The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Communist @DrexelUniv Professor Gets Paid to Teach Anti-White Hatred

Posted on | December 27, 2016 | Comments Off on Communist @DrexelUniv Professor Gets Paid to Teach Anti-White Hatred

Drexel University is a private school for rich kids which is “elite” only if you accept “elite” as a synonym for expensive. Annual tuition at Drexel is $51,030, plus $14,367 for room and board. The majority of Drexel students are white (53% of the freshman class) or Asian (16%), while “international” students were 18% of freshmen at Drexel, which exceeds the combined total (11%) of freshmen who are black or Hispanic.

That such a posh school would employ Professor George J. Ciccarielo-Maher IV is both ironic and deeply symbolic of the decadence that has beset American academia. Ciccarielo-Maher is a Marxist, an assistant professor of Political Science who loathes capitalism and America with about as much vehemence as you would expect from a Berkeley Ph.D. He hates our system of limited government, he hates our free economy, and he especially hates the American people:

Drexel University associate professor of political science George Ciccariello-Maher has a long history of espousing racist views towards white people on Twitter and has at times supported genocide.
Cicariello-Maher, a white man who specializes in race and racism among other topics, has been the subject of criticism from media outlets and social media users after he tweeted on Saturday, “All I Want for Christmas is White Genocide.” He subsequently deleted the tweet and brushed it off as a joke, saying that “White isn’t a race.” . . .
On Feb 3, 2013, the Drexel professor said that “Yacub made a lot of white folks.” According to Nation of Islam theology, Yacub is a black scientist who created the white race to be a “race of devils.”
Then on June 8, 2015, Ciccariello-Maher said, “Abolish the White Race.” A little over a week later, the Drexel professor said that Charleston church shooter Dylann Roof “simply put into practice what many white Americans already think.”
Ciccariello-Maher also tweeted in Sept. 2016 a purported exchange between him and his son: “Son: If I was a slave, I’d bake a cake & put a potion in it & the white people would steal it Me: What would the potion do? Him: Kill them,” the Drexel University professor wrote.
Just this past week, in response to a viral video claiming to show two men kicked off a plane for speaking Arabic, Ciccariello-Maher wrote, “#Gulag these Racist Crackers.”
Ciccariello-Maher, who describes himself as a communist, joined Drexel University in 2010.

The racist crackers in the Drexel administration were not amused:

Drexel became aware today of Associate Professor George Ciccariello-Maher’s inflammatory tweet, which was posted on his personal Twitter account on Dec. 24, 2016. While the University recognizes the right of its faculty to freely express their thoughts and opinions in public debate, Professor Ciccariello-Maher’s comments are utterly reprehensible, deeply disturbing, and do not in any way reflect the values of the University.
The University is taking this situation very seriously. We contacted Ciccariello-Maher today to arrange a meeting to discuss this matter in detail.

Here is the question: Given that Ciccariello-Maher’s anti-American views were never a secret, why does Drexel now pretend to find “disturbing” the professor’s expressions of hatred toward white people? Are the two phenomena — being anti-American and anti-white — not obviously related? No one ever denounces white Canadians for being white, nor do America-haters spew racialized hatred toward Swedes, Germans, Danes, etc. It is only the white man in America who is hated for being white, and why is this? Because Americans hate Communism. America led the fight against Soviet imperialism during the Cold War. Pro-Soviet stooges in the West mimicked the Moscow propaganda line that condemned America as a “racist” nation, and why? Because we were anti-Communist, that’s why.

Ciccariello-Maher’s anti-Americanism is just a stale leftover from the Cold War-era Left and, as such, is intellectually indefensible. Why is Drexel subsidizing the propagation of this failed belief system? Ethan Ralph points out that Drexel actually gave Ciccariello-Maher $15,000 to help him buy a home in Philadelphia, and the professor has repaid this favor by damaging the university’s reputation with his hateful rhetoric.

Perhaps they should spend whatever it takes to send Ciccariello-Maher someplace he could be happy — Pyongyang, for example.



Comments are closed.