A Reminder for ‘Male Feminists’

Posted on Comments

They hate you, too:

tell a self proclaimed male feminist that he cant be a feminist and watch him turn in to the biggest misogynist abusive s–t within 0.2 seconds. happens 100% of the time.

That 31-word post got more than 25,000 notes on Tumblr in the past year, and the same Tumblr feminist had this to say:

leftist men are just as horrifyingly and violently misogynist as all other men, including old conservative christian dudes, but they get away with so much because they dress up their misogyny in a specific “social justice” language and call themselves feminists rather than just straight up saying that they hate women, and they think women are only good for sex, having babies, and domestic labor like right wing men do, but they both hate women the same.

Insofar as “lefist men” and self-proclaimed “male feminists” describe the same group of men, the question arises whether any man can escape feminism’s general condemnation of males. Obviously, some men still believe that feminism is something other than mere man-hating, and some feminists may also encourage men to believe this. What we never see, however, is feminists who condemn the man-haters among them. It would seem that the first commandment of feminism is, “Thou shalt not speak praise of a male, nor defend any man against thy feminist sister.”

Feminism’s discourse about men is relentlessly negative, and no feminist ever criticizes these anti-male sermons, because to do so would result in her ex-communication from the cult. Therefore, if any man dares to object to a movement that seems to contemplate the annihilation of males as its ultimate goal, he can be sure that feminists will unite to denounce him for doing so: “How dare this despicable man quote our words as evidence against us? This is misogynistic harassment!”

Men must never call attention to feminism’s deliberate hatefulness, because no man has any right to defend himself against women who wish him dead. The mere fact that a man notices how feminists express malice toward him — merely because he is male — is considered proof that he is a particularly egregious oppressor. Not even the most sympathetic “progressive” man can ever be exempt from feminism’s all-encompassing hatred of males. Yet left-wing men are so eager to appease these spiteful women (whose votes are necessary to electing progressive politicians) that their allegiance requires them to absorb a constant barrage of insults from their feminist “allies” without complaint

We can only conclude that progressive men think they deserve to be hated by women, and who am I to say that they don’t?





 

34 comments

  1. Sure, leftists think women are “only good for sex”, but since when do leftists think women are “good for having babies”? Isn’t having babies one of the things leftists want to stamp out?

  4. This goes along with the left’s normal rhetoric; critical comments about Blacks is racism, critical comments about Women is misogyny, critical comments about homosexuals is Homophobia etc, etc. Ad infinitum.

    And it boils down to a very human trait which is that humans don’t respond well to criticism and if the speaker is not especially esteemed (and that can change in a second) then their criticism is taken as a personal assault and humans then react as any other entity would by defending themself and attacking back.

    Normal behavior but turns psychotic when applied to valid criticism, criticism meant as constructive input or casual observation.

    It usually is companion with a hair trigger to any words that could be construed as criticism if twisted correctly to seem so.

    Personally, I have found women are particularly adept at doing this latter. Especially if the criticism comes from a loved one or someone that the target feels inferior to and believes they have been attacked previously.

    Just one of the reason why I don’t engage in any in depth relationships anymore and have found it to be a blessed relief from the constant worry about verbal trip wires and their accompanying mine field.

  5. Ah, but that’s what they believe those on the Right believe.

    It’s not that the liberals think they know so much that’s the problem. It’s that they’re wrong about much of what they think they know.

  6. I’m not misoganist. I’m no a bigot. Discrimination? Feh..

    I really do care what progressive, self identified, feminists have to offer… EQUALLY!

  7. The “old verities” remain true: A traitor may be useful, but is never, ever trusted. Ditto, so-called “feminist men” withing the feminist camp.

  8. No its more than that. Notice the left when one of the precious diversity wickets leave the plantation and think for themselves. The absolute and almost gutteral hate and vitro comes spilling out. Michelle Malkin only knows how to type with ping-pong balls. Justice Thomas is an oreo and some other words that begin with n. Palin is a backwoods whore who will do just about anything for money needs to go back having screwed up kids. JC Watts was a house n word for being a GOP member. The list goes on and on and on.

    These comments some from reporters, actors, political types and other members of both the left 1% and it’s 99% followers. They are excused by the media later as just angry outbursts. See the CNN reporter fired for his want to poo in Palin’s mouth. Not as they actually believe this stuff. While the right is tarred and feathered for critical comments as “war on X” where the x is said diversity wicket. That mistakes like a leftist would make go to the memory hole or are excused better (they went to treatment for thier bigotry and do some penalties under observation of the abused diversity wicket) while the right has its mistake recycled until the original video tape snaps.

    I actually think the are projecting thier hate on folks and masking thier true feelings about some of the diversity warriors that hang around the leftist circles of political thought and philosophy. They hate them, but find then useful to get $$$ and votes for elections.

  9. Consider the source:

    lol the girl who made my life in high school hell, who sprayed ‘yasmin is a slut’ all over the gym for the entire school to see, because her boyfriend had a crush on me, she spread extremely horrible rumors about me and basically forced me to transfer schools (all this despite the fact that i rejected her bf a hundred times and avoided him like the plague, and despite the fact that i had never even kissed anyone at that point, but of course everyone believed all the shit she said about me) added me on facebook and is now posting all this libfem crap and calls herself an ~intersectional feminist~ and yet not once has she apologized for what she did

    Her enemy “basically forced (her) to transfer schools?” What you are looking at is a weak, weak sister, who can publish anything she wants via the anonymity of the internet, but can’t handle being challenged in person.

    It occurs to me that there might be an inversely proportional relationship between rage on the internet and the courage to stand up for yourself in person.

  11. We know that you can’t ” care what progressive, self identified, feminists have to offer… EQUALLY!” because Teh White Christofascist Cisheteronormative Patriarchy™ has so completely oppressed womyn that to achieve equally means that they must have worked thrice as hard, overcoming obstacles that men can never imagine. I therefore denounce you for suggesting that equality in judgement is equality.

  12. “The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant, but that they know so much that isn’t so.” — Ronald Reagan

  16. Feminists do not want equality, as any man discovers if he actually treats them equally. That is to say, if a man does not defer to her — if he does not kowtow and tug the forelock in acknowledgement of her vast superiority — the feminist will act as if she has been grossly insulted, merely because a man has treated her as he would treat another man. Perhaps some people are deceived by feminism, but I am not one of those people, and never have been.

    Feminists are privileged women who feel that they do not have enough privilege. How much would be enough? This we do not know, as there has never been any feminist who understood the concept of “enough.” Their ambition is limitless. As soon as feminists have conquered the Earth and eradicated every trace of evidence that males ever existed, they will immediately begin to plot their conquest of outer space.

  18. OT: You know the saying, “You know you’re taking flak when…” Well, Vox Day’s latest non-fiction, SJWs Always Lie, must be directly over the target, since they’re busy proving him right by posting 1-star fake reviews.

    One of them even wrote and published a parody of it already (SJWAL only came out two days ago). That is such an over-the-top response, I’m at a loss for words.

  19. How much would be enough? This we do not know, as there has never been any feminist who understood the concept of “enough.” Their ambition is limitless.

    This is true.

    As soon as feminists have conquered the Earth and eradicated every trace of evidence that males ever existed, they will immediately begin to plot their conquest of outer space.

    Conquest of outer space? Without men? A planet of feminist women would be hard-pressed just to keep themselves fed.

    No, I think that their society would devolve into a feeding frenzy of attack-justifying through virtue-signaling by victim-posturing. Their version of “lefty cannibalization” would become literal before they ever made a spacecraft.

  20. Aw, honey, I don’t think ALL women are “only good for sex, having babies and domestic labor.” I was referring specifically to YOU.

  21. Dear God, can you imagine the poor child with her for a mother? It is child abuse by definition.

  23. “…and
    they think women are only good for sex, having babies, and domestic
    labor…”

    And sammiches. Don’t forget the sammiches.

  25. I wouldn’t trust any of these crazed wenches to fix me a sandwich, or even a cup of water. God only knows what they’d be doing to it while I wasn’t looking.

  26. The jokes abound, of course, but if it’s a serious question… well, yeah. Child abuse. Consider: assuming she maintains her stated mindset, the child(ren) would have absolutely no idea of anything resembling normal, healthy interaction between man and woman. The mate would doubtless be a henpecked gamma male, LITERALLY used only as a sperm donor (per her writing, she hates men, so what would his only practical use BE? Breeding).

    I could continue, but just let your mind wander from that point, along the natural paths such a relationship might take.

    And, of course, it would be worse, if the child were male.

    Freak city.

  31. As soon as feminists have conquered the Earth and eradicated every trace of evidence that males ever existed, they will immediately begin to plot their conquest of outer space.

    That was more or less the sub-plot to Rom, Spaceknight #48

  32. Work at Home Special Report………After earning an average of 19952 Dollars monthly,I’m finally getting 98 Dollars an hour,just working 4-5 hours daily online….It’s time to take some action and you can join it too.It is simple,dedicated and easy way to get rich.Three weeks from now you will wishyou have started today – I promise!….HERE I STARTED-TAKE A LOOK AT…nw…….

    ???? http://supermosttoplevelworkzone/finance/team/…. ???????????????????????????????????

Comments are closed.