The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Obligatory WikiLeaks Apocalypse Post

Posted on | November 28, 2010 | 23 Comments

The biggest headline of the massive 250,000-document dump by Julian Assange’s organization is probably this:

Prince Abdullah: Neo-Con Warhawk?

Dude. When it turns out Saudi royalty is on the same page with Bill Kristol vis-a-vis the need to bomb Iran, you know Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s regime is in trouble.

More seriously: This WikiLeaks dump is extraordinarily damaging to U.S. foreign policy. It impairs the trust of our allies if their confidential communications with our diplomats are not secure. Even the New York Times — which for 40 years has had an unstated editorial policy of undermining America’s national security at every opportunity — feels the need to defend itself for reporting on these leaks.

The investigation to find the persons inside the U.S. government responsible for these disclosures should be a top administration priority, and Congress should hold hearings into the evident laxity with classified information. The White House issues a bland statement, but am I the only one who has noticed that WikiLeaks didn’t seem to have unfettered access to America’s top secrets until the Obama administration came to town?

Massive aggregation at Memeorandum, with more reports from Spiegel, Haaretz, The Hill and the Wall Street Journal, and blog commentary by Moe LaneWeasel Zippers, Legal Insurrection,  Yid With LidOutside the Beltway, Melissa ClouthierDonald Douglas at American PowerGateway PunditInstapundit and Vodkapundit. Dude, that’s a lot of “pundits.”

UPDATE: Welcome, Instapundit readers!

Bookmark and Share

Comments

  • Vermontaigne

    It’s pretty astounding that a couple guys could have such broadly unfettered access to that amount and variety of info without being detected by some kind of monitoring software. Naturally, the Iranians, having just been slammed by the Stuxnet geniuses, think that it’s all a US ploy. I’d call 2.5 million documents a pretty elaborate one.

  • Pingback: Instapundit » Blog Archive » ROGER SIMON: Sleazy WikiLeaks Meets the Digital Ninnies of the State Department. “The criminality …

  • MrPaulRevere

    This stooge Assange should become intimate with a rope. Having said that, since the info is out there I feel free to comment on it. A cold chill ran up my spine when I saw this at Hot Air: ” The Americans are also worried about Davutoglu’s alleged neo-Ottoman visions. A high-ranking government adviser warned in discussions, quoted by the US diplomats, that Davutoglu would use his Islamist influence on Erdogan, describing him as “exceptionally dangerous.” According to the US document, another adviser to the ruling AKP party remarked, probably ironically, that Turkey wanted “to take back Andalusia and avenge the defeat at the siege of Vienna in 1683.”

  • http://ilovegrover.com/ Thane_Eichenauer

    If Saudi Arabia wants to bomb Iran, what is stopping them? As for damage to US (imperial) foreign policy – foo on that. If the US wasn’t far too open to bombing other countries because some other foreign leader egged us on then the US government wouldn’t be in this fix in the first place. To me this has a very beneficial effect if it motivates foreign governments from rattling US sabers by proxy. If Saudi Arabia is going to attack Iran, there is nothing stopping them so long as they are ready to pay for their own attacks with their own money as well as risking their own pilots. It is long past time that the US Army and the United States should be cast as the evil empire. Let other countries defend themselves.
    “But she goes not abroad, in search of monsters to destroy.”John Quincy Adams

  • greybeard3

    “The investigation to find the persons inside the U.S. government responsible for these disclosures should be a top administration priority…”

    Ummm…I’m guessing that leaking a bunch of dox that damage this country’s foreign policy and its security ARE a “top administration priority.” No ****ing WAY a trove this big made it into the public sphere without the active assistance of at least mid-level officials. And also no ****ing way all these were dumped by a single disgruntled Army PFC warming a chair deep in the bowels of the Pentagon.

  • http://www.redstateeclectic.typepad.com AngelaTC

    Saudi Arabia wants to bomb Iran because the Sunni hate the Shia. Nuclear weapons is just their “Let’s give ‘em a reason!” They want us to do it because, as Bin Laden reminded us, Muslims on Muslim killing is prohibited by the Q’ran.

    The cables also point out that the Saudis are still the largest financiers of the Al Qaeda terrorists, and Iran is still supports the rebel dissidents in Saudi Arabia.

    And people honestly think we should still be involved in this Eastern religious crap, no matter how economically devastating it is to our country? We are so screwed.

  • Joe

    “The White House issues a bland statement, but am I the only one who has noticed that WikiLeaks didn’t seem to have unfettered access to America’s top secrets until the Obama administration came to town?”

    Should I yell bingo or yatzee?

    But I am sure Team Obama will get McGruff the Crime Dog and Patrick Fitzgerald on the case to track down the responsible* party

    *all blame leads to George W. Bush.

  • Mpeanut

    Sorry, I think you’re wrong. The siprnet has always had what I considered too much access. Having a security clearance is one thing, another part of it is having a “need to know”. The siprnet doesn’t do a good job of enforcing that requirement. It really could be one guy.

  • Pingback: WIKILEAKS – IT’S A GUSHER! | The News of World

  • Guest

    >Muslims on Muslim killing is prohibited by the Q’ran.

    Really? Does that mean Al Qaeda is going to Muslim hell? In case anyone hasn’t noticed, Al Qaeda has killed a lot more Muslims than infidels. For instance, look what they did in Fallujah, Ramadi, etc or anywhere they have been in power.

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/EU5DQWQTTHTPO4A4ZYSL3AAV2U Adjoran

    I hardly think Obama or his team is behind the leaks, since this batch exposes the cynicism and incompetence of his Administration, including the SecState, who might otherwise be a suspect.

    The perp bragged how he was able to do it by taking a CD-RW into work, with music, playing the music as he erased it and replaced with downloaded data for hours every day for months. The punk should be charged with the maximum for each document, and never see the light of day.

    Back when our security apparatus was directed by those with cojones, one might expect Assange to meet with an unfortunate accident. As it is, President Prissy-face will issue a sternly-worded statement, and threaten to issue an even more sternly-worded one if that doesn’t do the trick, whatever it is.

  • JeffS

    I gotta go with Mpeanut. SIPRNET has long been a security nightmare. A very small group of people with the right access could have copied the files very easily.

  • JeffS

    Ever hear this story? It was created around the first Gulf War…..

    Two soldiers are sitting in Saudi Arabia, before the big push into Kuwait. One of them asks, “Hey, didja hear that the Saudi’s have a new national anthem?”

    “No, what is it?”

    “Onward, Christian Soldiers!”

    “HAW!! Good one!”

    “OK, so tell me, what’s the new Israeli national anthem?”

    “I give up!”

    “Onward, Christian Soldiers!”

    ——————–

    The point being what AngeleTC said: for the Saudis, it’s a religious war. The Shi’ite / Sunni rift is a deep and bloody one, but the Saudis prefer to keep their hands clean. They’ll try to entice us into whomping the Iranians, which is why the House of Saud has always been “neo-con warhawk”. Against certain targets, anywho.

    But the only thing stopping the Saudis from attacking Iran are the Saudis.

  • JeffS

    Ever hear of the Ten Commandments? Specifically, “Thou Shalt Not Kill”?

    Yet there have been Christian-on-Christian wars for centuries. Religious laws always have a loop hole.

    I recall that there was some rational for AQ killing Muslims — something about supporting infidels, IIRC.

    Remember, Islam is a religion where “temporary marriage” can be an accepted euphemism for “prostitution.”

  • http://www.redstateeclectic.typepad.com AngelaTC

    Uh, I don’t think Al Qaeda was ever in charge of those regions. The insurgents fighting off the US occupation were a hodge-podge of forces.

  • Pingback: The Wikileaks you will never see UPDATE: Hank Stolz make a great point « Da Techguy's Blog

  • Pingback: Applesauce » The five most shocking revelations from Wikileaks release of diplomatic cables

  • Pingback: WikiLeaks « Ric's Rulez

  • http://twitter.com/theoriginalCL Michael Todd

    What “We the People” need more than anything is massive doses of sunlight shed on all aspects of our government. Foreign policy doesn’t exist in a vacuum, it is worthy of every bit as much criticism as everything else.

    What happened to the conservatism that held power in deep distrust? A conservatism that hails State secrets is not one born of Burke, Kirk, Nisbet, Taft, or anybody else of genuine wisdom. A sad commentary on conservatism indeed. Conservatism apparently hearts the State as much as the left. Sad indeed.

  • Anonymous

    “am I the only one who has noticed that WikiLeaks didn’t seem to have unfettered access to America’s top secrets until the Obama administration came to town?”

    1) “America” doesn’t have any secrets. America’s government has secrets, for pretty much the same reasons as Pablo Escobar had secrets.

    2) It was during the previous administration that Wikileaks published the US manual for conduct of war crimes at Guantanamo Bay. Given the lead time involved in most Wikileaks releases, it’s nearly certain that they procured the 6,780 Congressional Research Service reports they published on February 7, 2009, during that previous administration as well.

    3) The only thing Wikileaks has “damaged” is the ability of America’s idiot politicians to pursue cockamamie schemes without the people who foot the bill knowing about it.

  • http://ak4mc.us/cms/ McGehee

    Saudi Arabia wants to bomb Iran because the Sunni hate the Shia.

    Actually I think it’s more venal than that — Arabia wants to keep Iran from becoming the unchallengeable dominant force in the Gulf.

    The Gulf states certainly had no love for fellow Sunni Saddam Hussein. During the Iran-Iraq war the Gulf emirs rooted for both sides to lose.

  • http://therepublicanmother.blogspot.com republicanmother

    Word. I distrust every square inch of the federal government and think that sunlight, no matter how it comes is a good thing. Under the National Security Act, the feds have had free reign to do whatever they please overseas, the Founders would be horrified. But it’s in America’s best interest! Says who? Them? hahaha. As always, to answer every earthly question, follow the money.

  • Pingback: Cui Malo* « The Camp Of The Saints

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE