The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Feminism, Sex and Hypocrisy

Posted on | February 8, 2016 | 62 Comments

 

Perhaps readers will recall Nian Hu (@Nian_Hu on Twitter) or you may need to be reminded that Ms. Hu is the Harvard student who declared: “I am a feminist. I believe in the equality of the sexes. For me, feminism means freedom,” and that among these freedoms was “freedom to have as many sexual partners as I want without being looked down on.”

Well, this was an invitation to mockery that I could not refuse.

What Ms. Hu was saying, really, was that other people have no right to their own opinions. Everyone is required to approve of wanton promiscuity. The feminist freedom of Harvard sluts to get drunk and screw around would be infringed if they were to be “looked down on” because of their habitual and shameless fornication.

“Let me tell you what to think” — this is the dictatorial imperative of feminism, a totalitarian regime of clever college girls who have decided the rest of us are wrong about everything. You need to be constantly lectured by angry young women, because she is oppressed and you are privileged. Therefore the only correct opinions are opinions approved by these tyrannical Ivy League brats who consider it a social injustice — “harassment!” “misogyny!” — if anyone dares to disagree with them.

 

Are there no adults at Harvard University who can explain to these impudent kids that having a high SAT score when you’re 17 is not proof that you already know everything? Or are the faculty and administration of elite universities so intimidated by their students that there is no one on the Cambridge campus who will stand up to these young fools?

Petted and pampered and repeatedly told how wonderful they are (because being admitted to an Ivy League school is proof of their superiority to mere mortals), the insolent youth at schools like Harvard arrive on campus as freshmen convinced that they are smarter than God. The faculty apparently believe their task is to confirm, rather than contradict, their students’ grandiose narcissistic self-regard. So if the girls at Harvard are all sluts and the boys are all perverts, the faculty will schedule lectures in the department of Women, Gender, and Sexuality Studies where students will be told how awesome it is to be a slut or a pervert. The Harvard kids will of course bask in this flattery — “We’re not just smart, we’re sexy, too!” — and thus become even more deviant and immoral than they were when they arrived.

The Ivy League Is Decadent and Depraved, and we can say of Harvard University what Obi-Wan Kenobi said of Mos Eisley, that it is a “wretched hive of scum and villainy.” But I digress . . .

Nian Hu published a new column in the Harvard Crimson last week:

My friend scrolls through the photos of a man on Facebook. He’s white, lives in a predominantly white neighborhood, and went to a predominantly white high school. But in many of his photos, he is accompanied by Asian women.
“Yes, he has yellow fever,” my friend confirms . . . a preference for Asian women. The term is most commonly ascribed to white men who seem to only ever date Asian women.
Yellow fever is a widespread phenomenon. According to data collected from online dating sites, all men except Asians prefer to romantically pursue Asian women. In fact, there are many dating sites specifically tailored for white men looking to date Asian women. There is even a Tumblr blog that compiles messages from “creepy white guys with Asian fetishes.” Yellow fever was also depicted in Debbie Lum’s documentary, Seeking Asian Female, which takes a close look at relationships between white men and Asian women. . . .
It is egregiously misguided to assume that an entire ethnicity of women has one set of personality traits, and the fact that some men actually believe this reflects the limited experience they’ve had with real-life Asian women. Even worse, it suggests that perhaps they are viewing Asian women more as one-dimensional objects than human beings.
Objectification is already something that all women face regardless of race. . . . For Asian women in particular, objectification reduces them to infantile figures — delicate, submissive, and dutiful.
The fact that docility and submissiveness are viewed as favorable traits for Asian women is telling. It implies that non-Asian women are too loud, too opinionated, too intimidating, and that men would prefer women who keep quiet and acquiesce to their every demand. The stereotype that Asian women are meek, though blatantly untrue, nevertheless reveals that perhaps yellow fever is more than just an innocent preference based on physical appearance. . . .

You can read the whole thing, if you feel the urge to absorb another lecture about what a bigoted racist misogynist you are. Frankly, I got bored with these lectures decades ago. The Clarence Thomas hearings, the L.A.riots, the O.J. Simpson trial, Monica Lewinsky, Matthew Shepard — by the time the ’90s ended, like most American adults, I was sick and tired of listening to liberals tell us what to think about everything. Back then, of course, the liberal lectures were delivered by TV commentators and newspaper columnists whereas now, thanks to the Internet, every 19-year-old kid with a Tumblr blog is telling us what to think because, of course, teenagers know everything and grown-ups know nothing. But once again, I digress . . .

What is it about feminism that convinces young women they possess a monopoly of knowledge and virtue in regard to sexual behavior? How is it that I, who have six children — three of them older than Nian Hu — am assumed to be an ignorant bigot in need of a lecture about “Hey, objectification is bad, you guys”? Evidently, Ms. Hu disapproves of white men dating Asian women, and she has the right to her opinion. Likewise, the Nation of Islam and the Ku Klux Klan have the same right to disapprove of interracial relationships. It is not my job to tell other people what to think or say or do, so why should I let a Harvard sophomore tell me what to think, say and do? And how are we to decide whose sexual preferences should be condemned as harmful “fetishes” and “objectification,” whereas other preferences we are never allowed to criticize at all? Who has the authority to make this decision?

For example, ever since the American Psychiatric Association removed homosexuality from the category of mental illness, the question of why gay people are gay has been considered off-limits. Any speculation about the etiology of homosexuality incites activists to begin shrieking their insistence that gay people are “born that way,” and so it is impossible to research the possible developmental factors involved without being accused of malevolent homophobic intentions. Well, it’s still a free country, and I am therefore at liberty to say (a) I never believed the “born that way” argument, and (b) I don’t think most gay people actually believe it, either. Trust me. After two years of plowing through dozens of books about radical feminist gender theory, and monitoring the ongoing discourse on Feminist Tumblr blogs, I am if anything even more skeptical of the “born that way” narrative than I was before I began this research project. Because of the substantial overlap between feminism and lesbianism (which is apparent to anyone who bothers to look at Tumblr or, for that matter, Women’s Studies programs), an amateur student of feminist gender theory will invariably encounter various first-person narratives of the “How I Knew I Was Gay” genre.

In the course of relating their “discovery” of their “sexuality” (like they were Pizzaro and lesbianism was the Inca Empire), these women will often talk about their family backgrounds and their early childhood in such a way that would make an old-fashioned Freudian psychoanalyst puff his pipe and say, “Tell me more about your mother.” There are certain situations and circumstances that seem especially conducive to homosexual tendencies, and there is always a backstory, usually involving a sense of alienation, a feeling of being a misfit who is different from other kids, which then manifests itself as homosexuality — or not. Some misfits manage to work through their identity crises and turn out more or less normal. Of course, we have to wonder what sort of unresolved “issues” might be lurking behind the mask of normality when we see someone like Bruce Jenner, a 65-year-old married grandfather, suddenly declare that he is a woman named “Caitlyn.”

 

What does this have to do with Nian Hu’s criticism of “yellow fever”? Perhaps more than you would think. Radical feminists describe the transgenderism of Bruce “Caitlyn” Jenner as “gender fetishism.” That is to say, the so-called “dysphoria” of transpeople involves not merely a sense that they don’t fit in the body they were born in, but also a fetishistic obsession with the superficial traits and behaviors of the opposite sex. It is very easy to say Bruce “Caitlyn” Jenner is just crazy, but if it’s not yet illegal to ask, why is he/she crazy? What are the components parts of his/her delusional obsession? How does someone develop such an intense identification with the opposite sex?

Well, you can believe what you want to believe, but if Bruce can be “Caitlyn” (and you’ll be condemned for transphobia if you say he/she can’t) then why is it wrong for white boys to be obsessed with Asian girls? If Ms. Hu is going to denounce “yellow fever,” what other sexual preferences will she likewise declare to be intolerable “objectification”? Do we need a Committee for Acceptable Attraction to issue official protocols of who we are and are not allowed to like? Maybe we could have a Central Bureau of Sexual Planning that will assign us sex partners on the basis of a random lottery to prevent unfair “discrimination.” If the Bureau assigns you to have sex with Danny DeVito or Rosie O’Donnell, you must comply with your assignment, comrade!

What we perceive in Nian Hu’s diatribe against the “fetishization” of Asian women is how feminism justifies hypocrisy. Twenty years ago, liberals were constantly lecturing us that we should never be “judgmental,” but now we notice that liberals are themselves quite judgmental. Everything any heterosexual white male says or does is wrong, according to the judgmental Left, and scarcely a day goes by that we don’t get some new notice of hitherto unsuspected Thought Crimes we have have committed. We are nowadays indicted and prosecuted in absentia for Thought Crimes. No evidence is required and the first we learn of our wrongdoing is when we are told we are guilty of it: “Heteronormativity!” “The male gaze!” “Rape culture!”

And who are our accusers? Only the most privileged people on the planet — arrogant brats like Nian Hu whose status as a Harvard University student qualifies her to pass judgment on everyone else. Whatever the feminist likes is good, and whatever you like is wrong, because she is a victim and you are an oppressor. In the 21st century, the claim of victimhood becomes the ultimate privilege, entitling the victim to lecture everybody else, and if any man disagrees with her, his disagreement proves that he is a misogynist. Quod erat demonstrandum.

She’s grinding these axes while enrolled at Harvard University, annual tuition $45,278. Your parents are shelling out that kind of money to send you to college and you’ve got nothing better to do with your time than to look at a guy’s Facebook pages to see if he is “fetishizing” Asian women? And yet, you little hypocrite, you insist that you should be able to “have as many sexual partners as I want without being looked down on”?

Which is it, Ms. Hu? Is private sexual behavior off-limits to criticism, or is everything to be subjected to public scrutiny to determine if our sexual choices are appropriate? Either all choices are open to criticism or no choices can be criticized, but I suspect most of us would never want to live under a regime in which some distant elite of self-appointed secular “experts” arrogate to themselves the authority to tell everybody else how we are allowed to have sex and with whom.

This is why most people despise contemporary feminism, because feminists do not deceive us with their talk of “gender,” which we understand correctly to be a way of talking about sex. Feminists want to dictate what we are allow to say about sex, so as to control what we think about sex, and thus ultimately to tell us what we are permitted to do about sex. What is the basis for feminist authority in these matters? On whose behalf do feminists claim to wield such extraordinary social, cultural and political power? And when we catch feminists engaged in deception and hypocritical sophistry — excluding their own sexual behaviors from criticism, while condemning the rest of us as guilty of sexual Thought Crimes — why are we always accused of “harassment” for having the effrontery to notice these feminist lies?

Feminism Is a Totalitarian Movement to Destroy Civilization as We Know It, and unless people wake up to this menace, there will come a time — and perhaps soon — when we no longer have any freedom, nor any means of resisting the feminist dictatorship, which would certainly be the cruelest tyranny the world has ever known.

What a sad page in the history books it will be that tells the tale of how a once-great nation was destroyed, and a formerly free people were enslaved, by a bunch of Crazy Cat Ladies.

BREAKING NEWS:

CONCORD, N.H. — On the eve of the New Hampshire primary, Hillary Clinton’s quest to become the country’s first female president has encountered an unexpected problem: she is having trouble persuading women, young and old, to rally behind her cause.

Oh! What a bitter disappointment this would be to Ms. Hu!

(Hat-tip: Badger Pundit on Twitter.)

 

Comments

62 Responses to “Feminism, Sex and Hypocrisy”

  1. jakee308
    February 8th, 2016 @ 3:01 pm

    It isn’t feminism that teaches women these days that they are all knowing and all seeing.

    It’s liberal culture in general that does this. The constant berating of white males goes on in the class room, the television, the movies, books and other media and education foci.

    What was originally a recognition of the softness, sweetness and mothering of most women (that’s long long ago now) compared to the no nonsense, hard reality and straight talk of men has morphed into a comparison and value assignment that consistently vilifies all males traits and trumpets the virtues of all female traits.

    It’s the basis for men retreating from their societal responsibility and the increase in suicide. Men are being taught that being male is bad. Where can they go from there except deviancy that range from killing themselves to cutting off certain parts so as to be able to claim they too are worthy.

    It’s a sick culture that’s been created by those that themselves are sick and perverted. And I believe it’s reached a point where it is self perpetuating and resistant to being reversed or changed to a healthier one.

    And it’s all been done by the Liberals and their masters who have found Western cultures’ weak points and used them to attack and destroy it.

    I believe the only way Western Culture can be preserved is the withdrawal (physical and technological) from the current ‘Sick’ disease being spread. This can only begin after the cause is admitted to by enough ‘normal’ people and the ‘cure’ recognized as the answer. We’re still trying to fight and I believe the fight is all over and it’s time to get away from the diseased corpse.

  2. GUEST
    February 8th, 2016 @ 3:21 pm

    “Any speculation about the etiology of homosexuality incites activists to begin shrieking their insistence that gay people are “born that way,” and so it is impossible to research the possible developmental factors involved without being accused of malevolent homophobic intentions.”

    Although I’m about to use anecdotal evidence, I think if anyone would ever be courageous enough to do a real, serious study about this, they would find it to be true. Every person I’ve ever known who experiences homosexual attraction has one or more of these issues: absent or overbearing parent(s) and was sexually abused in some way, some form of mental illness or mental abnormality.

    It’s very sad because if our society would actually look into homosexuality it could very likely be treated–and perhaps not “cured’ per say, because I postulate that in instances of the sexually abused, their poor little growing brains misconnect things because of the abuse causing their brains to actually not function properly, and I doubt that that is fixable–but at least help them to not throw themselves into abnormal, destructive behavior.

  3. Quartermaster
    February 8th, 2016 @ 4:07 pm

    I’m guessing that a lot of women have a special place in h3ll reserved for them.

  4. Fail Burton
    February 8th, 2016 @ 4:11 pm

    1977: “Hey, babe. What’s your sign? You’re a Libra I bet.”
    2016: “Hey, babe. What’s your pronouns? You’re a gender neutrois I bet.”

    What I love about these daffy feminists is they tend to pie-chart every last atom of dirt in such a way men or whites are never right because there’s no announced goal or way to be right.

    If I don’t care to date Asian women all that much I’m a racist. If I have a particular attraction to Asian women I’m inverting the yellow peril. What’s the permitted sweet spot? Is it based on a local or national demography? If I claim I don’t see race I get hog-called for that. Who do I appeal to as an umpire; some ditzy 22 yr. old on Xanax who’ll claim it sucks away their energy to instruct men on their many failings?

  5. Jim R
    February 8th, 2016 @ 5:01 pm

    I got slammed into the idea of “yellow fever” when I started down the path of adopting our little girl from China and doing research into the problems that trans-racial adoptees face. Yellow Fever was one of many things that one older adoptee ranted about on her blog. It struck me at the time as nonsense. Yes, there are guys who prefer Asian girls… just as there are guys who prefer blondes, black girls, redheads, goth chicks, tall girls, fat girls, &c. There’s nothing ipso facto wrong with any of that. I believe that women have similar preferences.

    It also struck me that, for a country allegedly eaten up with yellow fever, Asian women are remarkably absent from the informal lists of “the hottest chicks in America”. Asian women don’t tend to grace the cover of the Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue; few if any Playboy Playmates are Asian; Kate Upton and the Unspeakable Armenian are our national sex symbols, not… um… Lucy Liu?

  6. Gringao
    February 8th, 2016 @ 5:02 pm

    The ultimate irony here is that the Identity Politics crowd will spring to its feet if you deny that Asians or even Asian women have no characteristics that distinguish them from other groups. Yet once a white guy says that he admires and is sexually drawn to those attributes, you’re suddenly a depraved fetishist to be denounced.

    It all comes down to a sick game of who’s in and who’s out. If you’re an In, nothing you do can possibly be wrong. If you’re an Out, nothing you do can possibly be right.

  7. Steve White
    February 8th, 2016 @ 5:22 pm

    Evidently, Ms. Hu disapproves of white men dating Asian women, and she has the right to her opinion. Likewise, the Nation of Islam and the Ku Klux Klan have the same right to disapprove of interracial relationships.

    If that’s the company Ms. Hu wishes to keep, so be it. But Stacy’s quote is one I intend to use in the future just because I think apoplexy is a useful indicator of how I’ve disrupted someone’s comfortable thoughts.

  8. RS
    February 8th, 2016 @ 5:49 pm

    Let us recall for a moment, Amy Chua’s essay in the Wall Street Journal about Asian “Tiger Moms.” Recall further the hand-wringing which accompanied its publication, inasmuch as Ms. Chua offered implicit criticism of American parenting by praising Asian parents.

    With that in mind, several questions for Ms. Hu: Is Ms. Chua correct about the qualities of Asian women as mothers? If so, what is the problem with a man seeking a strong woman who eliminates nonsense in favor of rearing high-achieving children?

    In truth, Ms Hu is merely seeking something about which to rage. As I mentioned yesterday, its recreation for her. And so, she prowls Facebook looking for things to piss her off, because only anger and bitterness, masquerading as intellectualism can briefly fill the void of her otherwise meaningless existence.

  9. kilo6
    February 8th, 2016 @ 5:49 pm

    For me, feminism means freedom,” and that among these freedoms was “freedom to have as many sexual partners as I want without being looked down on.”

    Ah yes, the 1984-ish “Freedon Is Slavery” type quotes come to mind when reading this.

    also, 2 Peter 2:19 (KJV)
    While they promise them liberty, they themselves are the servants of corruption: for of whom a man is overcome, of the same is he brought in bondage.

  10. NRPax
    February 8th, 2016 @ 5:59 pm

    Why do I get the feeling she’s upset because guys aren’t checking her out?

  11. Quartermaster
    February 8th, 2016 @ 6:17 pm

    By the lights of the loony feminist left, men are depraved for liking the charms of women. So, men can’t win no matter the circumstances.

    Since I’m going to lose no matter what, I’ll keep on liking those things and not worry about the loony feminist left.

  12. Quartermaster
    February 8th, 2016 @ 6:18 pm

    Lucy Liu is cute, though.

  13. The original Mr. X
    February 8th, 2016 @ 6:44 pm

    For me, feminism means freedom,” and that among these freedoms was “freedom to have as many sexual partners as I want without being looked down on.”
    That’s interesting, because for me, freedom includes the ability to have and express opinions about people who choose their political ideologies based on how then can best rationalise their sexual behaviour.

  14. Robert What?
    February 8th, 2016 @ 6:46 pm

    This obnoxious child would only be Harvard’s problem, or her parents’ problem if it wasn’t for the fact that spoiled brats like her often go into government employment or corporate HR departments where they exert power over other people.

  15. Jeff
    February 8th, 2016 @ 7:40 pm

    6 kids!!! The bible continues after “go forth be fruitful and multiply”. Please stop picking on the special snowflakes at our prestigious colleges and on tumblr.They might not have enough safe spaces to hide in from when reality comes calling.

  16. Patrick Albanese
    February 8th, 2016 @ 7:48 pm

    Of her multiple sex partners, I wonder how many are Asian..

    Or does she fulfill her role as the lure for white men who have yellow fever?

    Perhaps she is fetishizing white men…

  17. Gospace
    February 8th, 2016 @ 7:57 pm

    I don’t have a problem with Nian Hu’s feminism that states: “I am a feminist. I believe in the equality of the sexes. For me, feminism means freedom,” and that among these freedoms was “freedom to have as many sexual partners as I want without being looked down on.” She’s entitled to be wrong about it.
    I have a problem with the feminism that states she can retroactively call those sexual liaisons “Rape!” if she decides she didn’t really enjoy them, or she gets pissed off, or…. And that’s the same feminism.

  18. Zhytamyr
    February 8th, 2016 @ 7:57 pm

    Being outraged all of the time must be exhausting. How does she have the energy for all of that dirty dirty anonymous sex that she’s entitled to have without judgement?

  19. kilo6
    February 8th, 2016 @ 8:12 pm

    from the above quoted work of Miss Hu:

    … Even worse, it suggests that perhaps they are viewing Asian women more as one-dimensional objects than human beings.

    Typically I’d expect to see a different phrase or feminist bromide in such a rant. Instead I see an offhand reference to Herbert Marcuse, or maybe it’s just me and my idiosyncratic outlook on things

  20. John Rose
    February 8th, 2016 @ 8:20 pm

    Kate Upton = yes, the Unspeakable Armenian? Not so much. And Lucy Liu? Oh, yes.

    It comes down to beauty of a different sort, much as one can find Marilyn Monroe AND Audrey Hepburn beautiful, I’d imagine one can (as I do) appreciate the blonde ‘Americana’ look of Kate Upton, even as one likewise appreciates the slightly exotic elegance of Lucy Liu…

    IMHO, of course. 🙂

  21. Daniel Freeman
    February 8th, 2016 @ 8:24 pm

    I honestly couldn’t tell if it was that, or if she was gay and pissed about the competition, or both.

  22. Jason Lee
    February 8th, 2016 @ 8:37 pm

    When a woman writes about #TheWayThingsShouldBe, it’s nearly always personal.

  23. Gringao
    February 8th, 2016 @ 9:10 pm

    But lesbian women are perfectly fine with seeing the same charms and acting upon those desires. As I said, they are “In”

  24. Gringao
    February 8th, 2016 @ 9:11 pm

    You’d think that she’d be spending half her time just putting that chip on her shoulder.

  25. Fail Burton
    February 8th, 2016 @ 9:57 pm

    An oppressor Mongol who raped and enslaved my people when they didn’t massacre entire cities. I feel triggered. Where’s my reparations? Colonialist swine.

  26. Jim R
    February 8th, 2016 @ 10:06 pm

    Oh, no question. However, I don’t think her name would be a common answer to “name a hot woman”, nor do I think posters of her grace dorm room walls (college-aged men are, I think, implictly the group under discussion).

    The college-age adoptee who brought me acquainted with the term yellow fever made it out that she and her fellows could hardly go out in public without being leered at, catcalled, propositioned, and otherwise made to feel unsafe (how lefties love that word!), as if hoardes of men were lying in wait outside their dorms and apartment buildings, unable to resist the mere sight of female Asian flesh.

    She was (is?) a deeply confused girl; I blame her parents.

  27. Lemuel Vargas
    February 8th, 2016 @ 10:21 pm

    “…was ‘freedom to have as many sexual partners as I want without being looked down on.’ ”
    All the hot blooded heterosexual college and the not so college males must be applauding this statement from Nian Hu especially if the feminists defend her statement. They could have free sex without the consequences to it.

  28. Wombat_socho
    February 8th, 2016 @ 11:05 pm

    Because the personal is political, amirite?

  29. Wombat_socho
    February 8th, 2016 @ 11:06 pm

    The pretty, pretty lure concealing the murderous hook, aye.

  30. Joe Joe
    February 8th, 2016 @ 11:12 pm

    Ms. Hu seems a little out of step with other feminists:

    A New Feminist Study Concludes: You’re Racist if You Don’t Have Interacial Sex
    http://culturalmarxism.net/a-new-feminist-study-concludes-youre-racist-if-you-dont-have-interacial-sex/

    Would it be sexist or racist of me to say that one hand of the SJW universe doesn’t know what the other hand of the SJW universe is doing?

  31. mole
    February 9th, 2016 @ 12:44 am

    You are allowed to have sex with anything, any colour, with scales, fur skin or feathers.
    But the problem is, if you are a CIS white male you arent allowed to enjoy it.

  32. mole
    February 9th, 2016 @ 12:48 am

    “…According to data collected from online dating sites, all men except Asians prefer to romantically pursue Asian women…”

    Hmmm, now Im confused, is every race racist or are Asians racist for not preferring their own Asian ladies.

    Having seen the differences between my own mother (who I love, but shes damaged) and my Fathers Vietnamese wife I can see easily why a bloke would see “Asian values” as a good thing.

  33. RKae
    February 9th, 2016 @ 1:53 am

    Hey, feminist slut, are you willing to not look down on me if I attend church?

    Didn’t think so.

  34. Fail Burton
    February 9th, 2016 @ 5:31 am

    They have these arguments set up so you lose coming and going.

  35. Fail Burton
    February 9th, 2016 @ 5:36 am

    First on Hu?
    Yes.
    On Hu?
    Yes.
    What?
    He had sloppy seconds.
    On who?
    Hu.
    That’s what I’m asking.

  36. kilo6
    February 9th, 2016 @ 7:45 am

    Are you familiar with Horton hears a ho?

    http://youtu.be/Kis8Vy6aZLA

  37. Dana
    February 9th, 2016 @ 8:35 am

    Our host endangers us all!

    Maybe we could have a Central Bureau of Sexual Planning that will assign us sex partners on the basis of a random lottery to prevent unfair “discrimination.”

    Shut the f(ornicate) up! Do not give them any more ideas!

  38. robertstacymccain
    February 9th, 2016 @ 9:05 am

    Traditional values are traditional values, and ethnicity is an imperfect indicator of culture.

    A strong work ethic is traditional values, and a belief that respect must be earned is also traditional values, What men hate about feminists is that they tend to be lazy spoiled brats who behave as if respect is something they can demand without doing anything to earn it.

    When feminists denounce “stereotypes” of Asian women as “submissive,” what do they mean? Is Michelle Malkin “submissive”? Hell, no. But she has traditional values and does not go around demanding that people give her what she hasn’t earned. Doing things the old-fashioned way -=- working your butt off and not complaining about the fact that hard work is required to achieve anything in life — is the secret to Malkin’s success, but is that “Asian values”? Or is it just that Americans have become so spoiled we no longer expect white people to have such values?

  39. DeadMessenger
    February 9th, 2016 @ 10:34 am

    I suspect that Ms. Hu sees her blonde/blue/big boobed classmates getting the sort of attention that she wants for herself, and doesn’t understand why turning herself out as a slut isn’t having the same “popularity” effect for her as it does for those classmates.

    Therefore, she reverses direction, attacking the young men who prefer blonde sluts (which is, perhaps, all of them), by brandishing the bludgeon of feminista anti-patriarchy rhetoric as the “only reasonable” explanation for sexual preferences that do not include her.

    What escapes her is the fact that no heterosexual woman can be a feminist, by definition. She is thus a slut, and only a slut, no matter how she tries to explain away her trashiness in her own mind. She also doesn’t realize that the blonde/blue sluts are only just that, too, with simply a higher preference factor among equally trashy young men.

    Ms. Hu should contemplate this passage every day until she “gets it”: Why buy the milk, when you can get the cow for free?

  40. DeadMessenger
    February 9th, 2016 @ 10:44 am

    Indeed, which is where she gets her long-awaited revenge against her sluttier classmates, and against all men, who are personally responsible for the actions of the subset of men who preferred certain types of sluts while at Harvard the same time she was.

    And in her unmarried state, she will also blame the young, married professional men in her organization for not preferring cheap little Asian poptarts over the decent, non-diseased-and-non-slutty women they actually married. Such will clearly indicate their racism to her instead.

    Because the problem simply cannot be her; it must be everyone else. “I’m not paranoid, everyone really is out to get me.”

  41. DeadMessenger
    February 9th, 2016 @ 10:48 am

    Both hands of the SJW universe seem to be doing what is colloquially referred to as “slamming the ham”, fyi.

  42. DeadMessenger
    February 9th, 2016 @ 10:52 am

    White people ARE expected to have such values, so that they can be attacked for them later by SJWs.

  43. Gringao
    February 9th, 2016 @ 12:39 pm

    They know what they’re doing. They construct criticisms of both types of behavior, then deploy the one that fits the politics of the moment.

  44. Joe Joe
    February 9th, 2016 @ 2:09 pm

    That seems to be the most likely explanation. This way, you’re “bad” no matter what you do.

  45. MC227
    February 9th, 2016 @ 2:24 pm

    These whacked out feminazis are cuckoo for coco puffs!

  46. Fail Burton
    February 9th, 2016 @ 2:39 pm

    Who was on Hu first?

    That would be impossible

    What?

    He had sloppy seconds.

    On who?

    That’s right.

    When did you have Hu?

    Who?

    That’s right.

  47. JosephBleau
    February 9th, 2016 @ 5:33 pm

    So, when she is “having as many sexual partners as [she] want[s]”, are they predominantly Asian? Or is she sleeping with a bunch of white guys? I’m guessing the latter.

  48. Fail Burton
    February 9th, 2016 @ 8:23 pm

    Who’s on first?
    Yes.
    What?
    He’s second.
    On who?
    Yes, Watt.
    Who’s on first?
    Etc.

  49. mole
    February 9th, 2016 @ 10:23 pm

    Yes shes extremely conservative and an extremely hard worker who drives my father to be the “best man” he can be.

    My mother dragged him down she makes him a better man, its chalk and cheese.

    And in no way is she submissive, dad knows exactly when hes upset her and by using the silent treatment he usually ends up apologizing. As opposed to passive aggressive nagging or insults.
    Feminists project and lie about what the blokes find desirable, and as a life partner some of these ladies seem to hold great family values.

    Now this will sound trite but this year by selling watermelons and fruit for 3 months she earnt $15,000 cash. Dad did a lot of the driving and setting up, but she did the work. She seeks out ways to bring income into the family whereas my mother (god bless her) could only see money as something to be spent as quickly as possible.

  50. Dana
    February 10th, 2016 @ 6:58 am

    Nothing quite like denouncing stereotypes about Asian women while stereotyping a man who dates Asian women.