Many Thanks To Katie Packer For “Our Principles PAC”

Posted on | March 14, 2016 | 24 Comments

by Smitty

First, keep calm. Do not let the melodious strains of noise akin to “Jesus Built My Hotrod” that seem to pour forth from the media distract you from the purpose of restoring the country.

We’re going to make it through this. The Civil, First and Second World Wars still eclipse the current insanity for overall threat level to the country.

What’s needful is that we listen to ads like this from TrumpQuestions.com:
And ask yourself: Am I old enough to remember when the leading Republican candidate sound like an adult? Doesn’t seem like it was that long ago.

Category: Republicans

Comments

24 Responses to “Many Thanks To Katie Packer For “Our Principles PAC””

RightofGenghis
March 14th, 2016 @ 8:54 pm

Do you *know* how easy it would be for a competent Republican (I know, I know, as if there were such a creature) to make an ad like this about the things Hillary’s husband actually DID to women – and continues to do?

Her husband actually flew on a private plane to a private sex island with a man who is internationally known for recruiting underage girls for illicit sex with older powerful men. And Hillary supports him to this day. He sexually assaulted multiple women while he was the governor of Arkansas. He forced government employees to recruit women for him to have sex with. And Hillary supported him through it all.

Her husband didn’t just *say* some crude things about some women, he DOES CRUDE THINGS TO YOUNG GIRLS. Donald Trump may say unkind things as a private figure. But Hillary and her husband are FAR MORE DANGEROUS TO WOMEN. They use the power of the government and YOUR TAXPAYER MONEY to systematically enable a serial predator to continue preying on women and girls while she covers it up to advance her access to power.
Southern Air Pirate
March 14th, 2016 @ 10:12 pm

It doesn’t matter. There are some in the left who are willing to stand by and let little girls be raped, to let women be trafficked for sexual purposes and hell even women be groped if she promises to defend women’s rights to abortion as a form of birth control.
Matt_SE
March 15th, 2016 @ 1:21 am

So what you’re saying is, vote Trump or else a Democrat will get elected.

How is this any different from the shit sandwiches the establishment was feeding us for years?
AngelinaPGay
March 15th, 2016 @ 4:48 am

“my .friend’s mate Is getting 98$. HOURLY. on the internet.”….

two days ago new Mc.Laren. F1 bought after earning 18,512$,,,this was my previous month’s paycheck ,and-a little over, 17k$ Last month .,3-5 h/r of work a days ..with extra open doors & weekly. paychecks.. it’s realy the easiest work I have ever Do.. I Joined This 7 months ago and now making over 87$, p/h.Learn. More right Hereoi!430????? http://GlobalSuperEmploymentVacanciesReportsTime/GetPaid/98$hourly…. .?:?:?:?:?:?:?:?:?:?:?:?:?:?:?:?:?:?:?:?:?:?:?:?:?:?:?:?:?:?:?:?:?:?:?:?:?:?:?:?:::::oi!430…..
Quartermaster
March 15th, 2016 @ 5:17 am

I can remember when they sounded like adults, although they lied like children.
daialanye
March 15th, 2016 @ 8:52 am

Correct! The Strumpets need to compare Donnie with Democrats to make him sound electable. If he manages to be nominated the Dems will use his own statements—and his legal problems—to whack him in November.
daialanye
March 15th, 2016 @ 8:52 am

Correct! The Strumpets need to compare Donnie with Democrats to make him sound electable. If he manages to be nominated the Dems will use his own statements—and his legal problems—to whack him in November.
Adobe_Walls
March 15th, 2016 @ 3:08 pm

#NeverKasich
Adobe_Walls
March 15th, 2016 @ 3:08 pm

#NeverKasich
Malkin Blasts Drudge for Cruz Religion Slight | Regular Right Guy
March 15th, 2016 @ 3:12 pm

[…] Many Thanks To Katie Packer For “Our Principles PAC” […]
Adobe_Walls
March 15th, 2016 @ 9:35 pm

Now here is a really neat toy.
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-swing-the-election/
Adobe_Walls
March 15th, 2016 @ 9:35 pm

Now here is a really neat toy.
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-swing-the-election/
Daniel Freeman
March 16th, 2016 @ 4:09 pm

It’s nice to see them implicitly admitting that race heavily influences behavior, and that assortative mating is effectively turning college-educated whites into a separate race. I didn’t really expect 538 to be so politically incorrect.
Daniel Freeman
March 16th, 2016 @ 4:09 pm

It’s nice to see them implicitly admitting that race heavily influences behavior, and that assortative mating is effectively turning college-educated whites into a separate race. I didn’t really expect 538 to be so politically incorrect.
Adobe_Walls
March 16th, 2016 @ 5:18 pm

Did you play with it. For instance no matter how much you adjust the stats for Asians/other the effect is almost nil until you increase turnout and percentage for Pubs by over 200%.
If the percentage of non-college white vote increased by 6 from 63 to 69 Romney would have won with a comfortable margin.
You have to increase Hispanic Pub voters by a ridiculous amount to push Romney over the top.
A small change in Black turnout and/or percentages create significant changes. A small increase in non-college white turnout and percentage makes a dramatic difference.
The long and short is that white voters are still the single most important determinative in an election.
Adobe_Walls
March 16th, 2016 @ 5:18 pm

Did you play with it. For instance no matter how much you adjust the stats for Asians/other the effect is almost nil until you increase turnout and percentage for Pubs by over 200%.
If the percentage of non-college white vote increased by 6 from 63 to 69 Romney would have won with a comfortable margin.
You have to increase Hispanic Pub voters by a ridiculous amount to push Romney over the top.
A small change in Black turnout and/or percentages create significant changes. A small increase in non-college white turnout and percentage makes a dramatic difference.
The long and short is that white voters are still the single most important determinative in an election.
Rick Caird
March 17th, 2016 @ 3:00 pm

Of course, that won’t happen with Hillary. /sarc
Rick Caird
March 17th, 2016 @ 3:00 pm

On no. That’s not true. They have always lied like the pro’s they are.
daialanye
March 17th, 2016 @ 5:09 pm

Hillary appears to have the Attorney General on her side. Many Trump supporters seem to forget that.
Quartermaster
March 17th, 2016 @ 6:31 pm

They’re bad liars. That’s the reason for the comparison to children.
Rick Caird
March 17th, 2016 @ 9:18 pm

Maybe, but a lot of leaks could take that away and still cost Hillary a large amount of support. If it appears she is being allowed to slide on a major felony, it will be the same as being indicted.
daialanye
March 17th, 2016 @ 9:50 pm

There’ve been a thousand leaks already, and with the FBI having demanded yet not getting an indictment the slide has taken place.

No, you’re quite wrong. Only an actual indictment will cause the media to react sufficiently to hurt her more on this issue.

I believe, however, that Hillary can be beaten by any Republican candidate (now down to Trump and Cruz, obviously) who doesn’t by a great stumble give the pro-Hillary media ammunition for a counter-attack.
Rick Caird
March 18th, 2016 @ 3:05 pm

For an alternative opinion:

http://observer.com/2016/03/hillary-has-an-nsa-problem/
Daniel Freeman
March 19th, 2016 @ 12:48 am

Yes, I saw the same things. Pushing Asians makes no diff; pushing Hispanics makes little difference, because of low turnout; pushing black turnout makes a lot of difference because of homogeneity; and pushing whites (especially non-college whites) on either direction or turnout can make a huge difference, because there are so many.