Jeff Serves Up A Trump Rant Of Justice
Posted on | April 13, 2016 | 40 Comments
by Smitty
If you can tolerate a modicum of potty mouth, do take in the latest Protein Wisdom:
Here’s the truth: Trump has received 45% of the delegates with 36% of the vote. He’s won several caucus states and didn’t complain then. I’ve heard not one of his supporters argue that winner-take-all races in Florida, or full delegate takes in South Carolina — in neither of which state did he get a majority — disenfranchised those who voted for someone other than Trump and who will have no representation on the first ballot at a contested GOP convention. The truth is, the “system” has helped him, as it does most front runners who aren’t total incompetents and phony Republicans.
You Trump backers are dishonest shills praying at the altar of a false god. You are fine with populist authoritarianism so long as you believe it is you who will benefit from the king’s beneficence. You are, in short, Obama voters with Rs attached to your names. You are the problem.
Read the whole thing. And thanks, Jeff. This very much needed saying.
Comments
40 Responses to “Jeff Serves Up A Trump Rant Of Justice”
THE FULL METAL JACKET REACH-AROUND AWARD
This spot rotates to honor those who link us in shameless obedience to Rule 2 of "How to Get a Million Hits on Your Blog."
HIT THE FREAKING TIP JAR!
Search
Recent Posts
- NBC News Misinterprets Evidence Democrats Stole the 2020 Election
- In The Mailbox: 11.20.24 (Evening Edition)
- In The Mailbox: 11.19.24 (Afternoon Edition)
- Rule 5 Sunday: Casual Denim
- FMJRA 2.0: Franchises In Motion
- In The Mailbox: 11.15.24 (Evening Edition)
- In The Mailbox: 11.15.24 (Morning Edition)
- In The Mailbox: 11.14.24 (Morning Edition)
- Trump 2.0: ‘Siri, What Is Payback?’
- In The Mailbox: 11.13.24
Click here to manage your email subscription options.
RSS reader subscription
MEMEORANDUM
Recent Comments
- Election Results 2024: Prepared for a Night of Agony … But for Whom? : The Other McCain on Georgia: How’s ‘Jim Crow 2.0’ Working?
- And, Stacey Adam’s is Still Race-Pimping…… | If You are Left you ain't Right on Georgia: How’s ‘Jim Crow 2.0’ Working?
- Goodbye, Blue Monday | Animal Magnetism on Rule 5 Sunday: Pre-Coffee Lounging
- FMJRA 2.0: No Expansion This Year : The Other McCain on Can We Stay Sane a Few More Days? (Also: Has Trump Always Been Winning?)
- FMJRA 2.0: No Expansion This Year : The Other McCain on FMJRA 2.0: Preparing for the Winter Meetings
THE AMAZING GONZO FEED
Major Leagues
ADVERTISEMENT
Axis of Fedorables
- All-American Girl for the Restoration of Values
- Allergic to Bull
- Cat House Chat
- Chris Cassone
- Conservative Daily News
- DaTechGuy
- Fishersville Mike
- Girl on the Right
- Haemet
- Hogewash
- Just A Conservative Girl
- Marooned in Marin
- Paco Enterprises
- Sissy 'put moi in your blogroll' Willis
- So It Goes In Shreveport
- SWAC Girl
- The (Perhaps Slightly Less) Lonely Conservative
- The Camp of the Saints
- The World's Youngest Blogger
- Uncoverage
- VA Right
AMAZING SAVINGS NOW!
Archives
- November 2024 (30)
- October 2024 (47)
- September 2024 (43)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (63)
- June 2024 (59)
- May 2024 (48)
- April 2024 (43)
- March 2024 (55)
- February 2024 (46)
- January 2024 (45)
- December 2023 (53)
- November 2023 (62)
- October 2023 (57)
- September 2023 (56)
- August 2023 (53)
- July 2023 (69)
- June 2023 (67)
- May 2023 (53)
- April 2023 (60)
- March 2023 (73)
- February 2023 (65)
- January 2023 (56)
- December 2022 (60)
- November 2022 (64)
- October 2022 (58)
- September 2022 (68)
- August 2022 (75)
- July 2022 (69)
- June 2022 (73)
- May 2022 (74)
- April 2022 (57)
- March 2022 (79)
- February 2022 (65)
- January 2022 (58)
- December 2021 (62)
- November 2021 (68)
- October 2021 (73)
- September 2021 (63)
- August 2021 (60)
- July 2021 (80)
- June 2021 (64)
- May 2021 (64)
- April 2021 (58)
- March 2021 (73)
- February 2021 (57)
- January 2021 (71)
- December 2020 (77)
- November 2020 (81)
- October 2020 (84)
- September 2020 (94)
- August 2020 (75)
- July 2020 (68)
- June 2020 (83)
- May 2020 (77)
- April 2020 (65)
- March 2020 (85)
- February 2020 (94)
- January 2020 (95)
- December 2019 (88)
- November 2019 (60)
- October 2019 (113)
- September 2019 (91)
- August 2019 (91)
- July 2019 (88)
- June 2019 (80)
- May 2019 (74)
- April 2019 (97)
- March 2019 (100)
- February 2019 (85)
- January 2019 (93)
- December 2018 (90)
- November 2018 (83)
- October 2018 (96)
- September 2018 (79)
- August 2018 (107)
- July 2018 (98)
- June 2018 (86)
- May 2018 (78)
- April 2018 (78)
- March 2018 (97)
- February 2018 (61)
- January 2018 (70)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (68)
- October 2017 (67)
- September 2017 (70)
- August 2017 (68)
- July 2017 (52)
- June 2017 (60)
- May 2017 (56)
- April 2017 (80)
- March 2017 (80)
- February 2017 (102)
- January 2017 (104)
- December 2016 (65)
- November 2016 (86)
- October 2016 (77)
- September 2016 (81)
- August 2016 (66)
- July 2016 (83)
- June 2016 (81)
- May 2016 (65)
- April 2016 (64)
- March 2016 (81)
- February 2016 (74)
- January 2016 (66)
- December 2015 (64)
- November 2015 (85)
- October 2015 (71)
- September 2015 (80)
- August 2015 (67)
- July 2015 (79)
- June 2015 (69)
- May 2015 (72)
- April 2015 (94)
- March 2015 (122)
- February 2015 (71)
- January 2015 (93)
- December 2014 (99)
- November 2014 (67)
- October 2014 (109)
- September 2014 (87)
- August 2014 (106)
- July 2014 (132)
- June 2014 (154)
- May 2014 (126)
- April 2014 (145)
- March 2014 (144)
- February 2014 (142)
- January 2014 (185)
- December 2013 (192)
- November 2013 (174)
- October 2013 (175)
- September 2013 (181)
- August 2013 (172)
- July 2013 (147)
- June 2013 (135)
- May 2013 (128)
- April 2013 (105)
- March 2013 (162)
- February 2013 (191)
- January 2013 (206)
- December 2012 (190)
- November 2012 (176)
- October 2012 (240)
- September 2012 (206)
- August 2012 (235)
- July 2012 (223)
- June 2012 (161)
- May 2012 (230)
- April 2012 (269)
- March 2012 (282)
- February 2012 (247)
- January 2012 (267)
- December 2011 (285)
- November 2011 (300)
- October 2011 (302)
- September 2011 (297)
- August 2011 (288)
- July 2011 (297)
- June 2011 (245)
- May 2011 (260)
- April 2011 (344)
- March 2011 (293)
- February 2011 (201)
- January 2011 (263)
- December 2010 (265)
- November 2010 (266)
- October 2010 (305)
- September 2010 (280)
- August 2010 (272)
- July 2010 (230)
- June 2010 (244)
- May 2010 (256)
- April 2010 (222)
- March 2010 (271)
- February 2010 (286)
- January 2010 (229)
- December 2009 (21)
- October 2009 (1)
Free Agents
SHAMELESS CAPITALISM
The Other McCain is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for this blog to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Triple-A Franchises
- All-American Blogger
- American Power
- Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler
- Athens & Jerusalem
- Barney Quick
- Bartholomew's Notes On Religion
- BatesLine
- Bear Creek Ledger
- Bearsears Patriots
- Blog de KingShamus
- Bride of Rove
- Cold Fury
- Daily Pundit
- Dr. Helen
- I Own The World
- Legal Insurrection
- Moe Lane
- No Runny Eggs
- Obi`s Sister
- Protein Wisdom
- Rhetorican
- Small Dead Animals
- The Conservatory
- The People's Cube
- The Sundries Shack
- VodkaPundit
- Vox Day
- Zilla of the Resistance
Blogroll
- 90 Miles From Tyranny
- A Conservative Shemale
- A Point of View
- Adrienne's Corner
- AmSpec Blog
- Bad Blue
- Blazing Cat Fur
- Calvin Freiburger Online
- Carol's Closet
- Catholic Bandita
- Caught Him With A Corndog
- Cecil Calvert
- Common Cents
- Conservative Hideout
- Conservative Watch News
- Conservatives for America
- Conservatives For Palin
- Crazy For Liberty
- Dad 29
- DC Damsel
- Dr. Flap
- Dyspepsia Generation
- Effing Conservatives
- Election Dissection
- Eric Reasons, IT Genius
- Eye of Polyphemus
- Finding Ponies. . .
- Free Will
- Grandpa John's
- Granite Grok
- GrEaT sAtAn"S gIrLfRiEnD
- Hoosier Access
- John William Perry
- Judicial Watch
- Jumping in Pools
- KURU Lounge
- Laughing Conservative
- Makes My Brain Itch
- Marathon Pundit
- Martin Eisenstadt's Blog
- Media Fade
- Michael Leahy
- Mister Pterodactyl
- Naked Villainy
- Nice Deb
- noot's observatory
- Not One Red Cent
- Okrahead
- Ollieander
- Pileus
- Pinup Girl
- Point of a Gun
- Political Pit Bull
- Reaganite Republican Resistance
- Red Alexandria
- Red State Eclectic
- Red, White & Conservative
- Republican Redefined
- ResCon1
- Ric's Rulez
- Ricochet
- Right of Course
- Robipedia
- Robomonkey
- Ruby Slippers Blog
- Saberpoint
- Scared Monkeys
- Sentry Journal
- SI VIS PACEM
- Skepticrats
- Smash Mouth Politics
- Sooper Mexican
- Taking Hayek Seriously
- Tel-Chai Nation
- Tequila & Javalinas
- The Aged P
- The Classic Liberal
- The Izzy Report
- The Minority Leader
- The NeoSexist
- The Nose on Your Face
- The Republican Mother
- The Right Sphere
- The Saint Angilbert Press
- The Snooper Report
- The Underground Conservative
- Thunder Tales
- Tom McLaughlin
- Tory Anarchist
- TrogloPundit
- Vets On The Watch
- Watcher of Weasels
- Western Experience
- World's Only Rational Man
- WyBlog
- Yankee Phil
- Zingstrom's Blog
April 13th, 2016 @ 8:57 pm
Such a conundrum. Trump is winning with non-republican votes, but that is supposed to be the recipe for general election success.
April 13th, 2016 @ 8:58 pm
Trump gets slaughtered in the general. 50 some polls show Hillary crushing him and he’s trending in the wrong direction.
April 13th, 2016 @ 9:04 pm
If Trump loses many of his supporters bolt. On the other hand many of them wouldn’t support a true conservative and haven’t ever voted for a Republican or voted at all.
April 13th, 2016 @ 9:15 pm
If Trump gets the nomination and loses to Hillary it’s a loss for the GOP but not for conservatives. If Kasich is nominated, whether he wins or loses, it’s a loss for conservatives. If Cruz is nominated and wins it’s a great victory for conservatives.
Now if Trump wins the presidency it will take time to determine whether or not it’s a win or a loss for conservatives and we can’t know until the smoke and at least some of the rubble clears. If Trump wins the nomination we can only hope Susan Sarandon is right.
April 13th, 2016 @ 10:25 pm
Great article! I can forgive him for a few “f-bombs”. I don’t typically use such language myself, but considering he’s talking about the Branch Trumpidians, I can certainly understand!
April 14th, 2016 @ 12:03 am
I am grateful to Donald Trump for running. He cured me of the naive idea I held that “my side” was full of people who were different than the foolish, hero worshipping Obama supporters. That “my side” was about principles and ideas, not a man. They are not. While I still don’t believe that the majority of them protest Obama because of racism, I do believe that their protestations of his tyrannical behavior have been untrue. They do not object to the tyranny, but only to the tyrant they do not like. It is a very good thing to know, and now we must all be grownups and deal with the difficult reality before us.
April 14th, 2016 @ 1:04 am
That was a truly epic rant by Jeff. Well said.
April 14th, 2016 @ 6:44 am
Both parties have their share of low info voters. Go read the comments over at American Spectator, you’ll see a fairly large number of them.
April 14th, 2016 @ 6:46 am
The polls are useless in such match ups as it’s far too early to mean anything. Things tend to change dramatically after the nominations are set. In the end, the only poll that counts takes place on the first Tuesday in November.
April 14th, 2016 @ 7:22 am
Jeff been savin’ up for that. Good stuff.
April 14th, 2016 @ 4:40 pm
Trump supporter: Hey, this Colorado thing looks like a cheat.
Cruz supporter: You f(((()) piece of ()_)_+_, your head is )____, and we hate you because you guys are so aggressively rude.
Trump supporter: ??????
You can see it in Jeff’s comments. After Jeff’s unleashed his venom, a Trump supporter says ‘well if you don’t want me around, then I’m gone’. There’s no ‘bleep you, you bleeping snot, I’m bleeping leaving right bleeping now’. One side, the Trump side is generally polite, and the other side, is much more generally loudmouthed.
What’s happening is that a rougher crowd is joining the fight for freedom. And unlike the previous group, this group knows how to go on the offensive. I’m a conservative, but for a long time we’ve cowered when we should have advanced.
RSM’s ‘Remember RAAAAACISM has five A’s’ is part of that advance. But there is not enough attack, and the situation favors attack. We can win. The Left is fragile.
April 14th, 2016 @ 5:00 pm
Yep, epic rant from a guy that I have given money to over the years. Will save my money the next time he plays the poor pitiful Jeff. Good to see where the Cruz supporters are willing to go…I am sure that the party will recover from this because after all I am a low information voter. Eh Stacy…? We met at the SPLC in New Orleans…I used to run a blog that you used to link to from time to time. Was linked to by Instapundit, Hot Air, Captains Quarters, Michelle Malkin and a few others that I have forgotten. Yup thats me a low information voter.
Just because I knocked on doors for Reagan, made phone calls for Bush and gave out thousands of dollars to various Republicans, I am a low information voter…Yea I am real sure the party will get over this. I no longer go to Ace of Spades because I am an idiot according to him, I no longer visit Protein Wisdom, Redstate, Hot Air except for Jazz Shaw is worthless…the Republican party is crazy.
Building a wall to protect the citizens of this country is a conservative value.
Deporting the illegals is a conservative value. Giving out stuff animals to criminals is NOT a conservative value.
Ending crazy trade deals that are called “Free” to replace them with trade deals that are Fair is a conservative value.
Ending the desire to make endless war on a whole host of people is a conservative value.
Ted Cruz is no conservative….
April 14th, 2016 @ 6:28 pm
Now that’s a bit of PLO level revisionism there. You left out the Trump supporters issuing death threats, Trump himself talking about riots if he doesn’t get the nomination. But yeah, Trump is the victim, forget that Colorado went back to this system of choosing delegates in 2004 (back? Why yes, it’s the way Colorado choose it’s delegates from 1912 until 1988) and that the operation was known.
April 14th, 2016 @ 6:42 pm
How about a barrier along the whole border instead of Dodging Donny’s half way? The Rio Grande is not that much a barrier most of the time, regardless of what Trump says.
How about deporting illegals and keeping them out instead of Dodging Donny’s touchback amnesty? But Heaven forbid someone show Christian charity to children in detention, deserved as it may be.
Is breaking treaties, in other words, violating the laws of the United States now a conservative value?
And where does this “the desire to make endless war on a whole host of people” come from? And which “whole host of people” are we talking about? Jihadis? They have declared endless war on us, but maybe surrender to Sharia (such as Trump demanded of Gellar not too long ago, 1st Amendment be damned) is now a conservative value.
April 14th, 2016 @ 11:05 pm
Yea surrender to Sharia…that the ticket. You mean like Bush did when he declared Islam the religion of peace? You mean like what Bush did when he redacted the 9/11 report to save the Saudis? Is that the sort of professional politician you admire? Is that the sort of politician that moves YOUR side of the argument to call people like me, who have worked all of their adult lives for Republicans, a LOW INFORMATION VOTER…f@ck y’all.
And before you say that Bush isn’t running Cruz, the principled conservative, worked his ass off trying to get into the Bush administration and his wife managed it. Cruz has about as much chance of being Anti Establishment as I have of being Batman.
And Jeff is full of sh!t in so many other ways in this “Epic Rant” but truth is I simply don’t care anymore. You hate us, and want us out, fine, try and win without us.
April 14th, 2016 @ 11:05 pm
“What’s happening is that a rougher crowd is joining the fight for freedom.” No. An opportunistic hack is exploiting a bunch of rubes. But thanks for noticing that they have been missing from the battlements for the last 20 years.
April 14th, 2016 @ 11:50 pm
“Try and win without us”.
Same for your side, I think.
April 15th, 2016 @ 12:45 am
I’m sure both sides are doing so.
And you’re talking about Trump. I’m talking about Trump supporters and Cruz supporters.
And I didn’t say that the Trump idea about Colorado being a cheat was correct or not.
Goodness.
I did say that I’ve seen a lot more rudeness from Cruz supporters.
Even this very post shows the difference. We have a wide array of insults from Cruz supporters like GUEST and Mike, but Quartermaster is just polite.
This is just the facts, dude. Your people are much more aggressive and rude.
April 15th, 2016 @ 12:52 am
First the Tea Party came and was polite. They got stomped flat by the Usual Suspects.
So, the ‘rubes’ decided that we needed to pump the volume to 11, and kick the door down. Hence Trump.
April 15th, 2016 @ 10:20 am
Well, since Trump has declared, I personally have had my physical and financial well being threatened, my wife’s fidelity to our marriage vows questioned, and among other things been called a traitor to my country and my race. Oh, and Trump has sent death threats to the Colorado GOP chairman? Is that what you are saying? Trump has issued threats to Indiana delegates? No, those who are trying to intimidate and threaten those who are not supporting their candidate are overwhelmingly Trump supporters.
April 15th, 2016 @ 10:24 am
Well, since Garland is lot more recent than 9/11, and Trump held Gellar as responsible for the 2 dead jihadis because she dared to hold a “draw Mohammed” contest, yeah, that’s surrender to Sharia. One of the reasons that there is “hate” among the non-Trump supporters is that so many of the Trump supporters sound and act just like the Obama and Hillary supporters.
April 15th, 2016 @ 11:01 am
Donald Trump has sent death threats to the Chairman of the Colorado GOP?
Really?
Proof please. Because this fails the laugh test.
April 15th, 2016 @ 12:07 pm
Really please direct me to Trump sites that are telling Cruz supporters to fuck off. Please direct me to national publications that are calling for Cruz supporters to die. You can’t because there are none. We realize that it is impossible to win without you…
April 15th, 2016 @ 12:16 pm
Quoting your response to my ” You left out the Trump supporters issuing death threats,” you stated, “And you’re talking about Trump. I’m talking about Trump supporters and Cruz supporters.” My response to that was “Oh, and Trump has sent death threats to the Colorado GOP chairman? Is that what you are saying? Trump has issued threats to Indiana delegates? No, those who are trying to intimidate and threaten those who are not supporting their candidate are overwhelmingly Trump supporters.” so really, are you truly that dense as not to be able to follow the conversation?
April 15th, 2016 @ 12:34 pm
“Giving out stuff[ed] animals to criminals is NOT a conservative value.”
It is a Christian value, and therefore conservative. Note also, the “criminals” referred to here are children.
April 15th, 2016 @ 12:37 pm
You Trumpkins are unhinged. I don’t want to be part of any party you’re in. Winning or losing is less important to me than keeping my soul intact.
April 15th, 2016 @ 12:42 pm
The difference between Democrats and us is that we try to take out the trash. If Democrats did that, Hillary wouldn’t even be running.
April 15th, 2016 @ 12:44 pm
I learned after the Romney fiasco to not disregard polls. They can be biased, but 51 out of 58 polls showing Trump losing isn’t a blip.
April 15th, 2016 @ 1:07 pm
Perhaps so. My bad.
My response to death threats was that both sides likely do it.
You’re offering your personal life, and just a reiteration of your point.
You have not dealt with the point I raised, which is one that all of us can easily verify. Just look at this commentry, and Jeff’s OP, and his commentry.
Who’s being polite and who’s being RUDE?
April 15th, 2016 @ 1:13 pm
One thing, RSM: there’s some kind of “history” with Jeff about being shunned or something. I don’t know that story. Would you or anyone care to share?
April 15th, 2016 @ 1:25 pm
I’m inclined to agree, but not trusting the polls, given their performance over the last few years, is the prudent thing to do.
April 15th, 2016 @ 2:13 pm
I’ve done an in-depth statistical analysis on Trump’s performance this cycle, and he is so textbook on-top of his theoretical distribution, it’s remarkable:
Trump finishes average of [RCP poll averages] +1%, with a standard deviation of 3.5%. The margin of error of most polls these days is 3-4%.
The only deviation in the polls comes from Cruz, and his regular overperformance comes from the fact that undecideds break massively in his favor (the polls don’t capture this reality).
April 15th, 2016 @ 3:47 pm
Here is where your “conservative” got his conservative on…
https://ricochet.com/myth-ted-cruzs-principles/
In A Time for (Naked Opportunism) Truth, Cruz openly explains his political transition to the hard-right. While exploring the possibility of a Senate run in 2012, Cruz commissioned polls to judge the likelihood of his success and the mood of the electorate:
In our first benchmark poll, we asked a series of questions to assess where I stood compared to Dewhurst. One of those questions would become famous internally in our campaign: Question 10. It asked voters if they would be more or less likely to support me if they knew that “Ted Cruz understands that politicians from both parties have let us down. Cruz is a proven conservative we can trust to provide new leadership in the Senate to reduce the size of government and defend the Constitution.”
April 15th, 2016 @ 4:01 pm
I admire the bolding. Next time, try all-caps as well.
April 15th, 2016 @ 6:20 pm
You admire the bolding? heh…that’s the best you got? The supposed conservative all of you are hooting and hollering about got his conservative on after he discovered that it polled well. Nice.
April 15th, 2016 @ 7:42 pm
I agree with you. However, if Trump is the nominee, then the only poll that will count is in November. many have started with very high negatives and ended in November with far smaller negatives.
I’m not trying to say that the polls don’t say anything. But, ans more importantly, I think Trump’s performance recently is a serious cause for concern for his aficionados.
April 15th, 2016 @ 9:36 pm
There are plenty of them. I’ve seen it in various sites. That, and worse.
April 16th, 2016 @ 5:42 pm
Fine then show me one.
April 16th, 2016 @ 11:27 pm
You kid yourself to imagine that people are supporting Trump the man and not Trump the truth teller. If he came out tomorrow and said he’s all for mass immigration and much higher taxes etc, his support would evaporate away in short order. He’s popular because he is the only one willing to say things that the other candidates are afraid of, in short, he is not a coward who worries about what the media will say about him tomorrow. Trump moves the Overton window and only once the dangerous work is done, then the cowards chime in with ‘me too!’. But they’d not dare stick their necks out first.
April 16th, 2016 @ 11:33 pm
Jeff, and many others, have missed the point. Cruz can’t win in the general. Nor can any conservative like him. That isn’t America anymore. It might be again one day with hard work turning the culture around but the people are not going to vote in someone like Cruz for now. Jeff is basically advocating for people to support Cruz because his principles and record are the best of the candidates (which they clearly are) but leaves unmentioned that he’ll lose and lose huge on election day. Defeat with our heads held high is what he’s talking about. Me, I’d rather roll the dice on Trump. Even as a democrat, he’s at least a pro-American democrat which is at odds with the anti-American democrats in the democrat party. Maybe Trump can make the Republican brand a little bit cool again so that the President after him could be more like Cruz. But we cannot get from a welfare addicted SJW society to a President Cruz in one move. Wishing won’t make it so.