‘Limited Scientific Evidence’
Posted on | March 25, 2023 | 1 Comment
Are you kidding me with this? What kind of “journalism” is being practiced at NPR? Perhaps the kind in which ordinary common sense is prohibited. You don’t need an advanced degree in biology to know that the average man is 5-foot-10 and the average woman is 5-foot-5. And these average differences have a profound effect when considering the tail ends of the bell curve distributions. A man who is 5-foot-5 (the average height of a woman) is at the eight percentile (bottom 8%) of the male distribution; in other words, 92% of men are taller than the average woman. A man who is 6 feet tall is at the 84th percentile of the male distribution, whereas a 6-foot-tall woman is at the 99th percentile of the female distribution. So in a randomly selected group of 100 men, you’ll find 16 guys who are 6 feet tall. To find 16 women who are 6 feet tall, you’ll need to be choosing from a group of more than 1,500 women.
This is just basic statistics, using a single metric, based on information anybody can find with Google. There are other metrics we could consult. The world record for the 100-meter sprint is 9.58 seconds, set by Usain Bolt in 2009; the women’s world record, 10.45, was set by Florence Griffith-Joyner in 1988. The women’s record has stood for 35 years, which should suffice to suggest that it represents pretty much the maximum feasible speed by a female runner. Last year in the Southeastern Conference men’s 100-meter finals, how many of the male finalists ran faster than Griffith-Joyner’s world-record 10.45 seconds? The answer: All of them. And this is routine — that is to say, all competitive male sprinters outrun Flo Jo’s female world-record time, in every college track meet in America. “Limited scientific evidence”?
Imagine the epistemic closure you have to be living amidst to think that this sentence wouldn't instantly be flagged as a brazen lie.
Now realize that total institutional capture has made this deranged echo chamber encompass a significant chunk of the liberal public. https://t.co/MSPZGtF0y4
— Wesley Yang (@wesyang) March 25, 2023
Limited evidence: compare the stats in every men’s sport vs every women’s sport. https://t.co/3KTWGivyVw
— Noam Blum (@neontaster) March 25, 2023
NPR is funded by American taxpayers despite zero scientific evidence of any benefit to society. https://t.co/OHS7nKnrcD
— Christina Pushaw ? ?? (@ChristinaPushaw) March 25, 2023
Being a traditionalist, I can’t resist an ironic smile at the strange fruit now being produced by the feminist tree of Equality. For decades, feminists have assaulted any all-male institution as inherently unfair, but now you have men pretending to be women in order to access all-female institutions and suddenly the absurdity of Equality is apparent to everyone. The fact that militant feminists like Meghan Murphy now find themselves siding with conservatives vindicates what I’ve been saying for years: Never bet against the Gods of the Copybook Headings.
(Hat-tip: John Hoge.)
Comments
One Response to “‘Limited Scientific Evidence’”
April 2nd, 2023 @ 12:51 am
[…] ‘Limited Scientific Evidence’ A View From The Beach EBL 357 Magnum […]