The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

The Creepy Freaks of ‘Social Justice’

Posted on | August 10, 2015 | 173 Comments

 

Perhaps “Sarah” Nyberg (@srhbutts) thinks I’m stupid. Or perhaps Ms. Nygberg has been fooling people for so long now, Ms. Nyberg thinks that bogus little “victim” act will never fail. At any rate, after I was first suspended from Twitter for a five-month-old tweet about Ms. Nyberg, I had hoped that my response would caution Ms. Nyberg against further aggressions. Alas, as Benjamin Franklin said, experience keeps a dear school but fools will learn in no other. Some genuinely frightening people have tried to shut me up in the past, and have learned that I am not easily frightened. In fact, some of those people are in federal custody now because this is not a game that Homey D. Clown plays.

 

It appears Ms. Nyberg is leveraging friendships with Twitter support personnel in order to delete any mention of Ms. Nyberg’s male past and male name. You will call Ms. Nyberg “Sarah” on Twitter or else you will be shut down. The faux-female does not wish it known that he is faux, you see. And so it was that, after my first suspension on Friday, I was locked out of my account again Sunday. In order to log onto Twitter this morning, I had to delete two tweets:

 

This isn’t going to work, Sarah Nyberg. You are trying to evade the consequences of your own folly — using the pseudonym “Sarah Butts” while trying to shut down 8chan.net — and hope to conceal what was learned about you as a result of that blunder.

Just in case anyone has forgotten what we learned:

[“Sarah”] tried to shut down funding for the website 8chan.net, which had supported #GamerGate, by falsely accusing them of hosting child pornography.  However, he/she failed to anticipate the reaction,i.e., that the people he/she had attacked would figure out who he/she actually was, connect the dots, and expose [“Sarah’s”] unsavory background. It appears that “Sarah” had been something of a nuisance in various online forums circa 2006/2007, allegedly engaging in discussions about pedophilia and sex with dogs.
One of these discussions was about lowering the age of consent to 12, and Sarah said someone who had “a positive, fulfilling, non-abusive sexual relationship with an adult as a child are more likely to realize such relationships are not inherently abusive, and be more likely to admit they’re attracted to kids.” Sarah said that while “most people aren’t ready at 12,” this is not “a valid reason to outlaw sex at said age.” Sarah asserted that “most people” don’t understand “childhood sexuality,” because it doesn’t involve “full-blown intercourse” and therefore it is “inherently less dangerous and virtually impossible to lead to pregnancy, etc.” Sarah said “childhood sex play” is “nothing harmful” and that “what’s harmful is society pretending children are asexual.”

Have any of Ms. Nyberg’s friends ever asked him/her to explain that? Perhaps it was just a moot hypothetical discussion. Or not.

If we look at the forum where that discussion took place, we find that it was inspired by news about a fringe political party in the Netherlands, (Partij voor Naastenliefde, Vrijheid en Diversiteit, PNVD). Widely known as the “Pedo Party,” PNVD advocated lowering the age of consent from 16 to 12. It would appear Ms. Nyberg was enthusiastic about this idea, but perhaps I am misinterpreting his/her comments. The problem is that (a) it does not seem Ms. Nyberg has ever adequately clarified his/her views on the subject, but instead (b) is pretending to be a victim of harassment in order to (c) play a game of “Let’s Erase the Evidence” and also (d) depict anyone raising these questions as a hateful bully.

You may fool some people into believing your act, Nyberg, but you can’t fool everyone, and you sure as hell will never fool me.

DARVO — Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender — it’s a rather well-documented tactic, and when I see people (a) with sexual idiosyncracies (b) allying themselves with a “social justice” movement and (c) claiming that people who tell the truth about them are “bullies,” my suspicion is (d) they’re just angry their shady hustle got busted and (e) they’re trying to exploit sympathy by (f) posing as a victim.

A Martyr for the Sacred Cause! This is a game I’ve seen “social justice” types play many times before, and Homey don’t play that, see?

Was there a case a mistaken identity? Are you . . .“Sarah” Nyberg, the same Sarah who wrote so enthusiastically about “childhood sexuality”? If so, were your statements about having “a positive, fulfilling, non-abusive sexual relationship with an adult as a child” based upon your own personal experience?

Simple questions, really. Why aren’t they being asked? Meanwhile, a Reddit commenter quotes the Twitter rule behind my suspension:

Personal information includes full names, locations, phone numbers, email addresses, etc. Things that aren’t linked together on social media count as personal information. For example, if someone’s name isn’t linked to their Twitter bio, it’s safe to assume that posting it would count as dox. If you’re uncertain of whether or not a post is as liability for including personal information, please message the mods.
This extends to posting links to pages which contain such information.

What this rule was presumably intended to do was to prevent “doxxing,” and I am anti-“doxxing,” but this rule is written so broadly that, if applied as written, I could change my Twitter identity to “Latonya Q. Robinson” with a photo of a black woman as my avatar and then demand Twitter punish anyone who mentioned that I am, in fact, a white man named Robert Stacy McCain. Ah, but you see, this rule is not applied consistently, and is being used by “social justice” activists to protect themselves from critical scrutiny. Favoritism has been alleged by supporters of #GamerGate who say that their enemies are unethically exploiting personal connections with Twitter personnel:

SushiLuLu (also known as Stephanie Greene) was forced to delete tweets critical of Randi Harper in order to have her Twitter account reactivated. Randi Harper has demonstrated her unusual control over Twitter support before, and it turns out that Randi Harper and Del Harvey, Vice President of Trust and Safety at Twitter, are connected.
She has . . . become vocal against anti-GamerGate personalities such as Randi Harper,proprietor of the GGAutoBlocker, which labels prominent GamerGate voices such as Breitbart’s Milo Yiannopoulos as “shitlords” and their followers as “sheeple.” SushiLuLu even went so far as to write a three-part series solely on Randi Harper, focusing on the irony of someone who regularly flames her opponents (particularly Chris von Csefalvay, who did the statistical analysis on GamerGate) on Twitter having the gall to start the Online Abuse Prevention Initiative
Unfortunately, on the night of March 17th, SushiLuLu found out that Randi Harper has powerful friends. . . .
It appears on the night on March 17th, SushiLulu’s account became locked, and when she attempted to deactivate it, she was told to delete five tweets which were negative toward Randi Harper. . . .

You can and should read the whole thing.

Every responsible and intelligent person familiar with Randi Harper regards her as a disgusting and arguably dangerous individual. So far as I can discover, nobody actually likes Randi Harper. By striking a posture of victimhood and attacking #GamerGate, however, she made herself useful to the “social justice” cause which needs self-declared victims of “bullying” and “harassment,” because this is the argument they use to silence their critics. Randi Harper resorted to totalitarian tactics to suppress #GamerGate supporters, creating a videogame industry blacklist that “branded some 10,425 Twitter accounts, including those of journalists, as harassment ‘offenders’ in a humiliatingly ill-conceived attempt to provide a ‘blocking tool’ to its members”:

The blocking tool, which has been widely mocked online for its lack of sophistication and “blanket ban” approach, was assembled by Randi Harper, a persistent online agitator. The tool prevents users from seeing not only the tweets of users Harper has decided are implicated in harassment, but also many accounts who simply follow those users, by blocking a list of thousands of users with the use of an automated “bot.” . . .

Randi Harper is a clumsy, hateful thug, and you can click here to see Twitter conversations between Sarah Nyberg (@srhbutts) and Randi Harper (@randileeharper). Bad causes attract bad people, and these two are part of a clique of bad people with no discernible talent who are using “social justice” politics in a dishonest attempt to shake down the video game industry. They are losing, because they deserve to lose, and they are desperately trying to silence #GamerGate supporters who have exposed them and their “social justice” allies as miserable frauds.


Well, let Harper and Nyberg run squawling to Del Harvey, whining about how mean Mister McCain told the truth about them. They are liars and creepy freaks who should never be trusted.

“God gave them up unto vile affections . . . God gave them over to a reprobate mind . . .”
— Romans 1:26-28 (KJV)

Beware of reprobate minds. Crazy people are dangerous.





 

Category: Sex Trouble

Comments

173 Responses to “The Creepy Freaks of ‘Social Justice’”

  1. Finrod Felagund
    August 10th, 2015 @ 2:10 pm

    FreeBSD should sue Randi Harper for slander for her associating herself with it.

  2. Jeanette Victoria
    August 10th, 2015 @ 2:14 pm

    Social media where the cluster B degenerate bully freely. Sadly it just reinforces what we already know, these folks should be locked up and medicated.

  3. Jeanette Victoria
    August 10th, 2015 @ 2:19 pm

    How Randi Harper Uses Her Ties To Twitter Executive Del Harvey To Silence Other Women http://goo.gl/U1Uzxw

    You know lesbian Del Harvey who is really Allison Shea who was part of that disaster know as perverted justice

  4. Gunga
    August 10th, 2015 @ 2:27 pm

    Wow…just wow…it’s like a stew made with equal portions of stupid, evil, mean, vindictive and crazy…

  5. GamergateDunGood
    August 10th, 2015 @ 2:28 pm

    Seeing as how SJW freaks are running twitter, have you got a contingency plan in place for when they fully ban you from it? Chuck Johnson is gone and still gone while Zoey “threaten, dox, curbstomp but that’s ok because she’s trans” Tur still moves freely within twitter

  6. Dana
    August 10th, 2015 @ 2:59 pm

    Please do not refer to Mr Nyberg as “Ms. Nyberg.” Such an “homorific” — and it is my position that “Ms” is no honorific at all, and that women should be addressed as either Miss, Mrs, or, if one has earned the degree, Dr — implies that he is actually female.

    We tell the truth here, and should never consent to go along with the delusions and lies of the left.

  7. arcadius
    August 10th, 2015 @ 3:08 pm

    And people wonder why Twitter doesn’t turn a profit: http://techcrunch.com/2015/04/28/twitter-collapses-18-in-wake-of-lackluster-q1-revenue-user-growth/#.juhnjk:Y9R0

  8. RKae
    August 10th, 2015 @ 3:19 pm

    I said long ago that Twitter should be free… but if you want to delete a tweet, then that’s $5,000.

    They would have made a fortune on Alec Baldwin alone!

  9. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    August 10th, 2015 @ 4:05 pm

    I have no problem with Ms. If someone prefers Mrs. or Miss, I am totally fine with that too. I go by MsEBL but I am a cow and excluding extra type strokes and punctuation is always welcomed for allowing extra cud time.

  10. Fail Burton
    August 10th, 2015 @ 4:08 pm

    This gay racist feminist cult is the stupidest frickin’ bunch of people to ever gather on the American scene.

  11. Ilion
    August 10th, 2015 @ 4:15 pm

    Cathy Young: “Starting to think campaign against online harassment is really meant to ensure “social justice” bullies can bully w/out anyone fighting back.”

    Assuming that this is *the* Cathy Young, you’re only just now figuring that out?

    Hell, I figured out the basic principle in play with that sort when I was just a kid … back in caveman days, before there even were personal computers and the internet, much less Twitter and Facebook.

  12. Jeanette Victoria
    August 10th, 2015 @ 4:49 pm

    Sane people know that a man can NEVER be a woman no matter how much hormones and how much surgery they have.

  13. omicron123
    August 10th, 2015 @ 4:55 pm

    It ain’t them being trans* that makes them crazy. They’re crazy separate and apart from being trans*
    Source: I’m trans*. I’m also a staunch conservative and not very crazy at all. (Promise)

    So — on behalf of those of us who aren’t totalitarian nuts – sorry for the ones who are.

  14. omicron123
    August 10th, 2015 @ 4:58 pm

    Same people know that generalizations are generally the root of a whole lot of ills. 😛

  15. Southern Air Pirate
    August 10th, 2015 @ 5:20 pm

    Followed the link on to Reddit and the SJW’s there are shutting the whole thing down because GAMERGATE! Oh and supposedly doxing someone who has already outed themselves is evil and vicious and what a evil vicious rethuglican would do.

  16. Prime Director
    August 10th, 2015 @ 5:25 pm

    Mmmm-hmmm

  17. Dana
    August 10th, 2015 @ 5:40 pm

    The “honorific” MS is an abomination unto the Lord.

  18. Jeanette Victoria
    August 10th, 2015 @ 6:09 pm

    Fact XY can NEVER become XX

  19. RS
    August 10th, 2015 @ 6:24 pm

    Given that the second episode comes hard on the heels of the first, I still wonder why the five month initial delay? What’s the endgame? Either Nyberg is a (relative) “nobody,” in which case why dredge this up after it’s been forgotten? Or, if Nyberg is a (relative) “somebody,” why dredge this up after it’s been forgotten. I don’t see the point, especially given the number of other places where the information is easily obtainable and the fact that his current target has a web journal that gets a lot of pageviews and is outside the reach of the Twitter goons. It makes zero sense.

  20. omicron123
    August 10th, 2015 @ 6:59 pm

    Fact: not all from-birth women are XX, and vice versa. So genetic markers are a not-always-relevant generalization that does not dictate who society, or even you, would consider men or women.

  21. Jeanette Victoria
    August 10th, 2015 @ 7:10 pm

    Fact XX is ALWAYS a woman. Intersexed is a rare condtion. Bioglogy determines sex not what a person feels.

  22. Finrod Felagund
    August 10th, 2015 @ 8:27 pm

    Leftists seldom take the Streisand Effect into consideration.

  23. omicron123
    August 10th, 2015 @ 8:48 pm

    Intersex is similarly rare to transgenderism, as it turns out. ^_^

    Also your ‘fact’ is wrong. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/XX_male_syndrome

  24. Jeanette Victoria
    August 10th, 2015 @ 9:30 pm

    Ah yes another rare disorder used to justify the mental illness of people who do not have a rare disorder

  25. RKae
    August 10th, 2015 @ 9:32 pm

    Some people are born without legs.

    That doesn’t make legs an “illusion” or a “social construct.”

    It makes the absence of them a birth defect.

  26. omicron123
    August 10th, 2015 @ 9:39 pm

    Really? Have you done the research? ‘Cause other scientisty folks have and they in overwhelming majority seem convinced there’s something to this.

  27. omicron123
    August 10th, 2015 @ 9:41 pm

    Some people are born with giant noses. By all means, come after my mote of a (entirely self-funded) self-correction endeavor when you’re done lambasting all the rhinoplasty patients.

  28. SouthOhioGipper
    August 10th, 2015 @ 11:09 pm

    Good lord Mr. McCain. Your blog has become my favorite place on the internet. You’re one of the few conservatives actually fighting back out there that is not enthusiastically associated with some fringe MGTOW or “Red Pill” movement. The fact that that you take on the white nationalists and other fringe right elements is double points. I never venture into twitter except to follow your tweets and see which Internet justice warrior is being skewered by your blade of anti hypocrisy.

  29. Burn_the_Witch
    August 10th, 2015 @ 11:55 pm

    Perhaps when rhinoplasty patients begin arguing for special recognition or clear denials of reality, you’ll have a point.

  30. Burn_the_Witch
    August 10th, 2015 @ 11:57 pm

    If you’re trans, you’re crazy, no matter how much you promise.

  31. Lamprotatia
    August 11th, 2015 @ 12:09 am

    Conservatives can have mental illnesses too, just like physical illnesses.

  32. DeadMessenger
    August 11th, 2015 @ 1:12 am

    That’s Robert Stacy “Latonya Q. Robinson” McCain.

    And yes, he/she is awesome!

  33. DeadMessenger
    August 11th, 2015 @ 1:12 am

    That’s Robert Stacy “Latonya Q. Robinson” McCain.

    And yes, he/she is awesome!

  34. DeadMessenger
    August 11th, 2015 @ 1:39 am

    From the linked article: “With Randi and Del calling the shots on what can and can’t be said on Twitter, don’t expect freedom of expression for GamerGate.”

    Nor for anyone else. If Andrea Shea/Del Harvey is willing to bend over for a worthless non-starter like Randi Harper, then suddenly Twitter isn’t worth a steaming pile. Hope to see it upon the ashheap of history soon. At which point, I hope one or both turn up for a job where I have friends, and after 35 nerdy years, I have lots of friends. And then suddenly, the jackboot is on the other foot.

  35. DeadMessenger
    August 11th, 2015 @ 1:42 am

    Considering how quickly Twitter is turning into the neighborhood FreakStop, it may start coughing up blood before he gets banned. And Twitter execs will know the toxic entities who are to blame. (Especially if the user community helps them to know.)

    These assbags can only have control over you if you let them.

  36. DeadMessenger
    August 11th, 2015 @ 2:20 am

    Ah, Wikipedia, the always-accurate site contributed to by documented super-geniuses. Well, if Wikipedia says a thing, it MUST be true. [eyeroll]

  37. DeadMessenger
    August 11th, 2015 @ 2:23 am

    Some scientisty people also believe in junk science, like global warming and macro-evolution. I’m a scientisty person, and 80% of my peers are mind-controlled zombies. And zombie research don’t count for squat.

  38. DeadMessenger
    August 11th, 2015 @ 2:24 am

    BWAHAHAHA!

  39. DeadMessenger
    August 11th, 2015 @ 2:26 am

    Dude, you’re on a roll.

  40. DeadMessenger
    August 11th, 2015 @ 2:31 am

    “Waaah! [choking sobs] Mean people are mocking me and holding me accountable for stupid sh1t I’ve said and done. That’s not fair! My Mommy said I’m super smart and I have a good personality! I hate them, I hate them, I hate them”! [slams bedroom door, flings body across bed, cries]

  41. Fail Burton
    August 11th, 2015 @ 3:09 am

    I’d like to see a reality show where Butts, Sarkeesian, Harper, Wu, Arthur Chu and John Scalzi are all put in the same house and have to fight mixed martial arts matches at the end.

  42. Daniel Freeman
    August 11th, 2015 @ 3:30 am

    That would be awesome.

    Right up until they got aroused.

  43. omicron123
    August 11th, 2015 @ 5:01 am

    So you go around calling anyone with a history of rhinoplasty an “ugly nosed faker” or somesuch? Or do you blindly accept that their surgery happened and treat them like you would normal-nosed people?

    Please ask yourself, why should Trans*folks alone be targets of ridicule for so-called unnatural modifications?

  44. omicron123
    August 11th, 2015 @ 5:04 am

    You’re a very rude person – and I don’t say that likely. I’ve always excused a hell of a lot of behavior, but you’re somehow a step beyond.

    Take a step back. Ask yourself why you’re going out of your way to insult and derogate an erstwhile ally who’s done nothing to challenge you except claim not to be crazy?

  45. omicron123
    August 11th, 2015 @ 5:05 am

    Ah, snide dismissals based on assumed-inaccurate sources — the fallacy that dare not speak its name.

  46. omicron123
    August 11th, 2015 @ 5:06 am

    Absolutely. But this conservative – and many others I know – don’t.

  47. omicron123
    August 11th, 2015 @ 5:23 am

    At worst, the original action might be. (Though my investigation into the associated verses leads me to believe otherwise, that’s admittedly a matter of personal interpretation)
    But what’s your argument for *the act of respecting a trans*person’s choice* itself being sinful? ‘Cause I don’t see many verses in there saying “Lambast the sinner or burn in hell”.

  48. omicron123
    August 11th, 2015 @ 5:27 am

    Let me summarize your position for you, okay? “Having done no research, given nobody on the other side the time to even begin talking about the issue, let alone experienced it for myself, I am nonetheless confident and unswayable in my view that (despite the existence of myriad genetic conditions leading to unusual fetal sex development, whether in hormonal response, genes, or body features) no such birth condition could possibly affect the brain’s internal chemistry and self-held view of identity, and therefore all claimed sufferers of such conditions are both wrong and carnival-barking mad. Furthermore, I reserve the right to roundly insult any friendly face who I suspect of this assumed madness, dismissing and denigrating them in lieu of accepting the possibility they might not be crazy, and never even considering extending to them the benefit of the doubt.”
    Man, you make me proud to support conservatives.

  49. Dana
    August 11th, 2015 @ 5:41 am

    I don’t think that your reply was meant for me, but “the act of respecting a trans*person’s choice” is respecting a lie. You do not honor falsehood, and you do not respect lies.

  50. Dana
    August 11th, 2015 @ 5:43 am

    If you’ve had a rhinoplasty, you have changed the shape of your nose. You don’t lie about it, I suppose, if asked, and you aren’t claiming that your nose is anything but a nose.

    But if you are born male, then you are male, regardless of whether you can find a quack to castrate you and build you a faux vagina.