The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Harvard Feminists Lie About Rape

Posted on | October 5, 2015 | 108 Comments

An anti-rape protest at Harvard University.

No honest, decent or moral young person would ever want to go near Harvard University, a corrupt and decadent institution run by depraved perverts. Harvard women are particularly notorious for their shameless promiscuity — one Harvard girl boasted of her “freedom to have as many sexual partners as I want without being looked down on” — which is a major cause of sexually transmitted diseases in the Boston metro area.

“Boston residents ages 15 through 24 are almost four times
more likely to have Chlamydia than residents overall.
Among that age group, 70% of those diagnosed are female.”

Sex with Harvard girls is such a health risk it’s a wonder any man smart enough to get into Harvard would do it. Of course, most men who attend Harvard are gay, which may substantially lower their risk of chlamydia. However, some Harvard women still claim to be victims of rape:

The number of rapes reported by students at Harvard University’s Cambridge campus “nearly doubled” between 2013 & 2014, according to an article in school paper The Harvard Crimson. This alarming info comes via the new campus-security report from Harvard police, compiled as part of federal Clery Act requirements. But like so much related to campus rape numbers, this seemingly drastic increase isn’t nearly as alarming as some will make it out to be.
First, it’s important to consider concrete sexual assault numbers, which were still quite low. In 2014,33 instances of rape were reported to either campus police, university officials, or local law enforcement by students at Harvard’s main campus in Cambridge, and one rape was reported at Harvard’s Longwood campus. . . .. The number of rapes reported at Harvard last year is up from 17 incidents in 2013, and 24 in 2012.
But as Ashe Schow points out in the Washington Examiner, six of the 2014 rape reports — nearly 20 percent — were determined to be “unfounded,” i.e. “false or baseless.” This leaves us with just 28 credible rape reports at Harvard last year. . . .
In any event, with a population of about 21,000 students, Harvard University’s rape rate for 2014 was about 0.13 percent, or one in every 750 Harvard students.
The campus-crime report does not include a gender breakdown for rape victims, but let’s just assume for the sake of further extrapolation that all 28 were women. Roughly half the Harvard University student body is women. If we count both graduate and undergraduate students, that’s a rape rate of about 0.27 percent for female Harvard students, or one in every 375 Harvard women.
There are about 6,400 undergraduate students at Harvard, and about half are women as well. If we assume all the reported rape victims were undergraduate women — a not baseless assumption, considering only one incident of rape reported between 2012-2014 took place outside of a residence hall (though of course these aren’t exclusively undergrad housing) — that leaves us with a rape rate of about 0.88 percent.
In other words, this worst-case-scenario assumption means that about one in 114 female undergraduates reported rapes at Harvard last year.

You can read the whole thing. The fact that there were six false rape accusations — officially determined to be “unfounded . . . baseless” — at Harvard last year does not surprise anyone who knows anything about Harvard girls, whose dishonesty is as notorious as their promiscuity.

Still we must confront the shocking allegation that Harvard is now admitting heterosexual men who are willing to have sex with Harvard women despite the well-known risk of chlamydia infection.

This suggests either a serious mental health crisis in Cambridge, or else these Harvard students are using powerful mind-altering narcotics that deprive them of their capacity for rational thought. Perhaps they are getting high on ether. As a famous journalist once observed, “There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge.”

Whatever the explanation, any man accused of having sex with a Harvard woman should plead insanity, because he would have to be completely unhinged to do something as crazy as that.

P.S.: Tuesday will be my 56th birthday. Hit the freaking tip jar.



108 Responses to “Harvard Feminists Lie About Rape”

  1. Carrie
    October 8th, 2015 @ 4:37 pm


    Now, onto the less slightly hysterical parts of your psychopathic screed: there was no projection on my part, whether blatant or not. I’m simply pointing out that many of us would like to see a Republican (or at least a Conservative) President elected in 2016, but delusional, hysterical psychopaths on the Right are guaranteeing that we’ll never see another Right-leaning President ever, ever again.

    Childishly parroting facts but replacing all the nouns Ad Lib-style with opposite nouns did nothing but show how fu¢king far away from reality the current GOP is. Sods like you and the other twits with your wild version of reality are exactly why the USA will be either voting Left, or staying home. And you don’t even care. Because to care would mean you have to change, to mature, to behave like a responsible adult citizen dealing with reality, and apparently that is too much to ask from what has become Right-leaning white men in America.

    Whatever you fear most about a Hillary victory in 2016 is exactly what you’re going to get, again — because this modern excuse for the GOP is driving away women, people of color, LGBTQs, the poor, the educated, and anyone who can’t stand the KKK ‘tude that you people here are so protective of. And without that 85% of the voting population, you’re just not going to let us get any more Republican Presidents.

  2. Carrie
    October 8th, 2015 @ 4:46 pm

    And the use of “always” still never turns your lies into truths.

    So, I had to look up your little boy internet slang. “SJW” stands for “Social Justice Warrior”, eh? For fu¢k’s sake, if anyone wanted to be a specific warrior, wouldn’t they CHOOSE to fight for fu¢king JUSTICE FOR SOCIETY!?!?!? I’ll see if I can’t use your little juvenile term myself from now on, although I won’t be using it much as I don’t want people’s opinions to be colored by my sudden usage of little kid slang.

    Happy “fighting against justice for society”, I guess. You’ve certainly found something you’re great at.

  3. Carrie
    October 8th, 2015 @ 5:06 pm

    Interesting! Please let me know the name(s) of the person(s) who
    1.) invited you here;
    2.) pointed a gun at your head,
    3.) demanded that you post your blather here.
    Because whomever that was, I’ll just go ahead and say the same.

    And yet another correction: I am not a leftist, I am a Conservative who is tired of what has become of the formerly great GOP. It is your ilk who will have to answer for the future where America only elects Democrats, and elect Democrats is all the US will do if the likes of you are the new face of the Right.

  4. JollyGreenChemist
    October 9th, 2015 @ 1:23 pm

    SJW’s “claim” to fight for society. In reality they are merely fighting for their in-group of progressives, since outsiders do not matter.

  5. Carrie
    October 10th, 2015 @ 12:25 am

    A cursory search of “Social Justice” goals will show that to be quite false. I saw page after page after page of fighting on behalf of women, on behalf of poor people, on behalf of homeless people, on behalf of Blacks, on behalf of Browns, on behalf of Reds (Native Americans), on behalf of victims of crimes, on behalf of people fired unjustly, on behalf of children, on behalf of sidelined people (people with physical and/or mental handicaps), on behalf of entire families, on behalf of neighborhoods being poisoned by toxic businesses — oh, JFC, these Social Justice “Warriors” pretty damned much don’t HAVE any ooutsiders other than the top of the top people who NEED no social justice helping, because they’ve bought all the “justice” they could ever need!

  6. robertstacymccain
    October 10th, 2015 @ 2:55 am

    Gay males have a statistically MUCH higher chance of contracting STDs over heterosexual women, not a lower chance as implied.

    Yes, but in comparison to Harvard girls …

    My point is that feminists have whipped up such a frothing fury of anti-male hatred on campus as to shift the risk/reward incentives decisively against having sex with college women, at Harvard or anywhere else. Your own fanaticism — which has apparently convinced you that rapists are lurking everywhere — is typical of the attitude that has made it unsafe for males to pursue sexual relationships on campus. The message from feminists to college men sounds like this: “Do exactly as we say! Shut up! Obey! Give us money! We hate you! Rapist!”

    However successful this might be as politics, it’s not likely to inspire romantic admiration. What it is likely to inspire is aversion.

    Women who are full of vengeful rage are not desirable companions, and are especially unsuitable for marriage or motherhood.

    Even if she were physically attractive, there’s no way any intelligent man would trust such a woman with his money, his home, his children. And so feminism becomes a sort of Crazy Ex-Girlfriends Club — an aggregation of women temperamentally unsuited for normal adult life.

  7. Carrie
    October 11th, 2015 @ 11:44 am

    OK, so now you were kind enough to illustrate perfectly where the dishonest reporting came from — your own imagination. “[My] point is that feminists have whipped up… anti-male hatred…” Umm, no, they haven’t. And it’s a little worrisome that you feel so guilty for some reason that you actually felt confident enough to make this claim publicly. And shame on you for equating anti-rape with anti-male. There’s actually a difference between the two, you misandrist.

    You’ve made the similar falsehood in trying to claim that I have a “fanaticism which has apparently convinced [me] that rapists are lurking everywhere”. Nope, I go with the feminists on this one and say that fewer than 2% of the population has ever raped, or is indeed a rapist. If your math is so warped that you believe “2%” = “lurking everywhere”, then that just goes to show that one is never too old to get a math tutor. Might I suggest our eight-year-old? She was able to see how your numbers got derailed from the very start, and her child-labor rates are very affordable.

    “The message from feminists to college men sounds like this: “Do exactly as we say! Shut up! Obey! Give us money! We hate you! Rapist!” Well, again, this reeks of a guilty mind, as that is not one syllable the truth of what’s been going on. You know that we hear what we want to hear to excuse our actions, yes?

    The only sliver of reality your reply has touched on is that indeed, women today do not wish to date, or at least until college is good and done with and a career has already begun to pay off. Any sooner than that and she risks a bad marriage doomed from the start — and preventing bad marriages from even happening should be a goal that men could aspire to as well, you know.

    I know that women turning men down seems unfair to a man’s hormones (if not his ego). But to turn things into what you’re trying to turn it into just makes your side look himsterical at best. I was with an old school friend and her sister at an outdoor cafe for lunch in her new city. We three all have husbands (who stayed home). Two lovely young men, younger than we three, came over to sit down and brought coffees for us and started the ol’ pickup spiel that no woman wants to hear. Almost in unison we each said, “No thank you, we’re all married, not interested, thanks”, and those little b1tches went into full himsteria mode against us, spouting, “FXCKING LXSBIANS, WE BETTER LEAVE BEFORE THEY SAY WE WERE TRYING TO R@PE THEM!”, and they muttered angrily the entire way back into the cafe and out the front door… Say, you weren’t in Maine last month by any chance, were you?

    They, much like you, much like the bizarrely brainwashed few who read this site, all managed to hear/see/believe something that was not real, not even close to real. And this might be the biggest reason women aren’t saying ‘yes’ to men anymore. A himsterical man is an unpredictable man, a potentially violent one. It isn’t worth it.

  8. News of the Week (October 11th, 2015) | The Political Hat
    October 11th, 2015 @ 8:43 pm

    […] Harvard Feminists Lie About Rape No honest, decent or moral young person would ever want to go near Harvard University, a corrupt and decadent institution run by depraved perverts. Harvard women are particularly notorious for their shameless promiscuity — one Harvard girl boasted of her “freedom to have as many sexual partners as I want without being looked down on” — which is a major cause of sexually transmitted diseases in the Boston metro area. […]