The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Update: @fyeahmfabello Is Still Crazy (Beware of the Feminist™ Brand)

Posted on | April 1, 2016 | 34 Comments


Melissa Fabello is the editor of Everyday Feminism who hates white people, heterosexuality and men, not necessarily in that order. She’s also BFFs with Anita Sarkeesian, Commissar of the Feminist Thought Police.

After spending about 36 hours writing a massively serious piece about feminism’s radical theology, I checked back into the online world this morning and discovered there had been an uptick of traffic to the post I wrote about Fabello in February. What happened? This happened:

Well, I’m glad Ms. Fabello appreciates my concise summary of her anti-male/anti-heterosexual ideology. Feminism is a movement of crazy women, by crazy women, for crazy women — a democracy of the demented — and everyone else must be excluded and silenced, so as not to disturb the lunatics who are busy running this asylum.

“Melissa Fabello never wants to hear a word
any heterosexual white man has to say.
Mellisa Fabello doesn’t believe heterosexual white
men have anything to say that anyone else
should ever hear. Melissa Fabello is a feminist,
and the First Rule of Feminism is ‘SHUT UP!‘”

She deliberately dehumanizes men, a psychological projection expressing her sadistic desire to enact punitive revenge on a male scapegoat.

Melissa Fabello’s neurotic maladjustment would be between her and her therapist, were it not for the way in which feminist ideology serves to rationalize this kind of warped narcissistic tendency, justifying her antisocial traits by blaming all her problems on patriarchy. And there are enough crazy women in America — many of them even crazier than Melissa Fabello — to make this a powerful political movement.

Well, the Feminist™ brand is a hot commodity nowadays, because the Democrat-Media Complex has spent the past three years promoting it in anticipation of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign. Once you understand that partisan politics explains why we have been incessantly bombarded with this “Strong Empowered Woman” message lately, it is possible to obtain a sort of objectivity about it. Of course, the Feminist™ brand is still a form of mental poison, but it is important to keep in mind why this crypto-Marxist sludge is being poured into our culture.

When feminists aren’t busy moaning about “objectification” in the media or hyping the latest “campus rape epidemic” hoax, they can usually be found on the Internet offering to talk to your daughter about gender and sexuality. If you have a teenager who isn’t confused about sex, feminists want to help her become confused. Melissa Fabello’s site Everyday Feminism is devoted to promoting LGBTQIA sexuality, but the one letter you’ll never find in the Alphabet Soup Acronym Rainbow of Sexuality is “N” for normal. LGBTQIA is what 21st-century feminism is all about:

Until I started studying radical feminism, I never thought of “normal” as an achievement, but Feminism Is Queer, as Professor Mimi Marinucci has explained. Feminist theory condemns heterosexuality as “the ideology of male supremacy,” and denies that behavioral differences between men and women are natural. Any apparent differences between men and women are socially constructed by the gender binary within the heterosexual matrix (see Judith Butler, Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, 1990). Feminism seeks to abolish gender in order to achieve “equality” by establishing an androgynous society in which the categories “male” and “female” cease to have any significance.

If all you knew about sex and gender was Third Wave feminism’s endless celebration of androgynous confusion, you might suppose that very few young people in the 21st-century are normal. However, while researchers have recently observed “a slight increase in self-reported bisexuality,” the vast majority of Americans (substantially more than 90%) are heterosexual, despite every effort of feminists and LGBTQIA activists to convince Americans that heterosexuality is bad and wrong.

“Right now, today, as of writing this, I identify as queer. But I didn’t always. And no, I’m not referring to that awkward, uncomfortable time in my life where I knew that something felt ‘off,’ but I couldn’t quite place it, and so I paraded around in the charade of ‘straight.’ I mean that a few years ago, I identified as homoflexible. And before that, a lesbian. And even before that, bisexual.”
Melissa Fabello

Because feminists consider normal behavior either (a) tedious or (b) oppressive, the LGBTQIA crowd gets a disproportionate share of attention. This explains the proliferation of narcissistic adolescent Special Snowflakes™ who have figured out that being a weirdo is an easy way to get attention. Feminism in 2016 is a lot of 19-year-old Tumblr bloggers with facial piercings and green hair claiming to have some kind of mental disability (e.g., self-diagnosed post-traumatic stress disorder) and a bizarre sexual/gender identity. You really have to feel sorry for these kids’ parents, trying to explain to their relatives why Heather, a former valedictorian who until a couple of years ago seemed so happy and normal, changed her major from Business Management to Gender Studies and now insists that she is a “non-binary demiromantic pansexual genderqueer” whose pronouns are “they” and “them.”

Nothing is more pathetic than upper-middle-class suburban white kids claiming to be “oppressed,” which is what LGBTQIA feminism is mainly about, and anyone who thinks Melissa Fabello is a Victim of Society is an even bigger fool than Melissa Fabello is, a difficult feat.

Question: Why does Melissa Fabello want to talk to your daughter about sex? I mean, why are feminists constantly on the Internet — like scary weirdos in a chatroom, really — talking to girls about sex? Am I the only one who notices the vaguely creepy aspect of this?


“Woo-hoo! I’m queer! You’re queer! Being queer is awesome!

Ted Bundy had his VW Beetle, John Wayne Gacy had his clown costume, and queer feminists have YouTube channels. OK, maybe that analogy was too harsh, but is it really necessary for every sexual deviant in America to have a YouTube channel about how awesome it is to be a sexual deviant?


“Watch me do air-quotes around ‘lose’ your ‘virginity,’ girls, because it’s only a social construct. By the way, you should masturbate more.”

OK, she doesn’t actually say that in the video, but this is the attitude conveyed when feminists talk to girls about sex on the Internet, which they seem to do more or less 24/7 nowadays. Ever since Laci Green parlayed her YouTube “sex education” channel into a full-time career, every Gender Studies major with a WiFi hookup is all over the Internet offering their advice on gender and sexuality to kids. There is such a vast surplus of feminist sex blogging, you have to wonder whether it’s really about “education” or whether these weirdo women are just exhibitionist freaks who get off talking about sex to teenagers.

It’s 2016, right? Instead of driving around in a van asking kids to help you find your puppy, you just get yourself a YouTube channel.

Pardon my harsh analogies, but sex is not so difficult to figure out that we need entire brigades of feminists on the Internet to explain it to young people. Believe it or not, before there was an Internet, some of us learned what sex was — and even managed to perform it successfully — without ever watching a Laci Green video. Maybe kids have gotten a lot more stupid in the past 40 years, and therefore they need this kind of step-by-step instruction (“How to Locate Your Vagina”), but I doubt it.

Have you noticed that the feminists who want to talk to your daughter about sex are never married moms with daughters of their own? No, it’s always some degenerate like Jaclyn “I’ve Gone Down and Dirty With Strangers” Friedman who thinks she’s qualified to offer sex advice.

Well, sure, if you want your daughter to grow up to be a Crazy Cat Lady (and maybe get herpes, too) feminists can tell her how to do that.


Under no circumstance will Melissa Fabello listen to anything a “white dude” has to say about anything. To be male is to be wrong, the feminist believes. Melissa Fabello knows everything, and “white dudes” know nothing, but men are “afraid” to admit that they are intellectually inferior to her. Their masculinity is “fragile,” whereas she is the cheerful epitome of psychological strength, self-esteem and confidence.


You must never question Melissa Fabello’s identity, you see, whereas her entire career is about attacking the identities of others (except teenage girls, to whom she likes to talk to about sex). Perhaps the people she accuses of “erasure” were merely wondering why Ms. Fabello, the queer/lesbian/homoflexible who considers herself so infinitely superior to males, would be in a relationship with a man. The greater mystery, however, is why a man would want to be in relationship with her.

Does the “male feminist” just have a profound masochistic tendency? Does he crave the reluctant embrace of a woman who hates him? Is he aroused by being ridiculed and taunted about his inherent inadequacy?

Is it even possible for a feminist to love a man, and if so, how? These are questions Melissa Fabello never addresses when she’s recording YouTube videos telling teenage girls how awesome it is to be queer. If men are so utterly heinous that any expression of male sexual interest in women must be denounced as “objectification,” why would a feminist want a man to be sexually interested in her? There is no logic to it at all. It is wholly irrational for feminists to be in relationships with men, as the Leeds Revolutionary Feminists declared in their 1981 manifesto (available under the title Love Your Enemy? The Debate Between Heterosexual Feminism and Political Lesbianism) that accused heterosexual feminists of collaborating with the male oppressors of women. Some may imagine such radicalism is a relic of the past, but just last month Meghan Murphy published a rant denouncing “capitalist patriarchy,” condemning “gender roles that are rooted in domination and subordination (i.e. masculinity and femininity),” and describing feminism as a movement “to build a society wherein men don’t feel entitled to sexual access to women.”

Men can never be allowed “sexual access to women” — such is the logical conclusion of the feminist syllogism, at any rate. Lesbian separatists who have spent decades living in a commune in the hills of Alabama are at least logical in their approach to avoiding “capitalist patriarchy.” Inexplicably, however, Melissa Fabello hasn’t joined a separatist commune.

Wait, did I say “inexplicably”? No, I didn’t mean that. Because of course, I probably could explain why Melissa Fabello’s anti-male rhetoric is contradicted by her continued intimate association with males. Alas, that would be “mansplaining” and, as previously noted, Ms. Fabello never wants to hear anything a heterosexual white male has to say.

If anyone needs advice on how to be normal, I’m available. Being normal isn’t much of an achievement, but for feminists, it’s impossible.




34 Responses to “Update: @fyeahmfabello Is Still Crazy (Beware of the Feminist™ Brand)”

  1. Joe Joe
    April 1st, 2016 @ 10:42 pm


    Take the advice from someone who has lived a long time.

    You are young, you are pretty, and you could be spending your time enjoying all that. Instead, you are stewing in an anger that will debilitate you and separate you from true love and purpose.

    Life goes so damned quickly. One minute, you’ve got the world at your feet, and the next, you’re dealing with thinning hair, arthritic knees, and worries about who will take you in when you can’t work any longer. It’s quick, Melissa, quicker than they ever told you.

    When you’re my age, you’re going to look back on life and wonder what it was all about. Without a moral system and some happy memories, it will be empty. Without the husband and children you could have had, it could be unbearable.

    It may seem hip now to hate, but in denying your own love and joy, you will waste your life. And you won’t know until it’s too late.

  2. robertstacymccain
    April 1st, 2016 @ 10:52 pm

    Don’t even try to talk sense to a feminist. You’d do as much good talking to her cats, like she does.

  3. RS
    April 1st, 2016 @ 10:58 pm

    Well, the Feminist™ brand is a hot commodity nowadays, because the Democrat-Media Complex has spent the past three years promoting it in anticipation of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.

    Yes, but The Patriarchy is too strong to be defeated. We propped up BHO in 2008 and we’re propping up The Bern for 2016. Bruhuhuhahahahahahahha. Strike us down and we only grow stronger!!!!!!!!!!!! I mean, after all, we’ve had this as a standing item on the agenda at our meetings which–don’t tell anybody–are held the second Wednesday of every month in the basement of the 1st Assembly of God Church in Benkleman, Nebraska immediately following the Ladies Quilting Club.

    “Always A Step Ahead.” That’s the motto of The Patriarchy.

  4. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    April 1st, 2016 @ 11:15 pm

    Where can I get a Crazy Kat Lady action figure? I want one!.

  5. Fail Burton
    April 1st, 2016 @ 11:26 pm

    “I never want to hear a thing a Jew says. Quote me on that. Ha-ha. Look at me, I’m invulnerable because I have bullet-proof punching up/privilege theory. I knitted the vest myself out of Third Wave cotton. I can’t be a racist! Not never, ever. Go ahead, quote me all you like! Ha-ha-ha. Stupid Jews! La, la, la, – I can’t heeeaaarrr you! Shut the fuck up Jews!!! Wheeeeeee!!! I wear lipstick as a prank. I don’t need it cuz I’m perfectly okay, but you’re not, especially if you’re a Jew. Not all the lipstick in the world will change that!!!!” – Melissa Fangstank

  6. Joe Joe
    April 1st, 2016 @ 11:32 pm

    I feel great sadness about her. She’s caught up in an ideology that is not of her making and which she has been encouraged to adopt by political operatives who don’t give one DAMN about her but only about their agenda. I’d like to strangle those female operatives who have sold women out for a few dollars and a bag of ashes.

  7. Fail Burton
    April 1st, 2016 @ 11:33 pm

    I wouldn’t shed any tears for broken people who seem determined to write books about that time they never hiked the Inca Trail or motorcycled around Bali. If they weren’t sick internet addicts they’d already be doing that. The problem is no one sees you doing that stuff but yourself, and a moron like this drudge would rather have 5 people see the sandwich she just made than not have an audience to see her misery of an empty, boring life.

  8. Joe Joe
    April 1st, 2016 @ 11:39 pm

    She’s a pretty young women who should be dancing on the beach until dawn and falling in love with a man she could make a life with. Being bitter this young is a complete and utter waste. If this were my daughter, I would wonder what I had done so terribly wrong. Where is her father?

  9. Fail Burton
    April 1st, 2016 @ 11:55 pm

    If she’s acting like a bitter 60 yr. old Cornish fish-wife from the 17th century today, what do you think she’ll acting like when she’s 60?

    There’s a saying drug addicts have for her behavior: killing your tomorrows one day at a time. Eventually you reach a tipping point where you’ve squandered the best years of your life. That’s when she’ll really go off the rails. I would’ve no more thought of having a youtube channel at her age than I would’ve thought of locking myself in an air raid shelter for 10 years.

    What are people like her going to brag about in 40 years? That time they found a wi-fi spot? That cool blog post? How they maintained their genderqueer identity while dating a man? I can see the ghosts of children which will never be eagerly listening to that droning right now.

  10. Joe Joe
    April 1st, 2016 @ 11:57 pm

    “Killing your tomorrows one day at a time. ” That’s exactly it.

    In 40 years, she’ll brag about a revolution that she had little to no part in, one that destroyed true freedom. And she’ll have had no joy. Worst possible outcome.

  11. Fail Burton
    April 2nd, 2016 @ 12:41 am

    When I was 28 I walked out of a nightclub in Rio de Janeiro with a beautiful Dutch backpacker I had recently met and later fell in love with. The sun was rising in a big ball out of the sea as we headed back to the hotel from our long night.

    That’s the most boring story of the adventures we had there

    I don’t know that I’ve ever told that to anyone. It was just stuff I did for myself.

  12. Joe Joe
    April 2nd, 2016 @ 12:49 am

    That’s what life is made of.

  13. russemerson
    April 2nd, 2016 @ 2:06 am

    I might talk to my cats, but I don’t expect them to answer me, or to confirm my theoretical preconceptions about other people.

  14. Fail Burton
    April 2nd, 2016 @ 2:47 am

    She looks kinda fat in those pictures. She should cut down on bread and pasta.

  15. Daniel Freeman
    April 2nd, 2016 @ 3:54 am

    I would bet money that she would never in a million years comprehend your satire. Because she’s a grievance industry professional, so she can’t see herself as a bigot.

  16. Squid Hunt ?Patriarch
    April 2nd, 2016 @ 6:02 am

    Remember when gay people used to get offended when you equated them with child molesters? No, they really are after your children. They want to indoctrinate them, mentor them, twist them. Which is pretty much the response of any other sexual deviant with the innocent.

  17. Jason Lee
    April 2nd, 2016 @ 6:46 am

    I remember the post from February but I saw the picture at the top of this post and thought we were being introduced to another confused transexual.

  18. Update: @fyeahmfabello Is Still Crazy (Beware of the Feminist™ Brand) | Living in Anglo-America
    April 2nd, 2016 @ 8:48 am

    […] Update: @fyeahmfabello Is Still Crazy (Beware of the Feminist™ Brand) […]

  19. marcus tullius cicero
    April 2nd, 2016 @ 9:44 am

    …textbook clinical abnormal psychology product of an unhealthy relationship either mental or physical towards her father… She needs more cats!

  20. Art Deco
    April 2nd, 2016 @ 10:56 am

    They’ll answer you, but their answers will be indicative of their priorities: feed me, pet me, play with me, or let me outside.

  21. NeoWayland
    April 2nd, 2016 @ 10:57 am

    Because I lost a wager, I spent some time looking at Laci Green videos a while back. The stuff on sex is pretty good, the stuff on relationships is so-so, and the SJW stuff is just destructive. Although in her defense, I don’t think she has thought through the implications.

    Anyway, the chances of someone under 25 knowing very much about relationships are pretty slim. Particularly when their solution is for at least half of humanity to submit to their wisdom and change their ways.

  22. robertstacymccain
    April 2nd, 2016 @ 11:18 am

    “I spent some time looking at Laci Green videos a while back. The stuff on sex is pretty good …”

    You sick freak! I mean, honestly, that kind of stuff is just “Dear Penthouse Forum” fantasy, except they’re trying to turn it into “empowerment.” Next thing you know, it’s “rape culture” and how to deal with your herpes infection.

  23. NeoWayland
    April 2nd, 2016 @ 12:05 pm

    *shrugs* Different strokes for different folks.

    Just because someone has mastered driving stick doesn’t mean they’re ready for LeMans. Or drag racing in the boondocks, as my brother used to put it.

    Sex is easy, it’s practically wired into the biology. Relationships are hard.

  24. jolly green
    April 2nd, 2016 @ 1:27 pm

    More likely the problem was the mother who was a big time slut, and paraded one loser after another in front of poor Melissa, and because of that has she has no idea what a decent loving man actually is.

  25. trangbang68
    April 2nd, 2016 @ 4:20 pm

    “homoflexible” ? Is that a new position we haven’t heard about before?

  26. marcus tullius cicero
    April 2nd, 2016 @ 6:46 pm

    …where are her parents are they dead? what is their role on her insanity?
    …very very weird!

  27. Wombat_socho
    April 2nd, 2016 @ 8:15 pm

    The real secret, of course, is that The Patriarchy actually defers to the Ladies Quilting Club. Those grandmas know what’s up.

  28. Fail Burton
    April 2nd, 2016 @ 11:59 pm

    Fabello isn’t the only feminist who is an unofficial member of Heidelburg U, Class of ’33.

  29. Daniel Freeman
    April 3rd, 2016 @ 8:35 am

    I think it means “reluctantly willing to consider straight sex if I’m really desperate,” but it’s hard to keep up with all of the neologisms.

  30. Daniel Freeman
    April 3rd, 2016 @ 8:35 am

    I think it means “reluctantly willing to consider straight sex if I’m really desperate,” but it’s hard to keep up with all of the neologisms.

  31. The New Thought Crime: ‘Adultism’ : The Other McCain
    April 3rd, 2016 @ 4:18 pm

    […] can read the rest. Notice that (a) it’s published at Everyday Feminism and (b) the “LGBTQIA+” agenda is foremost in the author’s […]

  32. News of the Week (April 3rd, 2016) | The Political Hat
    April 3rd, 2016 @ 4:37 pm

    […] Update: @fyeahmfabello Is Still Crazy (Beware of the Feminist™ Brand) Melissa Fabello is the editor of Everyday Feminist who hates white people, heterosexuality and men, not necessarily in that order. She’s also BFFs with Anita Sarkeesian, Commissar of the Feminist Thought Police. […]

  33. The New Thought Crime: ‘Adultism’ | Living in Anglo-America
    April 3rd, 2016 @ 5:05 pm

    […] can read the rest. Notice that (a) it’s published at Everyday Feminismand (b) the “LGBTQIA+” agenda is foremost in the author’s […]

  34. Yes, ‘Gender’ Is About Sex : The Other McCain
    April 14th, 2016 @ 5:54 pm

    […] theory did not begin with Judith Butler, nor is the ostentatious weirdness of a self-described “queer” feminist like Melissa Fabello anything […]