The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

If You Don’t Like Slut As A Title For Sandra Fluke, How About Czar?

Posted on | March 3, 2012 | 37 Comments

by Smitty

In the annals of sluttiness, the Sandra Fluke story is some form of higher-order prostitution. Let’s call it politics. Some don’t like calling the woman a slut. Concur.

  • Her sexuality really should be a private matter, irrespective of her insistence on making it public. That goes both for media and funding.
  • The point at hand is really far greater than the number of men/women/who_knows? that have used Fluke like a trampoline.

I, for one, rejoice that Limbaugh decided to punt on the hunt for a term more blunt to describe this runt and her risible stunt. Likely a criticism shunt.

Director Blue gets at that pesky reality swirling in the distance, away from Fluke:

Meanwhile, Iran still is moving ahead with their plans for nuclear terrorism, gas prices are poised to hit $5/gal. and real inflation is moving toward 10%. And Obama wants free contraceptives. Happy to see that Democrats have their heads screwed on straight.

Also, the President’s budget, again, is a turd, while Harry Reid’s constipation rages and he won’t even leave one. The deficit is about to wrap around the moon. &c, &c, &c.

This entire contraception debate is a twofer: it both destroys and distracts. When you understand that the Administration is purely about destroying this country, all of this idiocy comes into diabolical focus.

What will Sandra Fluke’s Czar title be in the next Obama Administration? I like Postmodern Absurd Distraction Czar. Your suggestions in the comments.

Update: linked at The Conservatory. Jonas Brother? I was think more Andrew Ian Dodge, myself, not to make light of a serious Senate candidate. At least the Maine-iacs won’t be eating any more yellow Snowe.

Category: Blogging

Comments

37 Responses to “If You Don’t Like Slut As A Title For Sandra Fluke, How About Czar?”

  1. Now, This Is Just Mean
    March 3rd, 2012 @ 9:50 am

    […] Baby, you can drive my car. Yes, I’m gonna be a Czar. […]

  2. Dandapani
    March 3rd, 2012 @ 9:54 am

    Cunning stunt!

  3. Pathfinder's wife
    March 3rd, 2012 @ 10:06 am

    What I find darkly humorous is a Georgetown law student bemoaning the choice between contraceptives and food/education.
    Pretty sure if you can afford Georgetown, you can afford the pill or at least condoms…and afford to eat pretty well too.

  4. Steve Burri
    March 3rd, 2012 @ 10:20 am

    Systematic Legerdemain Utilizing Triviality Czar

  5. FenelonSpoke
    March 3rd, 2012 @ 10:34 am

    Czarina of Grandstanding and Political Spectacles.

  6. Pathfinder's wife
    March 3rd, 2012 @ 10:53 am

    Panty Exchequer, Department of Radical Secularism

  7. Stan Brewer
    March 3rd, 2012 @ 11:14 am

     All of those people that have trashed Rush Limbaugh for calling a spade a spade. He spoke the truth and he got excoriated for it. Well, now that he is being vindicated, will we get any apologies from those that did that? Probably not.

  8. LD Jackson
    March 3rd, 2012 @ 11:19 am

    It is really getting tiresome to see all of the headlines about this. As you said, it is distracting from the real issues at hand.You can be sure of one thing. President Obama is going to milk this for all Ira worth. The longer he does, the longer he can keep the real news out of the headlines.

  9. Pres. Obama Calls 30-Year-Old Law Student Sandra Fluke after Limbaugh Called Her Crass Names « Frugal Café Blog Zone
    March 3rd, 2012 @ 11:44 am

    […] Hollywood celebrities, both male and female, barely raise an eyebrow, as wrong as I think Rush Limbaugh was in calling Fluke a slut this week on his radio broadcast because she wants taxpayer-funded birth control, I am dumbfounded […]

  10. ThePaganTemple
    March 3rd, 2012 @ 12:12 pm

    This is real news. This is more of the left trying to force their social ideology on all Americans through the universities, mainstream media, courts, and government. Actually, they would prefer you focus on the economy. They and their media toadies can always blame it on Bush when things go bad and insist we need more, not less, government involvement. And the more government control we get over the economy, the more we get over every other area of life, this story being just one example of which people need to be aware.

    Or don’t you think its relevant that universities, hospitals, charities, and insurance providers are being forced to offer contraceptive coverage whether they want to or not? Do you think the founders would have been all right with that?

    What do you think they would have been more concerned with, government forcing American businesses to sell or not to sell a product at a certain mandated price, or the unemployment rate?

  11. rosalie
    March 3rd, 2012 @ 12:17 pm

    I think Stacy’s latest tweet will have to be considered.

  12. JeffS
    March 3rd, 2012 @ 12:24 pm

    Heh!  Nicely put, Smitty.  I quoted you over at Paco’s place.

  13. Serfer1962
    March 3rd, 2012 @ 12:37 pm

    Screwing 3 times a night! After a couple of weeks I’d want a vacation.

  14. ThePaganTemple
    March 3rd, 2012 @ 12:58 pm

     A vacation? After a couple of weeks I’d be dead.

  15. Adjoran
    March 3rd, 2012 @ 12:59 pm

     By the way, she is NOT a “23 year old c0ed” at all – at least not anymore.  She’s a 30 year old activist.  It’s not clear that she is enrolled at Georgetown now.

  16. JeffS
    March 3rd, 2012 @ 1:12 pm

    That’s because neither of you are professionals.  Or even highly enthusiastic amateurs.

  17. tranquil.night
    March 3rd, 2012 @ 1:21 pm

    Guy Fawkes would be proud Smit =3

    relativism delenda est

  18. justaconservativegirl
    March 3rd, 2012 @ 1:27 pm

    Thanks for the linky love.  Always appreciated.  

  19. Datechguy's Blog » Blog Archive » AUL, Dana Loesch and Amy Farah Fowler on the “Con” » Datechguy's Blog
    March 3rd, 2012 @ 1:45 pm

    […] 2: Smitty: the President’s budget, again, is a turd, while Harry Reid’s constipation rages and he won’t […]

  20. Wombat_socho
    March 3rd, 2012 @ 1:49 pm

     She is. The President of GU and the law faculty did a release defending her from “vilification”.

  21. richard mcenroe
    March 3rd, 2012 @ 1:58 pm

     Does the Georgetown Law Faculty encourage attempted perjury?  Worth knowing.

  22. ThePaganTemple
    March 3rd, 2012 @ 2:53 pm

     Good sex is like a great T-Bone steak. But if you have it that often eventually it would get to be like eating pinto beans and cornbread every night for days and weeks on end.

  23. JeffS
    March 3rd, 2012 @ 3:23 pm

    I agree.  But I forgot to add the “‘/sarc” tag.

  24. It’s Not About Sandra Fluke, or Rush Limbaugh, or Contraception — Jeffrey A. Setaro
    March 3rd, 2012 @ 3:43 pm

    […] If You Don’t Like Slut As A Title For Sandra Fluke, How About Czar? – Smitty, The Other McCain Share this: Filed Under: Culture, Politics Tagged With: Contraception, Rush Limbaugh, Sandra Fluke About JeffJeff Setaro is a 40 something IT professional and sometimes photographer from Connecticut. […]

  25. Adjoran
    March 3rd, 2012 @ 3:58 pm

     Maybe if she would get off her back and go to class instead of constantly going through contraceptives, she could graduate.

  26. Adjoran
    March 3rd, 2012 @ 4:00 pm

     It depends upon what your definition of “is” is.

  27. Adjoran
    March 3rd, 2012 @ 4:01 pm

    White House Office of Reproductive Enforcement.

  28. Cut Diseases, Cancer, Health Care Costs — Without Spending A Dime « Truth Before Dishonor
    March 3rd, 2012 @ 5:14 pm

    […] If You Don’t Like Slut As A Title For Sandra Fluke, How About Czar? by Smitty In the annals of sluttiness, the Sandra Fluke story is some form of higher-order prostitution. Let’s call it politics. … […]

  29. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    March 3rd, 2012 @ 5:58 pm

    Joke of the day:  Sarah Fluke…  

  30. ThePaganTemple
    March 3rd, 2012 @ 11:03 pm

     Going to class isn’t worth much if you can’t keep your mind on the subject. She might do all right though, if her professor was named something like Peter Dick Cockman.

  31. Adjoran
    March 3rd, 2012 @ 11:20 pm

    Aren’t they all?

  32. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    March 4th, 2012 @ 4:43 am

    I linked you here…

  33. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    March 4th, 2012 @ 4:52 am

    I added to that post a suggestion for Ms. Fluke.  That she adopt Stacy McCain’s habit of shaking the tip jar.  

  34. 1389
    March 4th, 2012 @ 9:04 am

     In other words, see you next Tuesday. LOL…

  35. McGehee
    March 4th, 2012 @ 9:49 am

    “Slut” is nowhere near as insulting as “electable.” They both mean the same thing but at least the four-letter one is less likely to do it in front of the entire country.

  36. Pathfinder's wife
    March 4th, 2012 @ 10:41 am

    I beg to differ, but with a caveat: it is only worthwhile if the object of one’s lust is also the object of one’s love (which kinda precludes the multiple partner or friendly acquaintance thing).

    This of course also sets the stage for not being let down when age and infirmity (or stress, lack of time, whatever) makes such feats no longer possible.

    In short, sexual relations within a committed pair bond (which usually means marriage in most human societies)…it’s outstanding; people should try it more.

  37. Bob Belvedere
    March 4th, 2012 @ 4:56 pm

    I’d need about a gallon of Lanacane or Gold Bond Cream.