The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Occupy Sexual Assault: Disrespect for Private Property Has Consequences

Posted on | November 19, 2011 | 33 Comments

Celebrations of sociopathic tendencies — and demonizing wealth is sociopathic — tend to attract maladjusted deviants:

ST. LOUIS (KMOV) — A 20-year-old woman participating in the OccupySTL protest reported to police that a man sexually assaulted her while she was in her tent on November 8, three days before tents were removed by the city. . . .
Brian E. King, 38, was charged with first degree sexual misconduct after police said he crawled into the victim’s tent and touched her breast. The assault happened on November 8 at the encampment that used to be set up in Kiener Plaza.

Perhaps the suspect will claim he was acting upon the “social justice” rationale of the movement: He represents the 99% of guys who are unfairly deprived of their equal opportunity to grope the breasts of cute 20-year-old chicks. Fight the System!

UPDATE (Smitty): welcome, Instapundit readers!


Category: #Occupy, Crime, Progressivism

Comments

33 Responses to “Occupy Sexual Assault: Disrespect for Private Property Has Consequences”

  1. Anonymous
    November 19th, 2011 @ 8:20 am

    Don’t worry, he’s already been declared a “non-Occuperson” by the Occupiers.

  2. Zilla of the Resistance
    November 19th, 2011 @ 8:33 am

    And the idiot enabling Mayor of St. Louis decided to use the occurape as an opportunity to attack THE TEA PARTY. Gateway Pundit has the video.

  3. ThePaganTemple
    November 19th, 2011 @ 8:41 am

    Let’s take a real close look here at the type of women who take part in the Occupy Movement. Do we really know what, or who, to believe when shit like this is alleged? I damn sure don’t. Whether she’s telling the truth or not, this woman will get extra food, extra pot, extra booze, and extra friends, and maybe even a whole bunch of full body massages in first one tent and another. The hell with the lot of them, the “abusers” and the “abusees” alike.

  4. chuck coffer
    November 19th, 2011 @ 9:32 am

    She was only half the population of the tent, but she was hogging 100% of the tent’s titties. No justice! No piece!

  5. Anonymous
    November 19th, 2011 @ 9:59 am

    The fact that 50% of the population has 100% of the vagina has long been noted by advocates of “social justice.”

  6. Anamika
    November 19th, 2011 @ 10:41 am

    Who said Stacy McCain has no standards? I’m sure he would also agree that all those numerous priests caught molesting children represent/motivated by the values of the Catholic Church.

  7. Anonymous
    November 19th, 2011 @ 11:12 am

    Well, here we go with that “is Occupy more crime-prone than the background area it’s in?” question.

    The US average for forcible rapes per year is 33.1 per 100,000 people. The average in the city of St. Louis is 97.2 per 100,000 people.

    One survey rates the city of St. Louis as the third most violent city in the world, behind Bogota and Juarez but ahead of Port-au-Prince and Mogadishu.

    I would not rate the neighborhood in question the most dangerous in St. Louis, but it is certainly one of the more dangerous in St. Louis, at least after dark.

    I’d be surprised to learn that there were less than two or three reported rapes in that part of town per week under normal circumstances. Stick a bunch of naive hipsters in tents right in the middle of it, and it’s amazing that this is the first reported incident.

  8. JeffS
    November 19th, 2011 @ 11:21 am

    Tut tut, Anamika, tut tut!

    The Catholic Church paid (and continues to pay) the price for their cover ups, and has acknowledged their errors.  One would hope that the #OccupyCretins learns from that.  But one would likely be disappointed.

    Tut tut!  Changing the subject is not an effective counterargument, Anamika!  The errors of your peers remain visible.  Tut tut!

  9. Anonymous
    November 19th, 2011 @ 12:50 pm

    It’s not amazing at all. Not when the Prime Directive, demonstrated repeatedly, is “lie at all costs.” Not surprising for a Copperhead operation, of course.

  10. Joe
    November 19th, 2011 @ 1:07 pm

    In the words of the prophet Kesha:

    Ain’t got a care in world, but got plenty of beerAin’t got no money in my pocket, but I’m already hereAnd now, the dudes are lining up cause they hear we got swaggerBut we kick ’em to the curb unless they look like Mick JaggerI’m talking about everybody getting crunk, crunkBoys tryin’ to touch my junk, junkGonna smack him if he getting too drunk, drunk

    Or as Dean Wormer said:  “Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son.” 

  11. Joe
    November 19th, 2011 @ 1:08 pm

    Okay who said her name three times and made her appear?  Cut it out! 

  12. Joe
    November 19th, 2011 @ 1:10 pm

    St. Louis is a hole knappster, but I question that “survey” about St. Louis being more dangerous than Port-au-Prince and Mogadishu. 

  13. Anonymous
    November 19th, 2011 @ 1:19 pm

    Joe,

    I question it, too. Seems a little over the top.

    BUT — I know that area from personal experience.

    I’ve been there in the middle of the night, and I’ve been in downtown LA in the middle of the night, and I felt safer in downtown LA.

    For that matter, I felt safer on Revolucion Boulevard in Tijuana, and in Khafji, Saudi Arabia in early 1991.

    There are different kinds of crime neighborhoods in St. Louis.

    The worst of them for homicides — the crack/heroin neighborhoods — lie between my house and the neighborhood in question.

    The neighborhood in question is “downtown” — during the day it’s a bustling business/tourist district. At night, it is mugging, rape, and occasional drive-by nightclub shooting territory. Unless there’s a baseball game or something going on, its population consists of tourists who shouldn’t have left their hotels on foot, and of the predators who prey on them. The only thing open is the bars and the liquor stores. Even the Hardee’s down there locks up at 8pm.

  14. Anonymous
    November 19th, 2011 @ 2:26 pm

    You do realize that none of those stats or observations are relevant to the discussion.

  15. Anamika
    November 19th, 2011 @ 2:34 pm

    Dungbat

  16. Anonymous
    November 19th, 2011 @ 3:01 pm

    Herpes.

  17. chuck coffer
    November 19th, 2011 @ 3:25 pm

    Or as Gary Busey said in DC Cab, Women have half the money and all the pu**y.

  18. Anonymous
    November 19th, 2011 @ 8:21 pm

    …and stop staring at her tuts!

  19. pandemic
    November 19th, 2011 @ 8:27 pm

    I’m sure he was just “blending in”, not an active participant of the Occupy movement.

    /sarc

  20. Anonymous
    November 19th, 2011 @ 8:53 pm

    It’s just this war and that lying son of a bitch Johnson.

  21. Instapundit » Blog Archive » #OCCUPYFAIL: Occupy Sexual Assault: Disrespect for Private Property Has Consequences. …
    November 19th, 2011 @ 9:05 pm

    […] #OCCUPYFAIL: Occupy Sexual Assault: Disrespect for Private Property Has Consequences. […]

  22. Steven Butterbaugh
    November 19th, 2011 @ 9:19 pm

    The mayors around the country who betrayed their purpose to protect people’s life and property ought to be charged with sourcing the crime that happened as a result of these permitted lawless encampments.  They ought to be sued and brought before a court.

  23. OrangeGirl
    November 19th, 2011 @ 9:38 pm

    This happened a *lot* during Tea Party events.  Remember?

    Yeah, me neither.

  24. Anonymous
    November 19th, 2011 @ 9:39 pm

    When did it become a crime to feel up a hippie chick?  Maybe he forgot to bring a couple doobies? 

  25. Black Flag
    November 19th, 2011 @ 10:22 pm

    I don’t want to hear another excuse for Occupy. We have yet to see a single OWS accomplishment other than a rolling crime wave, filth, rambling nonsense, and the disgust of most everyone who is unfortunate enough to encounter them. They have not helped the community in any way. They do not get along well with anyone outside their movement, much less each other. They are destroying every place they are encamped. They do nothing positive for anyone.

  26. Anonymous
    November 19th, 2011 @ 10:49 pm

    “I don’t want to hear another excuse for Occupy.”

    In order for there to be “another,” there’d need to be a first one. There hasn’t been. I’m actually interested in trying to figure out the facts, and I don’t give a damn whether those facts reflect well or poorly on Occupy.

  27. ThePaganTemple
    November 19th, 2011 @ 11:24 pm

    Now wait a minute, Governor Perry says those #OWS folks are just honest, hard-working people down on their luck, looking for jobs. Surely you’re not saying the Governor of the great state of Texas is wrong are you? I’ll have you know he relies only on the most top-notch information sources available. Why, he even has former aids to Charlie Crist working on his campaign.

  28. ThePaganTemple
    November 19th, 2011 @ 11:26 pm

    Now just where do you think hippie chicks keep their doobies?

  29. ThePaganTemple
    November 19th, 2011 @ 11:27 pm

    Oh, wait a minute that’s right. It was her TITTIES he felt. Never mind.

  30. JeffS
    November 19th, 2011 @ 11:41 pm

    Be glad Anamika has tuts, and not tits.  Oh, the humanity!

  31. Forrest Sergente
    November 20th, 2011 @ 1:40 am

    This is simply a preview of an Obamacare era breast exam. I mean, it was free wasn’t it?

  32. Bob Belvedere
    November 20th, 2011 @ 4:30 pm

    ‘Rutherford unperson. Substitute Ogilvy. Ogilvy biog details as follows: war hero, recently killed, Malabar front. Today awarded posthumous secondary order of conspicuous merit second class.’
    [Winston tapes over Rutherford’s face, consigning him to oblivion]

  33. Can Freedom of Speech Be Evil? « sitting on the edge of the sandbox, biting my tongue
    November 21st, 2011 @ 4:32 pm

    […] McCain makes a point that disrespect for personal property has consequences.  A young lady found herself assaulted by a fellow occupier, and Mr. McCain comments: Celebrations […]