Also, as a general rule, fatter women are better cooks. At some point in a man’s life, he realizes that good cooking makes a far greater difference in his quality of life than the kind of silly superficial stuff that young fellows care about.
My wife was very skinny when I married her. She’s a much better cook now.

Then I must be a supermodel, since hubby was my first and only for 35 years now. LOL Oh, and I don’t cook at all.

Uh, oh.

Better hope she doesn’t read the blog.

DUCK Stace!

She’s reading over your shoulder!

I recently got into a lonnng debate with a slut who disliked my “slut shaming.” I say she was a slut because she said she’d had something like a hundred sexual partners. Based on her photo, I can tell you the suggestion that “For women, the number of sexual partners decreases with increasing physical attractiveness” has merit.

I really don’t think Sandra Fluke is that unattractive and although he talked about contraception as a right who knows how many sexual partners she has had. Her father is Methodist minister so I’m assuming she was raised with some moral standards.

“Fat Bottom Girls” agrees with you. They try harder.

To continue the thought: being somewhat plain, but chaste, is like being poor and responsible with money. That one is poor does not mean that one has to play the lottery, nor buy $300 status purses and huge cars to ape the mannerisms of the more wealthy; likewise, that one is not attractive enough command a monogamous, exclusive relationship is no reason to slut it up.

(Rationally, unattractive women should prefer the old ways of doing things, wherein all women were given the opportunity to be chaste, not just hot women. But expecting liberals to understand reason is like expecting one’s pet turtle to solve differential equations.)

I appreciate your thoughtful comments, Roseanne.

Some liberal women are a very odd bunch. I can’t say all because some of my best friends are liberals women. A conservative woman I know remarked that they thought the sexual display of Beyonce wasn’t really appropriate for the Super Bowl and, one liberal woman I know (NOT my friend ) screeched, “You are envious of sexy and strong women.” My thought was: “Well, no, I’m not; I think you’re a brainless but attractive idiot who allows men to treat you as sexual booty and feels yourself somehow empowered that way”. Of course, I didn’t say that. I just thought it. That reminds me of the slut walk thing.

I honestly don’t think there are that many butt ugly women or men.

Some of the hottest women I’ve known aren’t necessarily strikingly gorgeous, but they know how to dress, keep fit and carry themselves well.

Anyone can become ugly. Just hold down a couch for months at a time while doing repeated 12 ounce curls.

Like everything else in this world, keeping up one’s appearance requires some effort and sacrifice.

Going at it from the wrong angle. Try going after the men. American men are already conditioned to open doors for women, and then lose their jobs. Feminists = easy sex, no child support, and a great way to waste time before a football game. And, if she’s further along in her career, you can upgrade from burgers and nachos to fried onions and steak that she pays for.
Feminism anaesthetizes women from the paradox that their search for freedom places them on their knees for The Man.

It’s great to be a American man!

Indeed, they do.

(1) Mrs. Other knows that Stacy is devoted to her [and a bit frightened].
(2) If you’ve seen a recent picture of her, she’s quite lovely.

Fifty years ago, Jimmy Soul anticipated all of this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9NF5XU-k2Vk

And lovely to speak to, as well.

Did I miss the article on the slut David Patraeus? 
I mean, I don’t think its the ‘slut’ label so much as it is the fact that it is not used for the men who were sluts with the slutty women? 

Men that prefer fat women to thin beautiful women with great figures are maybe just a wee bit insecure, “wee bit” perhaps being the operative phrase.

It’s actually surprising that TOM is still alive given some of what he’s posted here. Assuming, of course, he isn’t just bragging.

I’m trying to imagine Kurt Schlichter’s wife Irina Moises with a package of Hamburger Helper in hand. Not working for some reason.

Well the evolutionairy theory goes somewhat like this

it is quite easy for a average woman to get sex from a really attractive man. But it’s very very hard for her to get him to commit to her. The reason for that is that when it comes to uncommitted sex men have very low standards, much lower than for committed relationships.

Therefore it can be an effective evolutionairy strategy to be slutty if you’re only an average woman. The evolutionairy benefit is that you are more likely to get a man with good genes to father your child, the downside though that you are much less likely to get commitment since you’re having sex with many men, other men won’t commit to you since they are at risk of being cuckolded.

A VERY attractive woman though can get sex AND commitment from a very attractive man. Therefore there are less evolutionairy benefits for her being promiscuous.

I’ve met the lady and can verify this. Does not look her age in the slightest.

THIS.

The rich are quite frequently leftists. They are getting condign punishment from their boy Zer0. You’d think they would be smarter than they act, being rich and all. I guess they think their wealth was acquired like winning the lottery instead of because they had the freedom to pursue their own interests.

I like curvy women. Women built like 10 year old boys with boobs glued on have no attraction for me. I also like women that are comfortable being women, rather than trying to out boy the men.