The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Guys: Never Talk to a College Girl, Because All College Girls Hate You

Posted on | November 1, 2015 | 70 Comments

 

The implementation of so-called “affirmative consent” policies means that every heterosexual male student is at risk of expulsion if he attempts to have sex on campus. College orientation is now basically an anti-sex training program where female students are (a) taught that all men are rapists and (b) encouraged to file sexual assault charges if they have any physical interaction with male students. The fate of “John Doe” at Brown University — banned from campus for making out with a girl he met at a party — illustrates the extreme danger male students face in an academic environment where feminists have ginned up a frantic hysteria of hatred. Because the number of actual rapes does not justify their claim that 1-in-5 college women are victims of sexual assault, officials are trying to make up for the “Rape Shortage” by inciting false accusations.

At Washington and Lee University, an official reportedly told female students that “regret equals rape.” At Ohio State University, you are guilty of sexual assault unless you and your partner agree why you are engaging in sexual activity. At Harvard University, there were six false rape accusations in 2014. The organizer of a “Summit on Sexual Assault” conference at Darmouth College suggested male students should be expelled as soon as they are accused.

This is what feminism means for college students in 2015: Every male student on campus is a suspected rapist, and every female student on campus is his would-be victim. A college boy risks an accusation of “harassment” if he even speaks to a girl. The smartest thing a male student can do is to avoid female students as much as feasibly possible. Shelby Emmett interviewed students at New York University and one boy expressed the fear of sex caused by “affirmative consent” policies:

“That’s what scares the sh*t out of me. Because if anything happens, if someone says I did anything or something is misconstrued, I’m automatically the villain, I’m automatically the bad guy, and it’s up to me to prove that I’m not — which is interesting, because in America it’s supposed to be innocent until proven guilty.”

Yes, college boy, you are “automatically the villain.” Feminists hate you for being male, and they want to see you expelled.




 

Category: Education, Sex Trouble

Comments

70 Responses to “Guys: Never Talk to a College Girl, Because All College Girls Hate You”

  1. concern00
    November 1st, 2015 @ 8:39 pm

    All male universities anyone?

  2. Durasim
    November 1st, 2015 @ 8:42 pm

    It would appear that some guys are actually heeding this advice.

    These feminist campus commissars spend their entire college careers and beyond expanding the definition of rape to envelope all human male sexual behavior.

    Yet, some of them seem genuinely miffed that male persons do not want to hook up with them on Tinder or otherwise consort with them.

    http://nymag.com/thecut/2015/10/hooking-up-when-youre-an-anti-rape-activist.html

  3. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    November 1st, 2015 @ 8:57 pm

    Plumbers and electricians get more action…

  4. Mike G.
    November 1st, 2015 @ 10:32 pm

    Trade school anyone?

  5. Neo
    November 1st, 2015 @ 10:54 pm

    Back when dinosaurs roamed the land, women often went to college to find a potential “sugar daddy” to make their lives comfortable.

    My kids, who recently finished college, have told me this still happens, but with these new policies, I’m sure they are having a harder time of it.

  6. Regular
    November 2nd, 2015 @ 12:04 am

    OMG Stacy (and everyone), get a load of this:

    http://feltmovie.com/

    Soon to receive the Leni Riefenstahl Award of the Feminist Film Critics Association. Here’s the youtube trailer:

  7. Wombat_socho
    November 2nd, 2015 @ 1:44 am

    But that would be sexist! :v

  8. concern00
    November 2nd, 2015 @ 1:51 am

    And very patriarchal.

  9. Daniel Freeman
    November 2nd, 2015 @ 2:08 am

    This is mostly a problem for the middle tiers.

    The top tier of men will not care about these policies, and neither will their female peers. But when a middle-tier woman realizes that Mr. BMOC will never treat her as anything more than a casual hookup, her male peers — having experienced more rejection than not — will have been driven absolutely batty with paranoia by these policies.

    And RSM isn’t helping; but why should he? That’s the inevitable end, so let’s get it over with as quickly as possible, and move on to something that might actually work for human people in the real world. “Fail faster,” as the capitalists say.

  10. Fail Burton
    November 2nd, 2015 @ 3:34 am

    Science fiction author Robert Heinlein had an imaginary Future History timeline which included an era called “The Crazy Years.” It’s amazing the SF community was the first to completely fall to this feminist madness, the irony being they were the most prepared to avoid it by being a canary-in-a-coal-mine genre of warning literature of precisely this type of dystopian world. Even more irony is they were sandbagged by Orwell’s perceptual trap where authoritarian fascism wormed its way in by talking about wheel chair access and allergies of scented products. The modern KKK is probably kicking themselves for not coming up with that first.

  11. Francis W. Porretto
    November 2nd, 2015 @ 6:31 am

    Ultimately, this will cleanse the college and university campuses of any vestige of a male presence. That will leave the feminists free to lesbianize entire cohorts of young women. Years afterward, when those girls’ biological urges begin to assert themselves, they will find that good, decent men will have nothing to do with them.

    Conclusion: The mid-21st Century will be a boom time for sperm banks. Get in on the ground floor while you can!

  12. thesickmanofeurope_com
    November 2nd, 2015 @ 7:09 am

    “….It would appear that some guys are actually heeding this advice….”

    This is all very simple to solve.
    GUYS listen!
    1.Before banging her….take your smart phone out and film her enthusiastic and giggly Yes-Means-Yes consent.
    2.Take your (camera) car key-ring (Ebay less than $10) put it on the side table and film the whole sex act.
    3.Download the film and consent to your laptop for future “insurance”….DON’T TELL ANYONE ABOUT IT.
    4.Get on with your studies.

    http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/16-GB-Spy-Digital-VOICE-SOUND-VIDEO-RECORDER-camera-fob-keyring-camcorder-Cam-/140705553544?_trksid=p2141725.m3641.l6368

  13. Gunga
    November 2nd, 2015 @ 7:37 am

    Just wondering…does your garden center give you a volume discount on quick-lime, tarps, rope and shovels?

  14. Lab
    November 2nd, 2015 @ 7:37 am

    On a side note: Charlie Sheen’s line is old hat

    Prostitution is rape insurance.

  15. thesickmanofeurope_com
    November 2nd, 2015 @ 7:38 am

    Your point is?

  16. Lab
    November 2nd, 2015 @ 7:44 am

    Prostitution is rape insurance.

  17. Lab
    November 2nd, 2015 @ 7:51 am

    The slower we crash, the more we will learn about the value of truth over mainstream propaganda.

  18. robertstacymccain
    November 2nd, 2015 @ 7:54 am

    I hesitate to project how future trends will develop. My hunch is that there will be a sharp backlash against this current wave of feminism, although one can never predict what form such a backlash will take. The fact is, “equality” doesn’t work and nobody actually wants equality. Everybody wants to be a winner, and people who whine constantly about “equality” are just running a hustle. They’ve got an activist gig that pays them to promote “equality,” and the strange thing is that most people never see through that hustle.

    Ask yourself, who chose Amanda Marcotte and Jessica Valenti to speak as representatives of American women? Do Valenti and Marcotte have any common interest with my wife, my daughters, my daughter-in-law? Of course not. Valenti and Marcotte are nothing but partisan Democrat hacks and have never been anything else. Their “feminism” is merely a boutique brand of standard-issue Democrat Party liberalism, a way to rally foolish women for the party, to increase the “gender gap,” and anyone who cannot see through this transparent political scam deserves whatever misery they reap.

    At some point, however, the disillusionment with “equality” will cause any intelligent woman to denounce this sort of liberal feminism as a fraud. Either she must become an all-out radical lesbian (e.g., Cathy Brennan) or admit that she has been bamboozled by liberals. We see how conservative women like Suzanne Venker and Ashe Schow recognize this reality. They are not against “women’s rights,” but they realize that the real-life problems of most women don’t generally have anything to do with “rights” as feminists construe that term.

  19. Lab
    November 2nd, 2015 @ 8:18 am

    I am unfamiliar with American politics. what faction of the liberal movement is this grounded in? They obviously value equality> liberty.

  20. robertstacymccain
    November 2nd, 2015 @ 8:22 am

    Dear God, that’s twisted.

  21. Lab
    November 2nd, 2015 @ 8:23 am

    What philosophic theory explicitly advocates for equality over liberty?

  22. LIbtardian slayer
    November 2nd, 2015 @ 8:24 am

    Reminds me of the old saying, “A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle”
    And now, the fish are complaining they can’t find bicycles that fit them

  23. Quartermaster
    November 2nd, 2015 @ 8:28 am

    body disposal.

  24. Quartermaster
    November 2nd, 2015 @ 8:29 am

    Can’t have that. Remember VMI?

  25. robertstacymccain
    November 2nd, 2015 @ 8:33 am

    Steering one’s offspring away from those behaviors — warning them against “riding the carousel” — is every responsible parent’s duty in the 21st century. When my eldest daughter was born in 1989, I was quite determined in that regard. I was not a conservative, in a political sense, but was well aware of the psychological damage sustained by women in the carousel-rider circuit, and certainly did not want my daughter to be one of those.

    Liberal “pro-sex” feminism is a bad idea, and was always a bad idea. The wave of radical feminist rage we are seeing now must be understood as a backlash against 25 years of “pro-sex” feminism. These women have suffered damage by trying to live the Cosmo Girl fantasy of “empowered” promiscuity and, rather than realize that they were bamboozled — sold out and betrayed in the name of “equality” — they instead blame men who took advantage of them.

    The dog returns to its vomit, as Kipling said.

  26. Dana
    November 2nd, 2015 @ 8:40 am

    The link does not work.

  27. robertstacymccain
    November 2nd, 2015 @ 8:47 am

    Look, the smart thing for college guys t do is a reverse Lysistrata.In this climate, with every girl on campus looking for an excuse to join the Sexual Assault Survivor Club by accusing guys of rape, why take chances? Shun them. Ostentatiously avoid women on campus and, if you desire female companionship, seek it elsewhere. There are plenty of cocktail waitresses and single moms in search of boyfriends, and thus no need for a young man to associate with college girls whose only interest in male students is trying to get them expelled.

    One imagines that, if a college guy took this approach, his disinterest in female students would seem … mysterious. Girls would become perplexed by his aloof manner: “What’s up with Josh? Why does he give me that cold stare and walk away every time I try to talk to him?” Josh is under no obligation to explain himself, of course, but he if he chose to reveal his motives — his resentment at being constantly suspected as a would-be rapist, merely because he is male — this revelation might help bring attention to the bizarre irrationality that has seized hold in modern academia.

  28. robertstacymccain
    November 2nd, 2015 @ 8:49 am

    Join the Army.

  29. RS
    November 2nd, 2015 @ 8:51 am

    At Ohio State University, you are guilty of sexual assault unless you and your partner agree why you are engaging in sexual activity.

    Only impermissible answer: To have children.

  30. RS
    November 2nd, 2015 @ 8:59 am

    I periodically send articles about this stuff to my son who’s a junior at a well-respected public STEM university in our state. The ratio of males to females is about 60:40. One think, such a place would be a nest of testosterone-fueled sex crime and feminist rantings.

    Not so much. My theory is that the women who enter STEM fields are the serious types who don’t have time for all the social justice bullshit. They’re too busy trying to prevent a repeat of the Tacoma Narrows bridge incident. After all, a “Grand Unifying Feminist Theory” has precisely zero application to nuclear physics.

    I think my advice–in addition to “find your wife” in church”– would be to avoid women who are majoring in any of the “soft” subjects, i.e. Humanities, Social Sciences, Education, some business degrees, etc. where the feminists have really taken hold.

  31. Dana
    November 2nd, 2015 @ 9:00 am

    Another point: this will inevitably have very negative repercussions for college women. While a very small percentage of them will be able to stay on campus indefinitely, the number of Womyn’s Studies professorships remains small, and most of the coeds will have to do something really radical like get their degrees and go out into the real world and get a job. Since the Comités de Defensa de la Revolución will have reduced — certainly not eliminated — the number of coeds who emerge from academia with a fiance or husband, fewer of those coeds will have the luxury of a partner who helps to support the household financially, which means that getting that first job out of college becomes a more critical imperative.

    Now, couple that with the increasing realization among businessmen that hiring anybody other than a non-handicapped heterosexual white male increases the chances of an internal discrimination or hostile workplace environment lawsuit, and the female college students who fall in line with the leftist agenda are cutting their own throats. Since the men who went to college with these young ladies — is calling them “ladies” a microaggression? — are already leery that any interactions with college women could have negative results, when they achieve some positions of authority in the business world, they, too, will understand the potential problems in hiring women.

    Interestingly enough, the heavy dominance of women on college campuses means that there will be fewer men earning degrees, and thus the supply of male college graduates will be smaller vis a vis the demand, and they will command higher salaries than the women; that’s not discrimination, but simple economics.

  32. Gunga
    November 2nd, 2015 @ 9:08 am

    Surely thou doth jest? I speak of violets and daffodils, my good fellow. I am crushed that you think me so unkind. Crushed!

  33. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    November 2nd, 2015 @ 9:16 am

    Only problem is the current CIC

  34. DeadMessenger
    November 2nd, 2015 @ 9:17 am

    Sure am glad I always lived off-campus.

  35. DeadMessenger
    November 2nd, 2015 @ 9:22 am

    That’s going straight onto my WTF list.

  36. marcus tullius cicero
    November 2nd, 2015 @ 9:34 am

    …College in the 60’s, it sure was better times for everybody, males and females in those days…Feminism was still somewhat rational, tempered by Rock n’ Roll , War protesting and the Peace generation.
    The “good old days”, compared to today’s anger and frustration!

  37. SineWaveII
    November 2nd, 2015 @ 9:46 am

    Here’s an idea guys. Refuse to have sex with any woman until you find one that really loves you ( I suggest looking outside of the college campus), and then ask her to marry you. After you’re married you can have all the sex you want just don’t do it on a college campus. You can combine your resources to give each of you a better life.
    This is also a good time to have kids.
    Don’t get divorced.
    It’s so crazy that it might just work.

  38. Durasim
    November 2nd, 2015 @ 9:48 am

    The link to the NYMag article I posted? Works when I click on it.

  39. NeoWayland
    November 2nd, 2015 @ 10:17 am

    “I can’t even tell what’s real anymore.”

    Should be the tag line.

  40. thesickmanofeurope_com
    November 2nd, 2015 @ 10:26 am

    “…Join the Army…”

    Would I have to wear high heels?

  41. Finrod Felagund
    November 2nd, 2015 @ 10:28 am

    There are only two left, one of which is my alma mater.

  42. Matthew W
    November 2nd, 2015 @ 10:37 am

    Vividly !!!!!
    You would think that the bull dyke that wanted to be admitted there would have been in peak physical condition going in, but after on walk in the park, she was OUT !!!

  43. Matthew W
    November 2nd, 2015 @ 10:41 am

    Called the “One year scholarship.” Dad would pay for the daughter to go get married at school.

  44. Fail Burton
    November 2nd, 2015 @ 10:54 am

    I don’t see them as “liberal” feminists but women who don’t truly understand the lesbian origins of the ideology they promote. All they know that gender pronouns and genderblindness and rape culture and true and real concerns and social justice. The feral madness of Adrienne Rich, Robin Morgan and Andrea Dworkin results in these “liberal” feminists being like a culture using a tool another culture invented and which they don’t have a fundamental understanding of.

  45. Mike G.
    November 2nd, 2015 @ 10:55 am

    I’m a Vet and I used to recommend military service to young men (and women) who weren’t sure what they wanted to do. These days, not so much.

  46. Quartermaster
    November 2nd, 2015 @ 12:35 pm

    I am as well and my response to what I used to recommend is “H31! NO!!!” It’s gotten no better than liberal arts colleges, and with the “addition” of women to combat arms, it’s a losing proposition.

  47. Quartermaster
    November 2nd, 2015 @ 12:36 pm

    I’d drop the bull part.

  48. Matthew W
    November 2nd, 2015 @ 12:40 pm

    Better?

  49. DrGreatCham
    November 2nd, 2015 @ 1:48 pm

    Marxist collectivism.

  50. DrGreatCham
    November 2nd, 2015 @ 1:50 pm

    The socialist-lite progressive faction based on John Dewey’s “pragmatism.”