The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

‘Prove Them Wrong’: Not Too Shabby, NRSC

Posted on | September 23, 2010 | 15 Comments

by Smitty (via No Sheeples)

What’s interesting is all of the Tea Party candidates appear briefly. So maybe the blowback is reaching some of those floppy senior elephant ears.

Category: Republicans

Comments

15 Responses to “‘Prove Them Wrong’: Not Too Shabby, NRSC”

  1. jefferson101
    September 23rd, 2010 @ 9:50 pm

    That’s an improvement on what I’ve come to expect from the National RINO Senate Committee.

    Maybe they are hearing the rumble and feeling the ground moving under their feet after all. One would hope that they are, because if the Republicans continue to be what they were for most of the last 10 years that they held a majority in the House, I won’t be voting Republican any more after this go-round.

  2. NRSC releases new “Prove Them Wrong” video « Wintery Knight
    September 23rd, 2010 @ 10:10 pm

    […] Look at this new video: (H/T The Other McCain) […]

  3. Randy Rager
    September 23rd, 2010 @ 11:24 pm

    My days of voting for Satan his own self, as long as he was running against the Democrat, are over. Give me a real conservative or get the hell off the ballot.

  4. Tami
    September 23rd, 2010 @ 11:40 pm

    Seems the NRSC just might…I said MIGHT…be getting the message. We’ll see. 🙂

  5. M. Simon
    September 24th, 2010 @ 1:58 am

    I liked the fact that O’Donnell was in the mix and identifiable.

  6. M. Simon
    September 24th, 2010 @ 2:12 am

    Randy,

    If you are not voting for Satan any more I think that definitely rules out Democrats.

    I will say that I did vote for Satan in 2004. Obama. I. Just. Couldn’t. Stand. Keyes.

    And when he disowned his daughter I decided he was way too moral for my tastes.

  7. Deb
    September 24th, 2010 @ 3:14 am

    “And when he disowned his daughter I decided he was way too moral for my tastes.”

    I’ve seen you comment this way before and had never heard of it so I went googling. Nothing I ran across said she was “disowned”, just “not financially supporting.” Considering the daughter was 20 I don’t see the point. Maybe you define “disowned” differently, or maybe there is more info out there. Do you have a source for her being disowned?

    I did vote for Alan Keyes in that race, but only because I figured a carpetbagger was better than a communist.

  8. jefferson101
    September 24th, 2010 @ 8:31 am

    @#6, M. Simon:

    Exactly how far out there, either morally or politically, does one have to be in order for Barack Obama to be a superior choice?

    Inquiring minds want to know!