Who Wants to See Tina Korbe’s Thighs?

Posted on | February 16, 2012 | 101 Comments

The title of this post is not a hypothetical question, because last week the aforesaid Miss Korbe joined her Hot Air colleague Ed Morrissey for a video interview with Rick Santorum, which I didn’t see until somebody brought it to my attention yesterday:

Our keen-eyed readers will note that at the 0:28 mark of the video, Miss Korbe gives a little tug at the hem of her skirt and, not to get all Melissa Clouthier about it or anything, some folks might say that’s kind of a telltale clue that your skirt’s too doggone short.

OK, so how this came to my attention: Tuesday I blogged about Melissa’s criticism of the dress and behavior of some young ladies at CPAC and, as I said, I wanted to be responsible without being too judgmental. That is to say, I hesitate to judge a lady’s morals merely because she feels obliged to follow contemporary fashion.

For example, I think tattoos and pierced bellybuttons are two of the tackiest things in the world, but I’m pretty sure not every woman with tattoos and a pierced bellybutton is a whore.

Most of them? Sure, but not all of them.

Similarly, short skirts and exposed cleavage do not necessarily signal that a woman is up for some action with any dude who’ll give her the price of another hit of methamphetamine. It is true that many hookers dress that way, but not every woman who dresses that way is a hooker.

Or even a Maine College Republican.

‘A Peep Show of Her Hoo-Ha’?

Anyway, my responsible-but-not-judgmental post was linked in a roundup on the CPAC decorum controversy at “Thoughts and Ramblings,” whose proprietor suggested that this was in response to a post he’d done earlier, in which he said, “Tina, you are a Catholic, try actually dressing like one,” and accused her of giving the Senator “a peep show of her hoo haa.”

That went too far, I’d say. It was judgmental to the point of being irresponsible. And while I didn’t realize it when I saw the link yesterday, the proprietor of that blog has kind of a history here, of which he has since reminded me.

But I don’t want to get all into that now. What I want is to clarify that while my sense of humor is not universally appreciated, I mean no harm, no matter how offensive my jokes sometimes are. I’m pretty sure Steven Crowder and his (haawwtt) fianceé have figured that out by now.

Jokes work when they refer to truths that others recognize. We laugh at an observational comedian because he calls to our attention, in a humorous way, something we may or may not have previously noticed, but which causes us to laugh in recognition.

Back in the 1980s, when cable television began bringing to our homes a constant stream of stand-up comics, I remember kind of scratching my head in puzzlement when they’d do jokes about the bad driving habits of Asian women. Because I’m from Atlanta, and we didn’t have a large Asian population, these jokes by West Coast comedians didn’t provoke the laughter of recognition. Then, in 1997, I moved to D.C. which has a fairly large Asian population and . . .

Oh, my God! It’s so true!

Look, I hate to foster negative stereotypes. I’m sure there are many Asian women who are excellent drivers. It’s just that none of those excellent Asian women drivers live in the greater metropolitan Washington, D.C., area.

And everybody who lives in D.C. is laughing their butts off at that joke, because it’s so true. (Asian ladies, please: Take the bus.)

The reason I have risked denunciation by the Asian-American Female Motorist Anti-Defamation League is because it relates to my own history of offensive humor in regard to Tina Korbe and Hot Air.

When Hot Air first advertised that it was planning to hire a new blogger, I immediately smelled a rat.

Nobody advertises jobs like that, because the world of conservative New Media is still small enough that everybody pretty much knows who’s who. Hot Air is a sufficiently prominent site that there is no shortage of people who would crawl through broken glass and scale a 12-foot fence topped with razor wire for the opportunity to work there full-time. So if Hot Air wanted to hire a third blogger, all they’d have to do is send a few e-mails or make a phone call or two, and they’d have plenty of experienced bloggers to choose from.

The Cruel Charade

Something was extremely fishy, then, when a friend called to tell me he’d seen a “help wanted” ad from Hot Air posted in an online D.C. jobs-bank forum. My friend asked if was I planning to apply for it.

Obviously not: I was already a Green Room contributor, and if Hot Air wanted to hire me full-time, they didn’t have to place an ad. Ed’s got my number, I said. He could have called.

This was obvious enough, and I thought about all the other Green Room contributors — including a few friends of mine — who were also obviously about to be passed over for this full-time gig. Believe it or not, some of them actually applied for the job, although I knew that the mere fact that Hot Air was advertising this opening meant that the Green Room contributors (all of them) had already been weighed in the balance and found wanting. Shortly after my initial conversation with that friend, one of my fellow rejects from the Green Room called to talk about the advertised job, and I predicted, “They’re gonna hire a chick. Somebody with the ‘face for Fox,’ a candidate for the Red Eye leg-chair they can use to ‘brand’ the blog.”

The only other possible explanation, I said, was that corporate policy at Salem Communications (which had bought out Hot Air in 2010) required them to advertise the job opening. But even then, the prior existing relationship with Green Room contributors would have been a big enough loophole in such a policy that if there were a Green Room contributor they’d wanted to hire full-time at Hot Air, they wouldn’t have placed an ad.

There was something distinctly fishy going on, I told my fellow reject, and this job advertisement was just a charade. The fix was in.

Both my friends applied for the job anyway and never even got a call or an e-mail in response. And when it was announced that Hot Air had hired Tina Korbe, former assistant to Heritage Foundation’s New Media Director, Rob Bluey, my cynicism was amply vindicated.

So I Tweeted a couple of snarky remarks about it (I’ve forgotten what I said) and was profoundly offended when someone responded by accusing me of being jealous (!) of Tina Korbe. (I previously recounted this tale in August: “Discrimination Against the Ugly? Expect a Class-Action Lawsuit by Smitty and Me.” Also see, Jerry Wilson’s June item, “How to Become a High-Profile Conservative Pundit.”)

Look: I’d never even heard of Tina Korbe until her name was announced as the new blogger at Hot Air. Didn’t know her from Adam’s housecat, and she’d been hired for a job that I had made a point of not applying for. Exactly how I was supposed to be “jealous” of her is something I’d love to hear someone try to explain.

Rather than being jealous, I was angry about the cruel charade by which at least two of my friends (one of them a Green Room contributor) had been led to believe they had a shot at being hired full-time by Hot Air when — as I had immediately deduced when the ad was posted — they never had any chance at all. Exactly how many other people got their hopes crushed by that process, I don’t know. People don’t generally go around talking about jobs they applied for but didn’t get.

Nevertheless, despite the righteousness of my indignation, I regretted having publicly snarked about Tina Korbe’s hiring. My comments were unseemly and apt to be misinterpreted, but I just had that don’t-give-a-damn attitude that comes over me when I’m angry.

Bad Jokes and Hot Tempers

Complete cynicism is not an impenetrable armor, and even when you fully anticipate that the world will work exactly the way the world always works — “Them that has, gets,” as a downhome saying expresses it — there are times when even the most predictable outcome produces a sense of helpless frustration.

And, yeah, I’d have hired a chick, too.

When Hot Air started, their cachet was the connection to Michelle Malkin, and even after she scaled back her direct participation in the site, she was still “The Boss.” So after they sold out to Salem, having the blog as an Ed-and-Allah sausagefest involved a loss of some of the prestige they’d previously had. Ed’s done Fox a few times, but Allah’s a recluse, and if they wanted a “personality” to add to their brand, it only made sense to hire a telegenic young woman.

So I couldn’t really complain, you see. Even if I had been personnel director of Salem Communications, I would have had to tell my buddies, “Sorry. We’re hiring the blonde chick.”

Or maybe a redhead.

At any rate, the point of telling all that was to explain that I am entirely sympathetic toward people who are temperamentally disposed to say offensive things, or to push it too far. The thing about being “edgy” is, you never find out where the line is until you cross it and the million-pound sh*thammer comes crashing down on your head.

If you manage to survive the impact of such an incident, it should be viewed as a valuable lesson: Congratulations, you’ve found out where the line is located.

So it is with me, and so it should be with the proprietor of “Thoughts and Ramblings,” toward whom some of my friends say I’m too forgiving. (No one ever tells me I’m being too hard him.) I’m trying to be helpful and constructive. And to be told, in response, that I am “too much of a f–king coward” . . . Well, that’s neither helpful nor constructive, and I’m at a loss as to how to fix the problem.

Hey, Patrick: I’ve got a hot temper, too. My temper causes me almost as much trouble as my sense of humor, but however unfair people’s reactions may be, it’s still my responsibility to deal with my own side of the problem, because I can’t control other people’s reactions. I’m throwing you five links in one post — with “Tina Korbe’s Thighs” in the title, so it’s unlikely to be ignored — as a gesture of goodwill. Because I have no more reason to hate you than I have to hate Tina Korbe, or Ed, or Allah, or anybody else. And considering how often I’ve been accused of “hate,” and how much I’ve suffered on account of such accusations, I think you should ponder the significance of this gesture.

Also, you should ponder that Tina Korbe recently got engaged. Her fiancé is, I’m sure, a very nice person. Or maybe he’s a 6-foot-9 violently jealous maniac with a black belt in Tae Kwon Do who’s likely to hunt you down and pound you into a coma. Either way, you might want to ponder the location of a line somewhere between “your skirt’s too doggone short” and “peep show of your hoo-ha.”

Just sayin’ . . .

The cruel charade that preceded Hot Air’s hiring of Tina Korbe was not Tina’s fault and, despite my unseemly snark about it, she has been entirely courteous and friendly toward me. During CPAC, as a matter of fact, she posed for a photo with a buddy of mine, Jason Mattera:

Jason has always appreciated my sense of humor. So when Jason finds himself pursued by a 6-foot-9 violently jealous maniac with a black belt in Tae Kwon Do . . . ROTFLMAO!

Finally: Don’t get me started on “equality,” Atilla.

Inequality is not always disadvantageous to women, you know. And feminism is a sort of Animal Farm, with women as the animals who vanquish their male/human oppressors, only to discover eventually that some animals are more equal than others.

UPDATE: Lisa Graas has a religious mediation on Tina Korbe’s thighs, while Bill Quick incurs a Godwin’s Law penalty by accusing me of being a “Skirt Nazi” — ! — although I prefer to describe myself as The Friendly Fascist o’ Fun.

And of course, welcome, Instapundit readers!

UPDATE II: Now a Memeorandum thread, and I’m pleased to announce that we now have an answer to the titular question. Who wants to see Tina Korbe’s thighs? About 3,500 readers in the first 51 minutes after Professor Reynolds linked us. And considering that Tina was interviewing The Next President of the United States, her thighs were displayed for a worthwhile cause.

Next? SkirtGate! I can see the headline now:

Is Blogger’s Short-Skirted Video
An Illegal Campaign Contribution?

UPDATE III: “Subject to Misinterpretion,” a necessary response to criticism, deserved or otherwise.

Category: CPAC, Hot Air, Rule 5

Comments

101 Responses to “Who Wants to See Tina Korbe’s Thighs?”

On the Conserva-Cads [UPDATED to infinity]
February 16th, 2012 @ 12:57 pm

[…] IX: Stacy McCain relates all this to The Tina Korbe Leg Show at Hot Air, and Dan Collins has a few […]
ang1196
February 16th, 2012 @ 1:02 pm

I hate that “Your comparison ought to take into account the relative age and experience of the players. ” No, it shouldn’t. I hear that same argument (sometimes, I’m ashamed to admit, out of my own mouth if I like the person) “Well, maybe they got here because they are a (woman, black, gay…fill in the blank), and maybe they’re not at the same level as their peers right now, but the fact is they’re trying VERY hard, they’re making great strides, and the potential is there.”

Then wait until that potential is realized in the minors before putting them in The Show. That’s what the rest of us have to do. As for TK’s appearance and her ability to attract viewers, the most riveting talk TV ever was Firing Line, and while I did have a man crush on Mr. Buckley, I never was interested in seeing more of his cleavage.
Finrod Felagund
February 16th, 2012 @ 1:08 pm

Heh. Regarding driving in Atlanta, I’ve noticed two categories of drivers that tend to be Bad Drivers.

(massively politically incorrect observation follows)

The first group is young black women, who are bad drivers for what they don’t do as much as they do do. The second group is just as bad and for mostly the same reasons: anyone with an Educator license plate. Both groups are the types that will sit there without pulling forward in the left turn lane and let the light change red without making their turn. Or, they’ll change their mind at the last minute about where they’re going and try to do the kind of lane change that should have been done about 200 feet further back. Or they’ll not notice that the light has turned green already because they’re jabbering away on a cellphone. Or they’ll be doing 50mph in the far left lane of I-285 because again they’re jabbering away on a cellphone.
Peter Ingemi
February 16th, 2012 @ 1:11 pm

I’d vote for Roxeanne although I’d hate to lose her
Edward
February 16th, 2012 @ 1:14 pm

I’d have to say that I should be counted amongst those that aren’t overly impressed.

Look there are plenty of very attractive women out there in the world all vying for attention. If I’m of a mind to look at a pretty girl then, amazingly enough, there are pretty women who want to be looked at. On the other hand if I want to read interesting writing then I don’t particularly care what that person looks like. What I care about is the validity of their reasoning, the basis of their points and the overall logic applied. A thorough grounding in history, politics and economics comes in pretty handy for that as well.

Does Tina bring -any- of that to the table? Really? Or is she simply a more attractive conservative version of Miss McCain?

That said I generally avoid HA like the plague. What it mostly does now, as has been mentioned by others, is aggregate news. I rarely find anything original at HA and will only go there if directed by a link from a website that I do frequent. What little original thinking and writing that does go on at HA frankly comes from the Green Room writers. So the idea that these folks toiling away in the basement of HA aren’t up to the standards of HA makes me wonder why any of them even bother writing for HA. Personally I’d be insulted by this whole mess.

So what is in the cards for Tina? If she is going to blogging then how is any level of attractiveness an asset? If she’s going to be video blogging then what? Will HA turn into a version of Spanish news shows where attractive women almost completely dominate? Will she try for a gig on FoxNews?

Frankly I don’t care overly much except I want substance in what I spend my valuable time on. This is why I generally prefer to read transcripts rather than sitting through shows. It’s faster and I can more easily comprehend the ideas being presented.

So is the addition of Tina one of substance? Or flash?
DaMav
February 16th, 2012 @ 1:37 pm

Not sure what kind of strategy doesn’t promote new talent but it is not a successful one. And to try to turn Korbe into an affirmative action play smacks of unproven and unwarranted smear. Clue yourself into the fact that lots of women, blacks etc can succeed without it.
Oh boy: My critism of HotAir.com’s going Ann Coulter goes viral. | Thoughts and Rantings
February 16th, 2012 @ 1:54 pm

[…] hosting with a decent host. If Drudge links in, I might be in some deep doo-doo though.Okay, McCain, you win. I still don’t trust you no further than I could throw your scrawny, Fedora-wearing butt. […]
ang1196
February 16th, 2012 @ 2:04 pm

Oh, please, stop the display of high dudgeon. No one here is saying that all — or even most — blacks, women, etc. got where they are because of qualities other than their ability. I had no idea what TK looked like or how old she was when I started reading her posts and said to myself “Hey, a lot of this stuff just isn’t that good.” And after reading Ed’s and, especially, AP’s stuff, it’s a big letdown.

So, OK, I stopped reading her. But why is she there in the first place?
Subject to Misinterpretation : The Other McCain
February 16th, 2012 @ 2:04 pm

[…] Patrick brings up an ancient grudge and calls me a “f–king coward.”I compose a 2,000-word response to Patrick, in which I attempt to demonstrate that I am sympathetic to his plight, having myself experienced […]
Otisah
February 16th, 2012 @ 2:07 pm

Yup, slut-shaming as a campaign issue is a surefire winner. This is an exciting new turn in conservative politics.
Revisiting Decorum: The CPAC Controversy « Blog Entry « Dr. Melissa Clouthier
February 16th, 2012 @ 2:13 pm

[…] to the latter, Robert Stacy McCain, decided to link-whore (there’s that word again) on my previous post and took the opportunity to be vile to Tina […]
frank
February 16th, 2012 @ 2:15 pm

Katie Pavlich at Townhall fails to see your humor and I fail to see hope for the Conserv-o-shpere!
DetroitRight
February 16th, 2012 @ 2:15 pm

Um…. didn’t you get my trackbacks?
DetroitRight
February 16th, 2012 @ 2:16 pm

Hey stacy, see here please. I call a truce. http://thoughtsandrantings.com/2012/02/16/oh-boy-my-critism-of-hotair-coms-going-ann-coulter-goes-viral/
J. Knight
February 16th, 2012 @ 2:17 pm

Yep, she’s not “butch” enough to go to work at MSNBC, or tinted enough to make CNN. It’s about the only career move she has if she wants to stay in media.
frank
February 16th, 2012 @ 2:18 pm

Yes, I do have lysdexia…why do you ask?
frank
February 16th, 2012 @ 2:21 pm

…by that logic, actual mini-skirts become belts when women sit down? I’m glad that CPAC is such an educational event.
Wombat_socho
February 16th, 2012 @ 2:27 pm

No, you got edited for being off-topic.
There’s a difference.
frank
February 16th, 2012 @ 2:27 pm

So literally NOTHING short of a lap dance is the new standard. That throws open the doors to some very interesting interviews…
kathykattenburg
February 16th, 2012 @ 2:29 pm

“If you manage to survive the impact of such an incident, it should be
viewed as a valuable lesson: Congratulations, you’ve found out where the
line is located.”

As much as I despise everything you stand for and disagree with everything you believe, Stacy McCain, the above made me laugh. Humor and honesty about one’s own frailties is always refreshing, in anyone.

So thanks for providing a “we’re all just human beings” rest stop. 🙂
Wombat_socho
February 16th, 2012 @ 2:30 pm

Thank you! Now I KNOW I’ve done well! ^__^
Wombat_socho
February 16th, 2012 @ 2:31 pm

You must be new here.
frank
February 16th, 2012 @ 2:32 pm

…and what does her being beautiful have to do with it? If she was a toad, then she should hide her legs or what?

Tina K is a fine looking woman and no-one really gives a fig about the length of her skirt…no-one…esp RSM.
richard mcenroe
February 16th, 2012 @ 3:28 pm

Robin Williams, noted prude: “Girls that tramp stamp may look hot now, but in thirty years it’s gonna look like an octopus fighting a starfish, you know what I mean?”
richard mcenroe
February 16th, 2012 @ 3:31 pm

We don’t, cuz we’re pigs. But if you sit down on camera and suddenly realize you might REALLY be on camera, you’ve made a poor wardrobe selection.

Sharon Stone ain’t working ,uch these days.
DaMav
February 16th, 2012 @ 4:02 pm

Because some of us think she has insightful things to say.

Now stop being so petulent, your opinion counts too, it’s just different than mine.
Beck
February 16th, 2012 @ 4:58 pm

The skirt looks perfectly professional, and yes, I want to see Tina Korbe’s thighs.
More Distractions As Obama Skates - The POH Diaries
February 16th, 2012 @ 5:04 pm

[…] Lord, is this really happening? Has the conservative blogosphere erupted into a fight over who wore what in an interview? Are we now debating who acted like an ass at a conference that the vast majority […]
ThomasD
February 16th, 2012 @ 6:11 pm

That’s the real danger for the woman who chooses the infotainalist career path – your sell by date arrives much sooner.
neills
February 16th, 2012 @ 6:12 pm

Seconded.
TheySaidWhat?!
February 16th, 2012 @ 6:37 pm

Yeah, next time she should have to wear a burka.
The CPAC Dress Code and Decorum Debate – Silly, or Good Advice? | The Lonely Conservative
February 16th, 2012 @ 7:43 pm

[…] There was some back and forth between blogs that’s getting a bit hard to follow, until Stacy McCain followed up with a long post of his own giving some advice to Patrick. Now Politico has devoted some space to the debate, and […]
Edge of the Sandbox
February 16th, 2012 @ 8:01 pm

In Tina’s defense, in this “great hemline recession” it’s practically impossible to find a skirt that covers your thighs. See my observations here:
http://edgeofthesandbox.wordpress.com/2012/01/24/style-and-fashion-pick-me-up-the-great-hemline-recession/
Scorch666
February 16th, 2012 @ 8:27 pm

came from Townhall here. Very funny read, keep it up
RSM and the revenge of Korbe’s thighs « God's Own Crunk
February 16th, 2012 @ 9:09 pm

[…] via Who Wants to See Tina Korbe’s Thighs? : The Other McCain. […]
My Thoughts On Distractions And Distractions - The POH Diaries
February 16th, 2012 @ 9:39 pm

[…] McCain wrote a lengthy piece about the ensuing debate over Tina Korbe’s skirt, the length of it, whether Hot Air added her […]
Multimedia Group
February 16th, 2012 @ 11:24 pm

Totally agree.
Multimedia Group
February 16th, 2012 @ 11:32 pm

How can you even tell specifically, who are the bad drivers in Atlanta? 80% are bad.

I moved here from the west coast a few years back and have NEVER seen such bad driving behavior by such a large majority of drivers. Have these people never heard of a TURN SIGNAL??

Every morning during rush hour there are at least 2 or 3 “insurance seminars” on each of the primary freeway arterials, essentially bringing the entire city to a standstill at the cost of millions of dollars in lost wages and burned fuel while idling.

Sorry to go OT but; Atlanta drivers, most of you suck big time.
The Usual Brouhaha | Goldfish and Clowns
February 17th, 2012 @ 12:17 am

[…] (in her case, twice) have been quite pointed in their criticisms, with other pundits such as Stacy McCain (twice), Dan Collins, DaTechGuy, Dan Riehl, Joy McCann, Lisa Graas, Katie Pavlich, and Jenny […]
Minuteman78
February 17th, 2012 @ 10:40 am

You political hacks just don’t know how to pick your battles. You should be spending every second assembling facts and figures that will allow whomever gets the Repub nomination to energize the base and nail Obummer in November. Instead you pick a fight over skirt length. Absolutely beyond dumb…
Minuteman78
February 17th, 2012 @ 3:12 pm

…like what Guy Benson is doing HERE:
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2012/02/17/grim_milestone_the_third_anniversary_of_obamas_failed_stimulus
Under the Fedora: Hiring Men, Reporters-on-Twitter, and Internet Sweeps Week
February 17th, 2012 @ 3:51 pm

[…] on short skirts and female thighs than nearly anything else. The various posts on hemlines, from Stacy McCain and Little Miss Attila and from me have all drawn a ton of comments, and although I can’t speak […]
Skirting Conservatism | Forests of Trees
February 18th, 2012 @ 11:44 am

[…] women “look like women” get derailed by misplaced anger toward R.S. McCain’s thoughts on the subject. Our keen-eyed readers will note that at the 0:28 mark of the video, Miss Korbe gives a little tug […]
The Minority Report Blog » Under the fedora: Hiring men, bloggers vs reporters and internet sweeps week
February 18th, 2012 @ 1:04 pm

[…] posts focused on skirtlines and thighs than anything else. The various posts all over the net from Stacy McCain to Little Miss Attila to myself have all drawn a ton of comments and although I can’t speak for […]
FMJRA 2.0: Lord Of The Thighs : The Other McCain
February 18th, 2012 @ 5:45 pm

[…] (typeof(addthis_share) == "undefined"){ addthis_share = [];}– compiled by Wombat-sochoWho Wants to See Tina Korbe’s Thighs?Lisa GraasDaily PunditThe ConservatoryDa Tech GuyLittle Miss AttilaThoughts & RantingsMelissa […]
Ceylon777
February 18th, 2012 @ 8:53 pm

I didn’t get the whole Asian driver thing either until I watched a Chinese neighbor try to turn her car around in the street and hit not one, but two trash bins, one on each side of the street!
Notes on an Unfinished Letter of Apology (Or, Does Ed Morrissey Torture Cats?) : The Other McCain
February 19th, 2012 @ 3:14 pm

[…] over how Hot Air went about hiring a third blogger was quite widespread within the blogosphere, and my irritation at what I called the “cynical charade” involved the knowledge that some of my friends had applied for the position in sincere hope that […]
Conservative women are more than just “hotties in tube tops.” (But hopefully, they’re that too.) - Lawyers, Guns & Money : Lawyers, Guns & Money
February 20th, 2012 @ 8:46 pm

[…] on the street” falls on your shoulder pads. The alternative is having to deal with McCain reducing you to the “haawwtt fianceé” of one of the aforementioned conservative “rappers” in a post about a conservative […]
Confirmed: David Englin Is Misleading The Public On House Bill 462 « Red Alexandria
February 21st, 2012 @ 2:28 pm

[…] The smoking-hot Tina Korbe at Hot Air links to a misleading Dahlia Lithwick piece at Slate which calls the Virginia legislation akin to rape. David promoted Ms. Lithwick’s appearance on MSNBC MSDNC about this on his Twitter feed. […]
Short Skirt ‘ThighGate’: Tina Korbe’s Exposed Gorgeous Gams at CPAC 2012 Cause Mini-Scandal & Some Harsh Criticism from Some Conservatives (video) « Frugal Café Blog Zone
February 21st, 2012 @ 7:37 pm

[…] (who also probably has awesome legs) took offense at the outcry from some conservatives (namely, Stacy McCain, prolific, funny conservative blogger at The Other McCain) on how Korbe was dressed and also wrote […]