The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

How Feminism Caused the #Berkeley Riot: Understanding Leftist Psychology

Posted on | February 2, 2017 | 2 Comments

 

This morning I had planned to follow-up on Wednesday’s riot in Berkeley, but today Grandpa McCain was babysitting both his grandsons, which made blogging impossible. Now I’m finally getting around to the follow-up, but I’m exhausted and so I’ll just briefly remind you what I’ve been saying for nearly two years now: Feminism Is a Totalitarian Movement to Destroy Civilization as We Know It — and that caused the riot.

Ask yourself:

  1. Who were the people smashing windows and throwing fireworks and assaulting innocent people on the UC-Berkeley campus?
  2. What was their motive for this rampage of political violence?

The answers are:

  1. Young guys who don’t have jobs or wives or bills to pay.
  2. Trying to impress girls with how “progressive” they are.

Look, this isn’t very hard to understand. During the late 1960s, a lot of guys joined radical protest movements because it was the cool thing to do on liberal college campuses, and by “the cool thing to do,” of course I mean how a guy could get laid. If you were a scrawny neurasthenic geek, you weren’t going to be scoring with the homecoming queen, but you might still have a chance to get laid if you could impress a liberal chick by being an outspoken advocate of “peace” and “civil rights,” etc.  A basic motive that attracted a lot of dudes into the orbit of SDS, was because being radical was a way to get laid. (“Smash monogamy!”)

Flash-forward about 50 years, and what’s the situation? During the 2016 Democrat primary campaign, the radicals supported Bernie Sanders, who lost to Hillary Clinton, who made feminism the raison d’etre of her campaign and then lost to Donald/Adolf Trump/Hitler. So now, on liberal campuses, you’ve got a lot of feminists who supported Hillary moping around in a post-election depression, and these morose college feminists aren’t in much of a mood for romance, if you get my drift. This means their “progressive” boyfriends aren’t getting any action, and so what are these radical “Bernie Bros” gonna do? Throw an anti-Trump riot.

That’s what all this strutting macho #Resistance bullshit is really all about — dudes trying to get laid. Fortunately I came of age in the late 1970s, when the Left was demoralized and everyone was so cynical about politics that sex was about sex for its own sake. Also, there was no Internet back then, so nobody cared about a college kid’s opinion. All these 19-year-old “social justice” morons spewing mental sewage on Twitter and Facebook — who are they trying to impress, and why? Same answer, really. It’s about status-seeking and, amid the post-Hillary feminist butt-hurt epidemic, a guy who wants to get laid on a “progressive” campus like UC-Berkeley has to engage in invidious displays of anti-Trump rage.

You don’t need a Ph.D. in psychology to figure this out. However, if a guy is smart enough to go to Berkeley, he ought to be able to figure out that feminism causes herpes. Maybe guys should just be Republican and stop trying to impress those vile feminist whores. Also, consider switching your major to something useful and stop hanging around those dopehead left-wing perverts like the accused murderer Pablo Gomez.

 

Category: Education

Comments

2 Responses to “How Feminism Caused the #Berkeley Riot: Understanding Leftist Psychology”

  1. FMJRA 2.0: Waiting For The Superb Owl : The Other McCain
    February 5th, 2017 @ 4:07 am

    […] How Feminism Caused the #Berkeley Riot: Understanding Leftist Psychology EBL Terrorist Shouts ‘Allahu Akbar,’ Shot After Machete Attack on Louvre Museum EBL […]

  2. News of the Week (February 5th, 2017) | The Political Hat
    February 5th, 2017 @ 4:12 pm

    […] How Feminism Caused the #Berkeley Riot: Understanding Leftist Psychology This morning I had planned to follow-up on Wednesday’s riot in Berkeley, but today Grandpa McCain was babysitting both his grandsons, which made blogging impossible. […]