The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

You Should Be Reading Dalrock

Posted on | January 19, 2018 | No Comments

The blogger called Dalrock describes himself thus:

I’m a happily married man living with my sexy wife and our two wonderful kids in the Dallas/Forth Worth area. I’m very interested in how the post feminist world impacts myself and my family, and am using this blog to explore these kinds of issues.

I’ve occasionally linked and quoted Dalrock here, and some of his regular readers are also my regular readers. He is unafraid to make tough arguments: “Child support is designed to replace marriage, and it is wickedly effective at this. . . . Child support doesn’t just encourage women to have children out of wedlock, it also encourages women to kick married fathers out of the home.” Remember all those Maury Povich show episodes where unwed mothers learned the results of DNA tests to determine who their Baby Daddy was? That kind of irresponsibility is actually encouraged by the existence of a legal system that uses punitive measures to enforce child-support payments. It protects women’s “right” to screw around by forcing men to pay for the predictable result of such promiscuity. But as Dalrock points out, many conservatives are OK with this destructive policy. “We are trapped on Slut Island and Traditional Conservatives are our Gilligan” is the title of one of Dalrock’s classic rants, in which he makes the point that “slut shaming” works.

Too many conservatives are unwilling to confront feminist ideology directly and answer it with an emphatic “no.” It is folly to grant the first premise of an opponent’s argument and then try to argue for a different conclusion to the syllogism. Because many conservatives do not wish to seem prejudiced or unenlightened, they have a habit of giving away the game by accepting the idea of “gender equality” as a desirable goal. This is a strategic error, accepting battle on a field of their opponent’s choosing. A better strategy is the truth — no such thing as “gender equality” has ever existed in human history, and there is no policy which will bring about “gender equality” in the future. Even if it were possible to create “gender equality” by governmental fiat, this would not result in an increase in happiness. In fact, because “gender equality” is self-evidently contrary to human nature, such a regime would require a totalitarian system of enforcement which would negate personal liberty. The increasing insanity on our university campuses — where Title IX has long been a totalitarian mechanism for the enforcement of “gender equality” — is an omen of what feminist policy would produce in society at large.

Do I agree with every argument Dalrock makes? No, but I never agree 100% with anyone. Some of his arguments are offensive, but the point is that he is willing to question the basis premise of feminism, and unafraid to offend us in doing so. Dalrock points out, for example, that Pat Robertson’s Christian Broadcasting Network recently featured a dialogue between two women who have “mastered the art of not finding a husband.” CBN host Wendy Griffith is 53 and unmarried, while her guest Mandy Hale is 38 and unmarried. Are they really the best qualified experts to offer “family values” advice to young women?

It seems rather rude to raise such questions, but when we are fighting (and losing) a battle to preserve Western civilization, being overly concerned with courtesy is a hindrance to effective warfare. Dalrock’s insulting attitude toward Miss Griffith offends my sense of chivalry, but in doing so, he raises the question of whether Christian parents are giving their daughters advice that is as unbiblical as it is impractical:

[M]odern Christian culture has identified the feminist life script as coming from God. The very unbiblical feminist obsession with women’s self esteem has become a core tenet of modern Christianity.

Ouch! Dalrock summarizes the argument of Lori Gottlieb that “women who delay marriage too long will find themselves with a rapidly declining pool of marriage prospects,” and this is very important for several reasons. Christians who proclaim their devotion to “family values” have a sacred obligation to resist the decadence of secular society: “be not conformed to this world” (Romans 12:2). The Apostle Paul warned Timothy against those “seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils” that counsel “forbidding to marry.” That scripture can be read as a prophetic warning against those heretical cults which became known as Gnosticism, but in our day we find a sort of neo-Gnosticism creeping stealthily into many churches in the form of “Christian feminism,” an oxymoron.

“The Temptation of Eve,” John Roddam Spencer Stanhope,

Years ago, I warned that conservatives were losing the battle against same-sex “marriage” because they were unwilling to confront the secular gospel of “equality.” See “Gay Rights, Gay Rage” (Nov. 17, 2008) which I amplified in “Whither Marriage?” (Jan. 3, 2009), making the point that men and women are different in ways that are socially significant:

Are men and women equal in the fullest sense of the word? If so, then equality implies fungibility — the two things are interchangeable and one may be substituted for the other in any circumstance whatsoever. (La mort à la différence!) Therefore, it is of no consequence whether I marry a woman or a man.

The fantastical project of yesterday, which was mentioned only to be ridiculed, is to-day the audacious reform, and will be tomorrow the accomplished fact.

This is why so many of those who would defend traditional marriage find themselves unable to form a coherent argument, because traditional marriage is based on the assumption that men and women are fundamentally different, and hence, unequal. Traditional marriage assumes a complementarity of the sexes that becomes absurd if you deny that “man” and “woman” define intrinsic traits, functions, roles.

Attempts to advance “gender equality” require us to ignore or suppress the biological reality and social significance of sexual difference.

A successful marriage requires voluntary cooperation for mutual benefit, and this becomes impossible if a husband and wife see themselves as antagonists in a competition for “equality.” It is entirely possible to have a happy and enduring marriage that does not conform to a 1950s sitcom script of what a “traditional” family should look like. Yet a marriage is unlikely to be happy, and is not likely to endure, if an obsession with “equality” causes the spouses to resent each other for their different (and hence, unequal) contributions to their household.

Malaysia: Imam says girls
should marry before 15,
otherwise their value drops

Malaysian Imam Azhar Idrus stated that “girls are getting married at a later age due to education, adding that they are about 28 years old by the time they are finished with university” and that by “28 years old, no one would want to marry them.” . . .
Azhar added it is haram (prohibited) for teenagers of a marriageable age to befriend men unless the intention is to marry the man.
“Even after finishing school, it is haram to befriend men in any way at all,” he said.

Far be it from me to endorse the views of a radical Islamic imam, but Christian conservatives ought to ask themselves what the consequences will be if Muslims follow the imam’s teachings (which are certainly justified by the Koran) while the Western world embraces feminist dogma. The total fertility rate (average lifetime births per woman) in Malaysia is 2.5, which is 34% higher than the U.S. rate of 1.87.

Feminism Is a Totalitarian Movement to Destroy Civilization as We Know It, and if we wish to prevent that destruction, we must be willing to think seriously, and ask uncomfortable questions, about the causes of social decadence. That’s why I say: You should be reading Dalrock.


In The Mailbox: 01.18.18

Posted on | January 19, 2018 | No Comments

— compiled by Wombat-socho

EBL: But What About The DREAMers?
Twitchy: NOT SO FAST. Here’s The Reason Senator Cotton’s Office Told A Liberal To Cease And Desist
Louder With Crowder: Apple CEO Tim Cook Discusses 20,000 New Jobs Created By Tax Cuts
Jim Bovard: Enraged Readers Cheer Federal Killings Of Gun Owners (h/t NeoWayland)

Adam Piggott: Sovietman Reviews Pushing Rubber Downhill
American Power: Minority Unemployment Lowest On Record, also, Fake Twitter Memes About Homeless Along Santa Ana Trail
American Thinker: Breaking – Donald Trump Is Not Pregnant
Animal Magnetism: Animal’s Daily Random Thoughts
BattleSwarm: House Report – Awan Gang Rampaged Through Democrat Servers
Da Tech Guy: I Propose The 48 Hour Trump/MSM News Rule, also, What Does It Mean To Be Genuine?
Don Surber: Where Is The Media’s Shame?
Dustbury: The Man Who Would Be Governor
The Geller Report: Muslima Ex-Student Sets Eight Fires At St. Kate’s, also, Indian PM Modi Abandons Legacy Of Muslim Appeasement
Hogewash: Zooming In On NGC 3201, also, Team Kimberlin Post of The Day
Joe For America: Five Months After Hurricane Maria, PR Officials Caught Hoarding Relief Supplies
JustOneMinute: Not The Collusion I Was Promised, But…
Legal Insurrection: Kenneth Davis Nomination To DOE Civil Rights Offices Clears Senate Committee, also, SCOTUS Halts NC Court-Ordered Redraw Of Congressional Districts
Power Line: BOMBSHELL – Simpson Admits Fusion GPS Went To The Press To Salvage Hillary’s Campaign, also, With Alex Acosta History Repeats Itself
Shark Tank: Sean Hannity Endorses DeSantis For FL Governor
Shot In The Dark: “Unarmed”
STUMP: Divestment & Activist Investing Follies – Democratic Politicians Rev It Up
The Jawa Report: 75% Of U.S. Terrorists Foreign Born
The Political Hat: Jail For The Mind – Policing Speech, Policing Equity, Policing Privilege
This Ain’t Hell: SPC Bozdogan & PFC Krajnik Saving The World, also, Deplorable Vet To Attend SOTU
Weasel Zippers: Lib Pundit Bill Press – Trump’s Base “Wacko Racists”, “Rednecks”, also, Swiss Town Denies Passport To Dutch Vegan Because She’s “Too Annoying”
Megan McArdle: How The U.S. Wound Up Enthralled By Unions
Mark Steyn: The Media Get Waisted, also, Grab ‘Em By The Pussyhat

Amazon Warehouse Deals

‘Maybe as an Old Chick I Don’t Get it’

Posted on | January 18, 2018 | No Comments


You’ve probably heard about the Aziz Ansari “scandal,” in which a 22-year-old photographer (“Grace”) had a bad date with the 36-year-old TV star. Darleen Click’s take on the story is excellent:

It’s a cringe-worthy endeavor to read, not just because Grace keeps remembering her interior dialogue of feeling uncomfortable accompanied with little girl astonishment that Ansari wasn’t a mindreader, but that she never takes any responsibility for her own part in active participation in sending signals that are easily interpreted as coyness, not reticence. She receives and gives oral sex. Indeed, after she told him she didn’t want intercourse that night, she remained naked and even consented to give him another round of oral sex.
Maybe as an old chick I don’t get it, but wandering around a guy’s apartment in the nude and giving him head when he asks usually is an indication I’m consenting to sexual behavior.
Now, I get that Ansari, if I’m to accept at face value everything Grace says, acted boorishly and too aggressively in trying to get her into bed. However, persistence isn’t assault. Being on the receiving end of wolfish or piggish behavior makes for a bad experience, but an adult chalks it up to a learning experience, not an excuse to engage in public character assassination and virtue-signalling.

“If you don’t want to race, stay off the track.” How hard can it be to understand this game? What did 22-year-old “Grace” expect when Ansari invited her to his TriBeCa apartment? Do we have to draw her a diagram? Does she need a Powerpoint presentation? The object of the game being well-known, the two basic questions are:

  1. Do you want to play at all?
  2. Who do you want to play it with?

When a young woman accepts an invitation to the guy’s apartment, it’s like an audition: He plays his game, she plays her game and, if both players enjoy the game, there will be a future rematch. The story told by Grace is a classic of the emerging #MeToo “I’m-a-traumatized-victim” genre, although lacking the kinky LGBTQ thrills of the Melanie Martinez saga or the Eli Erlick story. As heterosexual hookup-gone-wrong tales go, it’s most interesting for its detail of the crudeness of Aziz’s technique. If you expected a 36-year-old millionaire celebrity bachelor to be smooth and tactful — perhaps even romantic — you’re going to be disappointed. As several critics have pointed out, however, “Grace” did a very bad job of communicating her own desires — or, as it were, her lack of desire:

In the Uber home from Ansari’s apartment, Grace texted a friend: “I hate men.” She continued: “I had to say no a lot. He wanted sex. He wanted to get me drunk and then f–k me.”

Male sexual desire is inherently wrong — this is feminism, 2018.

It was wrong for Aziz Ansari to want to have sex with “Grace,” because she is a feminist. She hates men because she hates sex.

Let us stipulate that Ansari’s technique was a huge problem. Darleen Click says he acted “entitled,” but technique is a matter of habit, and we may imagine that the millionaire show-biz celebrity is accustomed to dating women who don’t mind his “cut-to-the-chase” approach. Or maybe he’s used to hiring hookers, and doesn’t know how to deal with a 22-year-old amateur, an NYU student who expects . . . Well, what?

That’s the real mystery here. Did “Grace” think that her date with Ansari was going to be romantic, the beginning of a relationship? Did she therefore expect Ansari to proceed as tentatively as a college boy eager to impress her with his thoughtfulness and sensitivity? There was clearly a mismatch of expectations in this encounter, with Ansari flooring the accelerator, so to speak, going full-speed toward his intended destination from the moment they got back to his apartment after dinner.

Ansari is 36 years old, and he can’t read signals? That’s another baffling aspect of this story, how a grown man who had hitherto enjoyed a reputation as a progressive “woke” guy completely misread his date’s mood. Here’s a suggestion: He should have ended the date after dinner.

“Stick and move” — that’s the smart technique. Instead of moving so fast as to overwhelm her with a sexual blitzkrieg, leave her enough space to choose the next move. So she comes over to your place, you go out to dinner, and as you’re leaving the restaurant, you say something like, “Hey, I’m thinking I should probably just call you a cab.”

This puts the ball in her court, and requires her to respond with an expression of her own interest. It’s analogous to a “fork” in chess. You’re giving her a chance to bail out and, by taking the initiative to do so, you’re signaling that maybe you’re not really that interested.

She faces the dilemma: A guy who, on the one hand, is interested in her, but on the other hand, is willing to walk away — that’s the real power move young bachelors must master. In the age of “affirmative consent,” guys must learn to embrace the power of “no.”

There are 3.5 billion women in the world, and as much as you’d like to close the deal with this one tonight, you could just take a pass, chalk it up to bad luck and try again tomorrow night with some other girl. Or at least that’s message you convey when you offer to end the date early, at which point, it’s her dilemma: Did she fail to make a good impression? Did she say the wrong thing? Are her thighs too fat?

Every girl in the world has insecurities, see? When a guy conveys the message that he’s willing to walk away, she starts hearing that little voice inside her head telling her: “He doesn’t really like you. Nobody really likes you. Nobody’s ever going to like you. It’s the cellulite.”

While I don’t endorse emotional manipulation, an understanding of female psychology helps avoid the kind of disaster Aziz Ansari experienced. And let’s be clear: He is the victim of what has been called “3,000 words of revenge porn” — a bad date turned into a #MeToo story, inflicting permanent damage to his reputation, and giving feminists another excuse to lecture the world about “rape culture.”


Yes, the obnoxious Lindy West had to weigh in:

The notion of affirmative consent did not fall from space in October 2017 to confound well-meaning but bumbling men; it was built, loudly and painstakingly and in public, at great personal cost to its proponents, over decades. If you’re fretting about the perceived overreach of #MeToo, maybe start by examining the ways you’ve upheld the stigmatization of feminism. Nuanced conversations about consent and gendered socialization have been happening every single day that Aziz Ansari has spent as a living, sentient human on this earth. The reason they feel foreign to so many men is that so many men never felt like they needed to listen.

She speaks of “the stigmatization of feminism” as if it’s a bad thing, but let’s re-read those text messages “Grace” sent during her Uber ride home:

“I hate men. . . . He wanted sex.”

That’s the bottom line here. No feminist in 2018 approves of men wanting sex. It is wrong for men to want sex, according to feminism.

This is what Darleen Click means when she says “as an old chick I don’t get it.” Back in the day, women knew men wanted sex, but they were cool with it because women wanted sex, too. It may be difficult for young feminists to believe, but there used to be women who actually liked men. In fact, there still are women who like men, but none of those women are invited to write op-eds for the New York Times. In the wake of Hillary Clinton’s 2016 defeat, feminists have removed the mask of “equality.” Feminism is now an unapologetic anti-male hate movement.

“Men are the enemy. Heterosexual women are collaborators with the enemy. . . .
“We see heterosexuality as an institution of male domination, not a free expression of personal preference.”

Leeds Revolutionary Feminists, 1981

Back in the day, the lesbian separatism of the Leeds Revolutionary Feminists was an extreme fringe, but 21st-century feminism is about mainstreaming this radical anti-male/anti-heterosexual worldview.

Like I keep saying, people need to wake the hell up.


In The Mailbox: 01.17.18

Posted on | January 18, 2018 | No Comments

— compiled by Wombat-socho

Ninety Miles From Tyranny: The 90 Miles Mystery Box, Episode #138
EBL: Beats Looking At Squirrels…
Twitchy: President Trump’s Fake News Awards Breaks The GOP’s Website
Louder With Crowder: Democrats Okay With Shutting Down Government Over 800,000 Illegal Immigrants
Daily Caller: FBI, DOJ Argue For Dismissal Of Suit Over Garland, TX Jihadi Attack

Adam Piggott: I Don’t Take Photos, also, Gone Skiing
American Power: David Weinberger, Too Big To Know, also, Robert J. Gordon, The Rise And Fall Of American Growth
American Thinker: What I Learned In The Peace Corps In Africa – Trump Is Right
Animal Magnetism: Animal’s Hump Day News
BattleSwarm: UT – “Hey, Look At This Sweet Chicom Money!” Ted Cruz – “DON’T EVEN.” UT – (whimpering)
CDR Salamander: A Note To A Rump Admiralty
Da Tech Guy: Booker’s Senatorial Tears, also, The Social Media Facts Of Life Explained Once More
Don Surber: Grading Trump’s Fake News Awards
Dustbury: Plastic Fantastic Haters
The Geller Report: Trump Orders CNN’s Acosta Out Of Oval Office After Reporter’s Outburst, also, House Reports Muslim Spies Made “Unauthorized Access” To House Servers
Hogewash: A Burping Black Hole, also, Team Kimberlin Post of The Day
Jammie Wearing Fools: The #MeToo Movement Has Officially Jumped The Shark
Joe For America: CIA Officer Caught Spying For Chicoms – Responsible For Numerous Dead Informants
JustOneMinute: Russian Spies Were Actually Spying?
Legal Insurrection: “New California” Moves To Split Off From Golden State, also, Yale Psych Prof Has Second Meeting With Dems, Claims She’s Getting Death Threats
Power Line: The Press Corps Is Crazy – Trump Isn’t, also, Are There Any Sharks Left To Jump?
Shark Tank: Republican Rep Ros-Lehtinen Calls Trump A Racist
Shot In The Dark: In Some Ways…
STUMP: Taxing Tuesday – Following The Efforts To Dodge Federal Taxes
The Jawa Report: American ISIS Head-Chopper Identified As Zulfi Hoxha
The Political Hat: Free Healthcare Is Neither Free Nor Healthcare
This Ain’t Hell: Illegal Scumbag Charged For Sacramento County Deputies’ Murder, also, Navy Commanders Facing Negligent Homicide Charges For Collisions
Weasel Zippers: Dems Think 800,000 Illegals Are Worth Not Paying Active Duty Military, also, Linda Sarsour Endorses Bradley Manning For Senate
Megan McArdle: Listen To The “Bad Feminists”
Mark Steyn: **** ***, ******! also, Look You, Boyo

Featured Digital Deals
Amazon Warehouse Deals
Amazon Channels – CBS All Access

The Tyranny of Bright Normal

Posted on | January 17, 2018 | 1 Comment


Why do the media hate President Trump so much? Well, to begin with, he’s a Republican, and they’re Democrat operatives with bylines. Beyond that, however, the media think of themselves as members of what Richard Florida calls “the creative class,” and Trump’s a bright normal.

Readers familiar with The Bell Curve understand that cognitive sorting occurs by occupation and education level. However, students of economics understand that not all skills are created equal. You may think I’m a clever writer, but what’s cleverness worth in the marketplace? How much demand for clever writing exists, and how limited is the supply? The average reader doesn’t discern much difference in value between writing that’s just competent and writing that’s truly excellent and, in the grand scheme of things, I am nothing more than what the digital gurus call a “content provider,” the value of which is a dime a dozen.

Being a mature adult, I long ago adjusted to this economic reality, but this is quite obviously not true of the reporters who spent Tuesday afternoon shouting questions at President Trump’s physician. What’s the salary of a New York Times White House correspondent?

A. Probably more than you make;
B. Much more than I’ve ever made;
and yet also
C. Far less than he thinks he’s worth.

This is one of the most astonishing things about the media elite. They’re paid salaries that far exceed the average American’s income, yet they consider themselves as underpaid and underappreciated, and therefore emotionally identify with the oppressed victims of social injustice.

Why? Because status is always relative. Read more

In The Mailbox: 01.16.18

Posted on | January 16, 2018 | No Comments

— compiled by Wombat-socho

EBL: Patrick Stewart Cowboy Classics
Twitchy: President Trump’s Good Health Threatens To Send CNN’s Brian Stelter To The Nuthouse
Louder With Crowder: #MeToo Fail – Even The NYT Is Defending Aziz Ansari
City Journal: Policing Sexual Desire (h/t NeoWayland)

Adam Piggott: The Sins Of Multiculturalism – Suffer The Children, also, Culture Is Race – The Doublethink
American Power: What If Diversity Isn’t America’s Strength? also, Albert Camus, The Plague
American Thinker: End Judicial Tyranny With This One Weird TrickOne Single Word
Animal Magnetism: Animal’s Daily Capitalism 101 News
BattleSwarm: Clinton Corruption Update – It’s All One Scandal
CDR Salamander: Putting The Long War On The Map
Da Tech Guy: The New Fun Tastes Funny, also, European Angst Over Immigration
Don Surber: Who Needs Europe?
Dustbury: A Room Where The Light Won’t Find You
Fred On Everything: Mr. Trump On The Apertures – Stark Madness And Immiscibility
The Geller Report: Muslim Husband Convicted Of Murdering Convert Wife With Claw Hammer, Knife, also, Trudeau Doubles Down On Fake “Islamophobic” Attack
Hogewash: I’m Buying More Popcorn Futures, also, Team Kimberlin Post of The Day
Jammie Wearing Fools: Canadians On Guard Against “Islamophobia” Following Another Bogus Hate Crime
Joe For America: Feds Preparing To File Charges Against Leaders Of Sanctuary Cities
JustOneMinute: My Woody Allen Boycott Gains Traction
Legal Insurrection: We Wish We’d Gone To Samantha Power’s 2016 Election Watch Party, also, Democrats Say Trump Must Surrender On DACA To Prove He’s Not Prejudiced or Bigoted
Power Line: Kirstjen Nielsen Faces The Democrats, also, “Dreamers” More Likely To Commit Violent Crimes
Shot In The Dark: Sports Journalism At Its Finest
STUMP: New Project(s) – Re-Visualizing The Public Pensions Database
The Political Hat: An Erotic Clothing Company’s Newest Mascot – An Eight Year Old Drag Queen
This Ain’t Hell: Coming Soon To Groceries Near You! also, Dunford “Not Giving Up” On Pakistan
Weasel Zippers: Incoming Dem NJ Gov Plans Agency For “Defensive Protection” Of Illegals, also, Dow Breaches 26,000 On Robust Earnings Reports
Megan McArdle: The Real Reason Walmart Raised Its Minimum Wage
Mark Steyn: Captain The Illiterate! also, The Information Monopoly

Featured Digital Deals
Amazon Warehouse Deals
Kindle Unlimited Membership Plans

In The Mailbox: 01.15.18

Posted on | January 16, 2018 | No Comments

— compiled by Wombat-socho

Ninety Miles From Tyranny: The 90 Miles Mystery Box, Episode #137
EBL: Dolores O’Riordan, RIP
Twitchy: Columbia Prof Totally Beclowns Himself With Anti-Capitalist Mini-Rant
Louder With Crowder: Bradley “Chelsea” Manning Releases First Campaign Ad. Try Not To Laugh.
CNS News: Feds Collect Record Income Taxes Through December, Still Run $225 Billion Deficit (h/t NeoWayland)
Andrew Klavan: On Crudeness And Truth (h/t Loyal Reader Brian E.)

Adam Piggott: Australia Is More “Grown Up” Than Any Other Nation In The World
American Power: Martin Luther King Jr. Day, also, Anne Applebaum, Red Famine – Stalin’s War On Ukraine
American Thinker: Dick Durbin, Race-Baiting Hypocrite
Animal Magnetism: Goodbye, Blue Monday
BattleSwarm: Democrats Need Illegal Aliens Like Junkies Need Heroin
CDR Salamander: MLK Jr. – First Person Spoken Word
Da Tech Guy: Shrinks Present Latest Plot To Remove Trump From Office, also, Halfrican Keeps It Real about Why Third World Immigrants Come To America
Don Surber: You Ruined The Night For Samantha Power, also, Trump Delivers – On Time & Under Budget
Dustbury: Strange Search Engine Queries, also, Dead But Insufficiently Buried
Fred On Everything:
The Geller Report: Popular German TV Show – “All Children Are Muslims”, “There Is No God But Allah”, also, Fake Hate In Canada – Police Say Attack On 11-Year-Old Muslim Girl Didn’t Happen, She Lied About Everything
Hogewash: Yours Truly, Johnny Atsign, also, Team Kimberlin Post of The Day
Jammie Wearing Fools: Flaky – Ridiculous AZ Senator Compares Trump To Stalin
Joe For America: How One Communist Leader’s Stop At A Houston Grocery Store Changed Everything
JustOneMinute: And I Support Equal Pay For Equal Lawyering
Legal Insurrection: Dick Durbin Deliberately Blew Up DACA, also, Citing “Racism”, Maxine Waters & John Lewis To Skip Trump’s SOTU
Power Line: Is Obama As Shallow As He Seems? also, The Prophetic Voice
Shark Tank: Racism is Alive And Well In The Democratic Party
Shot In The Dark: The Ballad Of The Pink Beret
Sister Toldjah: If You’re Perpetually Offended, Please Stay Off The Nextdoor App
STUMP: Memory Monday – Second Week Of January 1918, also, Setting The Stage 2018 – Don’t Fight High Taxes, Democrats! Embrace Them!
The Political Hat: The Denigration Of Humanity To Mere Economic Worth
This Ain’t Hell: PFC Emanuel Mensah Gets Posthumous Soldier’s Medal, also, Medal of Honor For Sergeant-Major Canley?
Weasel Zippers: Public Poop Map Reveals San Francisco Is A Literal Shithole, also, Pope Changes His Mind – Fear Of Mass Migration Now “Legitimate”, “Fully Comprehensible”
Megan McArdle: Silicon Valley Will Pay The Price For Its Lefty Leanings
Mark Steyn: Bundy Morning Quarterbacking, also, Ruby, Don’t Take Your Love To Town

Featured Digital Deals
Amazon Warehouse Deals
Amazon Coupons

Late Night With Rule 5 Sunday: Stacey Dash

Posted on | January 15, 2018 | 2 Comments

— compiled by Wombat-socho

For better or for worse, I seem to be on a roll of actresses turned conservative culture warriors, and so we have Stacey Dash this week as our poster girl for fighting back against the Pink Goo of leftist political correctness. For those of you that came in late, Stacey walked off the Democratic plantation after voting for Obama in 2008; her public support for Mitt Romney won her a fair bit of abuse from the Left and her fellow celebrities (BIRM) but nevertheless, she persisted. A former commentator on Fox News’ Outnumbered, she was released last January, but is still active on social media and writes a column for Patheos.
By now, you should all be aware that many of the following pictures can be considered NSFW by your unfriendly local HR department. The management is not responsible for any misfortunes stemming from your failure to click in a suitable time and place.

From her 2006 Playboy photoshoot.

Ninety Miles From Tyranny opens this week’s parade of pulchritude with Hot Pick Of The Late Night, 90 Miles Mystery Box Episode #132, Morning Mistress, and Girls With Guns. Animal Magnetism adds Rule Five Sapiosexual Friday and a Saturday Blondepocalypse.

EBL brings us Hollywood Egrets, Oprah, Alabama & Georgia elbows, Ann-Margret, Catherine Deneuve, Les Parapluies De Cherbourg, Stormy Daniels, and Emilia Clarke.

A View From The Beach netted The Humble Tyla DavisHipsters are IdiotsOn Board for Another Frosty Friday?Weinstein Victims Excluded from Golden Globes?In the Jungle, the Mighty JungleI Knew I Liked HerLadies in RedRiding a Cadillac Into MondayFeminist Profs Blame Good Questions, Capacity for Abstract Thought and Rational Thought Processes etc. for Male STEM DominationIt’s Sooo Cold . . .Sunrise Girl Casts Light on Human Conquest of Americas, and Update on Oregon Gas Crisis.

Proof Positive’s Friday Night Babe is Jacqueline Obradors, his Vintage Babe is Karen Jensen, and Sex in Advertising is covered by Absolut Lemon Drop. At Dustbury, it’s Thelma Todd and Lupita Nyong’o.

Thanks to everyone for their linkagery!

Visit Amazon’s Intimate Apparel Shop
Amazon Fashion – Jewelry For Women
Amazon Personal Bra Boutique

« go backkeep looking »