The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Feminism Is a Totalitarian Movement to Destroy Civilization as We Know It

Posted on | May 21, 2015 | 97 Comments

Emma Sulkowicz lies about rape and Hillary Clinton lies about everything, but feminists insist that no woman ever lies about anything. Feminism is an ideology based on the belief that women have a monopoly on virtue. All women are intelligent, kind and honest, according to feminist theory, and all men are stupid, selfish and untrustworthy. Therefore, women have a right to everything, and men have no rights at all — except, perhaps, the right to remain silent.

Because SHUT UP!

The Women’s Liberation movement of the 1960s and ’70s was inspired by the idea of a Leninist “revolutionary vanguard” seizing power on behalf of women as a collective “oppressed class.” The Redstockings Manifesto of 1969 declared:

We identify the agents of our oppression as men. . . . All power structures throughout history have been male-dominated and male-oriented. . . .
We regard our personal experience, and our feelings about that experience, as the basis for an analysis of our common situation. We cannot rely on existing ideologies as they are all products of male supremacist culture.

Prior to 1969, in other words, the “existing ideologies . . . of male supremacist culture” had kept women ignorant of their own “experience,” about which no male knows anything. Because women’s “personal exprience” and “feelings” are the only valid basis for feminist analysis, everything anyone claimed to “know” prior to 1969 was automatically invalidated because all “knowledge” prior to the feminist revolution was produced by a male-dominated “power structure.”

Nothing is true unless feminist leaders say it is true. You cannot believe anything a man says . . . What? A man said something?

Whatever else being a feminist might mean, it means that men can never speak without permission and, because men are stupid and dishonest, everything men say is wrong, anyway.

Therefore, SHUT UP!

Of all the “existing ideologies” which feminists set out to destroy, none was more dangerous than the idea that human beings are “endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights.” This is obviously false, according to Feminist Logic™ because:

  1. It was written by a man;
  2. It was written prior to 1969;
  3. There is no “Creator”;
  4. Men have no rights.

Only women have rights, according to Feminist Logic™ and if any man says he has rights . . . What? A man said something?



The five characteristic modes of feminist discourse are:

  1. The anti-male lecture;
  2. The victimhood testimonial;
  3. The dishonest slogan;
  4. The slanderous accusation;
  5. The angry rant against anyone who dares to disagree.

It is impossible to debate a feminist because disagreement is hate and yet, because of the so-called “First Amendment” — a male-supremacist ideology if ever there was one — some men still believe they should be allowed to speak and write things feminists don’t approve. These dangerous oppressors are called “Men’s Rights Activists” (MRAs) and, believe it or not, even in 2015 it is still legal for them to have their own website called “A Voice for Men.” This is obviously a misogynistic hate crime and, because I am so notorious for engaging in patriarchal heteronormativity, I was asked to contribute an article:

A movement organized with the death of innocents as one of its basic demands is not a movement that will be honest or ethical in the pursuit of its other demands. Feminism’s lies are therefore never accidental or random. Rather, deliberate deception is necessary to the movement’s success. Feminists lie because if they told the truth, their movement would be recognized for what it is, and would collapse in discredited failure.
Having spent more than a year researching feminist theory, I have exposed what can only be described as a bottomless abyss of perverse insanity. . . .

Read the whole thing at A Voice for Men. It’s not illegal, yet.



97 Responses to “Feminism Is a Totalitarian Movement to Destroy Civilization as We Know It”

  1. DeadMessenger
    May 22nd, 2015 @ 11:24 pm

    I think the philosophical approach is what’s called for here. As a scientist, I know that science is not always correct, either. (But to M-man’s point, it would generally be more correct than feelings and uninformed opinions.)

    I’d read your argument, if you posted it. We don’t always agree, but your arguments are a lot more cogent than, for example, asinine claims about trigger warnings and micro-aggressions.

  2. Michael
    May 22nd, 2015 @ 11:33 pm

    I wear my so called “misogyny” with pride. It doesn’t hurt me, all they do is just parrot what they’ve been taught to do. It’s like a when a child whines over not getting his/her way, you just ignore it.

  3. Daniel Freeman
    May 23rd, 2015 @ 12:06 am

    I was posting in response to an invocation of the right to privacy. (I didn’t save it, so this is a reconstruction, not a quote.)

    A right to murder would be more incompatible with civil society than a lack of privacy, so it cannot be granted by a right to privacy. A fetus turns into a person sometime between conception and birth, so if we set the boundary wrongly of when this other human (half different DNA) becomes a person, then we’re allowing murder.

    That reasoning could be defeated by simply denying an objective reality to personhood. However, since MGTOW-man’s interlocutor made a slippery-slope argument about loss of privacy, I pointed out that meant that I could make a slippery-slope argument about the subjectivity of personhood, and we don’t have to speculate about the consequences. Slavery and the Holocaust are historical facts.

    ETA: I would set the boundary at conception out of an abundance of moral caution, but I understand that not everyone would be persuaded by that. Setting it at the pain point would invoke normal human empathy, and any boundary is better than none at all.

  4. DeadMessenger
    May 23rd, 2015 @ 12:46 am

    Huh. OK. Well, obviously I agree with you, but I actually think that the “abundance of moral caution” statement is the strongest part of your argument.

    Again, obviously, we know that I believe in the triune Christian God, but I know that most people in the world do not. Regardless of the beliefs of those people, (who are apparently unburdened by facts in the form of hundreds and hundreds of fulfilled prophecies, as well as legal-historical, and scientific proofs), until they can prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that my God and His moral truths do not exist, then it seems that even skeptics ought to be bound by the requirements of “abundance of moral caution” when dealing with what is (clearly) a human life. You know, with respect to killing someone, and all. (Sorry ’bout that run-on sentence.)

    But your pièce de résistance was using the guy’s slippery slope argument to justify your own. Deliciously passive-aggressive of you, Daniel. 😀

  5. Fail Burton
    May 23rd, 2015 @ 1:16 am

    Equal rights feminists do, and I’m fine with that. Radical feminists say straight out they have no interest in equality in the current systems of patriarchy. Anita Sarkeesian is a radical feminist and says that exact thing at roundtable discussion in Australia on youtube. They are interested in gender equality, which requires the abolition of gender distinctions. Radical feminists have a near phobia of men. In addition to that, it is an ideology created by lesbians for lesbians.

  6. Fail Burton
    May 23rd, 2015 @ 1:19 am

    You know better. See: #JustListen. Radical feminism believes in the moral and spiritual supremacy of women. What’s “mansplaining” if not a reflection of who talks about what? Try again.

  7. Fail Burton
    May 23rd, 2015 @ 1:21 am

    I was talking about radical feminists.

  8. Daniel Freeman
    May 23rd, 2015 @ 1:32 am

    Thanks. 😉 It’s a good tool to include in the kit, since they have to make a slippery-slope argument about the right to privacy, because (as I made a point of establishing first) they can’t stand on principle.

  9. DeadMessenger
    May 23rd, 2015 @ 2:06 am
  10. DeadMessenger
    May 23rd, 2015 @ 2:14 am

    “Automatically irrational to disagree”, eh?

    That guy should be sentenced to a lifetime of marriage to me, just for being a jerk. I most generally disagree with everything, just for the fun of examining my argument and the opposite for flaws. When I was taking seminary classes, it used to drive my teachers crazy when I automatically took the opposite position in any discussion.

    I’ve always been this contrary. Starting from when I was 4, people would say, “You’re going to be a lawyer someday, aren’t you, little girl?”

  11. Daniel Freeman
    May 23rd, 2015 @ 2:49 am

    Yes, I agree. Only crazy people would study feminism, and we do, so we must be crazy. You make a compelling argument.

  12. kelly
    May 23rd, 2015 @ 9:17 am

    I have done extensive research on feminist theory. The people that bash “feminism” are those that want to keep women subordinate and subservient to men. This is not about what you choose for your career. This is about how you are viewed in society based on the fact you are “female”. Listen to boy children when you ask them how they would feel about being a girl. Some have said they would “kill themselves!” Being a “girl” is considered a lower form of existence. It is time to teach boys and girls that they are both valuable and “equal”! Gender does not matter when it comes to what you “choose” as your career choice. Should a janitor make as much as Bill Gates? Of course not, but should a female janitor make as much as a male janitor? Absolutely! And should a female CEO make as much as a male CEO? Absolutely! But it is PROVEN that women still make less than men in comparable jobs with comparable skills, education, and experience. So, yes I know what has been written and what has been said! Educate yourself!

  13. Kelly
    May 23rd, 2015 @ 9:23 am

    If the shoe fits, lace that bitch up and wear it!

  14. Quartermaster
    May 23rd, 2015 @ 10:03 am

    Yes, you have done “extensive research” on feminism. Your deep ignorance of the psychology of boys shows. Also the depth of your hate is on display for all to see.

    Radical Feminism is not about equality. It’s about dominance of, and destruction of civilization. It’s core is hatred and its sacrament is child murder.

  15. Quartermaster
    May 23rd, 2015 @ 10:06 am

    Plus, just like me, you are a heteronormative patriarchal lesbian trapped in a man’s body.

  16. News from the world of gay studies and female college softball | Batshit Crazy News
    May 23rd, 2015 @ 10:24 am

    […] Without Irony or Self Awareness, Feminism is a Totalitarian Movement To Destroy Civilization, and Shorter Her […]

  17. Prime Director
    May 23rd, 2015 @ 11:56 am

    high five?

  18. Feminism Is a Totalitarian Movement to Destroy Civilization as We Know It | Living in Anglo-America
    May 23rd, 2015 @ 12:52 pm
  19. Kelly Flock Bair
    May 23rd, 2015 @ 3:18 pm

    And you have drunken the Koolaid!

  20. DeadMessenger
    May 23rd, 2015 @ 3:45 pm

    You are the one who needs education.

    First, you use the words of children to supposedly “prove” some point. So I suppose when those same boys say they want to be Batman when they grow up, you take them at their word?

    Second, in the course of my 30+ technical career, I have examined the pay rates of men and women, minority and not. I have always had access to company-confidential information at places I’ve worked (Fortune 100 companies, and the government), due to the nature of my career choices. I have done this study secretly, so that no data could be hidden or altered in any way. And I did this to validate, once and for all, whether women are paid less than men or not. Because if they were, my plan was to approach executives with my findings, in order to question them about the justification for such gross unfairness.

    However, I found that, based upon job function, experience, and education/training, not only are pay rates consistent between sex and ethnicity, but that in many cases, women actually tended to make somewhat more. So, to sum it up: woman engineers are paid the same as men engineers, woman building maintenance personnel make the same as their male counterparts, and woman secretaries make the same as male secretaries. And, for example, Carly Fiorina made more than nearly all the male CEOs at any company I worked for. So does Beyonce, for that matter.

    I have proven this incontrovertibly, inarguably and beyond a shadow of a doubt, using actual payroll and human resources data, involving, I would estimate, several million records of data. WAY more than would normally be used for such studies.

    Any perceived differences in pay are due to personal choices made on an indivdual basis. Frankly, women more often than men choose to have lives outside their work, and there is nothing wrong with that. I personally chose to cap my own career at the level I’m currently at, so I have time for my music, art and writing, or I could, and would, be making tons more money. Nobody held me back but me, and this is the case for millions of people, men and women.

    So it is YOU who needs education. You have foolishly believed the lying crap that feminists spew like raw sewage out of a broken septic tank.

  21. DeadMessenger
    May 23rd, 2015 @ 4:25 pm

    HE drank the Koolaid?

    Pot, meet kettle.

  22. kelly
    May 23rd, 2015 @ 5:32 pm

    You did too apparently!

  23. DeadMessenger
    May 23rd, 2015 @ 7:18 pm

    I guess you’re talking about the Koolaid of Truth, Fact and Rational Thinking, because that’s what I drank.

    As I said, I did actual studies with actual data, on account of I’m an actual statistician. Tell me about your studies? Do they involve validating any kind of “information” (correctly identified as propaganda) spewed by feminists? Or is it your mindless drone belief system in action? (Note that emotions and feelings do not constitute actual factual data.)

    If so, please give details. If not, conversation over.

  24. DeadMessenger
    May 23rd, 2015 @ 9:47 pm

    You sick perv.

  25. DeadMessenger
    May 23rd, 2015 @ 9:48 pm

    Some of us are people.

  26. DeadMessenger
    May 23rd, 2015 @ 9:50 pm

    Well, not certifiably, or anything. Just walkin’ around town, mumbling to ourselves crazy.

  27. MGTOW-man
    May 23rd, 2015 @ 10:13 pm

    When it comes to biology, including neuro-, embryo-, developmental-, genetic- just to name a few, it can’t be beat. Most everything about pregnancy: conception, hormones, risk factors, abnormalities, cell division, stem cells, stages, phases, fetuses, birth—you name it—it is well understood.

    Opinions and feelings/wishes, can’t trump absolute understanding.

    Life begins with gametes, but being human life starts with conception. The result is human until it dies, no matter the phase, until maturity phase is completed. Birth is just an arbitrary stop in the pathway of life. So, the human moves from one place to another, a difficult transition but not a defining stage of the human. Birth is not as significant a developmental event as several other stages of life.

    Every one of us was a single cell. The significance of that is that now, here we are, making it impossible to say that being a single cell is/was insignificant.

    People who say”To me, life begins…when born” or anything other than when it really began (by default and with irrefutable science backing it up) will argue with signposts too. They really do not understand, and may never, because to people like that, their feelings dominate them and overwhelm them rendering their ability to be objective nil, and thus unfit for discussion, let alone rule making.

    Thus, since life has begun at conception, stopping it, killing it, snuffing it, destroying it, terminating it, etc are all kllings regardless of the official human-biased definition of murder, which is about as useful as is the definition of feminism. But whether ” murder” or not is insignificant in respect to the life being stopped.

    We don’t need to “look human” to actually be human. The ONLY criterion is that of genetically possessing the number of chromosomes with the specific arrangement of genes. Any other opinion is subjective.

    My opinion comes in for the first time here when I say that men can’t have complete humanity without procreation equality with women, no matter who owns the “equipment”. 100-0, in favor of women, is not as fair for both sexes as is 50-50.

    Thus, abortion is a men’s rights issue and is the equal business of men. This is the only procreation system we have.

    Sorry for the long rant, but most of this, I was muzzled by AVfM and indirectly, by feminism.

  28. DeadMessenger
    May 23rd, 2015 @ 10:30 pm

    You’re singin’ to the choir, M-man. I’m a devout Christian, and I know that life begins at conception, and not only that, we are all created in the image of God, and should behave as if we understand the implications of that.

    The implication being, don’t kill your friggin’ young, you idiots. One reason – maybe the main reason – God told Moses and the Israelites to go into Canaan and kill every living thing there was because they were constantly sacrificing their children. Actions have consequences, and one consequence is God’s judgment.

    To your other point, two people contribute their DNA to participate with God in the act of creation. Thus, both the mother and the father have equal claim upon, and responsibility for their offspring.

    It makes me sick when women murder their babies, who are blessings from God. It makes me want to puke when I hear they’ve done it against the father’s wishes. I can’t really wrap my head around that. In fact, I wish I’d had more babies. What kind of a sick monster would kill a baby, anyway? What kind of person would even think to do that?

  29. MGTOW-man
    May 23rd, 2015 @ 10:31 pm

    I wouldn’t mind reading your philosophy on this. I’ll check back. Thanks for your tip about this site. I too understand AVfM’s reasons for not letting the threads be derailed. But I also can’t understand WHY the subject is divisive because biology has it down pat with no guesswork. People who think their feelings are more correct and factual than biology must be morons, which if about other subjects, they get warnings or banned. They get rid of other morons, so why not these too?

  30. MGTOW-man
    May 23rd, 2015 @ 10:37 pm

    I knew you were the choir. Thanks for letting me vent on you.

    Even for those who aren’t Christians, bio-sciences suffice here when it comes to understanding life. Between you and I, there is no real reason people can legitimately disagree.

  31. DeadMessenger
    May 23rd, 2015 @ 11:42 pm

    Well, here’s where I think Daniel’s philosophical approach is the ticket.

    Because in my opinion, just the off-chance [eyeroll] that the offspring of two humans is actually a living human being [another eyeroll], even at conception, then Dan’s “abundance of moral caution” is what matters, even beyond the common sense demands of science. I mean, for pity’s sake, is there anyone who really doesn’t know in their heart that their baby is alive at conception?

    I hate to mince words here, but the whole thing is completely stupid! If you can’t do the time, don’t do the crime. Keep your friggin’ knees together until you get married, when the two of you can together afford to raise the fruit of your loins, you hoes!

    Thanks for listening to MY rant, M-man.

  32. Daniel Freeman
    May 24th, 2015 @ 12:05 am

    I posted my philosophy above in a reply to DM. As for why that subject is so divisive in the MRM, I can only guess that it’s such a settled issue on the left that there is no discussion at all, so it has to be a verboten topic to maintain the issue-oriented alliance.

  33. Quartermaster
    May 24th, 2015 @ 1:19 pm

    I know. But I can’t help myself. I denounce myself vigorously, but with great sadness.

  34. Quartermaster
    May 24th, 2015 @ 1:20 pm

    Sometimes it’s hard to believe, but it is true.

  35. Quartermaster
    May 24th, 2015 @ 1:22 pm

    Once the female KKK is silenced by Islam, they will have it.

  36. Quartermaster
    May 24th, 2015 @ 1:24 pm

    Eve didn’t do much talking even. Adam was probably paying attention to certain parts of the female anatomy when he took the fruit from Eve. Women have been doing that stuff from the start.

  37. Quartermaster
    May 24th, 2015 @ 1:27 pm

    We like the choir here. It gives a good base from which to go to places like Politico and post the truth, which to a leftist is the same as trolling.

  38. Quartermaster
    May 24th, 2015 @ 1:29 pm

    I used to have a graphic of a woman trying to open a jar with the caption, “68,000 women a year starve to death while trying to open jars.” But, can’t seem to find it.

  39. Quartermaster
    May 24th, 2015 @ 1:33 pm

    Why not a Taco like this?

  40. DeadMessenger
    May 24th, 2015 @ 2:21 pm


  41. DeadMessenger
    May 24th, 2015 @ 2:22 pm

    You gotta use the gifts God gives you, lol.

  42. Prime Director
    May 24th, 2015 @ 2:31 pm

    Eye dean ounce mice elf

  43. Prime Director
    May 24th, 2015 @ 3:02 pm


    Where’d the trolls go?

  44. News of the Week (May 25th, 201) | The Political Hat
    May 25th, 2015 @ 6:17 pm

    […] Feminism Is a Totalitarian Movement to Destroy Civilization as We Know It Emma Sulkowicz lies about rape and Hillary Clinton lies about everything, but feminists insist that no woman ever lies about anything. Feminism is an ideology based on the belief that women have a monopoly on virtue. All women are intelligent, kind and honest, according to feminist theory, and all men are stupid, selfish and untrustworthy. Therefore, women have a right to everything, and men have no rights at all — except, perhaps, the right to remain silent. Because SHUT UP! […]

  45. MGTOW-man
    May 26th, 2015 @ 7:42 am

    Actually WHEN a human becomes a “person” should not be the line in the sand. Them using. “Personhood ” as a threshold or something is just them desperately grasping at some sort of criterion in which to plot their scheme. Vacuous.

  46. MGTOW-man
    May 26th, 2015 @ 7:50 am

    I think it is divisive simply because the left doesn’t want to admit they are wrong—solid wrong— in the face of irrefutable science. It is classic example of their feelings overwhelming them to the point of their perspectives on reality being entirely skewed. This is also the common denominator between the left and feminists: feelings, no matter the real truth.

    I am glad the left is starting to see feminism for what it really is but they also need to do some introspection…to untether their ties with how they FEEL.

  47. Feminism Is NOT About ‘Equality’ : The Other McCain
    June 4th, 2015 @ 7:26 pm

    […] have I told you? “Feminism Is a Totalitarian Movement to Destroy Civilization as We Know It.” Feminists keep saying the same thing. Are you paying attention […]