The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

You Stay Classy, Atheists!

Posted on | September 7, 2013 | 226 Comments

Dana Perino was on Fox News discussing a lawsuit by atheists who don’t like kids having to say “under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance:

“I’m tired of them. I remember working at the Justice Department years ago when I first started right after 9/11 and a lawsuit like this came through, and before the day had finished, the United States Senate and the House of Representatives had both passed resolutions saying that they were for keeping ‘under God’ in the pledge. . . . If these people really don’t like it, they don’t have to live here.”

A sample of the erudite atheist commentary in response:

And you wonder why ladies don’t want to go to atheist conferences? Atheists are so respectful, you f**king c**ts!

UPDATE: This is a recurrent theme with God-haters:

You can ask Michelle Malkin, Sarah Palin, Dana Loesch, Ann Coulter — any conservative woman who speaks on behalf of that which is good, true and decent will be bombarded with ugly filth from advocates of that which is evil, false and indecent, i.e., Democrats.

Democrat Party monsters even try to kill in the name of “social justice.” Because chicken sandwiches cause hate or something.

UPDATE II: What is it with Democrats and the “c-word,” huh?

 

Category: Fox News, Religion

Comments

226 Responses to “You Stay Classy, Atheists!”

  1. Quartermaster
    September 8th, 2013 @ 7:32 pm

    They have to work hard. They ain’t got nothin’.

  2. Craig Good
    September 8th, 2013 @ 8:09 pm

    Quartermaster, look up LMWIS in the Urban Dictionary. The fellow above was behaving exactly like the tweeters this post is complaining about.

  3. Craig Good
    September 8th, 2013 @ 8:15 pm

    Quartermaster, by any chance are you a creationist? Because you argue like one. Note that you completely evaded the question I asked. It’s an indication of an unwillingness to argue in good faith.

    You have made several assertions. I have asked for evidence. You have provided none, but just made further assertions. It’s pretty much just a Gish Gallop.

    http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Gish%20Gallop

    I’ve learned not to try to reason with Gallopers. Fare well, and may a seed of reason take root.

    Best wishes.

  4. Thane_Eichenauer
    September 8th, 2013 @ 8:24 pm

    I’ll consider myself forewarned.

  5. Quartermaster
    September 8th, 2013 @ 9:26 pm

    Actually, you are being mocked. You really need to consider where you are and think of why a person like yourself would be mocked.

  6. rmnixondeceased
    September 8th, 2013 @ 9:30 pm

    Heh. Too dense to even detect the mockery. Denser than Uranium and only 1/100th as ‘active’ …
    (Yes, more mockery).

  7. Quartermaster
    September 8th, 2013 @ 9:32 pm

    You have no idea what I am, and it wouldn’t matter to you anyway. Your attempt to classify me as “Galloper” is simply an attempt to classify me as something beneath your notice and write me off. That’s exactly what aggressive idiots like Dawkins, Kraus and Myers do.

    I make my living in science. I also am well aware of what gave birth to modern science, and you obviously are ignorant of that fact that modern science came about as a result of the reformation. The most prominent scientists up through the late 19th century were intensely Christian.

    In your ignorance and lack of reason, you can classify me as anything you like. I long ago lost my concern over how I was viewed by your sort. And, I will state again, if you truly believe that the Universe came to be by happenstance, then you are demented.

  8. rmnixondeceased
    September 8th, 2013 @ 9:38 pm

    *snicker* Assclown thinks man is the acme of intellectual development. Folks like the unpleasant Mr. Good are actually the nadir of intellectual development. To ignore the truth for a false narrative because it inflates their overarching ego is just sad …

  9. RMNixonDeceased
    September 8th, 2013 @ 9:59 pm

    “*snicker* Assclown thinks man is the acme of intellectual development. Folks like the unpleasant…” — rmnixondeceased http://t.co/QKkviYHs9e

  10. rmnixondeceased
    September 8th, 2013 @ 10:05 pm

    You always put a smile on my face Mare. My favorite is to tell them to do a “Spiro Agnew”, that is, to perform the action the anagram of his name tells them to do …

  11. Julie Pascal
    September 8th, 2013 @ 10:17 pm

    Does the pledge change or something if a person finds out where it came from? It is what it is.

  12. Foxhole Atheist
    September 9th, 2013 @ 3:40 am

    Wow…interesting…so not collecting stamps is a hobby then?

  13. Quartermaster
    September 9th, 2013 @ 6:46 am

    Nope. These days I’m into poking the willfully obtuse – people just like you.

  14. Foxhole Atheist
    September 9th, 2013 @ 7:47 am

    Ouch! And here I was thinking we could friends…darn it!

  15. rmnixondeceased
    September 9th, 2013 @ 8:07 am

    Heh …

  16. John
    September 10th, 2013 @ 5:39 am

    You guys are going to downvote this, but I don’t care. It’s very simple. The first amendment is freedom of religion. That is any belief system. Christian, Hindu, Atheist, Shintoist, Ba’hai, Muslim. All protected under the first amendment.

    The “In God We Trust” and “Under God” were adopted afterwards in 1956 and 1942 respectively. This was, in large part, due to the communist movement at the time and the incorrect believe that communism and atheism were the same.

    Personally it doesn’t bother me, and for a large reason because I’m not American (Aussie), but I have relatives in the US and if I did live there I’d let it slide, along with Merry Christmas and so on. There’s bigger battles and this, personally, is a non issue.

    However, on all technicalities, Under God and In God We Trust are both unconstitutional and anyone that is an advocate for the constitution, no matter their religious stance, should be against it.

  17. jack
    September 10th, 2013 @ 6:33 pm

    Hitler, like all dictators, was a social conservative and like Stalin and Mao criminalized homosexuality.

  18. Alessandra
    September 10th, 2013 @ 7:09 pm

    You’re surely ignorant of history and especially of Hitler! Hitler, was a sexual pervert, who just loved his brutal homosexual pal Enrst Rohm to pieces. No one knows exactly if Hitler was homosexual, bisexual, or heterosexual. It was Himmler who took a stand against homosexuality, mostly because he was very aware of how homosexuals, always obsessed about putting their sexual perversity above all, would form mafias inside the military and corrupt it. Hitler just followed along when Rohm was about to dethrone even him.

    http://alessandrareflections.wordpress.com/2013/01/19/blogsome-nazis-hitler-rohm-and-homosexuality/

  19. jack01
    September 12th, 2013 @ 11:33 pm

    Are you seriously referencing “The Pink Triangle”? Whatever credibility you had just went down the crapper when you referenced a book that has ZERO evidence to substantiate any of it’s claims and then call it “history”! LOL! Hitler thought Roehm’s lifestyle was repugnant(this comes from those in his circle) and had him murdered in the end. Or were you referencing the OSS report which a lot of which, especially his sex life, was pure speculation and disinformation. And are you saying Himmler wasn’t a tyrant? And sorry my dear Himmler had a lot more against homosexuals other than them “corrupting the military. Like this for instance:

    “Anyone who thinks of homosexual *love* is our enemy. We reject anything which emasculates our people and makes it a plaything for our enemies, for we know that life is fight, and it is madness to think that men will ever embrace fraternally”
    Heinrich Himmler, 14 May 1928

    “I wish to explore a few ideas on the subject of homosexuality. Amongst certain homosexuals there exists the following point of view: “what I do is of no importance to anyone else, it is a personal and private matter”. Everything which touches upon sexual matters ceases to be private when the life or death of a nation depends on it. It is the difference between world domination or annihilation.

    A nation with many children can gain supremacy and mastery of the wordl. A pure race with few children already as one foot in the grave; in fifty or a hundred years it will be of no significance; in two hundred years it will be extinct. It is essential to realise that if we allow this infection to continue in Germany without being able to fight it, it will be the end of Germany, of the Germanic world. Unfortunately this is not the simple matter it was for our forefathers. For them, the few isolated cases were simply abnormalities; they drowned them in bogs. Those who found bodies in the mire did not know that in 90% of the cases they found themselves face to face with a homosexual who had been drowned with all his belongings. This was not punishment, more the simple elimination of this particular abnormality. It is vital we rid ourselves of them; like weed we must pull them up, throw them on the fire and burn them. This is not out of a spirit of vengeance, but of necessity; these creatures must be exterminated.
    Heinrich Himmler, 18 Feb 1937

    These are Hitler’s words on homosexuals which oddly(or not)sound much like yours and those you traffic with:

    “He lectured me on the role of homosexuality in history and politics. It had destroyed ancient Greece he said. Once rife, it extended its contagious effects like an ineluctable law of nature to the best and most manly of characters, elimination from the reproductive process those very men on whose offspring a nation depended. The immediate result of the vice, however, was that unnatural passion swiftly became dominant in public affairs if it were allowed to spread unchecked”.
    Rudolh Diels, first chief of the Gestapo, reporting a conversation with Hitler.

    History, real history, says Hitler had romantic relationships with women(Reifenstahl, Braun, Gaubal, etc.) and sent gays to the concentrations camps.

    You should really be ashamed of yourself to try and equate gay people with mass murderers. Isn’t it bad enough what you say about them regularly? If you really believe in God fact is you will be judged accordingly for the hate you so easily pump into the world and relish like a villian.

  20. jack01
    September 13th, 2013 @ 12:00 am

    You were completely taken apart on your blog by absem who even went on to contact the researcher on the conversion therapy study you were sourcing and who then said conversion therapy was a travesty and the FRC was distorting his research. Just give it up already. You have nothing but your own hate and bile to work with. Or maybe you can site a book written by oher fundamentalist socon freaks that claim gays orchestrated the holocaust. Sad that you are so thickheaded and continue to call your bullshit science. You are despicable human being and should be shot into deep space where no one will ever have to hear from you again.

  21. jack01
    September 13th, 2013 @ 12:16 am

    And no, I don’t have a hatred of you. I just think you’re a pathetic asshole and a bitter hag who needs a life and to get laid once in awhile and to stop obsessing about what other people do in their bedroom. Seriously, you’re sad. And stupid too. You are basically wrong about everything that comes out of that warped little mind of yours and you routinely get destroyed in the comment section of your own blog.

  22. Alessandra
    September 13th, 2013 @ 3:12 am

    “Are you seriously referencing “The Pink Triangle”? Whatever credibility you had just went down”

    The crapper is where your credibility has always been. Until you show anything I have quoted is wrong, and not by vomiting your crapper info, you’re just displaying more of your ignorance on the Nazis, Nazi homosexuals, and history.

    …………….

    You quoted above:

    ….necessity; these creatures must be exterminated.
    Heinrich Himmler, 18 Feb 1937

    These are Hitler’s words on homosexuals

    …….

    So you don’t know there is a difference between Himmler and Hitler? You’re that stupid?

    Rudolh Diels “He lectured me on the role of homosexuality in history and politics”

    When did Hitler say this?

    ………….;

    History, real history, says Hitler had romantic relationships with
    women – and loved his brutal homosexual Ernst Rohm to pieces. So much so, that Rohm was about to usurp Hitler’s power, when the latter had him killed before he was dethroned. Much to his regret.

    It was HImmler who moved to get rid of homosexuals because he clearly saw how much they destroyed the military and loyalty. Hitler followed because it was to his advantage, and if he went against Himmler he would be outing the fondness he had for sexual perverts considerably.

    ……………;;

    “You should really be ashamed of yourself to try and equate gay people with mass murderers.”

    You should be ashamed to patently lie about every single real Nazi homosexual, their brutality and their crimes. Looks like you have a lot in common! You want LGBTs to do violence with impunity, and to lie about it to cover it, and smear and persecute anyone who exposes it.

    ……………….

    “was that unnatural passion swiftly became dominant in public affairs if it were allowed to spread unchecked”

    And you are now arguing that sexual politics aren’t a central part of culture and public affairs? That’s all you are obsessing about here: your homosexuality or your obsessions with it! And if you were in any way involved in public affairs, your pro-homosexuality obsession would be a dominant part of your mindset and your politics.

    Gay and pedophile and other sexually perverted mafias exist, that’s a real problem with people, the Catholic Church is a great example.

  23. Alessandra
    September 13th, 2013 @ 3:26 am

    LOL That’s funny. So far abesm has yet to answer any of the questions I asked him.

    And I so looking forward to hear more from his sockpuppet researcher who sounds just like abesm!

    You have nothing but your own hate and bile to work with. Or maybe you can site a book written by oher fundamentalist LGBT freaks that claim no gays supported or participated in the holocaust. Sad that you are so thickheaded and continue to call your bullshit science. You are despicable human being
    and should be shot into deep space where no one will ever have to hear from you again.

    Keep putting on display your nasty, ugly mind and vicious hatred of decent people and social conservatives.

    And you forgot to call me insolent! LOL

  24. Alessandra
    September 13th, 2013 @ 3:33 am

    Exposing how much you (and others with a homosexuality agenda, and often closeted homosexual problems) are pathetic assholes and bitter jerks who need ethics and to stop running away from promoting harm and violence related to sexuality is a nice part of my life.

    Seriously, you’re sad. And stupid too. You are basically wrong about
    everything that comes out of that warped little mind of yours and you
    routinely get destroyed in the comment section of this blog. And that’s because the bile you’re vomiting here would not be allowed to litter my blog – if you wanted to show how you are unhinged there.

  25. Alessandra
    September 13th, 2013 @ 10:54 am

    Louis L. Snyder writes, “what was needed, Roehm believed, was a
    proud, arrogant lot who could brawl, smash windows and kill for the hell of it. Straights, in his eyes, were not as adept in such behavior as practising homosexuals. No closets for them. Good citizenship in the Bourgeois sense, be damned, up with homosexuality.”(16)

    …

    Roehm’s eventual comrade Rossbach was, according to historian Nigel Jones, a “sadist, murderer, and homosexual, [and] one of the most admired heroes of post 1919 German youth.” “In Rossbach,” says a popular
    book on the youth movement, “we see the Fuhrer of our youth idolized and honored as can only happen in a time when `the personality of an
    individual counts for everything.’”(12) `Freebooter’ (armed bands of
    uprooted men Freikorps, Free Corps) commanders didn’t forget the trust placed in them by German youth. They understood the valuable role youth
    could play in resurgent, racist nationalism. Roehm enrolled hundreds into the S .A. Stormtroopers and historian Frank Rector records that,
    “the Hitler youth was so rampantly homosexuality that it became known among the German populace as the Homo Youth.”(13)

    Edmund Heines brought his Bavarian Rossbach-organization and Schill-Jugend (youth group), the original `Brownshirts,’ into the S.A. in Munich in 1923. Heiden reports that, “Lieutenant Rossbach’s troop,
    notorious for its homosexuality, spent its time brawling, smashing
    windows and shedding blood. Heines belonged to Rossbach’s organization before joining Hitler; then Rossbach and Heines formed a center with Roehm which took over and led the S.A.”(24)

    …

    The gay and bisexual officer corps of the S.A. became the
    Sicherheitsdienst (S.D.), organized by Reinhard Heydrich, Himmler’s second in command. It was this branch of the SS security Service that controlled the concentration camps. Of the three SS divisions the Sicherheitsdienst division was the most sadistic. Whenever the murder of
    innocent masses of Jews, Poles or captured allied prisoners was
    portrayed in the movies, it would have been the Sicherheitsdienst
    division, the `butch’ homosexuals, who were responsible.

  26. FMJRA 2.0: Caffeine Zombie : The Other McCain
    September 15th, 2013 @ 7:02 pm

    […] You Stay Classy, Atheists! […]