The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

The Creepy Freaks of ‘Social Justice’

Posted on | August 10, 2015 | 173 Comments


Perhaps “Sarah” Nyberg (@srhbutts) thinks I’m stupid. Or perhaps Ms. Nygberg has been fooling people for so long now, Ms. Nyberg thinks that bogus little “victim” act will never fail. At any rate, after I was first suspended from Twitter for a five-month-old tweet about Ms. Nyberg, I had hoped that my response would caution Ms. Nyberg against further aggressions. Alas, as Benjamin Franklin said, experience keeps a dear school but fools will learn in no other. Some genuinely frightening people have tried to shut me up in the past, and have learned that I am not easily frightened. In fact, some of those people are in federal custody now because this is not a game that Homey D. Clown plays.


It appears Ms. Nyberg is leveraging friendships with Twitter support personnel in order to delete any mention of Ms. Nyberg’s male past and male name. You will call Ms. Nyberg “Sarah” on Twitter or else you will be shut down. The faux-female does not wish it known that he is faux, you see. And so it was that, after my first suspension on Friday, I was locked out of my account again Sunday. In order to log onto Twitter this morning, I had to delete two tweets:


This isn’t going to work, Sarah Nyberg. You are trying to evade the consequences of your own folly — using the pseudonym “Sarah Butts” while trying to shut down — and hope to conceal what was learned about you as a result of that blunder.

Just in case anyone has forgotten what we learned:

[“Sarah”] tried to shut down funding for the website, which had supported #GamerGate, by falsely accusing them of hosting child pornography.  However, he/she failed to anticipate the reaction,i.e., that the people he/she had attacked would figure out who he/she actually was, connect the dots, and expose [“Sarah’s”] unsavory background. It appears that “Sarah” had been something of a nuisance in various online forums circa 2006/2007, allegedly engaging in discussions about pedophilia and sex with dogs.
One of these discussions was about lowering the age of consent to 12, and Sarah said someone who had “a positive, fulfilling, non-abusive sexual relationship with an adult as a child are more likely to realize such relationships are not inherently abusive, and be more likely to admit they’re attracted to kids.” Sarah said that while “most people aren’t ready at 12,” this is not “a valid reason to outlaw sex at said age.” Sarah asserted that “most people” don’t understand “childhood sexuality,” because it doesn’t involve “full-blown intercourse” and therefore it is “inherently less dangerous and virtually impossible to lead to pregnancy, etc.” Sarah said “childhood sex play” is “nothing harmful” and that “what’s harmful is society pretending children are asexual.”

Have any of Ms. Nyberg’s friends ever asked him/her to explain that? Perhaps it was just a moot hypothetical discussion. Or not.

If we look at the forum where that discussion took place, we find that it was inspired by news about a fringe political party in the Netherlands, (Partij voor Naastenliefde, Vrijheid en Diversiteit, PNVD). Widely known as the “Pedo Party,” PNVD advocated lowering the age of consent from 16 to 12. It would appear Ms. Nyberg was enthusiastic about this idea, but perhaps I am misinterpreting his/her comments. The problem is that (a) it does not seem Ms. Nyberg has ever adequately clarified his/her views on the subject, but instead (b) is pretending to be a victim of harassment in order to (c) play a game of “Let’s Erase the Evidence” and also (d) depict anyone raising these questions as a hateful bully.

You may fool some people into believing your act, Nyberg, but you can’t fool everyone, and you sure as hell will never fool me.

DARVO — Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender — it’s a rather well-documented tactic, and when I see people (a) with sexual idiosyncracies (b) allying themselves with a “social justice” movement and (c) claiming that people who tell the truth about them are “bullies,” my suspicion is (d) they’re just angry their shady hustle got busted and (e) they’re trying to exploit sympathy by (f) posing as a victim.

A Martyr for the Sacred Cause! This is a game I’ve seen “social justice” types play many times before, and Homey don’t play that, see?

Was there a case a mistaken identity? Are you . . .“Sarah” Nyberg, the same Sarah who wrote so enthusiastically about “childhood sexuality”? If so, were your statements about having “a positive, fulfilling, non-abusive sexual relationship with an adult as a child” based upon your own personal experience?

Simple questions, really. Why aren’t they being asked? Meanwhile, a Reddit commenter quotes the Twitter rule behind my suspension:

Personal information includes full names, locations, phone numbers, email addresses, etc. Things that aren’t linked together on social media count as personal information. For example, if someone’s name isn’t linked to their Twitter bio, it’s safe to assume that posting it would count as dox. If you’re uncertain of whether or not a post is as liability for including personal information, please message the mods.
This extends to posting links to pages which contain such information.

What this rule was presumably intended to do was to prevent “doxxing,” and I am anti-“doxxing,” but this rule is written so broadly that, if applied as written, I could change my Twitter identity to “Latonya Q. Robinson” with a photo of a black woman as my avatar and then demand Twitter punish anyone who mentioned that I am, in fact, a white man named Robert Stacy McCain. Ah, but you see, this rule is not applied consistently, and is being used by “social justice” activists to protect themselves from critical scrutiny. Favoritism has been alleged by supporters of #GamerGate who say that their enemies are unethically exploiting personal connections with Twitter personnel:

SushiLuLu (also known as Stephanie Greene) was forced to delete tweets critical of Randi Harper in order to have her Twitter account reactivated. Randi Harper has demonstrated her unusual control over Twitter support before, and it turns out that Randi Harper and Del Harvey, Vice President of Trust and Safety at Twitter, are connected.
She has . . . become vocal against anti-GamerGate personalities such as Randi Harper,proprietor of the GGAutoBlocker, which labels prominent GamerGate voices such as Breitbart’s Milo Yiannopoulos as “shitlords” and their followers as “sheeple.” SushiLuLu even went so far as to write a three-part series solely on Randi Harper, focusing on the irony of someone who regularly flames her opponents (particularly Chris von Csefalvay, who did the statistical analysis on GamerGate) on Twitter having the gall to start the Online Abuse Prevention Initiative
Unfortunately, on the night of March 17th, SushiLuLu found out that Randi Harper has powerful friends. . . .
It appears on the night on March 17th, SushiLulu’s account became locked, and when she attempted to deactivate it, she was told to delete five tweets which were negative toward Randi Harper. . . .

You can and should read the whole thing.

Every responsible and intelligent person familiar with Randi Harper regards her as a disgusting and arguably dangerous individual. So far as I can discover, nobody actually likes Randi Harper. By striking a posture of victimhood and attacking #GamerGate, however, she made herself useful to the “social justice” cause which needs self-declared victims of “bullying” and “harassment,” because this is the argument they use to silence their critics. Randi Harper resorted to totalitarian tactics to suppress #GamerGate supporters, creating a videogame industry blacklist that “branded some 10,425 Twitter accounts, including those of journalists, as harassment ‘offenders’ in a humiliatingly ill-conceived attempt to provide a ‘blocking tool’ to its members”:

The blocking tool, which has been widely mocked online for its lack of sophistication and “blanket ban” approach, was assembled by Randi Harper, a persistent online agitator. The tool prevents users from seeing not only the tweets of users Harper has decided are implicated in harassment, but also many accounts who simply follow those users, by blocking a list of thousands of users with the use of an automated “bot.” . . .

Randi Harper is a clumsy, hateful thug, and you can click here to see Twitter conversations between Sarah Nyberg (@srhbutts) and Randi Harper (@randileeharper). Bad causes attract bad people, and these two are part of a clique of bad people with no discernible talent who are using “social justice” politics in a dishonest attempt to shake down the video game industry. They are losing, because they deserve to lose, and they are desperately trying to silence #GamerGate supporters who have exposed them and their “social justice” allies as miserable frauds.

Well, let Harper and Nyberg run squawling to Del Harvey, whining about how mean Mister McCain told the truth about them. They are liars and creepy freaks who should never be trusted.

“God gave them up unto vile affections . . . God gave them over to a reprobate mind . . .”
Romans 1:26-28 (KJV)

Beware of reprobate minds. Crazy people are dangerous.



173 Responses to “The Creepy Freaks of ‘Social Justice’”

  1. omicron123
    August 11th, 2015 @ 8:11 pm

    Ignorance of what? Be precise, please. (Oh, and your attempts to dismiss my sources because you disagree with them don’t count – that’s what you call an opinion, and without basis in science or research it cannot support itself)

    Faulty reasoning where? Again, precision first and foremost.

    Fallacious arguments where? As every teacher throughout high school undoubtedly forgot to drill into your head, “show your work.” (But please stop going straight for the ad hominems – hypocrisy is never becoming)

    Mangle the very language how? (Oh, and the occasional misspelling on account of typing most of this on a 4-inch touch screen in rush hour traffic doesn’t count – sorry)

    You’re all talk. Put up or shut up.

  2. Dana
    August 11th, 2015 @ 8:42 pm

    I can respect a “trans” person as a person, in that I respect any human being who hasn’t harmed me. But saying that does not mean that I need or ought to have any respect for his delusions, or that I should go along with them for the sake of courtesy.

  3. Dana
    August 11th, 2015 @ 8:48 pm

    Ahhh, but the question is: was the blind man healed, was he granted the gift of sight? If he was not, then he would still be blind, and it would be perfectly accurate to note that. If, on the other hand, he was given sight, then no, he would no longer be blind.

    But I can see that you have attempted to set a trap here, with the expected response that, if the blind man could be given his sight, and thus be healed, the transsexual could receive hormones and surgery, and become the sex he believes he is. Sorry, but that’s wholly wrong. Look at Bruce Jenner and Bradley Manning: they may want to be female and believe that they really are female, but no amount of hormones and surgery can change the fact that they are biologically male, with all of the differences that males have from females, differences which involve more than the genitals. Further, both men males grew up male, both had all of their previous experiences as males, and both were reacted to as males for their entire lives. Being male or female is more than a matter of plumbing; it is also a matter of growing up, of experience, of all of life. Neither Mr Jenner nor Mr Manning has any idea of what it is like to be female.

  4. DeadMessenger
    August 11th, 2015 @ 8:57 pm

    The point is, one kindly and reasonably make allowances for someone with a birth defect. But people should not expect special consideration just because they wish they had a birth defect.

    Same thing with, say, a person with Down Syndrome versus a feminist. One has a birth defect that causes mental retardation, and the other is purposefully and voluntarily mentally retarded. And everyone knows which is which.

  5. Dana
    August 11th, 2015 @ 9:03 pm

    You know, I’m a Star Trek junkie, but if I said that I am really a Vulcan, found some plastic surgeon dumb enough to give me pointed ears and some way to dye my blood green, you would still never say, you’re right, you’re a Vulcan; you’d simply think that I was nuts.

    And that’s the case with transsexualism; it doesn’t matter how much medical quackery you can buy, males are always going to be male, and females will always be female, and to say differently is no different than me claiming to be Vulcan, just plain nuts.

  6. omicron123
    August 11th, 2015 @ 9:26 pm

    Nah… Common courtesy means you should go along with them (at least so far as not actively insulting them) for the sake of courtesy. Much as news reporters for the most part refrain from calling conservatives bigots (and are generally frowned upon when they do so).

  7. omicron123
    August 11th, 2015 @ 9:33 pm

    That attempted rebuttal coincidentally takes the few examples that fit its view of things in an attempt to bolster itself.
    But how does it deal with Jazz? She’s had every bit of that experience and life growing up as a woman. Is she female in your eyes?
    What about XX males and AIS females? Are they women and men, respectively, to you?
    As for the rest of it – surprisingly, hormones control most of the lived male/female experience. Change those and you change everything from emotions to muscle mass, and even posture/pelvic alignment. So in the end what we experience isn’t so vastly different, aside from childbirth and (unless you’re dedicated) the monthly cycle.

    Fact is, there is no easy “This is what it means to be a woman” argument to be made. For every aspect of femininity or womanhood, there is a counterexample. In the end you may well be left with the Definition of Filth argument – “I know it when I see it”. And – well – I guarantee that if you ever saw me, you didn’t know it. ^_^

  8. omicron123
    August 11th, 2015 @ 9:37 pm

    The fallacy here being that the leap from male to female, according to what is accepted as a male or a female by everyone in society including you, is both medically possible and approaching trivial. (As opposed to Napoleon complexes, furries, and Trekkies)
    You’ve got no problem with sterile folks, intersex-from-birth folks, AIS folks, XX men – basically anyone who stays where they started. Heck, if I asked you’d probably have no problem with that poor Arab guy who discovered he had an ovarian cyst in his hitherto-undiscovered uterus. You don’t even take offense to the existence of other body modifications!
    What you have a problem with – ALL you have a problem with – is people who transition. And that – I have to say – is just plain nuts.

  9. Burn_the_Witch
    August 11th, 2015 @ 10:30 pm

    At this point, you don’t even seem to know what a fallacy is. So doing poorly at pointing out your strawmen is pointing out every time you do it.

    There’s no need for you to keep up the charade that you’re some sort of genius. Because if you do, it’s really an indictment of the institution which credentialed you.

    I didn’t bother reading farther after such a patently stupid remark. You’re obviously not reading anything I’m writing, so this waste of time is almost over.

  10. Burn_the_Witch
    August 11th, 2015 @ 10:33 pm

    Taking a couple of minutes to type out a response in a comments section is hardly going out of my way. And yet once again I’m not denigrating or insulting you. I’m just making observations and backing them up.

    And since you have routinely demonstrated poor logic and offered wikipedia as the only source for your “science” I think your self-beclowning is complete.

    Just one more response to look at before I’m done watching you circle around the same nonsense over and over.

  11. Burn_the_Witch
    August 11th, 2015 @ 10:36 pm

    Is your scrollbar brokent. I’ve already said everything that needs to be said. That’s the beauty of written communication, I don’t have to keep repeating myself.

    Slow down and read for comprehension. I already showed my work. Over and over and over.

    Looks like we’re done here.

  12. Dana
    August 12th, 2015 @ 5:19 am

    Really? What you call “common courtesy” constitutes lying. “Go(ing) along with them would mean addressing Bruce Jenner as “Caitlyn,” and using feminine pronouns and references to him, which would be lies!

  13. Dana
    August 12th, 2015 @ 5:25 am

    How does it deal with “Jazz?” The television show itself tells you how: “Jazz” was reported to have lamented that the boys were flirting with “her” female friends, but none of the boys would flirt with “her.” It’s real simple: they know that “Jazz” is a boy!

    “Jazz” may have been trying to live as a girl for years, but he will never have a period, he will never worry about getting pregnant. He is trying to experience life as a girl, but he isn’t a girl, and everyone knows it.

  14. Dana
    August 12th, 2015 @ 5:31 am

    It’s simple: “sterile folks, intersex-from-birth folks, AIS folks, XX men – basically anyone who stays where they started” are suffering from birth defects (not necessarily the case in sterility), but they aren’t lying to themselves or lying to society (though they may be trying to hide their conditions) or asking me to lie with them about their unfortunate conditions. I have no problem with anybody suffering from some form of malady; those things aren’t (usually) their faults, but that I have no problem with such unfortunate people doesn’t mean that it’s wise or sensible to lie about them or their conditions.

    You have a problem with the truth. Well, the truth is not fungible, the truth is not flexible; the truth simply is, but you would have us believe otherwise.

  15. Dana
    August 12th, 2015 @ 5:33 am

    Other scientisty people knew, for as long as they were scientisty, that homosexuality was abnormal and a mental disorder; that only changed not because homosexuality changed, but due to political correctness.

    I don’t doubt one bit that there are people who seriously, strongly believe that they are the sex other than which they are, but that doesn’t make it anything other than a mental illness.

  16. Quartermaster
    August 12th, 2015 @ 5:44 am

    You are in very deep spiritual darkness. My views on James and Romans go all the way back to the ante-Nicene Church. Your “mentors” prepared you for hell.

    Works are a product of faith. No one saved until they enter eternity.

  17. omicron123
    August 12th, 2015 @ 5:49 am

    …you know, for a while back there I was worried I’d missed something and you actually knew something I didnt.
    But no. You just have a very hate-filled shade of “only I know the truth” Christianity going – kinda like everyone’s favorite cult of personality out West.
    I wish you well – and that you come to understand slightly more of the faith you profess than just its strictures and warnings.

  18. Quartermaster
    August 12th, 2015 @ 9:24 am

    Standard SJW speak. Someone warns you of the truth, and you accuse of hate. Strawmen will get you no where, and the eisegesis you and your “mentors” have engaged in have done nothing but teach you it’s OK to yield to sin. They have done a wonderful job of preparing you for eternity without God.

    I’ve told you of your problem with sin. I won’t bandy theology with a non-Christian who has been deluded into thinking he’s a Christian. The only thing that matters for you are the warnings of sin and judgment to come. I don’t become your enemy, or hate you, by telling you the truth.

    I do know something you don’t. I know Christ and Him crucified, and there is a heaven to gain and a hell to shun and how to get the first, and avoid the second. You’ve been deluded and will learn the hard way what Christ said about those who say “Lord, Lord” yet did not follow Him.

  19. omicron123
    August 12th, 2015 @ 9:44 am

    And now you’re calling me a SJW. This is too precious for words.
    If you’re ever in Atlanta, we can have a sit down and talk conversation on these subjects. In the meantime, though – I’ve heard all you have to say. I reject it utterly. The God I grew up with – the God of my baptist hometown church and my mother and father and the God I have known since I knelt by my bed at age six begging for forgiveness and acceptance – is not this vengeful God of works you claim to worship. He is a God of mercy and love who knows men and women’s true hearts and whether or not they follow Him. I have sinned often in my short life, sir – but not in this. God laid this path for me, from the moment I was born, and He gave me assurance through His son of my salvation: “He who has ears to hear, let him hear”. This I believe. And I will stand before Him on the last day – and mayhap you will be happy you were wrong.

  20. Prime Director
    August 12th, 2015 @ 6:21 pm

    Kinda like if someone went around calling conservatives bigots to their faces.

    Whoops, you broke character :^(

  21. Charles Miruka
    August 14th, 2015 @ 3:41 am

    Charles Miruka
    P.o. Box 6450–00300
    Ronald Ngala
    Nairobi Kenya

    Dear Friend

    have helped a number of individuals succeed and You are ready to roll
    up your sleeves to make it happen for us. You as a leader in the field
    of Enterprise Solutions to Poverty.
    I am seeking a legitimate
    lender,Trustee,Philanthropy & millionaires lending money to needy
    poor .I am Kenyan citizen, honest and trustworthy.Kindly support me
    with the loan to alleviate poverty & help the most needy in the
    community.Kindly assist me with their Email contacts Address.

    May Allah’s mercy and blessing be on you,your family and friends.I seek
    help from Allah firstly and from you my loving friend.Am seeking a
    solution firstly from Allah and then from you for matters which are too
    heavy for me, am helpless in combating the problems and for that I have
    resorted to seeking help from Allah first and from you.
    life is filled with sadness but I hope with Allah’s mercy and your
    support i will be able to put a smile on my face once again. My troubles
    started when i lost my Job since then life turned up side down in
    terms of financial support. put my family on hold.Now am
    stranded since I do not have any financial help.Am Am so helpless that i
    depend on my few friends for housing and feeding.
    In Allah’s name the Almighty,The most powerful,The
    creator,The most compassionate i humbly ask you to help me business loan .to help me establish my family
    May God’s blessings and peace be upon you ,your family and to all is entire humanitarian people. Am so humbled
    and happy to be your brother.Hope to hear from you soon. I will give
    you all my detail,thank you so much for your email is [email protected]

    Thanks in advance for The interest to help me.

    Charles Miruka

  22. guest
    August 14th, 2015 @ 3:37 pm

    Not “Sarah Nyberg.” Nicholas Edwin Nyberg.

    Never forget, and if you are in communication with him never let him forget, that he’s a pedophile faggot in denial pretending to be a girl. Him. Not “her.” Don’t indulge his delusions.

  23. News of the Week (August 16th, 2015) | The Political Hat
    August 16th, 2015 @ 4:29 pm

    […] The Creepy Freaks of “Social Justice” Perhaps “Sarah” Nyberg (@srhbutts) thinks I’m stupid. Or perhaps Ms. Nygberg has been fooling people for so long now, Ms. Nyberg thinks that bogus little “victim” act will never fail. At any rate, after I was first suspended from Twitter for a five-month-old tweet about Ms. Nyberg, I had hoped that my response would caution Ms. Nyberg against further aggressions. Alas, as Benjamin Franklin said, experience keeps a dear school but fools will learn in no other. Some genuinely frightening people have tried to shut me up in the past, and have learned that I am not easily frightened. In fact, some of those people are in federal custody now because this is not a game that Homey D. Clown plays. […]