A Word About the Blog-O-Bucks
Posted on | January 23, 2010 | 33 Comments
Patrick at Political Byline points out that the blogging life isn’t exactly the fast way to wealth for 99% of the people who do it.
Back when I worked for The Washington Times, I was somewhat naive about the online revenue model. In 2007, I got together in California with several bloggers — including Ace of Spades, Jeff Goldstein, Little Miss Attila and Dr. Rusty Shackleford – and heard them discussing the “blog-o-bucks.” No hard numbers were disclosed and I couldn’t tell whether this was just the usual shoptalk or what.
Well, dear brothers and sisters, when I finally cut loose in 2008, I learned. It’s hard out here for pimp.
There’s a reason that most bloggers have day jobs to pay the bills. You might have noticed that Professor Glenn Reynolds hasn’t told the University of Tennessee Law School to “take this job and shove it.”
That’s what we call a clue, Sherlock.
Look, Ace of Spades is currently averaging 132,000 hits a day. and recently has averaged more than 2.5 million hits per month. And yet, when Ace saw him Boston last week, he wasn’t lighting his smokes with $20 bills, nor was he buying Dom Perignon for the house. Maybe he’s doing OK, but he ain’t livin’ la vida loca.
Success is relative. Ace is one of the most successful independent blogs out there and I drool with envy at the thought of 2.5 million hits a month, which is about seven times our best month ever. But then I read where Patrick says his typical day on Political Byline is 600 hits and think, “Hey, be grateful for what you’ve got.”
Bottom line: Nobody’s getting rich here. The widespread fantasy circa 2004 that everybody and his uncle could blog their way to an easy six figures a year (and a lucrative book deal, too) has proven to be a chimera. There is real value to blogging – even at a few hundred hits per day – but monetizing that value is extraordinarily difficult.
Since switching to WordPress this month, Smitty and I have discussed in greater earnestness the need to enhance the monetization factor. My basic approach from Day One has been to push relentlessly to increase traffic. I got about 6,000 hits in March 2008, my first month of full-time blogging, whereas we averaged 235,000 per month in the last six months of 2009. The simple assumption is more traffic = more money. Yet Smitty (and others) believe we’re still under-monetizing, and so new projects are being considered.
Before I left for Boston Jan. 14, Mrs. Other McCain gave me a double earful about the financial situation and the fact that, having just returned from California a few days previous, now I was heading off for another week on the road. My response: “This is what the people are paying for — the road trips, the adventure, the show. They don’t pay me to stay home.”
It’s not always easy (my brain is still fogged from these back-to-back road trips) but really, it’s a heckuva ride. For a full decade, I was pretty much chained to a desk job in Washington and going nuts with frustration. Now I’m making a lot less money, but having a lot more fun, and for that I’m grateful to the tip-jar hitters — and to people like Donald Douglas at American Power, JSF at Valley of the Shadow, and Pete at Da Tech Guy for letting me crash on their sofas.
“We’re going to get there.” That’s what I tell Mrs. Other McCain, and that’s what I tell the other bloggers who are struggling to stick with it, even when the traffic is down, the tip-jar is empty and the AdSense dollars aren’t exactly pouring in. Just keep moving forward, and don’t let it get you down.

Pingback: Updated – I feel the need to clear some things up | Political Byline