Don’t Let The Gills, Scales & Fins Distract You–Nothing Fishy In Trumpistan
Posted on | February 10, 2016 | 124 Comments
by Smitty
Byron York almost doesn’t seem to notice:
There really were a lot of Trump voters out there, and party officials could not, or did not want, to see them.
And what an astonishingly varied group of voters Trump attracted. At his victory celebration in Manchester Tuesday night, I met a young woman, Alexis Chiparo, who four years ago was an Obama-voting member of MoveOn.org. Now she is the Merrimack County chair of the Trump campaign.
I sure would like to know how many other core leaders in Trump’s campaign cut their teeth working for the Commies. I don’t know the lady–her support could be sincere. Or not.
Comments
124 Responses to “Don’t Let The Gills, Scales & Fins Distract You–Nothing Fishy In Trumpistan”
THE FULL METAL JACKET REACH-AROUND AWARD
This spot rotates to honor those who link us in shameless obedience to Rule 2 of "How to Get a Million Hits on Your Blog."
HIT THE FREAKING TIP JAR!
Search
Recent Posts
- Rule 5 Sunday: Sleeping In
- FMJRA 2.0: Play Ball!
- ‘An Extensive Criminal History’
- Three Shot Dead in Bucks County, Pa.; Manhunt Underway for Fugitive Suspect; UPDATE: Suspect Takes Hostages; UPDATE: Suspect Now in Custody; Victims Identified as Family, Baby Mama
- In The Mailbox: 03.15.24 (Evening Edition)
- In The Mailbox: 03.15.24
- Democrats: The Pro-Hamas Party
- Crazy People Are Dangerous: Black ‘Sovereign Citizen’ Shoots Memphis Cop
- In The Mailbox: 03.14.24
- Haiti’s Zombie Apocalypse: Media Skeptical of Cannibalism Reports
Click here to manage your email subscription options.
RSS reader subscription
MEMEORANDUM
Recent Comments
- BREAKING: Penn’s Magill Resigns : The Other McCain on ‘Context Dependent’: Ivy League President Belatedly Realizes Maybe She Answered That Question About Genocide Wrong
- Rule 5 Friday- Gun Toting Girl Edition… – Average Bubba-Part Deux on Rule 5 Sunday: Hunting Season
- Weekend Fun Links - The DaleyGator on Crazy Professors Are Dangerous
- Goodbye, Blue Monday | Animal Magnetism on Rule 5 Sunday: Hunting Season
- So, there are no more Gay or Lesbian Pedos anymore? - The DaleyGator on Lesbian Teacher Sentenced to Prison for Sexually Molesting Two Teenage Girls
THE AMAZING GONZO FEED
Major Leagues
ADVERTISEMENT
Axis of Fedorables
- All-American Girl for the Restoration of Values
- Allergic to Bull
- Cat House Chat
- Chris Cassone
- Conservative Daily News
- DaTechGuy
- Fishersville Mike
- Girl on the Right
- Haemet
- Hogewash
- Just A Conservative Girl
- Marooned in Marin
- Paco Enterprises
- Sissy 'put moi in your blogroll' Willis
- So It Goes In Shreveport
- SWAC Girl
- The (Perhaps Slightly Less) Lonely Conservative
- The Camp of the Saints
- The World's Youngest Blogger
- Uncoverage
- VA Right
AMAZING SAVINGS NOW!
Archives
- March 2024 (31)
- February 2024 (46)
- January 2024 (45)
- December 2023 (53)
- November 2023 (62)
- October 2023 (57)
- September 2023 (56)
- August 2023 (53)
- July 2023 (69)
- June 2023 (67)
- May 2023 (53)
- April 2023 (60)
- March 2023 (73)
- February 2023 (65)
- January 2023 (56)
- December 2022 (60)
- November 2022 (64)
- October 2022 (58)
- September 2022 (68)
- August 2022 (75)
- July 2022 (69)
- June 2022 (73)
- May 2022 (74)
- April 2022 (57)
- March 2022 (79)
- February 2022 (65)
- January 2022 (58)
- December 2021 (62)
- November 2021 (68)
- October 2021 (73)
- September 2021 (63)
- August 2021 (60)
- July 2021 (80)
- June 2021 (64)
- May 2021 (64)
- April 2021 (58)
- March 2021 (73)
- February 2021 (57)
- January 2021 (71)
- December 2020 (77)
- November 2020 (81)
- October 2020 (84)
- September 2020 (94)
- August 2020 (75)
- July 2020 (68)
- June 2020 (83)
- May 2020 (77)
- April 2020 (65)
- March 2020 (85)
- February 2020 (94)
- January 2020 (95)
- December 2019 (88)
- November 2019 (60)
- October 2019 (113)
- September 2019 (91)
- August 2019 (91)
- July 2019 (88)
- June 2019 (80)
- May 2019 (74)
- April 2019 (97)
- March 2019 (100)
- February 2019 (85)
- January 2019 (93)
- December 2018 (90)
- November 2018 (83)
- October 2018 (96)
- September 2018 (79)
- August 2018 (107)
- July 2018 (98)
- June 2018 (86)
- May 2018 (78)
- April 2018 (78)
- March 2018 (97)
- February 2018 (61)
- January 2018 (70)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (68)
- October 2017 (67)
- September 2017 (70)
- August 2017 (68)
- July 2017 (52)
- June 2017 (60)
- May 2017 (56)
- April 2017 (80)
- March 2017 (80)
- February 2017 (102)
- January 2017 (104)
- December 2016 (65)
- November 2016 (86)
- October 2016 (77)
- September 2016 (81)
- August 2016 (66)
- July 2016 (83)
- June 2016 (81)
- May 2016 (65)
- April 2016 (64)
- March 2016 (81)
- February 2016 (74)
- January 2016 (66)
- December 2015 (64)
- November 2015 (85)
- October 2015 (71)
- September 2015 (80)
- August 2015 (67)
- July 2015 (79)
- June 2015 (69)
- May 2015 (72)
- April 2015 (94)
- March 2015 (122)
- February 2015 (71)
- January 2015 (93)
- December 2014 (99)
- November 2014 (67)
- October 2014 (109)
- September 2014 (87)
- August 2014 (106)
- July 2014 (132)
- June 2014 (154)
- May 2014 (126)
- April 2014 (145)
- March 2014 (144)
- February 2014 (142)
- January 2014 (185)
- December 2013 (192)
- November 2013 (174)
- October 2013 (175)
- September 2013 (181)
- August 2013 (172)
- July 2013 (147)
- June 2013 (135)
- May 2013 (128)
- April 2013 (105)
- March 2013 (162)
- February 2013 (191)
- January 2013 (206)
- December 2012 (190)
- November 2012 (176)
- October 2012 (240)
- September 2012 (206)
- August 2012 (235)
- July 2012 (223)
- June 2012 (161)
- May 2012 (230)
- April 2012 (269)
- March 2012 (282)
- February 2012 (247)
- January 2012 (267)
- December 2011 (285)
- November 2011 (300)
- October 2011 (302)
- September 2011 (297)
- August 2011 (288)
- July 2011 (297)
- June 2011 (245)
- May 2011 (260)
- April 2011 (344)
- March 2011 (293)
- February 2011 (201)
- January 2011 (263)
- December 2010 (265)
- November 2010 (266)
- October 2010 (305)
- September 2010 (280)
- August 2010 (272)
- July 2010 (230)
- June 2010 (244)
- May 2010 (256)
- April 2010 (222)
- March 2010 (271)
- February 2010 (286)
- January 2010 (229)
- December 2009 (21)
- October 2009 (1)
Free Agents
SHAMELESS CAPITALISM
The Other McCain is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for this blog to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Triple-A Franchises
- All-American Blogger
- American Power
- Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler
- Athens & Jerusalem
- Barney Quick
- Bartholomew's Notes On Religion
- BatesLine
- Bear Creek Ledger
- Bearsears Patriots
- Blog de KingShamus
- Bride of Rove
- Cold Fury
- Daily Pundit
- Dr. Helen
- I Own The World
- Legal Insurrection
- Moe Lane
- No Runny Eggs
- Obi`s Sister
- Protein Wisdom
- Rhetorican
- Small Dead Animals
- The Conservatory
- The People's Cube
- The Sundries Shack
- VodkaPundit
- Vox Day
- Zilla of the Resistance
Blogroll
- 90 Miles From Tyranny
- A Conservative Shemale
- A Point of View
- Adrienne's Corner
- AmSpec Blog
- Bad Blue
- Blazing Cat Fur
- Calvin Freiburger Online
- Carol's Closet
- Catholic Bandita
- Caught Him With A Corndog
- Cecil Calvert
- Common Cents
- Conservative Hideout
- Conservative Watch News
- Conservatives for America
- Conservatives For Palin
- Crazy For Liberty
- Dad 29
- DC Damsel
- Dr. Flap
- Dyspepsia Generation
- Effing Conservatives
- Election Dissection
- Eric Reasons, IT Genius
- Eye of Polyphemus
- Finding Ponies. . .
- Free Will
- Grandpa John's
- Granite Grok
- GrEaT sAtAn"S gIrLfRiEnD
- Hoosier Access
- John William Perry
- Judicial Watch
- Jumping in Pools
- KURU Lounge
- Laughing Conservative
- Makes My Brain Itch
- Marathon Pundit
- Martin Eisenstadt's Blog
- Media Fade
- Michael Leahy
- Mister Pterodactyl
- Naked Villainy
- Nice Deb
- noot's observatory
- Not One Red Cent
- Okrahead
- Ollieander
- Pileus
- Pinup Girl
- Point of a Gun
- Political Pit Bull
- Reaganite Republican Resistance
- Red Alexandria
- Red State Eclectic
- Red, White & Conservative
- Republican Redefined
- ResCon1
- Ric's Rulez
- Ricochet
- Right of Course
- Robipedia
- Robomonkey
- Ruby Slippers Blog
- Saberpoint
- Scared Monkeys
- Sentry Journal
- SI VIS PACEM
- Skepticrats
- Smash Mouth Politics
- Sooper Mexican
- Taking Hayek Seriously
- Tel-Chai Nation
- Tequila & Javalinas
- The Aged P
- The Classic Liberal
- The Izzy Report
- The Minority Leader
- The NeoSexist
- The Nose on Your Face
- The Republican Mother
- The Right Sphere
- The Saint Angilbert Press
- The Snooper Report
- The Underground Conservative
- Thunder Tales
- Tom McLaughlin
- Tory Anarchist
- TrogloPundit
- Vets On The Watch
- Watcher of Weasels
- Western Experience
- World's Only Rational Man
- WyBlog
- Yankee Phil
- Zingstrom's Blog
February 10th, 2016 @ 9:22 pm
You’ve gotta admit, the (Trump)mentum is rolling along. He just finished a speech at Clemson University earlier this evening to a full house at Garrison Arena.
I think Trump is going to steamroll through South Carolina.
February 10th, 2016 @ 10:07 pm
Hmm. My thought is that, as soon as the rest of the field is whittled appropriately, there is going to be some heavy artillery leveled at His Donaldness.
February 10th, 2016 @ 10:11 pm
It’s clear movement conservatives and strict constitutionalists(which is ridiculous considering the majority of conservatives support the Patriot Act, NSA mass surveillance, and the War on Drugs)make up far less of the party than previously thought.
February 10th, 2016 @ 10:18 pm
I believe South Carolina is a closed primary? If that cuts down on the Trump support it’ll be informative.
February 10th, 2016 @ 10:19 pm
It’s not.
February 10th, 2016 @ 10:22 pm
From Donald Trump’s home town newspaper
February 10th, 2016 @ 10:23 pm
And what is wrong with the Donald? To me, the fact that the GOPe and the Dems are frothing in their mouths and having convulsions is enough proof that the Donald must be doing something right.
February 10th, 2016 @ 10:33 pm
It remains to be seen what Trump’s ceiling actually is. As long as Kasich and Bush remain in the race the Establishmentarians *spit* have hope. As long as there are people who believe the ”Establishment lane” is the way to beat Trump those two and Rubio will split the squishy swine vote and Trump and Cruz will take the rest.
February 10th, 2016 @ 10:34 pm
Ah. Bummer.
February 10th, 2016 @ 10:34 pm
The enemy of your enemy is not necessarily your friend.
February 10th, 2016 @ 10:35 pm
That goes without being said. I just think that people are so damn mad at the squishes we’ve had forced down our throats, that Trump is a statement vote.
Rubio is a squish. His support for amnesty has effectively removed him from contention.
Kasich had his moment in the sun last night in NH. He’s gone after SC.
Bush is…well, he’s Bush. Low energy and pretty much Hillary lite.
Carson is a nice guy and hasn’t gained any traction at all. SC will be the end of him.
I had thought about Cruz, but his support for the TPP and the fact that if He were to be the nominee would start a bunch of law suits about his eligibility.
Will the courts be as kind to Cruz as they were to Obama? I don’t think so.
February 10th, 2016 @ 10:41 pm
I don’t know that Obama’s actual eligibility was properly litigated, merely the authenticity of his birth certificate.
February 10th, 2016 @ 11:02 pm
I enjoy pointing out to Trump supporters that question Cruz’s eligibility that Trump himself had his lawyers look into it last September and they said it was a big nothingburger.
February 10th, 2016 @ 11:58 pm
Doesn’t a fish rot from the head down?
February 11th, 2016 @ 12:37 am
Keep in mind, I say the following as a Cruz supporter.
I’ve read up on several different variations of arguments for and against NBC and how to change it, written at different times, and frankly, it’s complicated (I’ve had an interest even before Barry came along). It’s a procedural requirement, not a substantive one. Like saying, “sure you have a claim for a personal injury, but you didn’t file the complaint within the 2 year statute of limitations, so your claim is barred”. That pisses you off, because you have a substantive injury claim of merit, but procedurally, you lose because you missed the filing deadlines. Translate that to “Cruz (Rubio, Jindal, Obama, etc.) are pivotal to fixing substantive problems, so let’s just overlook that little procedural glitch…”.
Basically, the original intent of the Constitution is simply not being
followed. I tried to look at it differently, but it just stares ya in the face. Logically, Natural Born Citizen (NBC) really means two American parents and location to ensure a lack of foreign obligation, and was intended as such. It’s strict. If you don’t like that procedural requirement, fine, I agree, but you have to amend the Constitution to state as such.
Instead of amending it, which is hard, it is simply ignored it and “watered it down” to the point of having no effect by saying “naturalized” citizens are no different. Hence, we can, with a straight face, say that a person who was born in a foreign nation, but has only one parent
that is American, and another parent that is a foreign national, is an American NBC free of foreign obligations or entanglements, even though they have dual citizenship. Seriously? That’s not a knock on Cruz, or Obama, or
Rubio, it strikes me as ludicrous. It’s fine to consider them American (“naturalized”) citizens, but saying its the same as NBC is a stretch. Again, this only really matters for President, nothing else.
“Citizen at Birth” per Act of Congress or Citizenship per the 14th Amendment (anchor baby) are both forms of “naturalized” citizenship per the SCOTUS, i.e., a law is required to make you an American citizen. NBC results from simply being born to American parents on American “soil” – no act of law is required. People like Mark Levin see this as a distinction without a difference, but its like saying an NFL player is the same as a college player because they both play football.
I think the intent has been f”ed up/ignored legally for so long that rather than fix it, it’s just practiced incorrectly as if it were correct. Look up old articles on it from the 80’s – people wanted the Constitution amended to permit Americans born of American parents overseas to become NBC for purposes of being President, because they knew that’s what was needed. But instead, they just decided to “pretend” it’s not an issue, and “change” it in practice. Kinda like the SCOTUS rewriting Obamacare instead of making Congress fix it – a result in search of a rationale that violates the Constitution, all to achieve a practical result.
It’s hard to fix a mistake – and its easier to just continue making it so long as no one bitches about it. Hence the “nothing burger” – the courts just don’t want to deal with it. That’s not the same as being wrong or being frivolous. I see similar behavior all the time before judges – you have procedural law on your side, and they dismiss it out of hand because it prevents them from reaching a result they want. “It’s a tax, not a penalty” anyone?
February 11th, 2016 @ 12:44 am
I don’t believe it was. My bitch with him was his burden of proof was so low (i.e. produce a certified copy of his original birth certificate), and he couldn’t even do that until 3 1/2 years into his first term (and only because Trump pushed him to do it). Once he would have produced it, then it would fall to all the naysayers to legally challenge it. But how can you challenge it when he hadn’t produced it before he was elected? Hence the 4 year kerfluffle. At least Cruz produced his years in advance, meeting his initial burden of proof.
I also don’t know if Barry’s was ever filed with the Clerk of the Senate or other records office. I know it was posted online, but that’s not the same, legally. For example, a fraudulent certificate that is filed officially would be subject to criminal penalties.
February 11th, 2016 @ 2:00 am
The phrase “natural-born citizen” isn’t defined by the Constitution, so for good or ill it’s defined by what the Law says it is.
From what I understand, the law at the time Ted Cruz was born stated that if one parent is a citizen and has lived in the United States for at least 5 years after the age of 14, then their child is a natural-born citizen no matter where they were born.
The same law applied to Barack Obama didn’t automatically qualify him because his mother was 18 when he was born, and thus hadn’t lived in the United States for 5 years after the age of 14. That’s why it mattered whether he was born in Kenya or in Hawaii.
February 11th, 2016 @ 6:27 am
I voted for Obama twice.
Sorry.
Volunteered for him in 2008.
Oops.
Trump doesn’t look so bad.
Basically I just want a way to say “f-ck you” to the people in charge. I don’t expect my life to improve except by my own efforts and a lot of luck.
That former Obama supporters lean Trump doesn’t make me think he’s a secret democrat as much as either (A) he pisses off the correct people or (B) people like myself are just suckers for charismatic populists.
February 11th, 2016 @ 7:04 am
Is that real? I mean the part where a Jew will meet with the KKK.
February 11th, 2016 @ 7:05 am
Ummm… let me guess – they’ll say he’s a racist misogynist.
February 11th, 2016 @ 7:06 am
Amnesty is nothing more than a “bring more” sign.
February 11th, 2016 @ 7:13 am
A racist misogynist homophobic fish!
February 11th, 2016 @ 7:55 am
If Trump manages to build the wall, stop the job killing H-1B visa, can the middle class killing trade “deals”, throw Obama’s Iran deal in the garbage, AND stop muslim immigration, he’s worth my vote regardless of what else he does…
February 11th, 2016 @ 7:56 am
To which no definitive answer ever did emerge.
February 11th, 2016 @ 7:57 am
If the Establishment wants to have any hope of elevating ¡Marco! or any other Establishment candidate over Trump they have to get ¡Jeb! off the stage. They don’t have the guts to do that.
February 11th, 2016 @ 7:58 am
¡Marco! is as Establishment as ¡Jeb! or ¡Kasich!. So as long as there are two of them the Establishment can’t offer any means of defeating Trump or Cruz. And ¡Jeb! won’t leave…
February 11th, 2016 @ 7:58 am
Being a natural born US citizen is not a matter of *where* a person is born. Obama is not a natural born US citizen, even if he really was born in Hawaii, because his father was not a US citizen at the time of his birth (nor ever was, for that matter).
February 11th, 2016 @ 7:59 am
Anyone not the child of two American Citizens isn’t “natural born”.
February 11th, 2016 @ 7:59 am
That’s because you enjoy not using your mind when reason will take you where you don’t want others to go.
February 11th, 2016 @ 8:00 am
Anyone who favors the PATRIOT Act, NSA spying, DHS, TSA, or the abuse of the Constitution that IS the FEDERAL “war on drugs” cannot possibly be called a conservative. Because all of those things are clearly “progressive”.
February 11th, 2016 @ 8:04 am
Trump has all the right enemies…
February 11th, 2016 @ 8:04 am
“Natural Born Citizen (NBC) really means two American parents and location to ensure a lack of foreign obligation”
That’s not precisely correct. Being a natural born US citizen doesn’t require that one be born on US soil. Nor does it require that *both* one’s parents be US citizens. Rather, it requires that one’s *father* be a US citizen (*) who has lived in the US for a certain number of years at the time of one’s birth.
(*) and for this, being a naturalized citizen is sufficient.
February 11th, 2016 @ 8:05 am
My biggest sin was voting for Clinton in 1992 (hey, I was 20…). My next biggest sin? Voting straight GOP from 1994-2012. Both parties need to be destroyed.
February 11th, 2016 @ 8:09 am
“The phrase “natural-born citizen” isn’t defined by the Constitution, so for good or ill it’s defined by what the Law says it is.”
Is that the best ya got? It must be, because you people alwats trot it out, aas though it means anything.
The Constitution also doesn’t define “year”, of “age”, so until there is a law defining what “thirty-five years of age” means, who is to say what it means.
Likewise, the Constitution doesn’t define “marriage”, so, clearly, it can mean whatever the Powers That Be want it to mean today.
?
One can produce all manner of other illustrations of the absurdity of this “argument”.
February 11th, 2016 @ 8:20 am
That’s the “lawyer” trap, saying it isn’t defined in the Constitution (as a lawyer, I can say that). The Constitution does not have a “definitions” section like a statute usually does, but that does give us carte blanche to redefine “arms” to mean only a knife. That’s what our liberal buddies have done for 80 years – language in the Constitution “never” means what it says. Hence the fight over the right to firearms. It took Scalia writing a huge decision outlining the history to make clear what the words on the document already did. It’s just that libs don’t like guns, so they will incessantly try to read the 2nd Amendment to say something it doesn’t. Results in search of rationales.
Also, Congress has the power to grant citizenship “naturalization”, not just to foreigners that want to be Americans, but also to children of Americans born overseas. That’s the “Citizen at Birth” point. That allows Congress to protect those children and give them citizen rights. But NBC doesn’t require law, just birth circumstances. So Congress has the power to change the law on granting citizenship, but not the power to redefine NBC as stated in the Constituion. Otherwise, Congress would have the power to change the meaning of ANY word in the Constituion, which would thus negate any need for an Amendment process. The Courts have been doing that for 100 years, much to our detriment.
RE Cruz, his issue is that his father is a Cuban national, his mother American, and he was born in Canada. After birth, his mother applied to the Feds to naturalize him per statute, since his mother was American. So if you subscribe to a pure NBC standard, he’s missing location and on american parent. For example, the Great One, Mark Levin (who is a big Cruz supporter), calls him “naturalized” because he gets citizenship from his mom via law. That is true, he’s a citizen, but not a NBC. He’s a citizen by means of operation of law, which is A-OK for every other purpose BUT president. Levin thinks that means he’s NBC too, but if that is the case, then take it to its logical conclusion – why is only that type of “naturalization” sufficient for NBC? Why then couldn’t a truly foreign born person not become an American citizen and then run for president? He/she was “naturalized” too, right? How does Congress’ acts not violate the original intent of the Constitution? What would stop them?
RE Obama, you are correct. Given the law at his birth, if he was born in Kenya he would not even be able to be NATURALIZED under law because the law was different back then for naturalization. But if NBC means two American parents and location, Obama fails that too even if born stateside because his father was a Kenyan British National. That’s a situation worse than Cruz’s (which is why it would be insane for the left to challenge Cruz on this).
I’m not saying I have all the answers on this issue – I’m saying this is not cut and dried like its sold it is.
The sticking point with NBC is John Jay’s concern about foreign influence, foreign obligations. NBC carries a certain meaning (especially back then), otherwise the Framers would have just used “American Citizen” or “AC, natural born or naturalized”. They didn’t. That creates a better argument for parentage being the most important factor, regardless of birth location. But having one foreign national parent makes you NBC? That’s a bridge too far.
When people like Levin resort to lefty tactics of ridicule and refusing to address the situation any further, or even take calls on it, that doesn’t sway me on the strength of his argument. That’s “science is settled” crap. I listen to his argument, expecting him to address each issue raised, but he didn’t. he glossed over very important ones that were easliy answered (if he was right), and at that point he resorts to name calling. Neil Boortz used to be that way on abortion – “fingers in the ears la-la-la I can’t hear you”. And I’m a Levin fan that listens to him daily, because he’s an originalist. That’s why his stance on this gives me pause – I thought he might be right, but now I’m not so sure. I think he likes Cruz, and thinks he’s vital to the nation, so he’s willing to look the other way.
Again, amend the Constitution to include naturalized citizens (or specify the instances) and this goes away. But don’t shortcut it via law.
February 11th, 2016 @ 8:25 am
If they wait too late, it won’t matter what they do. By doing so in SC, they stand something of a chance. Frankly, however, I won’t vote for Rubio if he is the nominee. He’s already shown us what he is and I won’t vote for CINO.
February 11th, 2016 @ 8:31 am
The original definition the founders accepted was 2 citizen parents and born on US soil.
With increasing presence of US citizens outside the country, that has changed. From my time as a MilBrat, I know there are hoops the parents have to jump through if you were born outside the US, but can’t remember what they are. I have a friend who was born in Germany to an Army father and his birth certificate is in German. Under the law, however, he is a natural born citizen.
My understanding of the law is that one of the parents must be a US citizen, and doesn’t have to be the father. Cruz met that standard.
February 11th, 2016 @ 8:35 am
The U.S. Constitution doesn’t mention “marriage.”
Just like it does not mention a specific religion (except for the date), shoes, sexual preferences, or an official recipe for Johnnycake.
That doesn’t stop the politicos from messing with those things.
February 11th, 2016 @ 8:35 am
I noticed that – I think the Father angle was like the “women can’t vote” issue – fathers mattered legally and not mothers at the time of enactment. The 14th Amendment, at its passage, would permit mothers to be elevated to fathers (meaning 2 required, not either/or), but if the intent was to avoid a foreign obligation, how does having one parent NOT American (NBC or naturalized) address that? If you are not counting Mom, legally, that does the trick, or no?
February 11th, 2016 @ 8:35 am
It never was litigated. The courts did not allow it.
February 11th, 2016 @ 8:37 am
What was posted online was shown to be a hoax. Whoever tampered with it was stupid enough to leave the layers in place, rather than collapse it to one as you would expect in an image scan.
February 11th, 2016 @ 8:40 am
Do you know what law/Act says that a naturalized citizen is a Natural Born Citizen? I haven’t found any cite to one that states that. Levin didn’t address this, and an Act conveying “naturalized citizenship” in those military situations is not the same as granting NBC unless it specifically states it does. I think this is the pivot point on this matter. (FYI my nephew is born of an NBC American father and Spanish mother in Spain on a military base, and he had dual citizenship until he renounced it at age 18 to enter West Point).
February 11th, 2016 @ 8:43 am
I don’t know the nitty-gritty technical details on that, but once I heard about the layers my first thought was “that’s not a direct scan”. That’s why scans, etc. not filed of record carry zero weight. Try filing a basic civil complaint and serving it that way, you’d be laughed out of court. The filing matters, and just slapping it out there online did nothing but get the media off it.
February 11th, 2016 @ 8:47 am
I know exactly one self-identifying Trump supporter. He too voted twice for Obama. He isn’t marginalized by the establishment. He isn’t a “disaffected” voter. I get the impression he’d vote for Heath Ledger’s Joker if he could. Some people just want to watch the world burn.
February 11th, 2016 @ 9:00 am
I think it’s already too late. The GOPe should have had “The Talk” with ¡Jeb! before Iowa…
February 11th, 2016 @ 9:12 am
Trump might manage that.
February 11th, 2016 @ 9:13 am
LIB is a legitimate political, social position.
February 11th, 2016 @ 10:08 am
The Spanish mother was the kicker there. My friend had two US citizen parents and did not acquire German citizenship as a result.
I’ve seen the law cited in several places, but didn’t keep up with the cite so can’t lay hands on it immediately.
February 11th, 2016 @ 10:09 am
It got some people off it, but only those who wanted to get off it.
February 11th, 2016 @ 11:11 am
The same thing was said, at different times, of Caesar, Sulla, Marius, and Augustus.