The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

If We Outlaw Martian Voting, Then The 2012 Election Will Be Swarmed By Disenfrachised Martian ‘Voters’

Posted on | June 20, 2011 | 29 Comments

by Smitty

Does anybody understand the meaning of this buffoonery from E.J. Dionne, Junior? Emphasis mine throughout the post.

Rigging the 2012 Election

WASHINGTON — An attack on the right to vote is under way across the country through laws designed to make it more difficult to cast a ballot. If this were happening in an emerging democracy, we’d condemn it as election-rigging. But it’s happening here, so there’s barely a whimper.

The laws are being passed in the name of preventing “voter fraud.” But study after study has shown that fraud by voters is not a major problem — and is less of a problem than how hard many states make it for people to vote in the first place. Some of the new laws, such as limiting the number of days for early voting, have little plausible connection to battling fraud.

These statutes are not neutral. Their greatest impact will be to reduce turnout among African-Americans, Latinos and the young. It is no accident that these groups were key to Barack Obama’s victory in 2008 — or that the laws in question are being enacted in states where Republicans control state governments.

How, precisely? How would it follow that treating the identification requirement to vote as similar to, say, checking in for a flight (as distinct from clearing the TSA), reduce turnout?

Paradoxically, the rank partisanship of these measures is discouraging the media from reporting plainly on what’s going on. Voter suppression so clearly benefits the Republicans that the media typically report this through a partisan lens, knowing that accounts making clear whom these laws disenfranchise would be labeled as biased by the right. But the media should not fear telling the truth or standing up for the rights of the poor or the young.

Wait, E.J.: shouldn’t you establish that voter suppression has occurred, prior to connecting that dot to any major party? Oh, yeah: that would be an example of an honest argument. Given that you are sort of without fact #1 to stand on, it more logically follows that you’d not bore your reader with those pesky ‘fact’ things.

Sometimes the partisan motivation is so clear that if Stephen Colbert reported on what’s transpiring, his audience would assume he was making it up. In Texas, for example, the law allows concealed handgun licenses to work as identification, but not student IDs. And guess what? Nationwide exit polls show that John McCain carried households in which someone owned a gun by 25 percentage points but lost voters in households without a gun by 32 points.

Stephen Colbert is a comedian; do you normally accept his show as fact, E.J.? And what a crappy correlation==causation argument you have here. Could it be that student identification is insufficiently rigorous? Can you check in for the aforementioned plane flight with a student ID? I would be generally surprised if you could.

In part because of a surge of voters who had not cast ballots before, the United States elected its first African-American president in 2008. Are we now going to witness a subtle return of Jim Crow voting laws?

Given the systemic intellectual dishonesty of your post, Dionne, it strikes me that the greater threat to the integrity of the vote is from the Left, which, having spewed such inflammatory lies as contained in your column, will be forced to back up the lies with various acts of propaganda.

Whether or not these laws can be rolled back, their existence should unleash a great civic campaign akin to the voter registration drives of the civil rights years. The poor, the young and people of color should get their IDs, flock to the polls and insist on their right to vote in 2012.

Why, yes: yes, they should. Legally. They call these events ‘elections’.

If voter suppression is to occur, let it happen for all to see. The whole world, which watched us with admiration and respect in 2008, will be watching again.

Taken slightly out of context, as snarky post as this, the last paragraph almost seems a threat. But E.J. is a swell guy, and he would never do anything less that fair, balanced, honest, honorable, morally sound, and highly respectable. We just have to make sure the little green men don’t get too near his polling place.

On the other hand, Legal Insurrection, looking on the bright side, figures it might allow time for a vacation.

Bookmark and Share
Category: Uncategorized

Comments

  • DaveO

    BLUF: Dionne writes to protect the Democrat Party’s campaign to de-legitimize the keystone of democracy: the vote.

    What is not written is that there are enough people who vote Democrat who are either non citizens, or have legitimately lost their right to vote. This bloc of voters is very, very important to Democrats – it is the key bloc that helps them win most of their elections each cycle.

    That Dionne hates democracy that much is a given. That anyone buys the argument that any American citizen can’t prove who they are a dozen times over, with photographs and biometric means, regardless of age, race, income and education level is just pathetic.

  • Anonymous

    Doesn’t Texas law specifically require that illegal aliens be allowed to attend state schools and colleges and therefore be given student Ids?

  • Pingback: Rock ‘N’ Fisk Hootchie Koo « The Camp Of The Saints

  • http://thecampofthesaints.org Bob Belvedere

    Quoted from and Linked to at:
    Rock ‘N’ Fisk Hootchie Koo

  • http://thecampofthesaints.org Bob Belvedere

    If we outlaw Martian voting, only the humans will have guns…or something…I don’t know.

  • Anonymous

    So basically this article says that criminals only vote for Democrats. Coincidence Nixon is sure.

  • Jeff

    Voter verification is about the plain facts, about the truth. Neo-liberalism is a revolt against facts and truth.

  • http://leatherpenguin.com/wordpress/ TC_LeatherPenguin

    So, in Dionne’s view, all these people who will be “disenfranchised” are too feeble and/or stupid to get and present a form of ID needed by every adult to do pretty much anything, economically speaking? And isn’t inherently racist for Dionne to claim it is black and brown folks who are so stupid?

  • Crawford

    Why did the world watch us with “admiration and respect” in 2008? Because we elected a clown?

  • Anamika

    No one’s laughing at your rotten attempt at an anti-Obama joke. Please stop acting like a clown on an eclectic conservative forum. On a serious note i think the world took a welcome pause in 2008 as they got tired of Bush being the butt of all jokes.

  • http://2011.ak4mc.us/ McGehee

    But we’re all laughing at what a clown you are, and what a clown you’re defending.

  • Pingback: States That Require Photo ID to Vote Are #Raaaaacist! « That Mr. G Guy's Blog

  • http://thatmrgguy.wordpress.com/ Mike

    Linked here http://wp.me/pTkxi-KB “States That Require Photo ID To Vote Are Raaaaacist “

  • Anonymous

    We allow people into the country legally to study; doesn’t  mean they are allowed to vote. That’s why a student ID is unacceptable.

  • http://thecampofthesaints.org Bob Belvedere

    The quality of our clowns is second-to-none.  When Americans go, we go all the way.

  • Anonymous

    Dingbat.

  • Anamika

    Your self-awareness is commendable — but not your extrapolation of it over everyone else.

  • Anonymous

    By all means we should help the people who genuinely need assistance to get registered and get to the polls. I’m tired of bending over backwards for the rest of the whiners though.

    Let’s end this ridiculous notion that it is some sort of tragedy if people who are too damned apathetic to go through a basic registration process and show up at a polling place don’t bother to vote, because it’s not. If I could afford to, I would run ads before elections trying to discourage these easily discouraged and indifferent types. It would be a public service. The engaged voters of all stripes would vote anyway. The slackers? Who cares?

  • Anonymous

    I used to think I was witty then I quite drinking and realized I was just a smartass.

  • Anonymous

    And you proved his point admirably.

    Dumbass.

  • Anonymous

    You’re not laughing, but we are.

    First time I’ve seen an utter non-entity self-identify.

  • Anonymous

    You’re not laughing, but we are.

    First time I’ve seen an utter non-entity self-identify.

  • Anonymous

    You’re not laughing, but we are.

    First time I’ve seen an utter non-entity self-identify.

  • Pingback: Smorgasbord at Haemet

  • Pingback: The Daily Pixy » Blog Archive » Obama Squirms to a New Illegal Low

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1802716459 Rebecca Harris

    Dionne is right about the voter suppression part, there will be voter suppression:  of underage high school students, illegal aliens, and maybe even some of the dead.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Linda-Jamison/100000947146817 Linda Jamison

    Both sides we all fight about, are 1 in the same!????
     Think they care about us. look up Bilderberg.
     They keep wars of all kinds going. Kill Wars, Drug war, War on poverty,
     The race war!!! They make the money and we fight about which side is BEST!! LOL
     SAD!!!!..Ron Paul 2012.. Please for all our sakes. PEACE!

  • Pingback: dustbury.com » That many, huh?

  • Pingback: FMJRA 2.0: No One Driving : The Other McCain

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE