McDonald walks down the middle of Pulaski Road toward the flashing blue lights of the police cruisers trying to stop him. With a tug of his pants and a quickened step, the teen veers away from them.
Two officers jump from their vehicle, guns drawn. McDonald keeps moving, apparently trying to pass the officers who are several feet to his left. McDonald, holding something in his right hand, swings his right arm in the split second before an officer opens fire.
The force of the bullets spins McDonald around. His legs stiffen as he falls backward to the pavement. The teen rolls onto his right side in the middle of the roadway.
There is no sound on the controversial dash-cam video released late Tuesday afternoon by the city, only startling images that show a white Chicago police officer unloading 16 rounds on an African-American teen, who though armed with a small knife appeared to be trying to get away, police said. The video captures 15 seconds of shooting. For 13 seconds of it, McDonald is lying on the street.
Two clouds of smokelike debris silently puff upward immediately after McDonald falls. His head appears to lift, his arm moves. Then more bullets. Another cloud of white debris kicks up from behind his head.
And then it is over. The teen lies on the road for nearly a minute alone.
Chicago police Officer Jason Van Dyke has been charged with first-degree murder in the October 2014 slaying of McDonald, who suffered multiple gunshot wounds to his chest, scalp, neck, back, arms and right hand and leg in the shooting in the 4100 block of South Pulaski Road.
Van Dyke, 37, has been ordered held without bail until at least his next court appearance Monday.

Racism is the only issue in this case, we are expected to conclude. This is what we are told to think every time something like the Laquan McDonald shooting happens anywhere in America. The media narrative is always the same: Evil honky cop shooting innocent teenage honor student — Saint Laquan of Pulaski Road — and we must ignore every other circumstance except race: White cop, dead black kid.

The problem with this narrative, however, is that it requires us to sympathize with a criminal teenage dopehead. And it is very difficult for me to think of a criminal teenage dopehead as a victim of society, because I used to be a criminal teenage dopehead.

Fear and Loathing on Gordon Road

My buddy and I were desperate to get high that evening in 1975. Even though I only had my learner’s permit — still a few months away from my 16th birthday — somehow I got the keys to my Dad’s old car, and we went to an apartment off Gordon Road in Mableton, near Charlie Brown Airport. The dude who lived there might have some dope, my buddy said. When we got there, however, the dude said all he had was a few roaches left over in the ashtray. OK, so we picked through these roaches hoping to scavenge enough weed to roll a slender “pin” joint (the papers were strawberry Reefer Rollers, as I recall) when there was a knock at the apartment door. We hid the weed while our host answered the door. His greeting to the new guest was enthusiastic.

“Dave! Where you been, man?”

“Just got back from California,” said the long-haired dude, as he shrugged himself out of the straps of a drab green backpack. He had hitched his way cross-country, Dave explained. He and our host talked, while at the kitchen table, I was picking apart the roaches to try to get enough weed to roll a tiny joint. Noticing my efforts, Dave said, “Hey, little man, what you doin’?” Trying to make a joint from these roaches, I said.

“Well, f–k that sh-t, man!” Dave said, laughing as he undid the top flap of his backpack — stuffed full with several pounds of weed in fat “five-finger”one-ounce baggies. He tossed an ounce on the table.

“Roll one, man,” Dave said.

“Far out,” I said.

Bringing back this load of marijuana was, of course, the whole purpose of Dave’s journey to California and back to Georgia. In the mid-1970s, dopeheads were everywhere and law enforcement was clearly losing the War on Drugs. Efforts by the Nixon and Ford administration had managed to impede the flow of marijuana imported from Mexico, ending the era of the $15 ounce of “Acapulco Gold.” But market economics being a constant factor in human affairs, the extraordinary demand for the product generated huge incentives for the entrepreneurs on the supply side of this equation. Yes, my friends, capitalism can accomplish amazing feats, such as a hippie-looking dude thumbing rides all the way across the continent to deliver a felony-weight load of contraband to an apartment in Mableton, Georgia. God bless America!

Patriotic admiration for Our Nation’s Free Enterprise System wasn’t what 15-year-old me was thinking about when Dave plopped that fat ounce of weed on the table, of course. No, I was about to get high, the Prime Directive of my adolescent existence, and I was just one among millions of Teenage Dopeheads toking our way through the Seventies, which was simultaneously (a) an abysmal era of economic stagnation, social upheaval and foreign-policy disasters, and also (b) The Most Awesome Party-Down Decade in the History of the World.

Dude, I saw Aerosmith when they were the opening act for the Jeff Beck Group and Rod Stewart and the Faces at the Omni in Atlanta. Because I was stoned out of my mind, I don’t actually remember much from that concert, except that I went with Tony Wheeler, whose sister Becky I’d made out with during a trip the Douglas County High School Marching Tiger Band made to Disney World in 1974. Becky played the flute in the band and I played the trombone, but this isn’t a story about Becky or marching band or Becky’s brother Tony or seeing Aerosmith in concert, is it? No, obviously I have digressed . . .

This is a story about the Deadly Menace of Dangerous Narcotics, specifically that fat ounce of weed that Dave tossed onto the kitchen table in that apartment on Gordon Road, where I’d gone with a dope buddy hoping to get high. While I was rolling a joint from this unexpected bounty, Dave explained that this was Columbian Gold, laced with “THC.” Here it is necessary to explain that, when PCP became a popular illegal drug in the mid-1970s, it was falsely marketed as THC — tetrahydrocannabinol, the active hallucinogenic agent in marijuana. Why drug dealers circa 1974-75 resorted to this deception, I don’t know, but probably telling freaks they were using “THC” seemed more glamorous than telling them they were getting high on dog tranquilizers. Whatever the reason, what dopeheads in the mid-’70s usually called “T” was always some kind of PCP, perhaps mixed with other drugs. The first time I used “T” was in a small reddish-orange pill, but later we got “T” in powder form, when it was also known as “angel dust.” You could snort it — which was the most common way, in my experience — but you could also “cook” it (heating it up in a spoon) to liquefy it and inject it with a hypodermic needle. Once I watched one of my dope buddies “mainline” (inject intravenously) some of the stuff, but I never could stand needles myself, despite my otherwise all-encompassing enthusiasm for the Deadly Menace of Dangerous Narcotics.

It is when PCP is smoked, however, that it is really dangerous, as I learned that night in 1975 when we smoked the “dusted” weed Dave had brought back from California. It was very harsh on the lungs. The first toke caused painful spasms of coughing. After three tokes, I’d had all I could stand. Suddenly I was tripping out of my mind, fiercely gripping the arms of the chair I was sitting in, holding on for dear life. To this day, I remember the hallucinatory sensation of spinning backward in my chair. Nothing I did in all my years as an adolescent dopehead ever hit me with such overpowering force. Needless to say, my memory of what happened next is somewhat fragmentary. After I had gotten past the spinning-backward hallucination, I remember a sudden and intense paranoia, and this also seemed to have been the effect on my buddy. He had somehow been able to choke down four or five tokes of that PCP-laced weed, and was therefore in an even more twisted condition than I was. He expressed an urgent need to get out of there, a paranoid desire for escape that had also seized my mind, and we went stumbling out of the apartment, down the stairs and toward my Dad’s car, which I had borrowed to make this dope-quest expedition to Mableton.

Of course, by this point, I was in no shape to drive anywhere and, as I say, my buddy was even worse off than me. Picture us, sitting in the front seat of that old car — a 1962 sedan my Dad had bought used. Dad always liked to have a spare vehicle around, something he could drive if he had any problem with his main car, and this 1962 sedan was one of a series of old junkers Dad had over the years. Given that the Arab Oil Embargo of 1973 and the resulting increase in gasoline prices had drastically reduced the market for larger cars, my Dad had gotten a lowball price on that big old V-8 gas-guzzler with tailfins. This was certainly not a cool car for a teenager to be driving in 1975, but beggars can’t be choosers and remember, I was only 15 and still only had my learner’s permit.

So there we were, two long-haired teenage dopeheads, tripping out of our minds as we sat in an enormous 1962 sedan in the parking lot of an apartment complex in Mableton, faced with the daunting task of a 10-mile drive back to Douglas County.

And that’s when my buddy completely freaked out.

My memory of that night 40 years ago is a psychedelic jumble of crazy fragments, of course, but I seem to remember I had decided that my buddy should drive. He had a license, at least, and I was so messed up that I was curled into the fetal position on the front passenger floorboard, hoping the world would stop spinning. But my buddy was in such bad shape he couldn’t figure out how to start the car and, in a wild fit of drug-induced paranoid rage, he threw open the door of the car and went rampaging across the parking lot.

He ran toward the apartment building where he began banging on windows and yelling. Holy crap, I thought, somebody’s gonna call the cops. However much I feared the police, my even greater fear was that I would be arrested while driving Dad’s car in Mableton, after I’d borrowed the car by telling Mom a ridiculous made-up story about needing to drive my buddy to his house for some reason. So when my buddy went on his manic rampage — people coming out on their apartment balconies to see what all the commotion was about — this brought me out of my own head-spinning trip. This was an emergency and I had to deal with it. I got out of the car and ran over to grab him, where he was crashing through the shrubbery next to the apartment.

“Hey, man, we gotta get out of here. Somebody’s gonna call the cops.”

The word “cops” seemed to pierce his bubble of insanity. No teenage dopehead ever wants to encounter the police, and so next thing I can remember — these scenes are just crazy fragments of memory, as I say — we were back in the car, this time with me at the wheel, trying to get it to crank and when it finally started, we cruised out of there as rapidly as possible without attracting unnecessary attention. I don’t remember what kind of phony excuse I made to my Mom when I made it back home, but I went directly to bed and slept the sleep of the dead, thankful to have escaped after that nightmare freakout in Mableton. And although I still had four or five years of teenage drug adventures ahead of me, that night I made a solemn vow, and I never smoked PCP again.

Over-Policed and Under-Parented

Was teenage me an Oppressed Victim of Society? Of course not. Four decades ago, I was like many other middle-class white kids, looking for adolescent thrills, and I don’t remember any adult ever suggesting we were victims of anything except our own foolishness.

The Deadly Menace of Dangerous Narcotics is a matter of individual choice and thus a matter of individual responsibility. A teenage dopehead can’t blame other people for the consequences of his bad choices. Nobody forced me to drive to Mableton and smoke that PCP-laced weed. The fact that I was only 15, or that I had no way of anticipating the effects — finding myself suddenly in a state of hallucinatory paranoia after just three tokes — still does not exempt me from responsibility. And when my buddy freaked out in the parking lot, what would have happened if the cops had arrived before we made our getaway? Maybe you can suppose “white privilege” would have saved my buddy from being gunned down by the Cobb County police, but that night in 1975, I sure as heck didn’t want to hang around long enough to find out.

There are many things wrong with the media narrative of the Laquan McDonald case, as with so many other similar stories of the Innocent Black Teenager killed by the Evil White Cop. Sure, we can look at Officer Jason Van Dyke’s actions and see racism, and perhaps even view it through a political prism, as part of a society-wide pattern of racism and police brutality. Yet the media version of the Martyrdom of Saint Laquan demands that we focus on those few seconds of video — the shocking scene of his violent death — while requiring us to ignore the series of choices that preceded Laquan’s fatal encounter with institutional racism in the form of 16 shots from Officer Van Dyke’s 9-mm pistol.

Because the media narrative of this story is about racism, we are not allowed to mention the fact that Officer Van Dyke wasn’t just firing haphazardly at whatever random black person he encountered that night in October 2014. No, he arrived on Pulaski Road to join a situation in progress, the pursuit of a felony suspect who was attempting to evade arrest. It has been pointed out that several other Chicago police were on the scene, and that only Officer Van Dyke fired his weapon — a deadly use of excessive force, for which he has been charged with first-degree murder. If all Chicago police are racist, why did only one of them shoot Laquan McDonald? Or if racism is such a serious problem with Chicago police, where are the stories about officers just shooting black people at random? The media is so intent on selling us the Evil White Cop narrative (updated hourly on CNN) that anyone trying to look outside that framework risk being accused of endorsing police brutality. Nevertheless, let’s cite a bit of Laquan McDonald’s biography:

According to court records, McDonald’s father abandoned the family and had “no presence” in his life. At 3, McDonald became a ward of the state when the Illinois Department of Children and Family Services took him into protective custody over allegations that his mother had neglected him, according to state records.
He spent about two months in foster care before he was moved to a relative’s home and eventually back to his mother in 2002. But after just a little more than a year, he was again back in foster care when his mother’s boyfriend beat him, causing cuts, welts and bruises, according to the records.
McDonald was placed with his great-grandmother in 2003, and she eventually became his legal guardian. He lived with her for about a decade before she died in 2013 and he was placed with an uncle.
Court files show he racked up numerous juvenile arrests and had spent time in juvenile lockup.
By May 2014, he was released from detention after four months there and returned to the care of his uncle. And his mother was petitioning the court for custody.
McDonald enrolled in Sullivan House Alternative School in September 2014, a month before his shooting. . . .
McDonald, who was tall at 6-foot-2, liked to rap and dance, his teacher recalled. . . .

Doomed — hopelessly doomed by the circumstances of his childhood. Abandoned by his father, neglected by his mother, abused by her boyfriend, shuffled around between foster care and relatives, by his teenage years Laquan was a habitual criminal who had gotten out of juvenile detention just five months before the fateful night in October 2014 when he got high on PCP and was gunned down by Officer Van Dyke. And now, the ironic sequel:

Between Laquan’s death and when the footage of his shooting was released this week, the city of Chicago agreed in April 2015 to pay $5 million to McDonald’s mother.

Damn. By what logic does Laquan’s mother deserve $5 million from the taxpayers of Chicago? But that’s how the litigation lottery often works: The bad choices you make in life don’t really matter, if you can find a scapegoat with deep pockets, file a lawsuit and get yourself a settlement. Whether or not Laquan McDonald was a Victim of Society, society (or at least the part of society that pays taxes in Chicago) has now been victimized by Laquan McDonald’s mother, and her lawyers, who collected as their fee a nice slice of that $5 million settlement with the city. Maybe the story would have ended there — “justice” Chicago-style, where bribes and kickbacks and hush money are the normal routine of municipal government — if it hadn’t been for a nosy civilian and that pesky First Amendment:

Over the summer, freelance journalist Brandon Smith filed a lawsuit pressing the Chicago Police Department to release the dashboard camera video. A judge found in Smith’s favor and ordered that the video be released by November 25.

Alas, the Chicago-style cover-up was foiled by a freelance journalist! And I think it’s a safe bet that judge will not be on the mayor’s Christmas card list this year. By the way, did I mention that Chicago is nearly bankrupt?

Chicago’s financial situation is the worst of any large municipality in the nation. Moody’s recently downgraded the credit rating of the city’s municipal bonds to junk status, a sure sign to investors that the city can’t be relied upon to meet its financial obligations. The city’s response to this downgrade was to pass, just a month later, another $1.1 billion borrowing program. . . .
Of the ten largest cities in the U.S., Chicago is the only one that has no statutory limit on its muni bond issuances. Consequently, Chicago’s 2015 debt service and annual pension costs amount to 45% of its 2013 revenues.

But why should the corrupt Democrats who run Chicago let a trivial matter like impending fiscal catastrophe prevent them from paying $5 million to Laquan McDonald’s mother, a payment that can be construed either as social justice or hush money, depending on your level of cynicism. When it comes to Chicago, it’s impossible to be too cynical and no one would be surprised if it were subsequently discovered that there was some kind of personal friendship between the plaintiff’s lawyers and the city officials who “negotiated” that settlement. As wrongful death cases go, maybe this one was totally worth $5 million or maybe not, but the fact the case was settled for a seven-figure sum just six months after the shooting, and while city officials were busy trying to keep that video from going public, makes me suspect that Mayor Rahm Emmanuel’s administration wanted to make this trouble go away, and was willing to pay a premium price to achieve that objective. Besides, when you’re swindling taxpayers on such an enormous scale — borrowing $1.1 billion just to keep paying pensions, plus interest on the junk-bond debts you already owe — $5 million is chump change.

Vote Democrat and Blame Society

The people in charge of Chicago’s municipal government are as recklessly irresponsible as Laquan McDonald’s parents — the father who abandoned him, the mother who neglected him — and it is possible to perceive a symbiotic relationship in the way a citizenry corrupted by liberal welfare-state policies elects corrupt Democrats to preside over the bureaucratic apparatus through which everybody is trying to get something for nothing. City employees belong to unions that support the corrupt Democrats who, in turn, are expected to provide high wages and generous pensions to the employees. All of this vast municipal bureaucracy, employing many thousands of people whose livelihoods are dependent on the local Democrat Party political regime over which Mayor Emmanuel presides, is supposed to be funded through taxes. However, as we have seen, the Chicago municipal government operates in perpetual deficit mode, always spending more than it collects in taxes, so that it has amassed more than $60 billion in debt.

I repeat: Chicago’s municipal debt is more than $60,000,000,000. The city’s population is 2.7 million, which means municipal debt is about $23,000 per man, woman and child in Chicago. A majority of Chicago residents are either black (32.9%) or Latino (28.9%), and more than 1-in-5 (22.6%) residents live below the poverty line. The city is plagued by violent crime. More than 400 people have been shot to death in Chicago so far this year, and another 2,300 have been wounded by gunfire. In some Chicago neighborhoods, “gangs battle over turf and the right to sell drugs on a particular city block,” CNN reported after a 9-year-old boy was murdered. Police say the boy was targeted by a drug gang because his father is a leader of a rival gang.

Beyond the scourge of drugs, what drives the crime rate in Chicago is the same thing that contributes to crime in so many other American cities — family breakdown and particularly the absence of responsible fathers. The fate of Laquan McDonald, abandoned by his father when he was 3 years old, is not a rare occurrence for kids in Chicago, and is increasingly common across the United States. Forty percent of children were born to unmarried women in 2013, and more than 70% of black children are born to unwed mothers. Given these socio-economic realities, isn’t it obvious that black kids in Chicago have problems that cannot be blamed on racist cops? Officer Jason Van Dyke is charged with murder, but the hourly updates on CNN about “unrest” in Chicago isn’t a story about one trigger-happy cop. No, it’s the Endless White Guilt Trip that the liberal media can’t quit shoving at us, insisting that “society” (a term that is liberal media shorthand for white middle-class suburbanites) is to blame for whatever is wrong in American race relations.

The problem with this kind of blame-shifting — to make “society” or “racism” the explanation of what happened to Laquan McDonald is that it is antithetical to personal responsibility. Instead of blaming the criminal for his fate, we blame society. Instead of blaming the cop, we blame racism. Why are there protest mobs on the streets demanding “Justice for Laquan” when (a) his mother already got $5 million from the city, and (b) the cop who shot Laquan has been charged with murder?

Why does this particular story have to be national news anyway? I live hundreds of miles away from Chicago, and the only time I’ve ever been there was to land at the airport and change planes on my way to somewhere else. It’s not as if my opinion of the Laquan McDonald case is going to make a damn bit of difference, so why is CNN telling me about it every hour of the day? Is Mayor Emmanuel going to call me up and ask my advice? Is he going to read this blog post and, impressed with my expertise on the habits of teenage dopeheads, invite me to join his Task Force to End the Deadly Menace of Dangerous Narcotics? I doubt it.

My advice: Crime is a people problem. Figure out who the criminals are, have the cops keep an eye on them, and when you catch one, prosecute him to the max. Lock the bad guys up for as long as you can, get them off the streets, and generally convey the message you’re not going to tolerate crime in your community. If you can’t put the fear of God in those hoodlums, at least make them fear cops.

Even when I was a teenage dopehead criminal, I never lost my fear of the police. In Douglas County, Georgia, 40 years ago, Sheriff Earl Lee had a tough, no-nonsense reputation. Teenage dopeheads had to be careful not to push their luck too far in Douglas County. Quite a few of my dope buddies learned that lesson the hard way, trust me. As for me, my road to a drug-free adulthood involved a bad trip on psilocybin when I was 19, after which I never really enjoyed getting high anymore.

Being a survivor of The Most Awesome Party-Down Decade in the History of the World, and now a 56-year-old grandfather, it’s easy to laugh at the craziness I got into back when Gerald Ford was president and hippie freaks hitchhiked coast-to-coast with backpacks full of contraband. Was that “white privilege”? No, it was just the fact that there were so many long-haired dopeheads in 1975 the cops couldn’t possibly bust them all. America used to have a lot fewer police per capita than we do nowadays. It was Bill Clinton who changed that, using federal grants to “put 100,000 new police on the streets,” as he boasted.

Not only are there more cops in America now, but police have all kinds of crime-fighting technology they didn’t have 40 years ago. Nationwide computer databases of fingerprints, DNA and criminal records make it a lot easier for police to identify perpetrators. Video surveillance cameras are all over the place and, because nearly everybody has a cellphone with them at all times, it’s easy to call the cops to report a crime. America is a safer place than it was 40 years ago, because it’s simply harder for bad guys to get away. We’re locking up more criminals than ever, and the U.S. incarceration rate (716 per 100,000 as of 2013) is the highest of any nation in the world. More than 2 million Americans are behind bars, and it costs about $75 billion a year to keep all those criminals locked up.

Some of my libertarian friends say we’ve got too many people in prison and that the Deadly Menace of Danger Narcotics is less dangerous than the Deadly Menace of the Police. We should legalize dope, say the libertarians, and turn loose all the people doing time in prison for drug charges. My perspective is different. The way I see it, anybody who gets busted for dope should be prosecuted to the max. Dopeheads are generally bad people, and bad people should fear the law, like I did when I was a teenage dopehead.

However, if I was a bad person as a teenager, I never got busted, because I was never completely stupid. You don’t have to be a genius to avoid getting busted for dope, and I always figure the guys who get busted are either (a) stupid, (b) arrogant, or usually (c) both stupid and arrogant. There are way too many stupid arrogant people in America, and the more of them we put in prison, the better. Legalizing dope is just going to let these stupid people run wild, f–king up everything the way stupid people have f–ked up Chicago. This is what the Democrat Party is all about.

The Democrat Party’s policy agenda basically boils down to “Free Stuff for Stupid People,” and when you ask them who’s going to pay for all this free stuff, they say, “The rich!” Democrats expect us to believe that The Rich are a fixed target, helpless and immobile, who are going to let themselves be plundered to pay for the stuff the government is going to give to the stupid people who vote for Democrats.

The Great Something-for-Nothing Hustle that is the core message of the Democrat Party’s electoral appeal has never worked in the past, and will never work at any time in the future, but with the help of their propaganda apparatus — the public schools and the liberal media — Democrats manage to conceal the evidence of the ultimate impossibility of Something-for-Nothing economic nonsense. Oh, sure, there are times and places where Something-for-Nothing temporarily seems to work, but this is an illusion. If a prosperous, dynamic community decides to go on a spree of deficit spending and welfare giveaways, the short-term result may look promising. It may take a few years or a few decades for the problems caused by bad policy to become apparent. During the many decades it took for Chicago to accumulate a $60 billion debt, very few people in Chicago were worried about the possibility of municipal bankruptcy somewhere in a distance future. Nor did the exodus of taxpaying, law-abiding citizens moving from Chicago to the suburbs — or leaving the area altogether, moving to Denver or Dallas — occur as a sudden, dramatic crisis. Chicago is still the third-largest city in America, but its population has been declining slowly for six decades. In 1950, the population of Chicago was 3.6 million, but by 1990, it had dropped to 2.8 million, a decline of 29% in 40 years.

Democrats have made Chicago a worse place, and the Chicago Democrat in the White House has made America a worse place.

The people who think Obama has done a good job as president are the same people who blame racism for the death of Laquan McDonald. You’d have to be stupid to believe that, which is to say you’d have to be a Democrat. Of course, I used to be a Democrat myself. But then I grew up and the drugs wore off, and I’m a lot less stupid than I used to be.





 

Comments

134 Responses to “The #LaquanMcDonald Farce”

  1. WarEagle82
    November 27th, 2015 @ 6:17 pm

    Liberals turn places into literally “hell-on-earth” and then complain about the racism they find in “hell-on-earth” while ignoring the fact that it is their liberal policies that have created “hell-on-earth.” Yet they then demand ever-more-liberal policies to fix the catastrophe they have created thus far.

    One example of the stupidity inherent in the system is when DC Chief of Police Kathy Lanier said that citizens should shoot back when trapped in active-shooter nightmares ignoring that the liberal anti-gun policies create the “gun-free zones” where these shootings take place and ignoring that more idiotic liberal gun-control policies make it impossible for citizens to arm themselves to shoot back when confronted by active shooters. You can only buy this level of mental illness on modern American colleges….

  2. Ronald J. Ward
    November 27th, 2015 @ 6:45 pm

    It’s rather mind boggling as to what length some will go to exonerate a very very bad shooting while twisting the blame to the kid, to PCP, to the parents, to Democrats, to Obama, and to about anything else they can think of.

    A cop with a rather bigoted history who was under no threat at the time shot and killed a young man within seconds of exiting his patrol car and then he and his buddies quickly went to work covering it up and doctoring evidence.

    I can’t say that it was racism, a trigger happy cop, a cop who was having a bad day, or simply a history of unaccountability of policemen. But the PCP and the young man’s actions as well as his reluctance to “asume the position” were not justifiable reasons for the cop to deem himself judge, juror, and executioner.

  3. Prime Director
    November 27th, 2015 @ 6:56 pm

    Long in the leaf
    and short in the can

    No stems, no seeds
    that you don’t need

    http://youtu.be/h1sPmbj3t6E

  4. DeadMessenger
    November 27th, 2015 @ 7:04 pm

    The idea is to get the good stuff that is unseeded. It loses potency once it’s seeded. I, uh, heard that somewhere.

  5. DeadMessenger
    November 27th, 2015 @ 7:07 pm

    I have a knife in my hand right now. Come on over and explain how you don’t feel threatened. But wait, let me do a few hits of PCP laden weed first, so I can also be hallucinating and acting unpredictably.

    What’s really mind boggling is the lengths leftists will go to in order to excuse away stupid and/or illegal behavior, or to blame Republicans for it.

  6. Prime Director
    November 27th, 2015 @ 7:11 pm

    The NOI was not/ is not pro-civil rights; they were/are a pro-liberation, racial separtist UFO cult.

    If Elijah Muhammed is a civil rights figure, then so is Bull Connor.

  7. Finrod Felagund
    November 27th, 2015 @ 7:12 pm

    I’ve heard that quote attributed to both Richard Pryor and Robin Williams.

  8. Finrod Felagund
    November 27th, 2015 @ 7:18 pm

    “You can turn your back on a person, but never turn your back on a drug – especially when it’s waving a razor-sharp hunting knife in your eyes.” — Hunter S. Thompson

  9. Daniel Freeman
    November 27th, 2015 @ 7:19 pm

    No, you’re on the side of exonerating a very bad narrative, even while acknowledging that it’s bad. “I can’t say that it was racism, a trigger happy cop, a cop who was having a bad day, or simply a history of unaccountability of policemen.” But your fellow travelers can and do and are saying that it was racism, and you know that, and you’re criticizing any criticism of them anyway.

  10. Finrod Felagund
    November 27th, 2015 @ 7:20 pm

    Reminds me of a rant about spellcheckers I read in Dr. Dobb’s Journal years, ago, calling them snake oil: “Now is the tome fur all god men to sump this sneak oil gown the train.”

  11. DeadMessenger
    November 27th, 2015 @ 7:24 pm

    Nah, they skipped all that and just went immediately to the accepting hush money stage.

  12. NeoWayland
    November 27th, 2015 @ 7:52 pm

    I wasn’t talking about the NOI, I was talking about Malcolm X who left the NOI. That may have been why he was assassinated.

    The big reason I approve of Spike Lee’s X is because the Malcolm X character spoke of his wonder at different races and different skin colors making the pilgrimage to Mecca.

    Things were changing for him at the end. I think he was growing into the man he dreamt of becoming.

    The assassinations marked a turning point. The message changed from self-reliance to permanent government handouts.

  13. Adobe_Walls
    November 27th, 2015 @ 8:21 pm

    sinsemilla

  14. Steve Skubinna
    November 27th, 2015 @ 8:47 pm

    Holy cow!

    Oops – sorry, Evi, no offense.

    I forgot all about Dr. Dobb’s. Just checked and they’re still around! And now bookmarked.

  15. Prime Director
    November 27th, 2015 @ 8:48 pm

    Gifted, charismatic Malcolm was the natural successor to the increasingly-senile Elijah M and EM’s brood didn’t fancy kissing Malcolm’s ring, so they tried to eliminate him. Malcolm is basically a Trotskyite, an unlucky silver medalist.

    Malcolm knew NOI was a criminal enterprise long before he left. He only went straight in exile.

  16. DeadMessenger
    November 27th, 2015 @ 8:58 pm

    Imagine if there’d been PCP in that alcohol.

  17. DeadMessenger
    November 27th, 2015 @ 9:02 pm

    It’s possible that excessive exposure to sensi might be the cause of the gaping memory holes that I seem to be developing these days.

  18. theoldsargesays
    November 27th, 2015 @ 9:03 pm

    Because they’re stoned?

  19. theoldsargesays
    November 27th, 2015 @ 9:07 pm

    Right now I’m remembering Cheech & Chong’s Officer Stadanko in the classroom saying “Well Sister, your students seem to be very well informed..”

  20. theoldsargesays
    November 27th, 2015 @ 9:11 pm

    Haven’t you heard?
    Crack was invented by the CIA in cooperation with other governmental agencies then introduced into black communities as a means of throwing black men in jail and thus breaking up the homogeneous black family unit.
    :-/

  21. theoldsargesays
    November 27th, 2015 @ 9:13 pm

    I could only give you one now but I’ll owe you another 25 upvotes for the laugh.

  22. theoldsargesays
    November 27th, 2015 @ 9:16 pm

    Agreed 100% but….
    The young man’s actions and his drug use did out him in that place at that time during which he ran into that cop.

  23. theoldsargesays
    November 27th, 2015 @ 9:25 pm

    As it was written, so shall it be done.

  24. theoldsargesays
    November 27th, 2015 @ 9:32 pm

    Your last paragraph rings true. It used to fascinate me that MSNBC spent so much time talking about and replaying FoxNews clips until I realized that if it weren’t for FoxNews MSNBC would have no reason to exist.
    After all, as the Outlaw Josie Wales said, “Buzzards gotta eat, same as worms.”

  25. theoldsargesays
    November 27th, 2015 @ 9:34 pm

    Nah but I heard she bought a half-dozen Escalades, a recording studio and a semi-trailer full of Newports.
    (hat tip to Dave Chapell)

  26. theoldsargesays
    November 27th, 2015 @ 9:43 pm

    I was told that I tossed a 50gal. (150-200lbs?) barrel of the clean up from the fish market where I worked into a dumpster one handed and later broke the 10-second mark in the 100yd dash. Never touched the stuff again.

  27. Mike G.
    November 27th, 2015 @ 10:34 pm

    Or as we say where we’re from…Do stupid shit, stupid shit happens.

    PCP whether laced in a ‘J’ or taken in tablet form càn, excuse my French, fuck you up. DAMHIKT, I’ll take the fifth.

    I lived in Hotlanta back in the day, although to my recollection, I never ran into out esteemed host. In ’81 When I first moved down there, you could get into all kinds of trouble.

  28. Finrod Felagund
    November 28th, 2015 @ 12:31 am

    I discovered Dr. Dobb’s Journal when Creative Computing was folded (curse you, Ziff-Davis) and my subscription was transferred to them.

  29. Bill Nickless
    November 28th, 2015 @ 1:00 am

    You might check out http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=6932 where Eric S. Raymond argues the first two shots were justified and appropriate, but the other 14 represented negligent homicide. I find Mr. Raymond’s argument plausible and persuasive.

  30. CPAguy
    November 28th, 2015 @ 1:28 am

    Exactly.

    Maybe the cop acted stupidly, but if you are the perp, you should be fearful of cops, particularly stupid ones.

  31. CPAguy
    November 28th, 2015 @ 1:47 am

    That isn’t true.

    Malcolm X wasn’t anti-white. He did evolve from his younger days and was not ultimately like these fake, new age Black Panthers.

    He left the NOI after he saw who they really were lead by, self-serving elitist (like a lot of churches).

    He was likely killed by the NOI…maybe even with the assistance of Intel from the FBI.

    I know I can’t blame anybody for wanting to stop getting their ass whipped and embarrassed by taking personal responsibility for their own safety.

    Ultimately, MLK was just more political than Malcolm X, but the movement needed X to ultimately succeed.

    The dems would have never finally agreed fo enact the civil rights act without the paranoia that they were physically at risk for their historical treachery.

  32. Finrod Felagund
    November 28th, 2015 @ 1:56 am

    From what I understand, if you don’t let the plant flowers fertilize, the energy it would have put into making seeds goes to making more THC instead, thus higher potency.

  33. CPAguy
    November 28th, 2015 @ 2:02 am

    The NOI is like any mega church, they are built to enrich leadership. The NOI will say and do whatever to make sure Farrakhan and his minions get their share of the tithings.

    Look at the Mormons…they exist today merely to enrich leadership. They realized long ago Joseph Smith’s greed for power and money (and women) and had no problem doing what was necessary to keep the flock giving them money and changing orthodoxy to keep the Feds off their back.

    The Mormons aren’t the NOI; primarily because their “royal” families long ago were able to get into both Congress (and damn near the Presidency) and Wall Street.

    (Romney would have made a fine, if slightly liberal, President)

  34. Finrod Felagund
    November 28th, 2015 @ 2:15 am

    “There is another class of coloured people who make a business of keeping the troubles, the wrongs, and the hardships of the Negro race before the public. Having learned that they are able to make a living out of their troubles, they have grown into the settled habit of advertising their wrongs — partly because they want sympathy and partly because it pays. Some of these people do not want the Negro to lose his grievances, because they do not want to lose their jobs.” — Booker T. Washington, 1911

  35. DeadMessenger
    November 28th, 2015 @ 2:18 am

    I’m shocked to hear that you have any recollection of ’81. 😀

  36. Fail Burton
    November 28th, 2015 @ 2:37 am

    Yew go too hale jender pyrite.

  37. Fail Burton
    November 28th, 2015 @ 2:40 am

    It is well established that cops shoot to kill, not wound. Raymond’s argument makes no sense.

  38. Robert What?
    November 28th, 2015 @ 3:48 am

    I blame the police unions who protect the incompetent cops, the psychopath cops. Even though their numbers are few, they cast a pall over all the police. The police unions need to stop their knee jerk support of them. Actually, there shouldn’t even be any police unions, but that is another story.

  39. Daniel Freeman
    November 28th, 2015 @ 4:37 am

    Yes, my understanding is that’s why hemp and weed aren’t grown in the same areas. They’re male and female, and fertilization would make the weed less potent.

  40. NeoWayland
    November 28th, 2015 @ 7:43 am

    But he did go straight. He did change. He did call Elijah M out.

    Another great “what if” of history.

    Still, the assassinations were the turning point.

  41. Art Deco
    November 28th, 2015 @ 12:08 pm

    Dunno, Sir. The video makes it look as if the cop in question panicked. Wouldn’t be surprise if he plea bargains.

  42. Finrod Felagund
    November 28th, 2015 @ 12:45 pm

    This is the difference between alcohol being legal and marijuana not being legal: you don’t see alcohol with little-documented ‘additives’ like that.

  43. Ronald J. Ward
    November 28th, 2015 @ 1:37 pm

    Daniel, being the type of person who relies on evidence, I cannot make a determination of motive of the shooting based on what information we have.

    Based on the video, I cannot deduce a reasonable reason for the officer to shoot.

    Now if you want me to speculate or give my opinion, I’d say the problem is that police officers have become unaccountable. Prosecutors won’t prosecute them because they are an asset to them in convictions and career advancements. They protect their own and are then protected by the courts. So it’s quite hard to stay within the law when you’re obviously above the law. Again, simply my hypothesis.

    Racism? I don’t think and I certainly hope that the young man wasn’t shot down simply because the officer didn’t like black people. I’m not advocating or endorsing those who are claiming racism.

    But I find the tone of this thread to be somewhat disturbing on several fronts. There seems to be a narrative that we have a certain group of people who do very bad things and take very bad drugs and have very bad upbringing as some exoneration for a very bad shooting. There certainly does seem to be a tad of prejudice in that mindset.

  44. Bill Nickless
    November 28th, 2015 @ 1:42 pm

    Please study the law of self defense, e.g. http://bearingarms.com/shoot-to-wound-vs-shoot-to-stop-vs-shoot-to-kill/ :

    It’s simply the self-defense law element of proportionality–a person is allowed to use only as much force as is necessary to neutralize the threat, and no more than that. Proportionality has both an intensity and a temporal (or time) dimension.

    In terms of intensity, one can meet a non-deadly attack only using non-deadly means, and a deadly force attack with deadly means (also, of course, non-deadly means).

    In terms of time, one can use force only for as long as the threat remains imminent (that is, until it is neutralized). If it takes 5 shots to do that, but 6 are fired, that 6th round is excessive force and does not qualify for justification as self-defense. The first 5, you may be all good. The 6th gets you a murder conviction.

    In this context, whether the threat has been neutralized is based on the reasonable perceptions of the defender. Nevertheless, if the defender did or should have reasonably known the threat was neutralized, the legal justification for the continued use of force is gone, and every additional quantum of force thereafter is unlawful.

  45. Ronald J. Ward
    November 28th, 2015 @ 1:44 pm

    I’m not arguing that the young man’s actions didn’t result in his death. I’m saying that it wasn’t justification for his death.

  46. craigzimmerman12
    November 28th, 2015 @ 1:47 pm

    Did you read the story? Stop encouraging drug use and Marijuana IS a drug.

  47. Prime Director
    November 28th, 2015 @ 1:48 pm

    But he did go straight

    No, he lost control, like Trotsky.

    He “called out” EM after EM’s brood had already outmanuevered him and had him on the outs. The reasons he gave for leaving the NOI were post hoc BS rationalizations.

    He knowingly told EM’s lies for years then suddenly grew a conscious when he was shown the door.

  48. Ronald J. Ward
    November 28th, 2015 @ 2:02 pm

    Your response isn’t consistent with the reality of the shooting.

    Unless of course you feel that folks high on drugs, acting erratically, and clutching a knife are fair game for a cop to step out of his patrol car and open fire on.

    Or better yet, why not have the cop remain in his/her car and simply shoot those holding a glass and staggering as they leave the bar? Wouldn’t that be less threatening to the officers?

  49. Prime Director
    November 28th, 2015 @ 2:32 pm

    Are you trying to have a moment with me? Zat the best U can do?

    Lame ?

  50. NeoWayland
    November 28th, 2015 @ 2:32 pm

    Ah, I see.

    It’s not enough that he did it because he got burned. His heart wasn’t pure and he didn’t have the strength of ten.

    The fact that he changed was immaterial, at least to you.

    The NOI isn’t important to me. Malcolm X’s affiliation with the NOI doesn’t matter. The fact that the MLK and the Malcolm X assassinations defined a jonbar point that changed the American Civil rights movement for the worse, yeah, that’s important.

    Not the why of the assassinations, but that things got bad afterwards.