The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Feminism: Death Cult Chaos

Posted on | December 30, 2015 | 150 Comments

 

“Feminism Is a Totalitarian Movement to Destroy Civilization as We Know It” — this is a truth that cannot be repeated often enough as we watch the Democrat-Media Complex mobilize all its resources to elect Hillary Clinton president. Monday night I found myself assailed on Twitter by Clintonistas who resented my characterization of feminism as a totalitarian ideology as rigid and intolerant as the neo-Stalinism of the North Korean regime. The one thing Democrats cannot tolerate is the truth, and suppressing the truth about feminism — a movement that is not about “equality,” but instead is about power — is therefore necessary to Democrat success in the 2016 election campaign. If the truth is known, Democrats lose. Meanwhile, in England . . .

A student has spoken out about the challenges of identifying as neither male or female and also being attracted to both genders.
Speaking with the Liverpool Echo, Amy Toon – who studies modern history and politics at the University of Liverpool – described a feeling of relief at being able to self-identify as being non-binary and pansexual after years of being in the unknown.
However, despite being generally treated with respect, Amy told the site being referred to as “a girl” is upsetting and that many people think gay marriage is enough, but insisted the opposite. Amy also added how the option of hormone replacement would mean having to wait for up to five years, and said: “You have to live for quite a while being very unhappy with who you are.” . . .
Amy, originally from Leeds, described having to sign on as being female, however, services like the NHS provide the option of ‘Mx’ instead of the usual ‘Miss/Mr/Mrs’, and also told the news site “they/them” is a preferable way of being addressed, whereas others may opt for “ze, hir, hirs, and xe, xem, or xyr.”
Even though Amy has received support since self-identifying with both groups, the undergraduate highlighted feelings of anxiety and depression when being called a “girl” and added how students at the university “can be really transphobic.” Amy added: “They make stupid statements and our LGBT posters were torn down.” . . .

Amy Toon is a victim of society, oppressed by pronouns. How dare you call a girl a “girl,” you heteronormative transphobic bigot?

As easy as it is to laugh at such products of feminist ideology, we must not overlook the tragic dimension — what if it were your daughter who had been brainwashed by the transgender cult? — and the disastrous social consequences. A couple of weeks ago, I interviewed a parent whose child had been captured by this movement. It was a story familiar to anyone who has paid attention to this trend: A tomboyish daughter, a good student, generally well-behaved but somewhat socially awkward, quite suddenly becomes hostile and defiant, announces that she is “he,” denounces her parents as bigots for questioning the decision to “transition,” and pursues a new persona based on an extreme alienation from her female identity. Only after this dramatic and heartbreaking departure — their daughter not merely renouncing her identity, but rejecting her family — did the parents discover the precipitating cause. Their daughter, trying to cope with an adolescent identity crisis, had gone exploring the corners of the Internet where advocates of transgenderism celebrate “transition” as a miraculous cure for every confused teenager’s problem. These FtM (female-to-male) transgender blogs feature photos and videos showing the effects of testosterone injections and weightlifting in developing a masculinized physique, and the results of “top” surgery (i.e., mastectomy) by which tomboys turn themselves into simulations of men. Inside the transgender cult’s online echo chamber, the teenager encounters a very one-sided message.

“Propaganda” is not too strong a word to describe the transgender cult’s carefully calculated campaign to convert the confusion of an adolescent crisis into the certainty of “transition” into a new identity. Much like a porngraphy addict, the vulnerable teenager who is at first merely curious about transgenderism may quickly become obsessed, and parents whose children fall prey to the transgender cult often report that their teenager went from normal to weirdo to fanatic in a matter of months.

Laughter is not the appropriate response to these tragedies, and it is not just Christian conservatives who are raising concerns about the transgender cult’s recruitment campaign. Radical feminists have been warning about this trend for years. The blog 4th Wave Now was started by a feminist who watched in horror as her daughter was captured by the transgender cult. Understand that the feminist mom responsible for 4th Wave Now enthusiastically approved of her daughter’s lesbianism; it was when the teenage lesbian rejected female identity that her mother became alarmed. Feminist gender theory — the social construction of the gender binary within the heterosexual matrix — denies that there is any such thing as “human nature,” and feminists condemn heterosexuality as “the ideology of male supremacy.” Teaching girls to hate and fear men is what feminist motherhood is all about, so when their daughters want to become men — identifying with the hated male oppressor — we understand why feminists panic. Instead of smashing patriarchy, their daughters want to be the patriarchy.

 

The feminist crusade to destroy civilization in the name of “equality” has produced many ironic results, and we may be tempted to laugh when the debris of this destructive project lands on the doorsteps of man-hating fanatics who have fomented this War Against Human Nature. Yes, we can ridicule freaks like Tobias “Tobi” Hill-Meyer, whose career as a transgender pornographer brought shame on his/”her” lesbian feminist mother(s). However, the expanding cultural influence of radical feminism — promoted for decades in university Women’s Studies classrooms, and now increasingly extended to the public school curriculum — is aimed at all children, and every parent concerned for the future must pay attention. “The Queering of Feminism” means that “equality” requires the destruction of morality. All critical dissent must be suppressed while government schools indoctrinate children in the movement’s anti-male/anti-heterosexual ideology. Wellesley College Professor Julie Matthaei credits feminism with exposing “the oppressiveness of traditional heterosexuality” in a movement that “advocated lesbianism as an option for women.” By demonizing males and stigmatizing heterosexuality in this way, feminism seeks to create equality, but what it actually creates is decadence and chaos.

Meanwhile, in England . . .

The number of primary school-aged children, some as young as four, beginning to “transition” their gender is rising rapidly in the UK. The popularity of the fad appears to be clustered, with children copying others in the same schools.
Up to 80 primary school-aged children a year are now seeking help towards potentially changing their gender, the chair of Mermaids, a charity which lobbies for families who believe their children and teenagers are transgendered, has revealed.
Speaking to the Telegraph, Susie Green said that, in some cases, British children as young as four are already in the process of “transitioning” to another sex.
She also described how her organisation has observed a cluster effect across the country, with children following one and another in the same school; a school where there might be a teacher who promotes transgender ideology.
Her anecdotal evidence correlates with the results of a study by Mark Zucker at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health in Toronto, Canada, which found that transgenderism was more prominent and persistent among children when promoted by adults.
Researchers observed that children who saw therapists and others in authority who assume that they belong to the opposite sex can actually become more distressed, exacerbating their “gender dysphoric identity.”

Ask yourself, why is this trend so noticeable in England? One reason may be the 2010 Equality Act which effectively criminalizes criticism of the LGBT agenda. By making “sexual orientation” a protected category, this law not only requires schools to hire gay teachers, but makes it hazardous for anyone to express disapproval of homosexuality. LGBT advocacy in British schools is now ubiquitous and exempt from criticism, as is the case in many American school systems, where such advocacy often takes the form of “anti-bullying” programs. Is it any wonder, really, that many young people are so deeply confused about their sexuality?

Many parents are clueless about what is being taught in their children’s schools, but when we see transgender children in elementary school and LGBT clubs in high schools, it becomes obvious that the education system itself is dedicated to promoting this ideology. However, at the same time, the feminist fanatics who created the phony “rape epidemic” hysteria on college campuses are now promoting “consent education” in K-12 schools — to make sure that all students are warned that males are dangerous and heterosexuality is “rape culture.”

Feminism is a Death Cult, whose only goal is destruction — destroying religion, family, liberty, morality and, ultimately, human life itself.




 

Category: Sex Trouble

Comments

150 Responses to “Feminism: Death Cult Chaos”

  1. RS
    December 30th, 2015 @ 11:25 pm

    I believe California has criminalized providing psychological treatment or other counseling to children who maintain they are transsexuals, if that counseling or treatment is trying to dissuade them in any fashion from invoking the trans lifestyle. N.B. such counseling will undoubtedly include religious counseling, as well.

    Here is the truth and the table has been set for at least twenty years: Provide the indoctrination to children as young as possible. When the parents object and attempt to fix the mess created by the “worthies” in the public education system, the State is primed to intervene by alleging the parents are committing emotional neglect. Know that your local child “protection” agency is staffed by 22 year old, feminist social work B.A.s who will be more than happy to remove your children from your oppressively conservative household.

    The only way to avoid getting caught in the trap is to refuse to send your kids to public school. If they are in public school now, take them out! Don’t send them back after New Year’s. Home school or find a decent parochial school. Sell everything you own to do it, if you have to. I cannot emphasize this enough.

  2. Matt_SE
    December 31st, 2015 @ 12:19 am

    Amy Toon looks quite attractive, but I’d need to see a whole body photo to be sure. Maybe her ass is a mile wide.

  3. concern00
    December 31st, 2015 @ 12:26 am

    What a great way to ring in the New Year! What happens when only crazy is considered normal? At some point the cogs of society must come to a screeching halt. Then who is going to put food on their tables.

  4. Good Stuff
    December 31st, 2015 @ 12:30 am

    The feminist crusade to destroy internet in the name of “equality” has produced many ironic results, and we may be tempted to laugh but when the debris of this destructive project lands on our doorsteps…

    http://i.imgur.com/hzUcqCL.jpg

    The Feminism Totalitarian Movement has destroy Imgur as we know it. There is group of Feminist Puritans that report or down vote any post that features the female form. The end result is censorship

    The way I see it – http://imgur.com/gallery/JWJsS

  5. Good Stuff
    December 31st, 2015 @ 12:41 am

    I so agree – Luckily this is not a problem in Thailand. Even, the adoption people had no problem with my concept that Boobee Kid was born gay

  6. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    December 31st, 2015 @ 1:13 am

    https://twitter.com/MsEBL/status/682400098072985600

  7. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    December 31st, 2015 @ 1:16 am

    Feminism: Like the Heaven’s Gate cult, only a bit slower to get there.

  8. mole
    December 31st, 2015 @ 1:27 am

    Its a result of the atomisation of traditional society.

    Bear with me on this.
    First the traditional signifier of “who we are’ are stated to be illegitimate. So you are no longer American/Australian/Mexican, but a hyphenated version of the same, with little allegiance to the whole.
    Then the community groups, scouts/friendly societies/women’s associations etc are shattered into families of what they one were, anchors for people to build on.
    Schools and education are now capable of producing illiterate graduates who know they are victims somehow, people who internalise that message will be permanently damaged.
    Lastly the family, by rendering that illegitimate by making its meaning literally anything then whos to deny a family is 2 men and a beagle, or a polygamous sect of yoghurt weavers?

    In short the NEED TO BELONG inherent in nearly every teenagers life has had much of the old “normal” build -you-up institutions wrecked, leaving the kids to flounder into whatever morass the Internet and perverted minds can piece together.

  9. Finrod Felagund
    December 31st, 2015 @ 1:56 am

    It wouldn’t be worth it no matter how attractive she is. As a friend of mine says, “Don’t stick your dick in crazy”.

  10. Fail Burton
    December 31st, 2015 @ 2:22 am

    Funny how they’ve come after us via children by infiltrating comics, SFF and video games. Get ’em while they’re young, I guess. Recently the most honored SF novel in history featured the pronoun “cure” for heterosexuality. The SF author of the new Star Wars movie tie-in novel lobbied Disney for gay characters. One of Gamergate’s most prominent voices is transgender and comic heroes from the ’40s suddenly became gay.

    These people are now constantly lobbying for a female Dr. Who and Game of Thrones has caved in to make Westeros a nicer place for the gals.

    There is a distinct air of madness in society today and one can’t help wonder if the single largest difference is the percentage of American’s on psychotropic medications in the ’50s vs. today.

  11. Fail Burton
    December 31st, 2015 @ 4:09 am

    I’m writing a children’s story where noble lesbian transselkies run off to Lovecraft’s safe-space of Innsmouth to escape the evil normal people who drive them mad by making heterosexuality compulsory. I’m calling it “Shadow Over Grrls Gone Wild.”

  12. TheOtherAndrewB
    December 31st, 2015 @ 6:44 am

    I wonder if these geniuses believe that their theories on gender/sex being a social construct extend to the rest of the animal kingdom? Does a female giraffe ovulate only because that is the gender construct that the giraffe patriarchy thrusts upon her? Are peacocks given radically different plumage because of societal expectations? If a male gibbon wishes long enough will his penis disappear? Perhaps I really don’t want to know their thoughts after all…

  13. robertstacymccain
    December 31st, 2015 @ 7:18 am

    Indeed. It is important to understand that my first acquaintance with anti-feminist thought came from two traditionalist women, Wendy Shalit (“A Return to Modesty”) and Carolyn Graglia (“Domestic Tranquility”). This was during the “pro-sex” feminist heyday of the 1990s, and it was obvious to me that the hyper-sexualized messages of popular culture were producing bad outcomes. Here were are, about 15 years later, and now our college campuses are swarming with angry radical feminists screaming about “rape culture.” It is the loss of a traditionalist perspective that has caused this problem, but no one on campus is talking about the need for religious revival.

    The function of feminism as a political tribe — loyalty to the collectivity of women replacing loyalties based on nationality, ethnicity or religion — is a phenomenon too little noted.

  14. robertstacymccain
    December 31st, 2015 @ 7:57 am

    I’m an expert in crazy women. This is based on field research I conducted in the 1970s and early ’80s. I was a Democrat then, and I don’t endorse that kind of behavior, but from first-hand experience, I can assure you that there is an inverse relationship between promiscuity and sanity. The more hookups and short-term “relationships” a woman has gone through, the more her self-esteem suffers, and such women are seldom willing to accept responsibility for their own problems. Self-justifying rationalizations and scapegoating of males (as if it is always their fault that she has a preference for Bad Boys) are necessary to her as psychological defense mechanisms, but as the failures accumulate — she is repeatedly used and discarded — her attitude becomes increasingly hostile and irrational. And this process is what produces feminists like Andrea Dworkin and Jaclyn Friedman. Whether they were ever fully sane to begin with, their negative experience of “relationships” that never last, where every man she meets is just a selfish opportunist, create in her mind a profound need to demonize males.

  15. robertstacymccain
    December 31st, 2015 @ 8:00 am

    Know that your local child “protection” agency is staffed by 22 year old, feminist social work B.A.s

    Yup. Most people are unaware that the academic fields of sociology and psychology are feminist strongholds, and also LGBT strongholds. Social-service agencies are run by people who are profoundly hostile to religion.

  16. Dana
    December 31st, 2015 @ 8:40 am

    Our esteemed host mentioned the effects of “top” surgery, an elective mastectomy, plus taking male hormones to bulk up with muscles, but the female-to-“male” transition leaves out the big part: if the feminists are saying “Sorry about your dick” to the male-to-“female” trannies who want to join the feminist movement, the opposite has to be that the female-to-“male” trannies still don’t have a real dick, that can do what a real dick does.

    The trannies are saying that “gender” is a social construct, and not something innately connected to biological sex, but the problem with that argument is that they were all treated as members of the biological sex into which they were born. Not only were they socialized into the biological sex they are, they were not socialized into the sex they believe they should be. If “gender” is a social construct, then regardless of what they think they are, they were socially constructed differently from what they think they are.

    It all boils down to one simple fact: regardless of getting hormone “treatment” and whatever “sex reassignment surgery” they want, even if they get the best possible surgical results, they will never and can never actually be normal members of the sex they see themselves as being.

  17. Critical Eye
    December 31st, 2015 @ 9:04 am

    You need to raise your standards, friend.

  18. RS
    December 31st, 2015 @ 9:11 am

    I should also mention, the most insidious thing about this, is that it takes place in the shadows, because the juvenile and child justice systems are opaque. Parents are precluded from going to the media to publicize these travesties thanks to criminal penalties for disclosing the identities of the children involved. The reason is “we must protect the children!”

    Additionally, no longer are just any lawyers allowed to practice within the system. In order to be allowed to represent children, one must complete a multi-hour indoctrination system into the philosophy of “child protection.” Basically, this means being told to cease being an advocate and caring about things like due process and evidence and learn to be a rubber stamp for child protective services.

    The object of the game is to remove all parental authority and place responsibility for child rearing in the hands of the state. The tentacles are everywhere, from movements trying to ban homeschooling and private schooling to juvenile justice. Too many people naively assume that current public education is as it was decades ago. Do not think it will not happen to you or your kids.

  19. Matt_SE
    December 31st, 2015 @ 11:04 am

    Nah, it’s about what I expected:
    Cute face, kinda chunky down below. You see, ultra-hot full package girls don’t become lesbians or bisexual, or whatever the hell she is; not without abuse anyway.

    She’s obviously a bag full of crazy. Maybe she’ll grow out of it.

  20. Fail Burton
    December 31st, 2015 @ 11:30 am

    It’s more than just a political tribe. Given their sociopathy, modern “feminism” acts like an Aryan supremacy old school TV shows like The Twilight Zone and Playhouse 90 occasionally produced principled morality tales about in regard to Jim Crow and anti-Semitism. But then those were people who’d lived during a time of actual Nazism and saw what could happen to an entire nation when equal protection is eroded as is happening now.

  21. TheOtherAndrewB
    December 31st, 2015 @ 11:44 am

    Some aspiring scholar should do his doctoral dissertation on the link between emotional illness and hair dye. I don’t know what the link is, but it certainly exists.

  22. Ilion
    December 31st, 2015 @ 12:24 pm

    True.
    At the same time, women generally don’t do the group-loyalty thing very well — it’s a “man thing”, after all.

  23. Feminism: Death Cult Chaos | Living in Anglo-America
    December 31st, 2015 @ 12:59 pm

    […] http://theothermccain.com/2015/12/30/feminism-death-cult-chaos/ […]

  24. NeoWayland
    December 31st, 2015 @ 1:10 pm

    For a time during the 90s and early 2000s, there was a very obnoxious group called the Westboro Baptist Church. This was the group that ran godhatesfags.com and picketed military funerals because gays were allowed to serve. They weren’t nice and they wanted to cause as big a fuss as they could. Somewhere around 2006 or so they ran out of steam and they don’t get the headlines that they used to get.

    It was not unusual for many non-Christians to attribute the worst actions of the WBC and other extreme groups to ALL Christians. Some of us said that we knew Christians who were absolutely nothing like that and that it was wrong to hold every Christian responsible for the actions of some. We were usually told that the “good Christians” should do something about the bad ones.

    Stop me if you see a repeating pattern yet.

    Not all feminists are like this. These examples may be the loudest, they may get most of the attention, and it may even look like they are “winning.”

    I agree that their ideas are disruptive and dangerous. I do not agree that this is what feminism is about.

    I certainly don’t agree that outsiders should try to control feminists “for their own good” and “for the greater good.”

  25. Quartermaster
    December 31st, 2015 @ 1:58 pm

    The Westboro folks didn’t run out of steam. They started getting harassed themselves.

  26. Quartermaster
    December 31st, 2015 @ 1:59 pm

    I’m sure Tor will buy it. Given Scalzi’s performance, they need all the help they can get.

  27. RS
    December 31st, 2015 @ 2:31 pm

    The problem with your analogy is that the WBC people were on the very fringe and appropriated the terms “Baptist” and “Christian” to perpetuate a bizarre personality cult. Modern Feminism on the other hand is ensconced in the halls of academe. countless thousands of students, the media, and society are subjected to their whims, pronouncements, and edicts on a daily basis. The Westboro loons did not establish “diversity” offices on every campus in the country nor agitate for “God Hates Fags” Studies departments, nor have politicians advancing their agenda.

  28. NeoWayland
    December 31st, 2015 @ 3:32 pm

    I didn’t know that.

    They’re on my Watch List, but definitely on the lower third.

  29. Ilion
    December 31st, 2015 @ 3:32 pm

    Is it dying the drapes or the carpet (or is it either) that turns them crazy?

  30. NeoWayland
    December 31st, 2015 @ 3:43 pm

    My point was that despite the attention given to the WBC, it wasn’t worth it.

    Third Wave feminists aren’t worth it either. They claim to speak for people that don’t want anything to do with them.

    They aren’t as strong as they want you to believe. It’s just hype to get headlines.

  31. RS
    December 31st, 2015 @ 4:20 pm

    They aren’t as strong as they want you to believe.

    You haven’t been paying attention. RSM has documented the substantial influence of Third Wave Feminism on modern culture. The WBC people received negative attention and in no way constituted a social movement. Not so, with Third Wave Feminism. I appreciate the desire to wish the issues away, but magical thinking is counterproductive, as the push for affirmative consent laws among a myriad of other things attests.

  32. Finrod Felagund
    December 31st, 2015 @ 5:15 pm

    The Phelpsians (I refuse to call them a church, because they aren’t) discovered that when they tried bringing their harassment game to places like Mississippi, that people there would harass them back and the local authorities would happily turn a blind eye to it. Furthermore, when they needed the services of local businesses like say a wrecker because someone had let the air out of their tires, the locals took their own sweet time getting around to servicing them.

    You can’t harass everyone and not expect blowback, and they weren’t prepared for it.

  33. Finrod Felagund
    December 31st, 2015 @ 5:18 pm

    I don’t find her body unattractive, I find her mind unattractive (in fact downright repulsive).

  34. Finrod Felagund
    December 31st, 2015 @ 5:30 pm

    Every once in a rare while you can find one who is just glad to find someone that will treat her as a human being and blossoms as a result like a plant starved of water and sunshine getting sun and rain for the first real time. But, they have to have been unusually mentally strong underneath all along.

    BTW, heads up– a piece of leftist trash followed me here from an RCP post I was commenting on and it’s polluting the This Blog Gives Her Majesty 90 Days thread, and I think Wombat has already checked out for New Year’s. Sorry about that.

  35. NeoWayland
    December 31st, 2015 @ 6:42 pm

    Yep, I have been paying attention.

    It’s stagecraft, an illusion. It’s smoke and mirrors and faux Roman columns. It’s painted canvas held up by masking tape and chewing gum. It only looks good from a certain angle.

    They draw their power from getting attention and guilty pity. Nothing else.

    Unless they get attention constantly, they’ve got nothing. Not even their names.

  36. NeoWayland
    December 31st, 2015 @ 6:54 pm

    *nods* That’s it really. Neighbors you can depend on are what make a civilization work. You make neighbors and friends by treating folks with the respect they deserve. That’s one thing that I agree with almost everyone here.

    Back in the “heyday” of the WBC, many non-Christians got worked up over headlines. Some of these folks literally expected to get hunted down by redneck Republicans. It didn’t help that the Republicans had a very visible evangelical wing at the time.

    There are ways to deal with the RadFems and their wannabes.

  37. NeoWayland
    December 31st, 2015 @ 7:04 pm

    Honesty requires that I tell you that I had issues at the time and did some Christian bashing. They were a convenient target.

    However, I got my ears pinned back and I took another look at the Christians I knew. It was a humbling experience. That’s when I learned not to attack the label.

  38. Quartermaster
    December 31st, 2015 @ 7:56 pm

    They will get attention because the cultural leaders on the left will make sure they get attention. The point that RSM has been making is what you are missing.

  39. Quartermaster
    December 31st, 2015 @ 7:57 pm

    In one MS town they got some tires slashed and couldn’t find replacements in town. No one would sell them any.

  40. Quartermaster
    December 31st, 2015 @ 8:00 pm

    Non-Christians get worked up about the thing their leaders tell them they need to get worked up over. The GOP since the 1980 elections has had success because of the Evangelical “wing.” Without them no POTUS candidate since Reagan’s election in 1980 would have won.

    RadFems have ways of getting their stupidity in front of people because the MSM is owned by the left. Until that changes, the work RSM has been doing here is God’s work.

  41. Benschachar
    December 31st, 2015 @ 9:55 pm

    Dachsy!

  42. Jeanette Victoria
    December 31st, 2015 @ 10:21 pm

    Repeat that to all the professors across the country who are having their careers ruined by title IX suits

  43. Jeanette Victoria
    December 31st, 2015 @ 10:22 pm

    When they came to my home town all the military vet Bikers surrounded them no one saw their protests

  44. Jeanette Victoria
    December 31st, 2015 @ 10:23 pm

    The South gives them grief wherever they go

  45. Jeanette Victoria
    December 31st, 2015 @ 10:24 pm

    Excessive tatts and piercing as well

  46. NeoWayland
    January 1st, 2016 @ 9:22 am

    “Non-Christians get worked up about the thing their leaders tell them they need to get worked up over.”

    If I said that about Christians you’d call me on it, and rightfully so.

    Especially after I started my comments on this thread talking about how not all not all non-Christians bought into the panic.

  47. NeoWayland
    January 1st, 2016 @ 9:26 am

    It’s a tossup whether the “Evangelical wing” has delivered more votes than it has cost the GOP. Certainly it has been among the most visible. From what I can tell, it’s pretty much been a wash, even among Christians.

  48. NeoWayland
    January 1st, 2016 @ 9:36 am

    Attention AND guilty pity.

    Sarcasm does wonders. As does outright laughter.

  49. NeoWayland
    January 1st, 2016 @ 9:40 am

    That’s a pity yes.

    But as the whiny “Manosphere” shows, those professors aren’t the only victims. And as RSM has pointed out, they aren’t even the only victims on campuses.

  50. Jeanette Victoria
    January 1st, 2016 @ 9:59 am

    Agreed. And feminists hate traditionalist women like me