The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Feminism: How a Privileged Elite Can Claim Permanent Victimhood

Posted on | November 3, 2015 | 69 Comments

To disagree with Jaclyn Friedman is to “trivialize” rape.

“Enthusiastic consent is about making sure those rapes that apologists want to trivialize (which: almost all of them) are taken seriously.”
— Jaclyn Friedman, 2011

No matter how rich her parents are, no matter what the tuition was at her prestigious private prep school or how elite the university she attends, a feminist always believes she is a victim of male supremacy. She’s got a trust fund, a luxury car and spends her holidays at the family vacation home, but she knows she is oppressed by patriarchy, and that guy over there? The poor slob sweating his life away for an hourly wage? He is a beneficiary of male privilege, who oppresses her by his mere existence.

Quod erat demonstrandum.

If you reject these categorical claims — if do not view the world through feminist lenses — you are a misogynist, a sexist, a rape apologist.

Jaclyn Friedman attended elite Williams College (annual tuition $50,070) but she has made a career as a Professional Victim who teaches college girls to accuse male students of rape if, at any time, a girl should decide that her participation in a sexual encounter was less than “enthusiastic.” Did she enthusiastically consent to this particular touch or that particular kiss? Did the guy at any point during their hook-up do anything that she did not entirely enjoy? Well, this wasn’t just bad sex. She’s a victim of assault. If she decides six months later to accuse her ex-boyfriend of rape, we must believe the victim, and her ex-boyfriend must be expelled. This is what “equality” requires in 2015.

Despite her self-proclaimed willingness to get “down and dirty” with any stranger who strikes her fancy, Jaclyn Friedman insists that male college students habitually rape girls. Therefore “affirmative consent” policies must be rigorously enforced, and all students must undergo mandatory training where girls are taught to accuse male students of rape, and boys are taught to fear female students. Every girl he meets on campus is a potential accuser, and the only way a college boy can avoid an accusation of “harassment” or “sexual assault” is to avoid females altogether.

Guys: Never Talk to a College Girl,
Because All College Girls Hate You

That’s my solution to the alleged “campus rape epidemic.” Heterosexual activity at college violates federal Title IX, and the only way a guy can avoid being accused of sexual assault is to walk away every time a female student approaches him. Avoid college girls entirely — problem solved.

 

“John Doe” didn’t heed that warning. He met a girl at a party, started making out with her, and got banned from campus, because it’s sexual assault to make out with a girl at Brown University.

Young man, don’t let this happen to you. Avoid college girls. They hate you, and they will do whatever it takes to get you expelled.

Annual tuition is $49,346 at Brown University. Every girl on campus is a victim — her civil rights have been violated — the minute she decides she’s a victim. The guy must automatically be expelled.

“John Doe” paid $49,346 a year for the privilege of being expelled from Brown University and branded a rapist, even though he never got past second base with the girl whose civil rights he violated.

Some may say that these policies demanded by feminists are unfair, and that it is wrong for “John Doe” to be banned from campus without any of the due-process rights that would be guaranteed to a common criminal in a court of law. Some people might even go so far as to question whether the Brown University student who accused “John Doe” of sexual assault was actually a victim of anything. But anyone who criticizes these policies is a rape apologist, according to Jaclyn Friedman, and any expression of skepticism is trivializing rape.

In September 2010, Ms. Friedman was invited to give a speech at her alma mater, and what she told students was profoundly offensive to Williams College freshman Benjamin Fischberg:

The second talk, by Jaclyn Friedman, had the basic message that all Williams students should have frequent enjoyable sexual experiences. . . .
[She] simply told Williams students to have large amounts of sex as sex makes us happy. Ms. Friedman, the speaker, made it clear she did not value virginity, as it was nothing but a Judeo-Christian value that has no worth and should not constrict our lives. Her attack on Judeo-Christian values was baseless, and while I respect her perspective on sexual activity, she crossed a line when she attacked traditional morals and thought. . . .
Her self-described pro-sex stance was guaranteed to offend people’s sensibilities. Ms. Friedman . . . seemed to rejoice in taking as extreme a position on sex as possible. She refused to listen to students when they questioned her and gave no ground to those of a different mindset, an approach in conflict with the previous day’s talk about understanding those different from you. . . . Ms. Friedman can feel however she wants, but to try to convince college students that the traditional morals they hold are wrong seems irresponsible and rude. She did not accord her audience the level of respect we gave her, and while I disagree with her message on sex, I have a much greater problem with her refusal to consider any other perspective on sex.

Somehow, we hope, Mr. Fischberg managed to graduate from Williams College without being accused of rape. His description of Ms. Friedman’s hateful attack on religious morality, and her disparagement of virginity, however, should raise concerns about her qualifications to dictate sexual assault policy. Is the best way to prevent rape by encouraging students to reject “Judeo-Christian values” and instead to emulate Ms. Friedman’s “pro-sex stance,” as Mr. Fischberg called it?

But no one is permitted to criticize feminism at Williams College, which is why Suzanne Venker was prohibited from speaking there.

All women are oppressed and all men are oppressors. This is what feminism means. Anyone who disagrees is blaming women for their own oppression, as a radical feminist blogger explained:

Something we come across frequently is the idea that some women internalise and then reproduce or reinforce our own oppression. . . .
Whichever group of women we’re looking at, women aren’t the problem, or responsible for the situation we’re in. As the oppressed group we can’t reinforce our own oppression, we can’t have both the agency to maintain this oppression and at the same time, because of this oppression be so stripped of our agency as to be incapable of escaping patriarchy or doing much about it. Only the oppressors are in a position to oppress and maintain this oppression, which they do with the use of force. Their violence is unilateral, and violence in a context of oppression is always unilateral. . . .
The more a group behaves submissively to another, and in ways that appear contradictory to its own interests, the higher the level of occupation and repression this group is subjected to: this is a universal law. . . .
Liberal women are misdirected by the false hopes that not all men are bad and that equality is the solution, because liberal men constantly lure them into these myths and exploit women’s desires by posturing as allies and mimicking feminist discourse. . . .
When we talk about women betraying women, this is something organised politically, beyond ourselves. Men are the only agents of this betrayal, they are the ones organising it, they very literally stand between us and the women that are important to us, attempt to control, limit and sabotage our contact in every possible way. . . . What’s more, men are in fact the ones who betray us constantly, constantly! Quite contrary to women, who mostly act in good faith, who are expected to be transparent and honest at all times — planned deception is how men proceed by default. The contrast between men and women in this respect is so stark that it takes years to even imagine how men can be so calculating. They’re capable of betraying our trust for decades onwards, stealing everything we have, tricking and manipulating us at every turn and opportunity. The backbones of all their institutions, from marriage to capitalism to the democratic state to medicine to religion (etc) are built on lies, myths and reversals.

To disagree with that rant (from the radical feminist blogger at Witchwind) you would first have to understand what it means, which is quite difficult. Clearly, however, she believes all men are bad and equality is not the solution, “because liberal men constantly lure [women] into these myths” by “mimicking feminist discourse” — and at least no one can ever accuse me of that.

Yet as a summary of the feminist belief that all women are oppressed and that all men “maintain this oppression . . . with the use of force,” Witchwind’s rant is valuable, because she makes explicit the premise that is merely implicit in Jaclyn Friedman’s “rape culture” discourse.

After all, why should Ms. Friedman take it for granted that anyone who criticizes her is a “rape apologist” who wishes to “trivialize” sexual assault on college campuses? Why does Ms. Friedman insist that everyone who disagrees with her is dishonest, so that she can dismiss every counter-argument as “bulls**t” and expect that every feminist will support her? Isn’t it because Ms. Friedman presumes that her readers share the implicit feminist belief that all males participate in what Witchwind describes as unilateral violent oppression?

The brilliance of feminist theory — a worldview in which male oppression of women is assumed to be the universal explanation of everything — is that it relieves women of responsibility for their own decisions. However predictable the negative consequences of her choices (e.g., having sex with complete strangers, which Ms. Friedman is proud to say she enjoys), no woman can ever be criticized for her behavior, and if the results are unfortunate, she is never to blame. Jaclyn Friedman is a feminist, which means that she is your moral and intellectual superior. She is always right about everything and anyone who criticizes her is a rape apologist.

Feminists like Jaclyn Friedman have the ultimate privilege — the authority to tell other people what to think and to demand constant praise for exercising the authority of their privilege.

Permanent victimhood is the basis of feminist authority, and nowhere do feminists have more authority than on college campuses. This is why every male college student is now subject to being immediately banned from campus if his ex-girlfriend (or the girl he kissed at a party) decides to accuse him of sexual assault. “John Doe” at Brown University is one of more than 90 male students who have filed lawsuits claiming they were falsely accused and deprived of their rights because of this “campus rape epidemic” hysteria that feminists have incited on college campuses. Under current circumstances, male students must be warned:

  1. Assume every girl hates you. Female college students now fiercely resent the mere presence of males on campus. Feminists have taught girls that all males are violent and dangerous. The male student should expect female students to react with fear and disgust toward him. He must never forget that all women on campus view him as a sexual predator.
  2. Avoid being in the vicinity of female students. When you attend classes, choose a seat as far away as possible from any female classmates. In the dining hall, never share a table with women. Do not go to any parties where women may be present. The safest course of action is never to leave your dorm, except for attending classes and other such necessary excursions. Never be anywhere girls might be. If a girl walks into the room, you should walk out.
  3. Never make eye contact with females. College girls hate being looked at by guys. It’s “objectification.” Learn to avert your eyes or a girl might accuse you of being a “creep” or a “stalker.” Wearing wraparound sunglasses may help.
  4. Never speak to college girls. They consider males stupid, arrogant and obnoxious. Everything you say is obviously wrong. Girls know everything and guys know nothing, therefore she cannot stand the sound of a guy’s voice, talking as if he has anything she needs to hear. If you are talking to a guy and a girl attempts to join your conversation, shut up and walk away. Learn to be completely silent when female students are around.

Of course, it goes without saying that following these rules will preclude any possibility that a guy could ever have any heterosexual relationships at college, which is the goal. “Rape culture” is a feminist synonym for heterosexuality. Feminists are determined to eradicate the scourge of heterosexuality from campus, which is why any male student can be expelled for even attempting to have a relationship with a girl.

Guys may think this advice is too extreme, but there is a name for college guys who ignore my advice: “John Doe,” the expelled rapist.

Don’t be a “John Doe.” Avoid college girls. They hate you.




 

Category: Sex Trouble

Comments

69 Responses to “Feminism: How a Privileged Elite Can Claim Permanent Victimhood”

  1. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    November 4th, 2015 @ 12:06 am

    Perpetual victimhood gets old fast

  2. Daniel Freeman
    November 4th, 2015 @ 12:59 am

    OT: How are things going with the 2nd edition? Still aiming for by Christmas (IIRC)?

  3. DeadMessenger
    November 4th, 2015 @ 5:20 am

    I don’t trivialize rape. I trivialize Jaclyn Friedman. Furthermore, I think Benjamin Fischberg is a bad beyotch, and I believe my daughter is a good match for him. Ben, do you need a wife? I have one for you. Lol. Call me.

  4. DeadMessenger
    November 4th, 2015 @ 5:21 am

    Stacy’s book is the gift that keeps on giving.

  5. DeadMessenger
    November 4th, 2015 @ 5:22 am

    Jaclyn who?

  6. Francis W. Porretto
    November 4th, 2015 @ 5:55 am

    I’m particularly fascinated by the feminists’ “Overton Window of Rape.” In about fifty years, we’ve gone from a more or less reasonable feminism, largely concerned with assuring women’s equality with men before the law, to a feminism that preaches that men are inherently women’s oppressors, that “regret equals rape,” and whose mouthiest activists, obsessed with promoting lesbianism among young women, will tell you that “PIV” equals rape under any and all circumstances.

    If feminists were consciously aiming to breed themselves out of existence, I can’t imagine how they could do a better job. Whatever the case, the above presents a perfect schematic for how the radical fringe of a mass movement slowly but steadily gains control of the body of that movement. Eric Hoffer would have a field day with it.

  7. Fail Burton
    November 4th, 2015 @ 6:12 am

    You see the same pattern in sociopathic supremacist cults over and over again; they create demonization theories which seek to smear an entire group for what the worst of them do. That’s how “rape culture” works. According to veteran feminist Susan Brownmiller rapists are “shock troops” for all men.

    In “white privilege” no white person escapes. In the “compulsory heterosexuality” of the “gender binary” no straight person is innocent. No white escapes “cultural appropriation”; no non-white is ever guilty of it. The Bechdel Test only works one way.

    Every religion has it’s rules and dogma and to keep them straight and the disciples on track every religion needs its spiritual guide. The more I read these people the more they remind me of the Muslim Brotherhood. In this case it is not “Islam is the solution” but non-binary” feminism. These feminists show the same irrational suspicions of men as Sayd Qutb had of the West, and the same pattern of aggressive supremacist statements in conjunction with simultaneously claiming victimhood. It is an argument that is both neat and insane; to attack someone with a sword and then to claim defending one’s self is “harassment” or aggression.

  8. RS
    November 4th, 2015 @ 7:35 am

    It is quite instructive to note Ms. Friedman is not asked to comment on the possible correlation between her “have sex all the time with whomever you want” position and the “rape culture” she ostensibly decries. The Judeo-Christian morality she dismisses hanged rapists and functions as a brake on male misbehavior.

    As for loons like Ms. “Witchwind,” it’s striking to realize that you good replace references to men, males, patriarchy and the like in her writing with things like “Trilateral Commission,” “Bilderbergs,” “Knights Templar” or whatever and have your garden variety, xeroxed paranoid conspiracy newsletter self-published by some some dude in the woods whose cabin is wrapped in aluminum foil. “Don’t you see! Everything is evidence of the nefarious plot!!!!!1111”

  9. LIbtardian slayer
    November 4th, 2015 @ 8:05 am

    Gynosaurs feministus aka gynosaur aka man hater

  10. Fail Burton
    November 4th, 2015 @ 8:05 am

    Anyone who’s read queer girl Friedman’s anthology of essays she edited with Jessica Valenti called “Yes Means Yes” can get a bird’s eye view of what a civilizational suicide cult is. The funniest thing is how much they look down their noses at women throughout history who’ve been forced to resort to exploiting their sex while the essayists make clear that is their sole value to society. They can pretend they’re noble and secretly talented Fremen hiding in tunnels biding their time but they’re nothing more than rats in the walls living off the crumbs of men who can take an automobile plant and retool it to make tank components in a matter of weeks. Keep killing that Constitution ladies; it’s the only thing between you and a slave pen.

  11. RS
    November 4th, 2015 @ 8:22 am

    Here is a thought experiment predicated upon Ms. Friedman’s worldview:

    A young Christian college male is propositioned by an amorous “sex-positive” college female. He refuses her advances. She inquires as to the reason, and he explains his Judeo-Christian morality precludes him from engaging in that behavior. Further, he is seeking a woman with similar views to his own. Query, whether we then see a complaint by said female that the young Christian male engaged in “slut shaming?”

    [BTW, my son is junior at a STEM university majoring in math and computer science with a minor in computer engineering. 3.8/4.0 GPA. If I do say so myself, he had a good upbringing. Have your daughter send him her C.V. : ) ]

  12. robertstacymccain
    November 4th, 2015 @ 8:25 am

    “… a bird’s eye view of what a civilizational suicide cult is.”

    An apt description. I’ve got Yes Means Yes on my bookshelf and have quoted it a few times, but never reviewed it, per se, because it is difficult to put into words how unspeakably awful it really is. You have captured it perfectly in a few words.

    What you have to ask yourself, in regard to Ms. Friedman’s “philosophy” (if we can call it such) is, what would society look like if everybody lived that way? Well, Ms. Friedman is a 40ish bisexual who has never married or had children, so if you want the human race to become extinct — if your ideal future life is to be a crazy cat lady — by all means, emulate Jaclyn Friedman’s lifestyle.

  13. CrustyB
    November 4th, 2015 @ 8:35 am

    Avoid being in the vicinity of female students

    In the insane environment of 21st century America, that is but one of many groups you can no longer safely interact with. When I’m forced to talk with someone from a “protected” demographic like that I keep the conversation as polite, humorless and, above all, brief as possible.

  14. LIbtardian slayer
    November 4th, 2015 @ 9:05 am

    In other words, men never rell the truth about rape and women never lie about rape.
    Kind of like how blacks no natter how hateful can never be racist and whites no matter how considerate are racist if only unconsciously

  15. TC_LeatherPenguin
    November 4th, 2015 @ 9:10 am

    Spent a day in Williamstown during recent Berkshires vacation. lovely town, esthetically, but every Williams student I encountered was batshiat cray-cray. The locals I spoke with (mostly shop owners) all rolled their eyes and shrugged when I asked them how they coped: “The college owns this town.”

  16. Toastrider
    November 4th, 2015 @ 9:20 am

    Pictures, or no deal 😀

  17. Daniel O'Brien
    November 4th, 2015 @ 9:24 am

    Don’t worry, the Muslim will breed these cray-cray folks out of existence. Their future is sealed.

  18. Jeanette Victoria
    November 4th, 2015 @ 9:30 am

    Mom and Dad were right wait until your wedding night…problem solved

  19. Agnes Martinez
    November 4th, 2015 @ 9:44 am

    ?

    .?my neighbor’s aunt is making $98 HOURLY on the lap-top?….A few days ago new McLaren F1 subsequent after earning 18,512$,,,this was my previous month’s paycheck ,and-a little over, $17k Last month ..3-5 h/r of work a day ..with extra open doors & weekly paychecks.. it’s realy the easiest work I have ever Do.. I Joined This 7 months ago and now making over $87, p/h..Learn More right Here….
    ps..
    ??
    ??? http://GlobalWorldEmploymentsVacanciesReportHigh/GetPaid/$97hourly… ?????????????????????????????????????????????????

  20. Southern Air Pirate
    November 4th, 2015 @ 9:55 am

    Well remember that in some of thier political circles, the human race is the most vile and evil thing to have been created by random mutation or the great spirits of Avalon (take your pick as most feminists I know hate religion and love mystical energy crap so they believe in both). So yea if we all quit pumping out kids to save mother Gaia that would be great.

  21. marcus tullius cicero
    November 4th, 2015 @ 9:55 am

    …is not all that bad, there are college women in less privileged institutions (public college) that do not hate the attention of males, and enthusiastically enjoy being participants in love and sex.
    Just avoid schools altogether!

  22. Southern Air Pirate
    November 4th, 2015 @ 9:56 am

    Name one public college that doesn’t have a woman’s study program?

  23. marcus tullius cicero
    November 4th, 2015 @ 10:04 am

    …have to retract my information…Cannot find a single college w/o woman’s studies curriculum.

  24. Finrod Felagund
    November 4th, 2015 @ 10:05 am

    Fucking feminist spammers.

  25. RS
    November 4th, 2015 @ 10:26 am

    Probably none. Nonetheless, I think Cicero’s point is that there are some colleges and universities where the infection is somewhat contained. It does take some research to find them, but they are out there. My two elder kids attended/currently attend such schools. As I’ve mentioned in previous comments, one’s best bet is to avoid humanities and social science departments. There, the rot runs deep.

  26. Fail Burton
    November 4th, 2015 @ 10:32 am

    And it’ even worse than that. Friedman is a supremacist whose moral ethos is that her identity is good and the other’s bad. Men control the world’s finances and all bad things and blah, blah, blah.

    Sound familiar?

    Friedman is Jewish. To take up an ideology that is in principle indistinguishable from one which once tried to genocide you is retarded.

  27. jakee308
    November 4th, 2015 @ 11:36 am

    I would ask any male going to college; “Would you stick your penis in a meat grinder and ask strangers if they’d like to give the handle a turn or two?”

    I would hope most all would cry “No way!”

    Yet they hook up with some air head from who knows where with who knows what kind of upbringing or family background and hand them the opportunity to take their future and grind it to bits.

    With little or no reason to do so other than their confusion or misdirection or just plain revenge to the imaginary Patriarchy.

    I was a naive guy who worshipped women, then I went into the service and my eyes were opened as they say. I discovered that lo and behold, women are just as bad (just in some different ways and how they go about it) as men as far as trustworthiness and loyalty.

    It forever changed my interactions with women. And a good thing because the Sexual Revolution was just getting started but I’d had a crash course in the negative results of assuming the innocence of any female unknown to one personally.

    There should be a College course for it. Maybe a college prep course in High School would be better.

  28. JackLo
    November 4th, 2015 @ 11:37 am

    I know she’s a “feminist”, but what do you really call people like this? There’s no soul, no poetry, they’re completely narcissistic, there’s a basic lack of decency and humanity, theyre cruel, and elitist…I would say she’s a Bolshevik, but I think that would be giving Lenin and Trotsky a bad name? Wait, she’s a sociopath! That’s it! These women have all the traits of sociopaths. Feminism is a sociopathic and totalitarian movement.

  29. Grandson Of TheGrumpus
    November 4th, 2015 @ 11:44 am

    I’m exceedingly glad that I’m well past the age where I have to tolerate these people— but I fret for my children and grandchildren!

    I’ve always thought that the correct response, returned at the time of the accusation is

    “I don’t trivialize sexual assault! I’m trivializing you! You’re a clown… and everybody laughs at clowns— why should I be different?”

    Through voluminous experimentation I’ve found that, even though facts, honesty, genuine concern and good will, etc… bounce right off a Progressive’s mental armour, attacks on their planet-sized ego usually hit and shock as nothing else will!

    And when the motive is to disable or vanquish one who seeks to be your enemy– what could be better for our target than a Proggie’s ego?

    Without exception a proggie’s ego is hugely out of proportion to their experience, abilities or knowledge… and they know it! Their ego is so fantastically huge… they take kudos for everything done by anyone, after all— it’s the size of God’s, (…except His is right & proper: He earned His by creating everything there is…)— how could they armour or defend all that undeserved self-accolading, (if I might coin a term…)?

    When you defend against an enemy it is best to attack the soft spots. That is their softest spot.

  30. RKae
    November 4th, 2015 @ 11:47 am

    I couldn’t agree more.

    This free sex experiment is a failure. It’s time we admitted that Ward & June Cleaver had it right.

  31. Quartermaster
    November 4th, 2015 @ 11:54 am

    I just looked at Tennessee Tech. When I left they didn’t have a program in Women’s Studies and they still don’t. They do have a program called interdisciplinary Studies, where you might be able to pursue such nonsense.

  32. Quartermaster
    November 4th, 2015 @ 12:28 pm

    $98 hourly on the lap top? Advertising lap dances?

  33. Ilion
    November 4th, 2015 @ 1:31 pm

    Damn this system! It allows me to give your post only one thumbs up.

  34. JackLo
    November 4th, 2015 @ 3:18 pm

    It is a failure, but they won’t admit it, and of course are putting off their agenda’s failures on men by claiming the problem isn’t random sexual encounters with strangers, it’s that most men aren’t skilled lovers, and that’s the real reason women feel awful, and empty afterwards. McCains Maxim, “the failures of feminism can only be cured with more feminism”, is no more true than here. As someone who in his younger years, and at
    the dawn of Internet hook-up culture, indulged in some of this behavior, the reality is you have to be a sociopath to exploit people just for sex, and claim to enjoy it. The feelings associated with this behavior are predominantly negative, and the fact that it signals either status, or is considered sex positive amongst feminists and in modern society in general speaks volumes about how debased, and sick the culture has become. I never would have dreamed rebellion would be a loving, conservative, monogamous relationship, but it is.

  35. Fail Burton
    November 4th, 2015 @ 3:39 pm

    I’m hoping the increased scrutiny of this sick movement is at least eating away at the edges where people are not institutionally held hostage. We’ve seen the recent closing of a bigoted webzine called Crossed Genres in science fiction and the dizzy and batty Ada Initiative in tech. One senses Anitia Sarkeesian’s run is coming to an end since there is no college administrator or human resources person for her to run to. Such people exist on good will while giving nothing in return but irrational hatred. People don’t always announce boycotts; sometimes they just turn their backs.

  36. DeadMessenger
    November 4th, 2015 @ 5:10 pm

    Re: thought experiment

    Well, of COURSE it’s slut shaming! If he pays no attention to her at all, it’s slut shaming, and if he pays any attention at all, it’s rape, followed by slut shaming.

    Re: my daughter

    I don’t know what’s wrong with her, but she has a mental breakdown whenever I ask to give her picture out. I could just do it anyway, but I suppose I wouldn’t like it if someone did that me without my permission, so I don’t. I don’t understand it. She’s a cute girl, has a quick, intelligent sense of humor, and is talented in many ways. She has friends both male and female, though like me, she relates better to guys. So she’s socialized.

    I’m speculating, but maybe she’s nervous or scared because she has no romantic experience of any kind. That I know of. But I’d say not, because she’s practically never out of sight of me, her dad, or someone from our church (who report in to me anytime they catch her in the act of mutually flirting with some guy). And she works at our church.

    At this rate, she’s going to be lucky to end up with one of those guys in the worship band, like they could support a family.

  37. DeadMessenger
    November 4th, 2015 @ 5:18 pm

    She’d kill me in my sleep if I did that. Or poison my food. She’s a chef, and she knows how.

    We took a face painting class together once. We had to paint our faces for practice, so I have a picture of her as a juggalo. Maybe I should post that one, lol! She’d have a stroke!

  38. Jason Lee
    November 4th, 2015 @ 7:36 pm

    Ward Cleaver was a badass with pretty good married man game.

  39. Jason Lee
    November 4th, 2015 @ 7:40 pm

    They’re sadomasochists so the thought of societal collapse does not deter them.

  40. Jason Lee
    November 4th, 2015 @ 7:41 pm

    I just hope the Mormons can keep up.

  41. Jason Lee
    November 4th, 2015 @ 7:42 pm

    the “rape culture” she ostensibly decries…

    Key word, ostensibly

  42. ATDavidD
    November 4th, 2015 @ 8:08 pm

    Did none of these women have brothers, fathers, uncles, grandfathers?

    Did none of these women have sisters, mothers, aunts, grandmothers in happy marriages?

    Can none of these women think 20 years into the future? (Gee, where’d everybody go?)

  43. RKae
    November 4th, 2015 @ 8:13 pm

    Hugh Beaumont was actually a Methodist minister. Jerry Mathers and Tony Dow both said that he was like a second father to them and an incredibly nice guy.

    If you want to see some GREAT Hugh Beaumont, check out the film “The 7th Victim.” It’s a creepy old horror flick from the ’40s about a woman who gets sucked into a Satanic cult. Brilliantly done!

  44. Isa
    November 4th, 2015 @ 9:00 pm

    “She plays guitar and sings. She’s a devout Christian girl.”

    is she single? 😛

  45. Mike G.
    November 4th, 2015 @ 9:29 pm

    Why do most people hate feminism?

  46. RS
    November 4th, 2015 @ 10:00 pm

    Of course some, if not most, did have decent home lives–maybe not perfect, but whose is? Unfortunately, they bought into the rhetoric which views such relationships has “trauma bonding” or “false consciousness” all as a result of eons of social construction. That is, these young women have been subjected to psychological abuse by women in power at the various universities they’ve attended. As our host has well-documented, most of these university women are clinically insane. Yet they have enough awareness to engage in destructive experiments upon the young people placed in their charge, all for the sole purpose of destroying society.

  47. DeadMessenger
    November 4th, 2015 @ 10:31 pm

    Of course. That’s why I’m trying to give her away, only she won’t play along.

    She says “I’m not ready.” And I say, “Mary was 14 when she had Jesus. You’re ready. Right now. Go find a husband or I’ll find one for you.”

  48. Ilion
    November 4th, 2015 @ 10:36 pm

    It’s such a shame that I’m already way too old, ’cause I really did want to have children.

    My line has been on the verge of extinction for 200 years (that is, one son per generation surviving to adulthood). My father finally had two … and neither of us have any sons or daughters.

  49. Mike G.
    November 4th, 2015 @ 10:36 pm

    Just wondering Stacy if you have read the SCUM manifesto by Valerie Solanas, circa 1967.

    This woman advocated for the complete elimination of men. Crazy as a sh!t house rat

  50. DeadMessenger
    November 5th, 2015 @ 12:47 am

    Aw, that’s sad.

    But take the girl, and you can adopt. : )