Mike Malloy Progressively Throws Tornado Victims Under The Bus

Posted on | March 5, 2012 | 15 Comments

by Smitty

Hopefully the victims of the horrible, fluke, freak tornadoes will get a shout out from #OccupyResoluteDesk at his “squelch the Super Tuesday” news conference. May the Lord have mercy on Mike Malloy:

I thought that one of the tenets of liberalism was sympathy for victims. Oh wait, there is some fine print: “Except bitter cling-on conservatives”.

via Bluegrass Pundit

Or maybe he can talk about this, via Hot Air:

Update: linked by The Lonely Conservative.

Category: Progressivism

Comments

15 Responses to “Mike Malloy Progressively Throws Tornado Victims Under The Bus”

AnonymousDrivel
March 5th, 2012 @ 8:58 pm

So he knows the people who were killed were Bible-Clingers based on the rubble? (Not that it would make any difference to his obscenity, but what if they were, oh, I dunno, Atheistic Obamabots?)

He’s pathological.
smitty
March 5th, 2012 @ 9:54 pm

Stereotypical Lefty Geo-Religious Bigotry (SLGRB).
Dianna Deeley
March 5th, 2012 @ 9:55 pm

That pretty much covers what I was thinking, yes.
Libtalker Mike Malloy Mocks Tornado Victims | The Lonely Conservative
March 5th, 2012 @ 9:55 pm

[…] can call conservative women sluts and the c-word, Malloy, too, will be given a pass. Disgusting.H/T Smitty at The Other McCainTweetvaso linkTags: Christians, Mike Malloy, mocks, nasty, tornadoes This entry was posted on […]
Dave C
March 5th, 2012 @ 10:01 pm

No ability for nuance at all..

No chance that a left winger could have been next door neighbors with a right winger and both of their houses have been demolished?

nah, it’s flyover country.. they’re all right wingers according to Malloy.
Rightklik
March 5th, 2012 @ 10:46 pm

Carbonite and ProFlowers will dump him now, right?
Evi L. Bloggerlady
March 5th, 2012 @ 11:12 pm

Did Obama call the victims?
Adjoran
March 6th, 2012 @ 12:35 am

People sometimes look at me funny when I tell them leftists have no soul, that we can never reach any sort of accommodation with them on anything and there is no point in trying – the only possible results would be frustration or our side giving up something for nothing in return, because they never negotiate in good faith and cannot, for they have no good faith.

Yet they keep piling up examples – Malloy, Maher, Maddow, Olbermann, Schultz, O’Donnell, Kos, and hundreds of others who regularly wish death and use gutter language and epithets on our side. But let Limbaugh retaliate – mildly, in comparison to their side’s normal fare – and it is as if the sky was falling in.

Rush was stupid to say it and right to apologize – one, because we should be better than that (it was possible to laugh at the sex she must be having without calling her names), and two, because we had the moral high ground in the debate which has now turned into a circus where the real topic is lost.
DaveP.
March 6th, 2012 @ 3:14 am

Don’t forget Michael Moore, who on 9-11-01 declared that he “didn’t understand why” those planes had crashed into NYC buildings full of good Democrats (who, by context, weere sympatico with the hijcakers) instead of Texas high-rises full of Rethuglicans.
FenelonSpoke
March 6th, 2012 @ 7:36 am

I trust nobody is surprised by this. If quite a number of people who were hit by tornadoes were Christians and Mike Malloy gets some perverse satisfaction from mocking them he’s not only insenstive,but behaving as one would expect since the Bible says “Blessed are you when people insult you….” (Mattthew 5:11)
Suddenly liberals are talking about God and not Global warming?LOL.I am a Christian, but people saying”God got you!” in reference to natural disasters is equally objectionable when anyone-religious or non religious-does it:http://senseofevents.blogspot.com/2012/03/tornados-and-disaster-drivel.html
Bob Belvedere
March 6th, 2012 @ 7:58 am

Will he visit the area?
ThePaganTemple
March 6th, 2012 @ 8:59 am

I agree with everything you said here with the exception of “we should be better than that”. Number one, we are already better than the leftists, but you can’t fight these scum by the Marquis of Queensbury rules, because they’ll bury you with them.

Fight smartly, yes. But not nicely.
ThePaganTemple
March 6th, 2012 @ 9:03 am

Par for the course. If instead of West Liberty the tornado had destroyed Louisville, this creep would be crying and moaning about it and demanding a trillion dollars in funds to help them rebuild, because of course Louisville is the most left-leaning area of the state.

This is why I don’t nor never will cry when one of these asshats catches a bullet.
Pathfinder's wife
March 6th, 2012 @ 10:35 am

Heh, let him mock — the wheel of fortune doesn’t stop; who was on top today may find himself on the bottom tomorrow. The wheels of fortune are beginning to turn (but where it will stop is anybody’s guess).
It would be wise to be humble, patient, and kind when a person is in a position of power, but the opposite has been chosen — so if you freely choose your karma, don’t come crying when it turns out to be the proverbial female dog, or decisions have consequences.
People like him have been around for a long time; their fates make for interesting study in lessons that should be learned and not repeated (yet they always are).
SDN
March 6th, 2012 @ 10:36 am

People sometimes look at me funny when I tell them leftists have no
soul, that we can never reach any sort of accommodation with them on
anything and there is no point in trying – the only possible results
would be frustration or our side giving up something for nothing in
return, because they never negotiate in good faith and cannot, for they
have no good faith.

Of course, you refuse to take the argument to its’ logical conclusion: if we can’t trust them, we can’t live in the same society with them. Removing them will require the same treatment as our Founders gave the Tories: war, followed by exile or death.

I’d rather fight that war now than bequeath it to my grandchildren.