Feminist Tumblr: She Loves Your Tears, You ‘Whiny’ #GamerGate ‘Baby Men’
Posted on | July 23, 2015 | 79 Comments
She was asked her opinion of Anita Sarkeesian:
This anonymous radical feminist is 25 years old, but provides no information about her education or background. She is a tabula rasa. We know nothing about her except for her all-encompassing hatred of males, who are always wrong about everything:
Male Opinions Are Not Objective Facts
Men are socialized since birth to think their feelings and thoughts are the objective truth. They are taught they are generally right about something, unless contradicted by another male with equal or more authority. men subconciously believe they are firmly right about things so much they won’t even consider alternative perspectives unless it comes from a place of higher authority.
Men are socialized to believe women are inherently wrong, and that is why women are “crazy”, because it is so difficult for men to even consider the possibility that they don’t know shit. This is why men often offer strong opinions on topics they just heard about, especially if they’re contradicting a woman.
This is because people will respect a man’s opinion and give his words weight even if he has zero background in the subject because men are considered credible by default. Women are considered wrong by default and must argue their way to display their truth, no matter how strong their credentials.
Men probably have to tell themselves they’re logical all the time just to keep up the lie that feeds their ego. Thinking is difficult work for a man who is used to instantly being told he is right, while women are constantly being argued against and therefore exploring the topics more deeply and doing more thinking.
A summary translation: “Men know nothing. Everything any man claims to know is an expression of his own arrogant prejudice. No woman should ever trust any man, because all men are fools.”
She got more than 1,800 notes for that denunciation of males, basically a restatement of what Rebecca Solnit argues in her popular feminist book Men Explain Things to Me. Could I make a counter-argument? Perhaps, but why bother? Feminists never listen to anything a man says. We understand why feminism’s First Rule for Men is, “SHUT UP!”
This is why feminism is not about equality. No feminist wants to be “equal” to that despicable subhuman creature, the male. Feminism means males must be silenced, because no male has any truth to speak. Men are stupid and untrustworthy; feminists have a monopoly on truth and virtue. From the feminist perspective, everything about males is invalid, inferior, irrelevant, bad and wrong. Therefore, every woman must gratefully embrace the knowledge imparted to her by feminists. By invoking this crypto-Marxist totalitarian concept — women as a revolutionary class, led by an intellectual vanguard — feminists thereby anoint themselves as Omniscient Arbiters of Truth.
Any 25-year-old feminist with a Tumblr blog can join the pantheon of Olympian Goddesses who dispense immortal wisdom to the Sacred Sisterhood. Oh, did I mention she wants to “Desexualize the Female Body” because “F–k Your Fascist Beauty Standards”?
You see her feminism involves a sort of sour-grapes rationalization. Men do not value her opinion because (a) men are stupid and inferior, and (b) men “think their feelings and thoughts are the objective truth.” She is disappointed that men “sexualize” women, evaluating her in terms of her desirability as a romantic companion. This involves “beauty standards” that are “fascist,” by which she means that beauty is undemocratic because it is not equally distributed among all women. Some women are more beautiful than others, and this is wrong because . . .?
Well, it’s just wrong. How dare you ask a feminist to explain herself?
Like all radical egalitarian philosophies, feminism appeals to the ambitious malcontent who, feeling herself somehow disadvantaged by the status quo, dreams of a utopia in which women will be treated according to a “fair” standard, which is to say, a standard that will make her Queen Bee of the hive. A woman who declares that she is “oppressed” by “male supremacy” usually means nothing more than this: Men don’t treat her the way she would like to be treated, and so she wants to destroy civilization as we know it, and institute a gynocracy in which women will be empowered to inflict humiliating punishment on men. Whatever else feminism may be, it is always in large measure a sadistic revenge fantasy whose strongest appeal is to women of unlimited cruelty. If any man doesn’t like her “feminist perspective,” his disagreement proves he’s a “whiny piss baby,” and she will celebrate by drinking your tears.
She hates you. She really, really hates you. You’re probably “a fedora wearing doritos munching mountain dew drinking reddit bro.”
Comments
79 Responses to “Feminist Tumblr: She Loves Your Tears, You ‘Whiny’ #GamerGate ‘Baby Men’”
July 24th, 2015 @ 9:34 am
I was guilty of this for years, then I started taking financial and lifestyle advice from the crack whore who would blow me under the underpass for a junior whopper.
Boy has my life changed!
As a description of the Feminist Tumblr Mentality, this is nearly perfect.
July 24th, 2015 @ 9:35 am
Anita’s tl;dr; “I’m good enough, I’m smart enough, and doggone it, people like me!”
Sorry, toots. Just because you wave your Hogwarts wand to try and suddenly upset the entirety of society doesn’t mean that anyone but your similarly coprocephalic flannel-shirt-wearing crowd will actually listen. And no, your credo doesn’t mean that you will suddenly start getting dates from even the A/V crowd, who would prefer reruns of Star Trek to being lectured at by someone who blames all social ills on them.
Now go make us some sammiches…
July 24th, 2015 @ 9:56 am
See how insidious it is? It’s everywhere and nowhere!
July 24th, 2015 @ 10:11 am
Yep. This loony’s rant is simply “projection” – it is SHE that is a know-nothing.
Ace of Spades recently had a post along this line of thought – actual experts or professionals with knowledge of facts and informed opinions are SOUGHT OUT and PAID by others for their opinions, their expertise. The hacks, ideologues, loonies and social engineers VOLUNTEER their “expertise” to the point of forcing it upon you. One reeks of desperation for legitimacy, the other already knows its legit and simply wants paid for its time.
See all the “forced” social acceptance and tolerance for gays, trannies, etc. Deep down, they “know” something is “wrong” with them, that they are not “normal”, hence the mad push for “normalcy” and oppression of any counter-opinion. It’s a psychological issue played out on the national social stage.
July 24th, 2015 @ 10:11 am
This young woman has obviously not handled the numerous rejections of her short life very well at all.
July 24th, 2015 @ 10:25 am
“analyze videogames from a feminist perspective.”
I had a picture of an inmate in an old-fashioned insane asylum looking out into the real world through a tiny window with the bars in the way.
July 24th, 2015 @ 10:42 am
If all you know is feminist theory, then that window is very tiny indeed. It’s been established in a number of cases that Sarkeesian doesn’t have even the most basic familiarity with some of the games she’s “analyzed”; apparently all she did was watch promo trailers and read game boxes before going off on a tirade.
July 24th, 2015 @ 11:27 am
I forgive you on this; I understood it to be a demand, but simply couched in less microaggressive terms.
July 24th, 2015 @ 11:29 am
The usual.
July 24th, 2015 @ 11:30 am
Yeah, well he was actually at work, supporting her.
July 24th, 2015 @ 11:31 am
Elliot Rodger.
July 24th, 2015 @ 11:36 am
Exactly my point. He was a black swan (i.e.,
an unpredictable or unforeseen event, typically one with extreme consequences), and NOT the normal male.
July 24th, 2015 @ 11:48 am
Keep that up and people are going to talk…about the great deal I gave you!
July 24th, 2015 @ 11:48 am
[…] Read the whole thing. […]
July 24th, 2015 @ 12:54 pm
The best Dew comes from a properly calibrated fountain. Second best is glass, then cans, then plastic.
July 24th, 2015 @ 3:15 pm
My store has Throwback (Pepsi, Dew, Dr Pepper) in glass bottles. ‘Spensive though, which is ok, I guess, because I shouldn’t be drinking flavored acidy sugar water anyway.
July 24th, 2015 @ 3:17 pm
Hm?
July 24th, 2015 @ 4:45 pm
I’m developing a theory that all male feminists are some kind of autophile, and I’m not sure that Brianna is technically an autogynephile — that applies more to “lesbian” transwomen — but he might bathe in his own tears.
July 24th, 2015 @ 6:47 pm
[…] Read the whole thing. […]
July 24th, 2015 @ 7:43 pm
Ask your husband. 🙂
July 24th, 2015 @ 8:45 pm
Do you know General Dindu? I think he is from your country.
July 24th, 2015 @ 9:48 pm
“Oh, did I mention she wants to “Desexualize the Female Body” because “F–k Your Fascist Beauty Standards”?”
Nuns are doing quite good job in desexualizing their female bodies by wearing habits. Maybe aforementioned radical feminist should try going to the sisterhood?
July 25th, 2015 @ 7:52 am
You should all report for re-education immediately.
July 25th, 2015 @ 7:56 am
Of course, McCarthy was right – there really were ‘Reds under the bed’ but there isn’t a ‘Patriarchy’ in the West keeping women from doing whatever they want.
July 25th, 2015 @ 8:01 am
Why do we need to analyze video games anyway? Aren’t they just supposed to be fun to play?
July 25th, 2015 @ 9:17 am
[…] http://theothermccain.com/2015/07/23/feminist-tumblr-she-loves-your-tears-you-whiny-gamergate-baby-m… […]
July 25th, 2015 @ 3:28 pm
Well, that’s why I buy them, but then I’m not a whiny feminist.
July 29th, 2015 @ 6:02 am
Isn’t ‘feminism’ basically “penis envy”?
July 29th, 2015 @ 9:12 am
Isn’t it funny the transformation we’re going through: Moderns tell us that a male’s attraction and lust for another male should be seen as like but “just different” from the much more common attraction to a female. It’s natural for a male who wants males to see a male that attracts him and to have a visceral reaction.
These reactions need no policing: why this male, and not others? what exactly does he want to achieve in a “healthy” sex life with other males? So it’s natural, but somehow the natural biological function of mate choice is a conspiracy against women! Men shouldn’t have a sexual stimulus just by looking at women.