The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Democrats, Feminists and Other Liars

Posted on | January 27, 2016 | 52 Comments

 

Let’s begin with something that should be obvious, but which has seldom been stated explicitly: There is no objective reason for the recent upsurge of radical feminism in the United States. However bad sexism is today, it is not worse than it was five years ago or 10 years ago. In fact, there is abundant evidence that women in American today face much less discrimination than at any previous point in our history.

The only reason we have so many young American women identifying themselves as feminists in 2016 is because of partisan politics.

Four years ago, Democrats exploited an entirely fictional “Republican War on Women” narrative that enabled President Obama to win re-election with the largest “gender gap” ever recorded by Gallup. And with Hillary Clinton expected to be the Democrat nominee in 2016, the liberal propaganda machinery has been promoting the feminist brand in every way possible. Far beyond the narrow limits of what we usually think of as “politics,” and extending to the entertainment industry, university classrooms, the public school system and every other means of communicating ideas, feminist messages are being promoted by liberals with a frenzied energy that we can expect will crescendo to a shrieking climactic paroxysm of rage between now and November.

And this is all just partisan politics. There is no “rape epidemic” on our nation’s college campuses, nor has there been any increase in “harassment” or “objectification” of women to explain the incessant chatter about these subjects emanating from so many clamorous feminist voices. This is not a conspiracy, but rather a liberal consensus.

Democrats have decided that a revival of radical feminism is necessary to elect Hillary Clinton, and so we cannot escape it.

Evidence of what this is really about is not difficult to find. Consider the case of Emma Sulkowicz, the “Mattress Girl” whose false rape accusation led to Paul Nungesser’s lawsuit against Columbia University. Once the facts of the case were described in the Nungesser v. Columbia complaint, everybody with two eyes and a brain realized Sulkowicz is just crazy, vindictive and dishonest. The only difference between Sulkowicz’s case and the University of Virginia rape hoax is that Nungesser is a real human being, whereas “Haven Monahan” can’t file a lawsuit because he is a fictional character created by the deranged liar Jackie Coakley. However, because the “campus rape epidemic” theme is such a major part of the Democrat Party’s 2016 campaign agenda, partisan propagandist Julie Zeilinger returns to Sulkowicz’s discredited fable:

Beyond “Mattress Girl”: The Case for a More
Complex Campus Sexual Assault Media Narrative
It’s not often that an undergraduate thesis lands a student on the cover of New York magazine. But that’s what happened to Emma Sulkowicz, whom most people equate with the media-created shorthand “mattress girl,” in 2014.
In “Carry That Weight,” her performance art thesis at Columbia University, Sulkowicz examined her own experience with sexual assault. The piece, and the media storm that followed, quickly positioned her as a public figure and face of the broader campus sexual assault movement.

(Note the admission that this is an organized political “movement.”)

The media coverage, however, “didn’t make it clear that I was a human too, and not just a hero that could change the world,” Sulkowicz told Mic. “There was the expectation that I would give a speech at every rally, [that] I would perform for everyone and say stuff. But that’s a big expectation to have for just one person.”
The extensive media coverage of sexual assault has been both advantageous and detrimental for the campus sexual assault movement. Most coverage of rape and sexual assault hasn’t fully reflected the nuances of survivors’ and activists’ lived experiences, which studies confirm are still widespread. One 2015 Washington Post-Kaiser Family Foundation poll that found 25% of college-aged women report having experienced “unwanted sexual incidents” at school, and a new 2016 study revealed a similar finding.

(These tendentious surveys have been debunked, but never mind . . .)

Advocates have long understood the importance of media coverage and its unparalleled ability to amplify their messages, provide education and connection for survivors, hold authorities accountable and, ideally, prevent sexual assault.
But media narratives about survivors have often perpetuated and reflected how the broader culture sees and understands survivors: a single story and a perfect victim. More often than not, high-profile survivors and activists are presented as a neatly packaged, but ultimately incomplete, narrative. . . .

You can read the whole thing. The bottom line is that, after it became apparent that Sulkowicz was lying, and after the UVA rape hoax was exposed, it became more difficult for professional liars like Julie Zeilinger to get the kind of media coverage that previously helped promote the phony “campus rape epidemic” narrative.

To anyone with a modicum of common sense — a category that excludes feminists — there was never any credibility to the claim that female students were routinely subjected to sexual violence by the kind of brainiac nerds with high SAT scores and perfect GPAs who attend elite universities like Columbia (annual tuition $51,008).

This was the telltale clue about the whole “rape  culture” narrative, really. Whereas common sense suggests that sexual violence would be more common at low-ranking state universities or community colleges, the loudest complaints about an alleged “epidemic” of sexual assault were instead made by women attending schools like Yale, Brown, Oberlin and Occidental. That is to say, this narrative originated with highly privileged young women on elite campuses where “social justice” activism is a way of life. While it is usually impossible to know the truth of any particular case — typically these are “he-said/she-said” incidents, involving alcohol and with no corroborating evidence — the overall picture is clear enough. On no campus do the actual reports of sexual assault come anywhere near the “1-in-5” statistic widely publicized by feminists. Even stipulating the feminist claim that 88 percent of campus assaults are never reported, extrapolations based on actual reports would only reach about 1-in-40, as a worst-case-scenario estimate.

Every rape is a tragedy, of course, but there is no “epidemic” on America’s university campuses and the current feminist obsession with “rape culture” is simply a matter of political opportunism.

The hypocritical dishonesty of feminists becomes further apparent in their habitual silence about the subjugation of woman and endemic sexual violence in the Muslim world:

Persecution watchdog groups are raising awareness for a Christian Pakistani girl who was killed earlier this month after she and her friends rejected the sexual advances of drunken Muslim men . . .
The British Pakistani Christian Association reported last week that the incident occurred on Jan. 13, when three young Christian girls, Kiran (17 years), Shamroza (18 years) and Sumble (20 years), were approached on the streets at night by four allegedly drunk Muslim men in a car. The girls rejected the lewd advances of the men, which caused them to turn violent.
“How dare you run away from us, Christian girls are only meant for one thing, the pleasure of Muslim men,” one of the men reportedly said.
The men then crashed their car right into the girls, causing Shamroza to break several ribs and Sumble to break her hip. Kiran, however, was lifted up from the ground on the hood of the car, and driven until the car suddenly stopped, throwing her rapidly to the ground, where she cracked open her head and suffered internal bleeding, leading to her death.

Meanwhile, in Germany:

A German university city with a Green party migrant-supporting administration has banned refugees from several nightclubs following complaints from females of sexual harassment and theft.
Women have allegedly complained to managers of clubs in Freiburg, southwest Germany, about being fed date-rape drugs and being accosted in toilets.
Another woman claimed she had been raped while a bouncer was allegedly stabbed by a migrant. . . .
According to local media reports, the problem extends to six discos in the town.
‘No more entry for asylum seekers,’ was the headline in the weekend edition of the newspaper Badische Zeitung. . . .
One woman, aged 46, told the Badische Zeitung she had been in the White Rabbit in December when a large group of African men had come and ‘bothered’ guests.
‘I was surrounded and marginalised while dancing,’ she said. ‘The situation was full of male violence. I felt threatened.’
On that night two bouncers eject five men from the premises for harassing another woman who complained she had to run a ‘gauntlet’ of men on the club stairs.
Dietmar Ganzmann, operator of the El.Pi student disco, said he had decided only to allow a certain number of refugees entrance on any given night, and no more. . . .
Peter Bitsch, operator of the discotheque Kagan, confirmed that many women no longer feel safe in the clubs when there are large numbers of migrants in them.

Meanwhile, in Sweden:

Police were at a refugee camp trying to find a 10-year-old boy who had been raped ‘multiple times’, when a swarm of Muslim refugees attacked, causing the police to flee.
The Daily Mail reports that the camp was located in Västerås. Staff in the centre tried to remove the boy but were stopped by the mob of asylum seekers. . . .
The incident took place last Wednesday and is just now getting media attention. It’s hard to keep track with all the rapes in the world’s rape capital.
Swedish Prime Minister Stefan Lofven said on Monday that more police are needed in order to deal with the influx of asylum seekers.

So while liars like Julie Zeilinger solicit media assistance in an attempt to resuscitate the mythical “campus rape epidemic,” they continue ignoring a real plague of sexual violence committed by Muslims, and the American feminist movement is dedicated to electing Hillary Clinton, who by abandoning Americans at Benghazi demonstrated that it is her policy to surrender to the encroaching menace of Islamic violence.





 

Category: Democrats, Education, Election, Feminism, Hillary Clinton, Sex Trouble

Comments

52 Responses to “Democrats, Feminists and Other Liars”

  1. Finrod Felagund
    January 27th, 2016 @ 5:04 pm

    Violence against women by Muslims can’t help Hillary Clinton get elected President, so of course American radical feminists are going to ignore it. Protect the narrative!

  2. RS
    January 27th, 2016 @ 5:07 pm

    ‘I was surrounded and marginalised while dancing,’ she said. ‘The situation was full of male violence. I felt threatened.’

    She cannot name the problem which is right in front of her face. Instead she displaces her fear to male violence when the only thing that’s changed is the religious makeup of the crowd.

  3. Fail Burton
    January 27th, 2016 @ 5:32 pm

    Very good post. Even stranger still is the rise of this exact same cult in the science fiction community, and one that finally and inevitably reached into Star Wars with a well-known male feminist SF author lobbying Disney to allow him to include gay characters in his tie-in novel and recent complaints about the non-presence of a female action figure from the movie.

    I mention SF because it highlights how bizarrely and obsessively out of place this movement is and how it can find poison in the most unlikely places. In recent years there have been a number of threats of boycotts by high-profile SF authors if SF conventions don’t have a feminist-approved sexual harassment policy. By an amazing coincidence the model policy was always drawn from the now mercifully extinct man-hating “geek feminist” Ada Initiative. Listening to these people you’d think SF conventions were wild Hell’s Angels parties. An editor at Tor Books, the largest publisher of SF in the world, recently called people who opposed this feminist push “neo-Nazis” in a Facebook post waving about a forthcoming “geek feminist” book written by a woman who won two Hugo Awards for claiming men have erased women from military history, thus explaining why there are no women in epic fantasy. To buttress this claim she used paintings of black women in medieval armor.

    One male feminist author even considers himself an expert on rape and has the word in the header of his blog. He has relentlessly pushed the idea men, whites and straights have oppressed the “marginalized” in SF along with the phony 1 in 5 rape stats and anti-due process “#JustListen” hashtags if any woman claims anything.

    By another amazing coincidence this movement in SF rose in 2009 with the internet flame war known as “Racefail” followed by posts about how the lesbian Bechdel Test applies to “intersectionality” at a site called The Angry Black Woman. 2009 also saw posts like “When Will Whites Stop Making Movies Like ‘Avatar’?” at the Gawker SF site io9 run by a transgender and a lesbian. Since then both the Hugo and Nebula Awards have become nothing more than projects to promote intersectionality and lesbian SF and there is no sign of this movement in SF slowing down.

    Like the campus rape activists, this movement in SF makes no secret of the fact they consider SF a vehicle to advance their feminist messaging and a 2013 otherwise average SF novel won the most awards in SF history by being promoted for the French Queer Theory of “genderblind” pronouns. The same month the novel was released the author wrote a post where she used an analogy of a restaurant where most “cis white dudes” punched women, non-whites and gays in the face at random.

  4. Ruth
    January 27th, 2016 @ 5:41 pm

    “Abolish Rape Culture”?

    The people you voted for are inviting it in. Stupid bints.

  5. RS
    January 27th, 2016 @ 5:55 pm

    BTW, take a guess at the number of colleges and universities with “Womyn’s Studies” departments are non-profit. Now guess how many professors advocate for political parties, issues and candidates in their classrooms in contravention of that status. Now guess whether anything will be done about it.

  6. RS
    January 27th, 2016 @ 6:03 pm

    I read something about the COC’s in the open source world over at Vox Day’s place the other day. Inevitably, these codes of conduct allow for banishment from a group by a cadre of “worthies” whose actions are a) hidden and b) not subject to appeals. As has been pointed out, these things are designed to be weapons to be deployed against males by women to rid the various open source communities of the problematic Y chromosome. Add in the claim that any call for judging a persons contribution should be based on the quality of the code and the merits of the contribution are merely camouflage to keep out “marginalized” groups, i.e. anyone not white, straight and male, and you can see what the endgame is.

  7. Hodor
    January 27th, 2016 @ 7:07 pm

    I find almost everything here worth reading and, having frequented this blog for a couple-few years, will invest the time needed to devote to sometimes long-ish entries.

    This post, however, seems to me to be a very succinct distillation of several elements percolating “out there” that can be easily consumed, understood, and digested, resulting in many threads tied neatly in a knot- all in less than 5 minutes.

    Well done. Cheers.

  8. Joe Joe
    January 27th, 2016 @ 8:09 pm

    It’s more than partisan politics. If you take the feminist “rape culture” fight with the #BLM fight against legitimate policing, and the illegal alien fight against Federal immigration law, what you are really seeing is a three pronged assault on the legitimacy of the American criminal justice system.

    The “rape culture” nonsense is an attack on due process. When “Yes means Yes” becomes law (as it is in NY and CA, but only for college students) it means that a precedent has been set for doing away with due process in some criminal proceedings. This erodes Constitutional protections of the (sometimes falsely) accused.

    The #BLM attack on policing has been against LEGITIMATE police actions, including self defense. Look at the example of Officer Wilson in Ferguson: Michael Brown, a small time drug dealer and assaulter of a shop owner, reached inside a police vehicle and beat Officer Wilson’s head and then went for the officer’s gun. (The bullet in Brown’s hand and Brown’s prints on Officer Wilson’s gun indicate that Brown’s hand was wrapped around the gun when the bullet was fired.) Brown was CHARGING Wilson when the officer shot him. This was also demonstrated by the forensic evidence.

    So what is the point of attacking Officer Wilson, who followed police procedure and legitimately was in fear for his life? Why not attack the officers who killed Kelly Thomas?

    Or who beat up this woman on a California freeway?

    Why go after an officer who remained in the confines of police procedure and the law?

    It can only be to delegitimize normal policing and create the impression (worldwide) that American police forces are racist and unjust, even when following the rules and law. In other words, the rules and American law are racist and unjust.

    Just like the rules and American law are unjust because a man accused of rape can get an attorney, cross examine his accuser, and provide evidence in his own defense. The very idea that American law is just is being undermined by both #BLM and the feminists.

    Now let’s try one more. For years, illegal immigrants from Mexico have been encouraged by American business (and government) to break American immigration law, jump the border, and work (under the table) in the US. American business and the government that serves it have never created a legitimate “guest worker program” which would give some type of legal status to these workers and guarantee some protections for them. Business doesn’t want them protected–that costs money. Business wants them cheap–under minimum wage–with no OCEA rules in place and no worker’s comp or insurance.

    The cost of these workers has fallen on the already beleaguered middle class, especially in states like California, where illegal immigrants are able to get all kinds of public assistance including, now, Obamacare (Covered California). When the middle class complains that they shouldn’t be paying for people who have broken the law, they are told (1) that there are no illegal people (and shame on you!) and (2) the cost of your strawberries and lettuce will skyrocket if American citizens picked them and (3) that Americans don’t want to pick produce anyway.

    This attitude on the part of the Federal Government and big business/Chamber of Commerce supports a general contempt for American immigration law in the minds of these illegal immigrants. Illegals become empowered to march in the streets and fight for “rights” that they technically don’t have. You can’t really blame them: the state and Federal governments has given them the green light to act self righteous and make demands.

    Here again, American law is seen as unjust. The Federal and State governments can’t be bothered to follow the law. (And in a case where the state does try to follow the law, like Arizona, the Federal government punished that state, its own citizenry, and not those breaking the law.

    What all of these movement are doing is weakening and undermining American law and the Constitution. Focusing on just the feminists or just #BLM or just the illegal immigration problem means you’re missing the forest for the trees.

    The “forest” is a planned and systematic breakdown of American law.

    Once it is broken down enough, the Mark Levin-ists will force a new Constitutional Convention, and a new constitution of the Socialist States of America (already written, probably in the immediate post war period) will be enshrined, allegedly by public demand.

    Pass me the tin foil.

  9. Matt_SE
    January 27th, 2016 @ 8:41 pm

    Something will be done about it, and something effective: the Department of Education will be ended.

  10. Instapundit » Blog Archive » AND SPEAKING OF STACEY MCCAIN: Democrats, Feminists and Other Liars….
    January 28th, 2016 @ 2:00 am

    […] AND SPEAKING OF STACEY MCCAIN: Democrats, Feminists and Other Liars. […]

  11. Terenc Blakely
    January 28th, 2016 @ 2:22 am

    Scratch a lefty find a nihilist.

  12. DeadMessenger
    January 28th, 2016 @ 2:27 am

    Yeah, that is a load of guano. As you imply, part of the problem is the PC mindset of the victim, which only leads to further victimization.

    Here’s how it would’ve worked for me. Perhaps some young woman somewhere will be educated:

    ‘I was surrounded and harassed by Islamics while dancing. I felt threatened. A can of Raid Ant and Roach spray coincidentally fell out of my purse, and I inadvertently sprayed two of the guys in the eyes with it while trying to return it to my bag. Sorry about that. They knocked another douchebag to the ground, where I accidentally stepped on his groin over and over in my spike heels during the confusion. Then some angry truck drivers and roofers came over and escorted those men to the train station, they said. I guess they went back to Syria because I haven’t seen them since.’

  13. DeadMessenger
    January 28th, 2016 @ 2:33 am

    There is no Department of Education. As of 1 Jan 2000, it was renamed the Ministry of Reeducation. Perhaps you didn’t get the memo.

  14. DeadMessenger
    January 28th, 2016 @ 2:36 am

    I think by this point, McCain can dictate this stuff into a transcription machine in his sleep.

  15. Francis W. Porretto
    January 28th, 2016 @ 5:50 am

    There is no objective reason for the recent upsurge of radical feminism in the United States.

    I’ve been thinking about this since I first read it, and I have to disagree – not because I differ with your reason for thinking so, but because the reason itself is quite different.

    A “movement” that sees that its fortunes are failing and fatally threatened will often exhibit “Battle of the Bulge” behavior: i.e., it will try one last-ditch, all-in and all-out push in a final attempt to reclaim its chances. During such a push, it will often:

    1) Appear much larger and stronger than it really is;
    2) Command wildly disproportionate attention from the media;
    3) Achieve temporary gains of “territory” that it will ultimately surrender.

    Of course, to the casual observer, the reality might not be apparent, and the results will cause many an “I should have known better” smacking of the forehead. (Equally of course, there’ll be pseudo-prognosticators who succeed in concealing their alarm until the results are in, at which point they’ll crow that they “knew it all along.”)

    “Surveys” that attempt to assess the state of popular opinion on controversial subjects – especially those where a dispreferred response is likely to get you publicly vilified or worse – are notoriously unreliable. For the opponent of a totalitarian movement such as feminism, the path of caution is always to fight with maximum concentration and effort. But the prospects might not be as bleak as they look. Though that should “go without saying,” nevertheless saying it now and then is the rhetorical equivalent of chicken soup: it might not help, but it can’t hurt.

  16. TatR
    January 28th, 2016 @ 6:39 am

    “The media coverage, however, “didn’t make it clear that I was a human too, and not just a hero that could change the world,” Sulkowicz told Mic.”

    Wow, that line. Traditionally people in such situations say things like “I ‘m no hero, I’m just trying to make a difference” or something. She states she’s “not JUST a hero.” Delusional crazy person.

  17. thesickmanofeurope_com
    January 28th, 2016 @ 6:47 am

    “…The only reason we have so many young American women identifying themselves as feminists in 2016 is because of partisan politics….”

    The only reason we have so many young American women identifying themselves as feminists in 2016 is…… because we have a generation (or two) of emasculated effeminate pseudo men that are more than willing to accept and listen to women’s bull….most of these guys (if they are LUCKY) raised in a household with an emasculated and submissive father….and if they are not lucky they are then raised then by a “strong and independent” slutty dysfunctional single mother.

  18. Matt_SE
    January 28th, 2016 @ 8:26 am

    Uh oh, now I need to be reeducated.

  19. CaptDMO
    January 28th, 2016 @ 8:49 am

    SciFi, “Free” computer code, Video games, aerospace, military promotion, award bestowal in general ….
    The data doesn’t support your thesis.
    “Well, it’s COMPLICATED, you see, Math is HARD!”
    No, no it is NOT.

  20. jakee308
    January 28th, 2016 @ 9:16 am

    We’re looking at another branch of leftist liberal insanity; Rape Chic.

    They’ve brought us Radical Chic, Privilege Chic, Climate Change Chic, etc.

    And although the term originally referred to celebs attracted to certain groups and philosophies, it also affects those who are striving or are part of a demographic that feels they are a part of the class of celebs or could be because they have money, looks and connections.

    Ergo; Ivy League schools.

    We see this no where else as most common people have to much to do to stay afloat to waste on unreal threats or fads.

    This is all Wannabes. They wannabe the focus of a movement. Another Rosa Parks or Gloria Steinem.To be a SJW of SJWs. A Goddess of guilt.

    I see now the structure of this pathology.

    Women with too much time on their hands and nothing constructive to do with it.

    Idle hands are the Devil’s workshop.

  21. Dana
    January 28th, 2016 @ 9:56 am

    What makes you think that he doesn’t?

  22. CrustyB
    January 28th, 2016 @ 10:12 am

    “Being a victim means you’re a *good* person!”

    This mythology is one of the biggest fallacies of modern America. People who wake up in the morning, stretch, open the shade, look out at the sun and say “Let’s see how I can hallucinate that I’m a victim today!” The insane drive people have to create victimization for themselves, as if women were still denied the right to vote, blacks still couldn’t get a room on the Vegas strip, police were still raiding homosexual’s bedroom to break up their fecal sex lives, etc.

    If Hitler were mugged, would that make him an OK guy we should all respect? I think not.

  23. physicsnut
    January 28th, 2016 @ 10:22 am

    the feminist up-tick sounds like pre-emptive distraction.
    Regarding Germany and Sweden and Denmark etc
    Europeans ought to be getting pitchforks, swords, long bows, short bows, sling bows, hatchets, molotov cocktails, rip saws, pruning shears, chain saws, turkey fryers, razors,
    and scissors

    They ought to organize an INTERNATIONAL LORENA BOBBITT BRIGADE
    and show a little snip snip snip to the muslim invaders
    it goes around the language barrier.

    why would a bunch of COMMIE ATHEISTS at Salon, Alternet, ThinkProgress always blabber on about islamophobia ?? just their little “lets you and him fight”. its a dog whistle

  24. Fail Burton
    January 28th, 2016 @ 11:25 am

    I don’t have an explanation but I see it differently. I think the key factor was Twitter. The vast majority of people are live and let live types who Tweet a sandwich they just made or something about music.

    But you have a lunatic fringe of nobody no-talents which for the first time in history had a direct real-time pipeline to CEOs, author, celebrities and the like.

    Look at the situation which occurred in SF. Look at who the beneficiaries are. K. Tempest Bradford. Not a writer, indifferent blogger, much higher profile than her talent would otherwise give her. Her main “talent” is shaming whites on Twitter. Same with Mikki Kendall – 200,000 Tweets, internet shut-in – who isn’t even a blogger. Serial convention panelist though. I could go on and on, but you get the point.

  25. Dana
    January 28th, 2016 @ 11:26 am

    We might need to contact Mrs McCain, to ask her if her husband might be dictating — pun very much intended — whilst inflicting his patriarchal heterosexual lusts upon her.

  26. Dana
    January 28th, 2016 @ 12:13 pm

    Certainly there’s a reason for the “recent upsurge” in radical feminism in the last five years: the economic collapse in 2008 meant that the employment prospects of Womyn’s and Gender Studies graduates plummeted, and once graduate school didn’t help them, they had to do something, which meant only one thing, taking their chronic combitching even more public, and increasing their political agitation.

    http://40.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ltalohGjbP1r25y9yo1_500.jpg

    It could not be that a Master’s degree in Women’s Studies leads only to bartending legitimately, so the fault must be that the white cisheteronormative patriarchal capitalist system unfairly and oppressively keeps those brilliant and brave women from being hired as CEO-tracked upper-level managers right out of college. Therefore, the oppressive white cisheteronormative patriarchal capitalist system must be smashed to provide true freedom and opportunity for All Women. With a bunch of feminist professors, capably aided by all of those feminist graduate students competing for far too few professorships themselves serving as ‘teaching assistants,’ it became both easy and necessary to indoctrinate the incoming freshwomen/ freshpeople matriculating at the university.

  27. Dana
    January 28th, 2016 @ 12:29 pm

    Of course, the Special Snowflake™ freshwomen/ freshpeople are also being taught that not only are they just as free as men to have casual, pointless, virtually anonymous sex, they have a right to good, great casual, pointless, virtually anonymous sex, and any male who, upon being given the opportunity to provide good, great casual, pointless, virtually anonymous sex, fails to do so, the Implied Contract and Obligation to provide an absolutely toe-curling orgasmic experience has been so seriously violated that the copulatory experience could not have been consensual, and must have been rape. Said Special Snowflake™ freshwomen/ freshpeople consented only to awesomeness, not blah, and anything less than awesomeness simply has to be rape! Since no male seeking to copulate with Special Snowflake™ freshwomen/ freshpeople is going to admit, beforehand, that he’s more dud than stud, he deceived the Special Snowflake™ freshwomen/ freshpeople when entering the Implied Contract and Obligation.

    Clearly, any campus male who is unable to provide a young lady with an absolutely toe-curling orgasmic experience must announce this in advance, so as not to deceive the Special Snowflake™ freshwomen/ freshpeople. The best way to do that is to require all inadequate collegiate males to wear t-shirts which announce, “I suck in bed.” The campus male homosexuals would like to see such advertising as well. 🙂

  28. Dana
    January 28th, 2016 @ 12:31 pm

    And there is no truth to the rumor that I always use 17 words when three would do just as well!

  29. Quartermaster
    January 28th, 2016 @ 12:51 pm

    You used 21 this time.

  30. Micha_Elyi
    January 28th, 2016 @ 1:49 pm

    By the way, ‘chic’ is French for ‘sheik’.

  31. Fail Burton
    January 28th, 2016 @ 1:56 pm

    Most modern feminists, especially radical gay feminists, have an irrational fear of men. They have tried to organize their phobia into a comprehensive logical ideology by way of explanation. The result is paranoid gibberish and logic that folds back on itself.

  32. Dianna Deeley
    January 28th, 2016 @ 2:02 pm

    It is nearly impossible to convince any woman under 40 that there isn’t a “campus rape epidemic”, they’ve been so thoroughly indoctrinated.

  33. Micha_Elyi
    January 28th, 2016 @ 2:05 pm

    “Of course, the Special Snowflake™ freshwomen/ freshpeople are also being taught that … they have a right to good, great casual, pointless, virtually anonymous sex, and any male who … fails to do so (has violated the Snowflake).”–Dana

    Your experience may vary but females I have turned down for sex often become angry and physically violent. That there are females who sublimate their urges to become physically violent toward men who don’t fulfill their sexual objectification fantasies but express their violence and resentful anger in passive-aggressive ways doesn’t surprise me in the least.

  34. Dianna Deeley
    January 28th, 2016 @ 2:55 pm

    Only if you’re safely anonymous and a looooong way away. There’s no telling if that would sound funny or not!

  35. Dana
    January 28th, 2016 @ 3:12 pm

    Our esteemed host knows who I am, and (approximately) where I live. his sense of humor would take my comment as intended.

    Whether his darling bride would . . . .

  36. Dana
    January 28th, 2016 @ 3:19 pm

    My experience varies, because I’ve been married for 36 years, eight months and nine days. I’m not ‘out there’ making myself seem available for outside copulation, and my profession is extremely heavily male dominated, meaning that workplace hanky-panky simply isn’t an issue.

    When I was available for sex with other women, the times were somewhat different. There were a few women who’d make their desires known, but it was always done a bit more subtly.

  37. Dana
    January 28th, 2016 @ 3:19 pm

    But who’s counting . . . ?

  38. NeoWayland
    January 28th, 2016 @ 3:27 pm

    “Let’s begin with something that should be obvious, but which has seldom been stated explicitly: There is no objective reason for the recent upsurge of radical feminism in the United States. However bad sexism is today, it is not worse than it was five years ago or 10 years ago.”

    I’d qualify this by saying that the label “feminist” has been hijacked, but otherwise I think you’re dead on.

  39. RS
    January 28th, 2016 @ 3:31 pm

    Totally OT. Nice game from UK against Mizzou. I think the Wlldcats are underrated this year. I’m not a big Calipari fan, but they they look very good. Now, back to my incantations against the incubus Frank Haith who has joined Quin Synder in my pantheon of Mizzou basketball coaches I loathe.

  40. NeoWayland
    January 28th, 2016 @ 3:32 pm

    It’s power through victimhood.

    Again.

    Shelby Steele’s White Guilt nails the explanation.

  41. NeoWayland
    January 28th, 2016 @ 3:34 pm

    And participating.

    Bill Clinton’s escapades should be proof enough.

  42. RS
    January 28th, 2016 @ 3:35 pm

    Provided the women in question are determined to see themselves as victims. I have a now 25 year old daughter–Summa Cum Laude, Phi Beta Kappa, gainfully employed in Europe–who managed to navigate four years of undergraduate education without being accosted once.

    Of course, she’s a Christian conservative who could pull the larynx out of an attacker in a heartbeat, so maybe that has something to do with her attitude.

  43. Gunga
    January 28th, 2016 @ 3:57 pm

    If you scratch a lefty, you better wash your hands immediately. Just sayin’….

  44. Gunga
    January 28th, 2016 @ 3:59 pm

    That poor old man with the funny mustache got mugged and you have no sympathy for him? What kind of monster are you? Can I get some muscle over here?

  45. MC227
    January 28th, 2016 @ 4:11 pm

    Just a bunch of attention whores addicted to Facecrack. the worst thing you can do to a feminist is ignore them that makes them batshit crazy!

  46. Valerie Stewart
    January 28th, 2016 @ 7:00 pm

    I saw a discussion earlier today in the blogosphere that it’s “true female empowerment” that women can have good, casual sex with jerks without marrying them first.

    Um, that’s the opposite of “female empowerment.” Do I really have to explain (to them) why? Shouldn’t it be obvious to those “intellectual” radfems?

  47. Kaminsky
    January 28th, 2016 @ 11:09 pm

    The better things are for women, the more insane their stances need to be in order to maintain their serotonin which they derive from indignation.

  48. Dana
    January 29th, 2016 @ 8:51 am

    They aren’t what they were last year, but they’re good.

    Coach Calipari is, once again, trying to take the best athletes available and turn them into basketball players. He has a lot of success at that, because these guys have so much natural athletic ability, but, in the end, UK got beat by Wisconsin — and almost got beat by Notre Dame in the regional finals — because the Cats ran into some real basketball players.

  49. Dana
    January 29th, 2016 @ 8:54 am

    Yes, you really do have to explain it to them.

    Part of feminism is resentment at the fact that men can be more callous and careless when it comes to sex, and that’s just so plain unfair! The feminists’ solution is to allow women to be callous and careless when it comes to sex, something which runs afoul of the fact that men and women are biologically different.

  50. Daniel Freeman
    January 30th, 2016 @ 5:16 pm

    Have you read The Fraud of Feminism by E. Belfort Bax? It’s been dishonest for over a hundred years.