LIVE AT FIVE10.1.10
Posted on | October 1, 2010 | 30 Comments
TOP NEWS
Massive East Coast Storms Blamed For Four Deaths
Gloria Allred Targets Another GOP Candidate For Cali Governor
Equal opportunity barratry
As TARP Nears Its End, White House Claims Cost Will Be Lower
Unexpectedly!
Pakis Cut Afghanistan Supply Line At Khyber Pass After Friendly-Fire Incident On The Border
POLITICS
GOP Unknown Within Striking Distance of Frank in MA-4
“You’ve made this personal. You’re attacking me.” – BAWWWney Frank
Geithner: Economy Needs MOAR STIMULUS
Senate Votes To Turn Down Volume On TV Commercials Before Adjourning
Paladino: Cuomo Took Post-HUD Payoff
THE ECONOMY, STUPID
Health Reform = Fewer Doctors, Med College Group Says
HP Names Ex-SAP Chief As New CEO, Industry Experts & Markets Dubious
J&J, FDA Both Take Flak For Bungled Motrin “Phantom Recall”
White House Pledges Flexibility on McDonald’s Health Care Plan
Substituting salad for fries tentatively approved pending Sebelius decision
SPORTS
Giants Down Snakes 4-1, Clinch Tie For NL West
Padres on brink of elimination after loss to Cubs
Ochocinco’s Charity Cereal Gets The Wrong Number
Oops.
Kobe Says He’ll Play In Exhibition Games
Despite only one practice on surgically repaired knee
AFL-CIO Head Offers To Mediate For NFLPA
2010 MLB Playoffs Hater’s Guide
FAMOUS FOR BEING FAMOUS
Tony Curtis Dies Of Heart Failure, 85
Daughter Jamie Lee Curtis: “He Leaves Behind Families Who Loved Him”
Heidi Montag Calls Off Divorce, Reconciles With Spencer Pratt
J-Lo & Seacrest Already Feuding
Jenny McCarthy: I Wish I Had A Sex Tape
FOREIGNERS
Ex-Guerrilla Could Soon Be Brazil’s First Female President
Ecuador’s President Declares State of Emergency Over National Unrest
Trapped in hospital all day after being tear-gassed by rioting police unhappy with salary cuts, finally freed by troops
PRC Gives Muted Response To House Tariff Bill
Indian Holy Site To Be Divided Between Hindus, Muslims, Court Rules
Oddly, no riot ensues
BLOGS & STUFF
Ben Wetmore Explains CNN Boat Sex Prank
Feds Put Arm On NYC To Change Street Signs For Safety Reasons – In 15 Years
Craig Newmark: NPR To Be Dominant Media Player in 2020
More Adventures In Police Professionalism
— compiled by Wombat
Comments
30 Responses to “LIVE AT FIVE10.1.10”
October 1st, 2010 @ 9:01 am
Do you realize that the usage of the word “Paki” in supplement to the proper usage “Pakistani” isn’t appropriate and maybe offensive?
October 1st, 2010 @ 9:03 am
Obviously not. Welp.
October 1st, 2010 @ 9:05 am
And shouldn’t that be “in place of the proper usage…”? Your poor grammar is inappropriate to the tone of this blog and definitely offensive. 😉
October 1st, 2010 @ 9:47 am
The word “Paki” has a more broader (and less concrete) meaning/usage than “Pakistani” (which is very concrete). I assumed you intended to use the word “Pakis” as a supplement (adding the pejorative element) than just a substitute to citizens (/the administration) of Pakistan. But, since you accept your ignorance, it seems i was wrong in my assumption (but not in my grammar as you had assumed :)).
Anyway, English isn’t my first language and i apologize for any (further) lowering of ToM standards for language in the comment section. But i can assure you i can’t be worse than Kojocaro, a frequent ToM participant.
October 1st, 2010 @ 10:06 am
You are correct that your assumption was wrong. I’m merely following British tabloid usage in using it as a substitute (with the intent of saving space) rather than the intent of being deliberately offensive.
October 1st, 2010 @ 10:23 am
Wait a sec..
this doesn’t pass the smell test.
British press (even the Tabloids) in particularly is very sensitive to the usage of the word “Paki”.
I challenge you to show just one such usage (substitute for “Pakistani”) in a headline from The Sun, The Daily Mirror, News of the World or any other lesser tabloids.
(What you will be guaranteed to find though, is that almost all “Paki” references are ‘news’ about ethical slurs.)
October 1st, 2010 @ 10:43 am
Apparently, you were not that intent in saving space in using the phrase “Afghanistan Supply Line” in the same sentence.
I understand you weren’t deliberately offensive, and most people take it at face value, but your explanations about “tabloid usages” and “saving space” are unnecessary and counter productive.
October 1st, 2010 @ 10:58 am
Because if I’d used a/s/l it would have changed the entire meaning, no? Look, you asked me why I used “Pakis” instead of spelling out “Pakistanis” and I told you. If my usage is archaic and you don’t like my other reason either, see comment #2.
October 1st, 2010 @ 1:31 pm
I don’t mind your “saving space” reason, anyone can be sloppy in writing a headline, but your claim that you were “merely following British tabloid usage” is demonstrably false. False memory, an attempt to find an excuse*, or something else made you make that statement, its for your to reflect upon. Could be a nice learning experience.
*In the interest of being open myself, my explanation in comment #4 is shamelessly self-justifying. You were right about my usage of the word “supplement”. It was wrong. I intended to use “substitute” (“in place of” would convey the same message) but became a bit sloppy while writing that sentence (Its true though, English is not my first language). I just went along to make a convoluted argument to prove you wrong, instead of accepting my own fault. I see, I’m not alone here. But then you were not as convincing/good at it, as i was 🙂
October 1st, 2010 @ 11:00 pm
I, personally, could give a fuck if the entire nation of Pakistan reared up on their piss-stained hind legs at once and took umbrage with a shortening of their name.
But I don’t.
Fuck Pakistan, and India too.