The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

A Moby in the ‘Manosphere’?

Posted on | May 27, 2015 | 87 Comments

Before getting to the point — the possibility that liberal trolls pretending to be Men’s Rights Activists (MRAs) are creating fake “hate” against women — permit me to clarify something: I am both a journalist and a conservative and do not think those two things are contradictory in any way. I was a full-time newspaper reporter, editor and columnist for nearly a decade before I became a conservative in the mid-1990s, and so my perspective on politics and media bias is somewhat different than many other conservatives.

All that is preamble to explaining my attitudes vis-a-vis the whole MRA movement and the so-called online “Manosphere.” You go to war with the army you have, as they say, and the current situation regarding feminism — which has become the “Sex Trouble” project — clearly requires an institutional base outside the currently existing ideological/political system. It would be foolish to expect, inter alia, the Heritage Foundation or National Review to get down in the trenches of the War of the Sexes as it is currently being fought. There are a handful of conservative journalists (including Ashe Schow of the Washington Examiner and Cathy Young of the Daily Beast) who “get it” in terms of the mutant totalitarian strain of feminism that has erupted into public spasms of raging insanity the past couple of years. However, there is generally a shortage of attention being paid to this by conservative media, and so we must build something new and different.

There is an existing network of online popular opposition to feminism, but this presents its own problems. Whereas mainstream conservative organizations allied with the GOP tend to be wimpy and prone to run for the hills the first time someone calls them ugly names, the grassroots “Manosphere” is the exact opposite: A lot of pissed-off-and-fed-up people who feel like they’ve been fighting a guerrilla war against feminism for years and who have a predictable tendency to Say Things You Wouldn’t Want to See Quoted in the New York Times.

No big deal, really. Grassroots is grassroots, and you cannot expect “message discipline” from random people on the Internet. However, the Left (of which feminism is a subsidiary) loves to play the guilt-by-association game, so when the spotlight suddenly shines over there where you’ve been fighting your guerrilla war, you can predict that they will do their “links-and-ties” tactic to try to discredit you. Trust me, my friends, I’ve got the scars of old battles and many tales to tell you about how this game is played, but let’s get down to a practical example.

Aaron Clarey wrote an article at Return of Kings highly critical of the new movie Mad Max: Fury Road. Because I almost never go to movies, I don’t really care about this any more than I care about any other vile poison emerging from Hollywood. Was it scripted by Catharine MacKinnon based on a novel by Andrea Dworkin, directed by Sheila Jeffreys and produced by Anita Sarkeesian? I don’t know, but it’s apparently got the whole Tough Action-Hero Chick thing happening, which is very much a feminist-approved theme, and Return of Kings is not down with anything that feminists approve.

However, it is not Aaron’s opinion of this movie, but rather a comment someone left on his article that caught my attention because it caught the attention of a left-wing “male feminist” Whose Name Shall Not Be Written Here. The comment by “TS77RP1” reads thus:

The only way back is to begin punishing ambition in our daughters and in all female children. They need to be physically and psychologically disciplined to be servile and deferential and they unfortunately need to have it beaten into them that they should NEVER trust their own judgement and always seek guidance and permission of their male headships.
My daughter would be turned out with nothing but a shirt on her back if she so much as looked at a college website or played with her brother’s educational toys.
She would be belted to the point of being unable to sit if she exhibited confidence in decision making.
I don’t want my wife to step foot out of the house unless her every dime and minute spent can be accounted for and executed in conjuncture with my approval. My daughter will exude obedience and timidity for whoever her future husband is and it’s imperative that all Christian Men demand nothing less within their own homes. Playtime for feminazis and the left is over. This is our world and our heritage to protect. Let the cultural war begin!

Well, this is a horrifying thing to read, but is it authentic? I did a search for “TS77RP1” and this comment has apparently been deleted from Return of Kings and, furthermore, the only places on the Internet where that handle can be found are all quoting the left-wing “male feminist” Whose Name Shall Not Be Written Here.

If it walks like a moby and talks like a moby, it’s probably a moby, and if you don’t know what a moby is, you should learn.

moby
An insidious and specialized type of left-wing troll who visits blogs and impersonates a conservative for the purpose of either spreading false rumors intended to sow dissension among conservative voters, or who purposely posts inflammatory and offensive comments for the purpose of discrediting the blog in question.
The term is derived from the name of the liberal musician Moby, who famously suggested in February of 2004 that left-wing activists engage in this type of subterfuge: “For example, you can go on all the pro-life chat rooms and say you’re an outraged right-wing voter and that you know that George Bush drove an ex-girlfriend to an abortion clinic and paid for her to get an abortion. Then you go to an anti-immigration Web site chat room and ask, ‘What’s all this about George Bush proposing amnesty for illegal aliens?’”

Was the commenter “TS77RP1” such a troll? I strongly suspect it. Having seen firsthand the insidious deceptions that the online Left is willing to employ, this would be par for the course. This doesn’t rule out the possibility Dictator Dad is real, but I’m extremely skeptical.

Anyway, let this be a warning to the grassroots opposition to feminism: Keep your eyes open for similar dirty tricks.

Team Clinton is playing for keeps, you know.





 

Comments

87 Responses to “A Moby in the ‘Manosphere’?”

  1. JL
    May 27th, 2015 @ 2:46 pm

    While I don’t doubt that there are people who hold the opinions expressed in the supposed “Christian Man’s” comment, I suspect that they are more likely to be reading the Qur’an than the Good Book (either version (…or they might be a Haredi, but those guys are jerks)). In any event I denounce myself for being critical of the Religion of Peace (TM).

  2. concern00
    May 27th, 2015 @ 2:46 pm

    The press (MSM) are no longer known for their investigative journalism skills. Why investigate and analyze when you can google?

  3. Gunga
    May 27th, 2015 @ 2:49 pm

    That Moby is such a…Moby…

  4. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    May 27th, 2015 @ 2:50 pm
  5. Are Little Green Football’s Charles Johnson and Chuck C. Johnson the same dude? | Batshit Crazy News
    May 27th, 2015 @ 2:51 pm

    […] Twitter Is Chuck Johnson banned for life on Twitter or not? EBL: They do complete each other TOM: A Moby in the Manosphere Blogmocracy: Mr. […]

  6. Fail Burton
    May 27th, 2015 @ 3:25 pm

    Who knows? I don’t particularly care what women do and don’t want to save civilization. My thing is this hate speech being passed off as “feminism.” It’s not “feminism,” it’s a supremacist ideology based on lesbianism which exists in direct opposition to men. When Audre Lorde talks about the “master’s tools” she’s actually talking about white equal rights feminism and considers them the enemy, just another “tool” of the patriarchy.

    That doesn’t stop these supremacists from passing themselves off as an ideology they’re not. If you look at the Gamergate Wiki page they make no distinction between EQ feminism and the gender feminism which attacked video gaming. That makes it appear as if gamers are against equal rights for women instead of the truth, which is they are against being defamed by an anti-male, anti-white ideology. When Anita Sarkeesian talks about “toxic masculinity” that is straight out of French Queer Theory and gender as “performance,” not Title IX.

  7. Jeanette Victoria
    May 27th, 2015 @ 4:18 pm

    LOL

  8. Dean Esmay
    May 27th, 2015 @ 4:20 pm

    Setting aside the left vs. right thing (there are many people fighting to expel the hateful feminist left, for which I wish them much success, and there are some things I want to argue with you conservatives about too), I noticed long ago that political operatives, frequently paid, go onto blogs and other sites pretending to be something they aren’t. I’ve seen it in countless contexts. While there are genuinely nutty self-proclaimed and real MRAs, they are dwarfed by the number of sock puppets pretending to be MRAs from what I can see.

    Anyone who wants to do real journalism about MRAs is easily able to contact real MRAs with real names and faces and phone numbers. If you don’t like A Voice for Men, you can reach the National Coalition for Men (founded in 1977 I believe), the Anti-Misandry forums, the Men’s RIghts Subreddit, and the heads of several recognized MRA groups–I will even help you get ahold of them if you don’t want to talk to me and yes, some of them are not at all fans of AVfM or me. It wouldn’t matter. You want a real story? Come talk to the real players.

    Would I speak to a liberal leftist? Of course. I work with rock-ribbed conservatives, liberal atheists, libertarians, various flavors of anarchist, even am on speaking terms with a Marxist or two, along with some solid Objectivists who are stunned I would even talk to such people.

    People can sit and say “I find the concept of men’s rights revolting” and you know what? So do I. But guess what? Feminism is an established multibilion$$ movement spreading lies about the status of women, about rape, about domestic violence, and more, and if you want pushback on that that isn’t based on “Republican Vs. Democrat” (which last I looked is an argument that’s been raging since at least the 1860s) you’re going to have to work with people who may not see everything the same you do in other areas. You might find yourself sitting next to a hippie who wants to tell you why you shouldn’t circumcize your son or who thinks we need to pay attention to the problem of society looking the other way at violent abusive women.

    So it becomes a question of priorities. It also goes back to the old rule of politics: did you want to be right, or did you want to get things done? Now if you want to drop out of society you can, but if you want to actually affect change, and you want more than “destroy the left” as your war cry, you’re going to have to at least speak with and possibly exchange ideas and strategies with people you don’t necessarily always agree with.

    Note that this pretty much goes for everybody who wants to fight a large and evil empire. Which make no mistake, that’s exactly what we’re fighting: a multibilliion$$ empire. Want proof of that? References easily available from totally nonpartisan sources.

  9. Dianna Deeley
    May 27th, 2015 @ 4:29 pm

    I’ve met a lot of fathers, some better than others.

    What man wants his daughter to be some sort of slave? That’s a stereotype, believed by leftists to be a majority view (though only in secret, because they know it’s wrong). It shows up in novels about righteous, sophisticated city people fighting a bigoted village in the midwest.

  10. Jason Lee
    May 27th, 2015 @ 5:39 pm

    This Moby is doing it all wrong. If you want to impersonate the mythical knuckle-dragger of your imagination you probably shouldn’t pepper your comments with words and phrases like “servile,” “conjuncture” and “cultural.”

  11. Phil_McG
    May 27th, 2015 @ 5:49 pm

    She would be belted to the point of being unable to sit if she exhibited confidence in decision making.

    Obvious feminist troll is obvious.

  12. Phil_McG
    May 27th, 2015 @ 5:50 pm

    B-b-but… “Christian Men”!

    Seems legit, right?

  13. Fail Burton
    May 27th, 2015 @ 5:55 pm

    They only forgot a reference to Judith Butler

  14. Phil_McG
    May 27th, 2015 @ 5:55 pm

    Zackly. It’s Gender Studies thesis-talk.

  15. JulenOchoa
    May 27th, 2015 @ 6:05 pm

    while you don’t doubt? are you kidding me? on what basis? have you ever spoken to any man ever who has opinions remotely like this? of course not! stop pandering to anti-male bollocks and go and get the brain washing washed out of you.

  16. robertstacymccain
    May 27th, 2015 @ 6:55 pm

    Thanks for your comment, Dean. Whatever anyone’s political/policy/ideological orientation, the fact is this: The sudden upsurge of radical feminism that past couple of years has not been a random coincidence. It is not merely political, it is clearly partisan. In 2012, Democrats found they could use the “War on Women” attack to devastating effect (Obama’s “gender gap” in 2012 was the largest ever recorded by Gallup in 60 years) and with Hillary Clinton the expected Democrat nominee in 2016, they began ratcheting up the anti-male rhetoric immediately after the election, beginning with Steubenville.

    In other words, the “rape culture” witch hunt on university campuses is part of a Democrat Party propaganda campaign, and the victims of this are viewed as collateral damage in the all-out war to elect Hillary in 2016. Therefore, those who are pushing feminism now — in academia, journalism, K-12 education, the entertainment industry, etc. — are all in one way or another de facto political operatives. The defeat of Hillary Clinton in 2016 would be the most direct way to deal them a meaningful setback, and it is important that the GOP understand that its policies, should a Republican win the White House, be directed toward uprooting the taxpayer-funded infrastructure (especially in the field of education) that supports the feminist movement.

  17. Matt_SE
    May 27th, 2015 @ 6:57 pm

    My favorites:
    Jingoistic, reactionary, false consciousness.

  18. Andrejovich Dietrich
    May 27th, 2015 @ 7:04 pm

    Moby Chick. A great white whale of a woman who is the embodiment of true evil. For in her poutrageous attitude of entitlement. She vows to the last to grapple with men; from hell’s heart she stabs at men; for hate’s sake she will spit her last breath at men.

  19. Prime Director
    May 27th, 2015 @ 7:30 pm

    They see Patriarchy like Hedey Lamarr in Blazing Saddles risking an almost certain academy award nomination for best supporting actor

    Hedey: I, your name (schmucks), pledge allegiance to Hedey Lamarr and to the Evil for which he stands.

  20. RS
    May 27th, 2015 @ 7:39 pm

    In my profession, we are told to beware of the “perfect” case or witness. Ditto the highlighted comment. It is too perfect a representative of what the Left believes Feminism’s critics are about and what they believe. In over a half century of attending conservative, evangelical Christian gatherings, I’ve not heard such sentiments expressed even once.

    Further, assuming such an individual truly exists–and I suppose in a country of 300+ million people, you could find one or two like this, just as you could find one or two who receive alien transmissions through their artificial knees–such proud references to spousal and child abuse would have brought him to the attention of the authorities long before he decided to “out” himself on the internet.

    The comment’s author speaks like a typical atheist who’s heard that the New Testament says something about wives submitting to their husbands but doesn’t know that there are more verses about husbands treating their wives as Christ treats the Church: Infinite sacrificial love. I’ve spent all my time trying to figure out how to do that, to worry about what my wife’s Christian obligations are.

  21. M. Thompson
    May 27th, 2015 @ 8:13 pm

    That’s HEDLEY!

  22. Paul Elam
    May 27th, 2015 @ 8:40 pm

    Mr. McCain. I’d like to point out why I think your take on this is partially off target. Full disclosure here, the closest political description I can give of myself is libertarian, fiscally far right of center, socially slightly left of center.

    I agree totally that the left is ground zero for feminist expansion. It is their breeding ground. Unfortunately what remains of the right is in reality their chief enablers.

    Repubicans have been so gutless in their reaction to Marxist feminism, and have been so mindlessly gynocentric that they have participated just as much in continuing massive entitlement spending, immigration fraud and corruption in anything wrapped in a political skirt, like VAWA.

    When they did manage to hold off VAWA for a few days, it was not because it was a massively corrupt bill, or that it provided funds to help end due process for fathers and men in general. They instead objected to attempts to broaden the “victim” spending to gays and Native Americans.

    They never talk about what is really wrong with VAWA, or even get close. They just keep renewing it because of the female vote. So in that case they are doing the Democrats work for them.

    Mitt Romney responded to a completely bogus “war on women” with a long lived laughing stock of a sound bite, “binders full of women.”

    Our family courts have been corrupt for decades (longer actually), but even when Ron Paul was asked about Title IV-D, he did not even know what it was.

    Then we also have the fact that there are plenty of people on the right who look the other way at government expansion, draconian laws and all the crap that comes with that because they think it supports their “traditional values.”

    After all, it was Ronald Reagan who signed no fault divorce into California law.

    I agree totally with you that getting Democrats out of office may help dry up some of the funding, but I also think it is a huge mistake to think the Right will provide solutions that are currently eroding our civil liberties. In some ways, the right will make things worse.

    This culture has a lot to learn about sexual politcs and we are a ways from being there. Thankfully, some pundits on the right are starting to get it (that this problem is a hell of a lot more than two years old) and seem to be turning the corner.

    I hope that turns into a little more real information and wisdom in right wing political platforms.

  23. Quartermaster
    May 27th, 2015 @ 9:11 pm

    Alas, what you posit as the right is actually left of center. The entire GOP leadership is leftist. The GOP began as a leftist Party and that has never changed. The Dims started as a quite conservative party, but they got tired of losing to the GOP in the latter half of the 19th century, and progressives infiltrated from the GOP and turned the party sharply left. Wilson was their first regressive POTUS, and it has been downhill since that time. Both major parties are leftist as a result, and the only thing that happens is the country’s leadership simply shifts between wings of the same party.

    There is, in reality, just one party, and the parties maintain two names to keep up appearances.

  24. crydiego
    May 27th, 2015 @ 10:02 pm

    These Mobys are definitely out and they are not just from the left. The one’s from the left throw hate at women and the ones on the right throw hate at the left. When in doubt, remember, the MHRM is non-partisan and they don’t hate women.

  25. DeadMessenger
    May 27th, 2015 @ 11:46 pm

    Yeah, that “perfect case” thing was exactly what I was thinking, too.

    I have atheists who respond to me online with comments obviously from one of those “Bible inconsistencies” websites. Only problem is, those can be readily debunked by someone who knows the Word and God’s heart and will in matters.

    This sounded like more of the same to me, but also like a short story for a creative writing assignment.

  26. Steve Skubinna
    May 28th, 2015 @ 12:19 am

    Yeah, the whole thing is just too good to be true. It’s a caricature by people who don’t know any conservatives except the evil ones in their heads that they argue with.

  27. Steve Skubinna
    May 28th, 2015 @ 12:24 am

    That person is probably a Gender Studies professor who spends her spare time creating fake hate crimes at her school.

    You’d expect it to become depressing after a while. You know these hate filled racists are out there, but they refuse to show themselves. So to prove their existence you must manufacture rape hoaxes and hang nooses on your door and burn crosses on your own lawn and spray paint racist epithets on your apartment building.

    Then, once the hoax is uncovered nobody takes seriously your explanation that all you were doing is starting a dialog. It’s frustrating because those people pretend they can’t hear the voices in your head.

  28. sputnik
    May 28th, 2015 @ 12:26 am

    The Republican party arose from the ashes of the old Whig party — it didn’t just materialize out of nuthin’! — as a servant of “The Money Power” of old New England, what would later come to be called Wall Street. Lincoln was a corporate lawyer (the Illinois Central Railroad, Vanderbilt owned) whose sole function was to preserve the greater tax base for the benefit of big money, in an era before the income tax, when the Federal Gummint relied primarily on tariffs for revenue. (See “The Tariff of Abominations,” which the Old South refused to pay.)

    Expecting “conservatives” to reliably deliver meaningful social change at the political level is as absurd as any other expectation of political solutions. What we mean when we bandy about the word politics is really law. Thing is, the law is a sort of ex post facto affair by nature; it exists only as a formal codification of the existing mores and practices within a society, mores and practices which PRECEDE any such explication in ink on papyrus.

    Thus, properly, our “leaders” need to be led, and thus, no meaningful “political” change — no meaningful changes in the law — will occur until there exists widespread, irresistible social change in attitudes and beliefs, as Paul Elam has correctly observed elsewhere.

    That’s what finally put an end to slavery, first in England, and then here; further furtherance of the institution had become politically unviable, through the efforts of highly motivated human rights activists. It wasn’t Lincoln; a certain recent movie portrayed the final push as a matter of arm-twisting the Connecticut delegation, a gross historical misrepresentation which the present-day state of Connecticut found offensive, and which it protested, to no avail! No, the only arms in need of any twisting to get the 13th amendment passed were—

    Lincoln’s!

    Guy was a mope and a half. The Emancipation Proclamation only made slavery illegal in those states that had attempted to secede, not in MO, MD, or even D. C. itself! Odd, but true, and yet the myth was sold so convincingly that dem unwillin’ African imports voted overwhelmingly republican for decades thereafter, well into the 20th century. No, I wouldn’t give you a plugged nickel for either party, either, tank you bery much.

    Let us hope and work that we may be as effective in the campaign for a society more civil towards men, as effective as anti-slavery characters such as William Wilberforce.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Wilberforce

    As for “mobys” in our midst; I sorta figgered that out fer m’self. I’m just glad that a prominent voice such as McCain, here, is articulately highlighting the fact.

  29. Finrod Felagund
    May 28th, 2015 @ 12:51 am

    I wonder how many on Team Blue there have even heard of A Modest Proposal.

  30. Daniel Freeman
    May 28th, 2015 @ 1:24 am

    OT: Michael LaCour is really screwed now. Although he may have faked other results, that’s difficult to explain, and difficult to understand. But everyone knows what it means when someone tries to gaslight a journalist.

    (h/t Twitchy)

  31. Fail Burton
    May 28th, 2015 @ 1:53 am

    But these feminists ironically mirror what they can’t find. They admire lesbians like Audre Lorde who use phrases like “the gap of male ignorance” in her most quoted essay. Have you ever seen so-called misogynist industry video gamers use rhetoric like that before or after Gamergate? These are morons who give us LOLs at the idea of misandry and yet that’s clearly what they are. This is an ideology that has no critical thinking skills whatsoever nor self-awareness. Their hate and mental health issues clouds everything.

  32. concern00
    May 28th, 2015 @ 3:34 am

    …is such a Moby Dick?

  33. CrustyB
    May 28th, 2015 @ 6:58 am

    Being a conservative means you can think objectively, so by definition you are a journalist.

  34. menrppl2
    May 28th, 2015 @ 7:01 am

    fair play has yet to win a hockey game

  35. DukeLax
    May 28th, 2015 @ 7:05 am

    I believe that American gender-feminists are going to keep pushing more and more perversions and manufactured statistics Alliances into state law enforcement…and state law enforcement are going to keep unconstitutionally “Taking the pork”…..until we reach the point where hetero-relationships become such a legal liability that guys are forced to go MGTOW…just to not be harassed by a perverse system.

  36. Krolll
    May 28th, 2015 @ 7:46 am

    A very clear pattern is recognizable: People’s anger at feminists is turned into support for state/UN funded international feminism by bringing up the Arab regions and India.
    The way India is portrayed in the feminist media, for instance, is nothing but slander. As a rule, men fare no better than women anywhere in the world. In backward, conflict ridden, area’s, the difference between protectiveness and suppression is always hard to discern.
    ‘Cui bono’ is as allways the question to be asked. The Birmingham Trojan Horse Plot was used to introduce the worst cultural marxist policies Britain has ever seen. Christian schools were threatened with closure because their 10-yr old pupils had not been taught about transsexuality and homosexuals…

  37. Steve Skubinna
    May 28th, 2015 @ 7:59 am

    Thing about LaCour is that his behavior doesn’t just happen in a vacuum. Somebody just spotted one example and suddenly the whole thing began to unravel. And you know damn well that he’s not an isolated example, he’s just the most recent guy who got caught.

    Well, he can always get a job at Think Progress or Vox or even MSNBC.

  38. Finrod Felagund
    May 28th, 2015 @ 10:03 am

    Precisely. Leftists that never venture outside their Community-Based Reality don’t know what their opponents are actually like, so they have to imagine them.

  39. InRussetShadows
    May 28th, 2015 @ 10:05 am

    Yes. It is also pounded into our eyes incessantly by Hollywood. Think of your standard horror tropes – evil always begins in some small town somewhere, right?

  40. InRussetShadows
    May 28th, 2015 @ 10:07 am

    Agreed. They have majored in self-awareness fail and minored in inability to notice irony.

  41. Finrod Felagund
    May 28th, 2015 @ 10:09 am

    Or in Gor novels, but everyone understands that they’re fiction.

  42. Finrod Felagund
    May 28th, 2015 @ 10:12 am

    Shorter version of what you said: almost all the Democrats and half the Republicans in office are worthless spend-o-holics that very much need to have their fingers pried from the levers of power.

  43. Something smells fishy | Dalrock
    May 28th, 2015 @ 10:55 am

    […] out McCain’s post A Moby in the ‘Manosphere’? for his description of the troll and the definition of the term […]

  44. realraven2000
    May 28th, 2015 @ 11:14 am

    a moby most definitely. that comment was so entrenched in the “traditionalist view” that is the caricature the anti-MRA crowd relishes and the ascribes exactly the female lack of agency and male having-to-control-everything which is one of the things MRAs and MGTOWs tell everyone to avoid, which gets feminist activists and sympathizers (scum like Steve Shives) to mix up PUA with MRA. They don’t even know that, just like Don Quixote, what they are fighting is a caricature and not the actual “ideology” that they pretend to attack.

  45. Steve Skubinna
    May 28th, 2015 @ 12:12 pm

    I once worked with a gay guy who thought he was closeted, yet everybody knew. He wasn’t stereotypically swishy, he just tried too hard, always talking about all the women he had sex with all the time. With women. Sex, you know. All kinds of women, all the time. Usually tow or three at a time.

    Most of us simply nodded while chewing the inside of our lip and tried not to obviously eye roll. It was almost painful. It always reminded me of the scene in All Of Me, where Lily Tomlin’s personality has control of Steve Martin’s body and so, trying to act like a man, swaggers about spitting and reaching down to shift his load.

  46. Lev Bronshtein
    May 28th, 2015 @ 12:12 pm

    Have any of you ever been in a street fight, or a road war?

    I go after Liberals, on Leftist sites, from the hard Left.

  47. Steve Skubinna
    May 28th, 2015 @ 12:16 pm

    If it ever comes to an actual street fight these people are toast. Feminists, SJWs, progs, all of that hapless silly gaggle of losers. If they ever figure out what the radical Muslims really want to do they’ll realize that the only thing standing between them and a bread knife to the neck or being tossed from a building is us.

    If they’re lucky.

    Anyway, this clown isn’t “going after” us from the right, he’s being a moby. I presume what you do is attack them as being insufficiently pure, ideologically, as sellouts to capitalism or the patriarchy or white privilege.

  48. Lev Bronshtein
    May 28th, 2015 @ 12:21 pm

    Yeah, pretty much “Agree and Amplify” on them, and they just can’t stand it.

    For example: calling for segregating whites from blacks, to protect blacks from “white privilege” and “oppression”.

  49. Ayatollah Obama
    May 28th, 2015 @ 1:05 pm

    As if public opinion is determined by fighting it out in the comments section of clickbait blogs. The left really likes to waste their time.

  50. Andrejovich Dietrich
    May 28th, 2015 @ 1:22 pm

    Count Da Money..In a different History of our world